Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drvoke

McCabe will not face criminal charges

Recommended Posts

 

Image result for Justice Dept. won’t charge Andrew McCabe, the former FBI official who authorized the investigation of President Trump

 

 

McCabe is innocent, apparently.  I'll bet he is all smiles thinking about a certain individual's rage when he hears that he can essentially kiss his ass.

 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/justice-dept-wont-charge-andrew-mccabe-the-former-fbi-official-who-authorized-the-investigation-of-president-trump/ar-BB100rHv?ocid=spartanntp

(Full article at above link)

 

 

The Justice Department  will not bring charges against former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe for lying to investigators about a media disclosure ending a long-running inquiry into a top law enforcement official who authorized the bureau to investigate President Trump.

The move will surely infuriate Trump, who has raged publicly and privately in recent months that McCabe and others he considers political enemies should be charged with crimes.

McCabe authorized the FBI to begin investigating President Trump personally for possible obstruction of justice in connection with the probe into whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

But the veteran law enforcement official later himself became the focus of a grand jury probe over allegations from the Justice Department inspector general that he lied to investigators exploring a media disclosure. The investigation was led by the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office; a spokesman for that office declined to comment Friday.

What exactly happened in the case remains unclear. Justice Department officials authorized prosecutors to seek an indictment of McCabe last year, and in September, a grand jury that had been hearing evidence was summoned back after a months-long hiatus to consider the case. But the day came and went with no public charges being filed. McCabe’s legal team sought to press the Justice Department for a status update, but were told nothing.

McCabe authorized two FBI officials to speak for a Wall Street Journal report detailing tension inside the FBI and Justice Department over the Clinton email case and a separate investigation of the Clinton family foundation. But he initially denied having done so when FBI officials — and, later, the inspector general’s office — tried to determine who might have spoken to the media.

The inspector general accused McCabe of lying at least four times, three of them under oath, and even misleading former FBI Director James B. Comey, his boss. 

 

 

Image result for Andrew McCabe cartoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, drvoke said:

 

Image result for Justice Dept. won’t charge Andrew McCabe, the former FBI official who authorized the investigation of President Trump

 

 

McCabe is innocent, apparently.  I'll bet he is all smiles thinking about a certain individual's rage when he hears that he can essentially kiss his ass.

 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/justice-dept-wont-charge-andrew-mccabe-the-former-fbi-official-who-authorized-the-investigation-of-president-trump/ar-BB100rHv?ocid=spartanntp

(Full article at above link)

 

 

The Justice Department  will not bring charges against former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe for lying to investigators about a media disclosure ending a long-running inquiry into a top law enforcement official who authorized the bureau to investigate President Trump.

The move will surely infuriate Trump, who has raged publicly and privately in recent months that McCabe and others he considers political enemies should be charged with crimes.

McCabe authorized the FBI to begin investigating President Trump personally for possible obstruction of justice in connection with the probe into whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

But the veteran law enforcement official later himself became the focus of a grand jury probe over allegations from the Justice Department inspector general that he lied to investigators exploring a media disclosure. The investigation was led by the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office; a spokesman for that office declined to comment Friday.

What exactly happened in the case remains unclear. Justice Department officials authorized prosecutors to seek an indictment of McCabe last year, and in September, a grand jury that had been hearing evidence was summoned back after a months-long hiatus to consider the case. But the day came and went with no public charges being filed. McCabe’s legal team sought to press the Justice Department for a status update, but were told nothing.

McCabe authorized two FBI officials to speak for a Wall Street Journal report detailing tension inside the FBI and Justice Department over the Clinton email case and a separate investigation of the Clinton family foundation. But he initially denied having done so when FBI officials — and, later, the inspector general’s office — tried to determine who might have spoken to the media.

The inspector general accused McCabe of lying at least four times, three of them under oath, and even misleading former FBI Director James B. Comey, his boss. 

 

 

Image result for Andrew McCabe cartoon

I guess lying to the fbi or congress for some people is not against the law?   Go figure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is VERY discouraging.   Unless Barr has something else planned for McCabe (let’s face it, lying about leaking to a reporter might be pretty minor in the scope of things), we may as well fire every member of the DOJ and FBI (including Barr), dismantle both organizations and rebuild something to replace them from scratch.   Because if McCabe escapes punishment for treasonous election tampering and a seditious coup attempt against a lawfully elected President, then both organizations must be so corrupt they are beyond repair.  We’ll know by April or May at the latest, because that’s when it’s been promised Durham will release findings (which would be indictments of top people, if his investigation is honest and as sweeping as we've been led to believe).   If he doesn't, or he attempts to sweep everything under the rug by only going after some minor players, we will know for certain that the whole justice/legal system is corrupt beyond repair.   Then Trump has to make a decision if he wants to get reelected in a landslide.   Because it is NOT all about the economy.   Because every conservative knows in his heart that if the swamp isn't drained NOW, everything Trump has accomplished will be rolled back by the next DemocRAT in office.   The UNIPARTY will have been left intact.    So why bother voting for him in that case?   We might has well let the DemocRATS win, let it  all collapse, and let the 3% clean up the mess ... because ultimately, isn't the purpose of the 2nd Amendment?  To prevent that, Trump will have to call in the military to drain the swamp.   Does he have will to do that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BeAChooser said:

This is VERY discouraging.   Unless Barr has something else planned for McCabe (let’s face it, lying about leaking to a reporter might be pretty minor in the scope of things), we may as well fire every member of the DOJ and FBI (including Barr), dismantle both organizations and rebuild something to replace them from scratch.   Because if McCabe escapes punishment for treasonous election tampering and a seditious coup attempt against a lawfully elected President, then both organizations must be so corrupt they are beyond repair.  We’ll know by April or May at the latest, because that’s when it’s been promised Durham will release findings (which would be indictments of top people, if his investigation is honest and as sweeping as we've been led to believe).   If he doesn't, or he attempts to sweep everything under the rug by only going after some minor players, we will know for certain that the whole justice/legal system is corrupt beyond repair.   Then Trump has to make a decision if he wants to get reelected in a landslide.   Because it is NOT all about the economy.   Because every conservative knows in his heart that if the swamp isn't drained NOW, everything Trump has accomplished will be rolled back by the next DemocRAT in office.   The UNIPARTY will have been left intact.    So why bother voting for him in that case?   We might has well let the DemocRATS win, let it  all collapse, and let the 3% clean up the mess ... because ultimately, isn't the purpose of the 2nd Amendment?  To prevent that, Trump will have to call in the military to drain the swamp.   Does he have will to do that?

Awe did the right wing pudidants blow smoke up your ass again. You gotta be the most incorrect person on this forum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dontlooknow said:

Awe did the right wing pudidants blow smoke up your ass again. You gotta be the most incorrect person on this forum. 

yahtzee!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

This is VERY discouraging.   Unless Barr has something else planned for McCabe (let’s face it, lying about leaking to a reporter might be pretty minor in the scope of things), we may as well fire every member of the DOJ and FBI (including Barr), dismantle both organizations and rebuild something to replace them from scratch.   Because if McCabe escapes punishment for treasonous election tampering and a seditious coup attempt against a lawfully elected President, then both organizations must be so corrupt they are beyond repair.  We’ll know by April or May at the latest, because that’s when it’s been promised Durham will release findings (which would be indictments of top people, if his investigation is honest and as sweeping as we've been led to believe).   If he doesn't, or he attempts to sweep everything under the rug by only going after some minor players, we will know for certain that the whole justice/legal system is corrupt beyond repair.   Then Trump has to make a decision if he wants to get reelected in a landslide.   Because it is NOT all about the economy.   Because every conservative knows in his heart that if the swamp isn't drained NOW, everything Trump has accomplished will be rolled back by the next DemocRAT in office.   The UNIPARTY will have been left intact.    So why bother voting for him in that case?   We might has well let the DemocRATS win, let it  all collapse, and let the 3% clean up the mess ... because ultimately, isn't the purpose of the 2nd Amendment?  To prevent that, Trump will have to call in the military to drain the swamp.   Does he have will to do that?

If we can't punish this obvious breech of law I hold no faith any of the others will face consequences. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NeoConvict said:

If we can't punish this obvious breech of law I hold no faith any of the others will face consequences. 

maybe your handlers magnified the wrongdoing of the others?  maybe there never was any "there" there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, maineman said:

maybe your handlers magnified the wrongdoing of the others?  maybe there never was any "there" there.

Well one thing is for sure. If the doj could of charged him with crime they sure in the hell would of. But they couldn't make it stand up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, maineman said:

maybe your handlers magnified the wrongdoing of the others?  maybe there never was any "there" there.

 

No magnification necessary, COWARD.

 

Here's what the Office of Inspector General said ...


mccabe-1.jpg

 

McCabe clearly lied under oath on three separate occasions.   And I bet I could name others that the IG didn't consider.   

 

You choose to ignore this, MM, yet demand Flynn, Rogers, etc be punished for the process crime of lying to the FBI during a bogus seditious coup attempt by the FBI.   You're a COWARD and a hypocrite of the first order, Pocket Change.   Just saying ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

Chest house start over 

Awe did the right wing blow smoke up your ass again. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

Get rid off the Barry  appointees 

Lol McCabe was a Obama appointee?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

Get rid off the Barry  appointees 

So you don't care if they do their job you just want all Trump lap dogs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dontlooknow said:

Lol McCabe was a Obama appointee?

No idea but scrub the list in the fbi and DoJ is that one in the same?   If barry appointed them bye bye 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dontlooknow said:

So you don't care if they do their job you just want all Trump lap dogs. 

I don’t want any Barry’s people in there 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

No idea but scrub the list in the fbi and DoJ is that one in the same?   If barry appointed them bye bye 

So you don't care if they do a good job you just want Trump lap dogs. And are you aware that Barr said to trump I will not be bullied?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dontlooknow said:

So you don't care if they do a good job you just want Trump lap dogs. And are you aware that Barr said to trump I will not be bullied?

Bully him 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...