Jump to content
maineman

Andrew McCabe soon will be wearing an orange jumpsuit!

Recommended Posts

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/02/13/buried_in_ig_report_fbi_gave_steele_highly_protected_secrets_122394.html

 

Quote

 

Buried in IG Report: How an FBI Team in Rome Gave Steele Highly Guarded Secrets


By Eric Felten


A month before the 2016 presidential election, the FBI met Christopher Steele in Rome and apparently unlawfully shared with the foreign opposition researcher some of the bureau’s most closely held secrets, according to unpublicized disclosures in the recent Justice Department Inspector General report on abuses of federal surveillance powers.


What’s more, Steele, the former British spy who compiled the “dossier” of conspiracy theories for the Hillary Clinton campaign, was promised $15,000 to attend the briefing by FBI agents eager to maintain his cooperation in their Trump-Russia collusion investigation codenamed Crossfire Hurricane.


That investigation was so closely guarded that only a handful of top officials and agents at the FBI were allowed to know about it.


The report by Inspector General Michael Horowitz details how a team of FBI agents in early October 2016 shared with Steele extensive classified materials, just weeks before the bureau cut off ties with him for leaking his own research to the media. The secrets included foreign intelligence information still considered so sensitive that the IG’s report refers to it even now only as coming from a “Friendly Foreign Government.” In fact, this is a reference to Australia. That country’s ambassador to Britain sent the United States a tip about loose talk by junior Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos. The FBI has described that as the predicate for its Trump-Russia investigation. 


The IG report also discloses that FBI agents knew Steele worked for Glenn Simpson, whose opposition research firm Fusion GPS was paying Steele to dig up dirt on Trump for the Clinton campaign, and that Steele informed the FBI that the “candidate” – Clinton herself – knew about Steele’s work. Steele did not keep to himself the classified material he had learned from the FBI. Shortly after the Rome meeting, Steele briefed Simpson on what the FBI had disclosed to him.


The FBI’s disclosures to Steele -- described on pages 114-115 and in footnote 513, and supported on pages 386-390 and footnotes 252 and 513, deep in Horowitz’s report – were violations of laws governing the handling of classified material, according to the Inspector General and experts in national security law who spoke with RealClearInvestigations.

 

I hope everyone reads the details in that article.  

 

You will, if you want to know the truth of what was going on, rather than continue believe the lies the MSM and LF's leftists keep spouting.

 

Quote

This is no small matter. “Sharing classified information with anyone not authorized to receive it is a crime,” says Sean Bigley, an attorney specializing in national security law. “But sharing classified information with a non-U.S. citizen not authorized to receive it is also the very definition of harm to national security.”


501534_5_.png
The Justice Inspector General's report found unauthorized disclosures and gave explanations for them.
Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General

 

Of course, Deep State member IG Horowitz went on to rationalize away that criminality in his report ... in a desperate attempt to provide cover for the criminals.

 

But ...

 

Quote

To appreciate the magnitude of the FBI’s breach of the rules governing classified materials, consider how the bureau’s former Director James Comey and former General Counsel James Baker have used classification to limit what Michael Horowitz was able to ask them. Comey and Baker “chose not to request that their security clearances be reinstated for their OIG interviews,” the Inspector General writes. “Therefore, we were unable to provide classified information or documents to them during their interviews to develop their testimony, or to assist their recollections of relevant events.”


The idea that the FBI is gratuitously sharing classified information with a foreign informant is rather extraordinary, says lawyer Bigley. “If one of my clients did this, they would be stripped of their security clearance, out of a job, and probably facing indictment.”


 

As you can see, good journalists and bloggers continue to unravel the threads of this seditious coup.  

 

Now, guess who was Deputy Director of the FBI when all this corruption and criminality occurred?


Andrew McCabe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, maineman said:

keep hope alive.  

 

The acting director of the FBI... who do you think would qualify as his "handler"?

 

You have been watching too much TV.

Again, surprised he wasn't charged. Susan Rice comes to mind. I imagine she sleeps poorly after this announcement. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NeoConvict said:

Again, surprised he wasn't charged. Susan Rice comes to mind. I imagine she sleeps poorly after this announcement. 

 

Why would that be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

Again, surprised he wasn't charged. Susan Rice comes to mind. I imagine she sleeps poorly after this announcement. 

Yeah just because your right wing news has you brainwashed into thinking something is illegal and they are going to jail doesn't mean they know what they are talking about. You should know this by now. I mean how many times do you have to be wrong before you see the light. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BeAChooser said:

 

Why would that be?

If he made a deal it would be for his superiors. Rice being the obvious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dontlooknow said:

Yeah just because your right wing news has you brainwashed into thinking something is illegal and they are going to jail doesn't mean they know what they are talking about. You should know this by now. I mean how many times do you have to be wrong before you see the light. 

 

2 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

If he made a deal it would be for his superiors. Rice being the obvious. 

You guys never learn. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dontlooknow said:

Yeah just because your right wing news has you brainwashed into thinking something is illegal and they are going to jail doesn't mean they know what they are talking about. You should know this by now. I mean how many times do you have to be wrong before you see the light. 

Slavery

Women's rights

Negro vote

Woman vote 

Communism 

Socialism 

Normalizing divorce 

Normalizing gender confusion 

 

Liberals have quite the track record of being wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dontlooknow said:

 

You guys never learn. 

We learned. That is why we voted for a political outsider. Perhaps liberals should do the same?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NeoConvict said:

Slavery

Women's rights

Negro vote

Woman vote 

Communism 

Socialism 

Normalizing divorce 

Normalizing gender confusion 

 

Liberals have quite the track record of being wrong. 

You guys just don't learn. Tisk tisk. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
5 hours ago, maineman said:

just kidding!

 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/14/politics/andrew-mccabe-justice-department-investigation/index.html

Washington (CNN)The Department of Justice is dropping its criminal investigation involving former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe without bringing charges, it announced on Friday.

That's not part of the Durham investigation. They aren't prosecuting him for lying about a particular incident that was already under investigation. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DeepBreath said:

That's not part of the Durham investigation. They aren't prosecuting him for lying about a particular incident that was already under investigation. 

 

Deep throat holding out on another fake investigation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
1 minute ago, dontlooknow said:

Deep throat holding out on another fake investigation. 

He lied to investigators. 😂 We don't need a prosecution to point that out and for whatever reason they didn't feel like wasting money prosecuting.

 

Maybe they thought forever being remembered as THE LIAR will be enough punishment.😂

 

2. As I stated, this IS NOT from the Durham investigation which is currently ongoing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, maineman said:

against whom?

Start with the underlings and go all the way to Obama.....what irony that will be when he's hung for Treason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

If he made a deal it would be for his superiors. Rice being the obvious. 

 

But why does that threaten Rice?  Seems to me that gives her more power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RebelGator said:

Start with the underlings and go all the way to Obama.....what irony that will be when he's hung for Treason.

Lol you guys so believe this. This is so funny. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BeAChooser said:

 

But why does that threaten Rice?  Seems to me that gives her more power.

Yeah we know all the democrats are going to hail. Lol you been wrong about everything all year. You would think you would learn. But nope. You keep deep throating right wing propaganda. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BeAChooser said:

 

But why does that threaten Rice?  Seems to me that gives her more power.

If he agreed to testify to her wrongdoing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NeoConvict said:

If he agreed to testify to her wrongdoing...

Soon the democrats will be investigating everything that trump did after the election. You ready?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

If he agreed to testify to her wrongdoing...

 

Oh ... so you think he's made a deal with Barr or Durham?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NeoConvict said:

Again, surprised he wasn't charged. Susan Rice comes to mind. I imagine she sleeps poorly after this announcement. 

keep hope alive, little broomstick cowboy....keep hope alive.  If you feel inclined to lose a thousand dollars and pay for me new set of graphite shaft irons, bet me $1000 that Susan Rice is indicted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Just now, maineman said:

keep hope alive, little broomstick cowboy....keep hope alive.  If you feel inclined to lose a thousand dollars and pay for me new set of graphite shaft irons, bet me $1000 that Susan Rice is indicted.

Mainman gloating a guy who lied to investigators due to partisan politics is not getting prosecuted. 😂

 

Shows your true character, not that we needed confirmation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, RebelGator said:

Start with the underlings and go all the way to Obama.....what irony that will be when he's hung for Treason.

another broomstick cowboy, another dream.  nite nite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DeepBreath said:

Mainman gloating a guy who lied to investigators due to partisan politics is not getting prosecuted. 😂

 

Shows your true character, not that we needed confirmation. 

clearly, the clown's DoJ did not feel he'd done anything wrong.   Guess you lose, wet nurse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DeepBreath said:

Mainman gloating a guy who lied to investigators due to partisan politics is not getting prosecuted. 😂

 

Shows your true character, not that we needed confirmation. 

and did you want to take that bet, wet nurse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
1 minute ago, maineman said:

and did you want to take that bet, wet nurse?

No. Just pointing out you're gloating over someone who admitted they LIED to investigators. 

 

For a guy who claims NEVER to lie, you sure have no problem with lying as long as it supports your political agenda. 😂

 

Do you have ANY morals or values? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...