king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Wtf over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 This judge has some explaining to do Judge Keeps Anti-Trump Juror in Roger Stone Trial, Ignores Conflict of Interest Kari Donovan by KARI DONOVAN November 6, 2019 0 Judge Keeps Anti-Trump Juror in Roger Stone Trial, Ignores Conflict of Interest Share on Facebook Share on Twitter U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee, refused on Tuesday to remove a potential juror with a clear conflict of interest in the high profile Roger Stone Trial. The potential juror served as a press secretary in the Office of Management and Budget during the Obama administration, according to Politico and Reuters. According to Daily Caller, the defense lawyers told the judge that the woman admitted to holding negative feelings about President Donald J. Trump. Additionally her husband also currently works in the Justice Department’s national security division, which was involved in the investigation of the Trump campaign and other Trump associates, including Stone. Stone has been embroiled with a lawfare scheme, led by the government, against him, meant to punish him for helping Trump win the Presidency in 2016. He faces five counts of making false statements to Congress, one count of witness intimidation and one count of obstructing an official proceeding. The Democrats have been intent on impeaching Trump since his victorious 2016 election and they developed a conspiracy theory using the full weight of their government power and authority to falsely present Russian collusion between the Trump Campaign in the election, to the American people. With the Democrats in control of intelligence agencies and most of the Government workers in D.C., a scheme was designed to stop Trump’s America first policies during his campaign, to shift Government power to the hands of the Democrats. In a clear and established pattern of behavior by Mueller, the plan to put pressure on Stone and all of his own associates with legal bills and hearings, was to get him to “roll” on Trump, giving Robert S. Mueller, the special prosecutor in the Russian Collusion Hoax, material to impeach Trump. Stone has been steadfast that he would not lie about Trump, that he would not roll on Trump, but would stand trial himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: The lawyers knew all about it and picked her anyways. Grounds for an appeal just like on Law & Order Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 7 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: The lawyers knew all about it and picked her anyways. , the defense lawyers told the judge that the woman admitted to holding negative feelings about President Donald J. Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taipan Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: You don't get everybody that likes you on a jury. Leticia? The Flaming Democrat? Full of rancid hate for Trump and all GOP? "Grounds for Appeal". What does Governor Mike Huckabee recommend? "Commute". By the President. That is what I advocate also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EltonJohnson Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Mistrial and then decline to prosecute again Get ready libs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 7 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: The american justice system doesn't run like the corrupt Republican Senate koc. How bout the democrat house does it run like it in a Secret skif? Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 28 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: You don't get everybody that likes you on a jury. They can’t be biased or prejudice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 11 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: Mistrial and then decline to prosecute again Get ready libs Oh man total melt down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineman Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 33 minutes ago, king of the county said: Grounds for an appeal just like on Law & Order are you suggesting that politically appointed government employees are incapable of serving as honest impartial jurors. What about someone who has a regular private sector job but also happens to be a political savvy sovereign democrat (or republican)? Why does anyone's political point of view make them unqualified to serve on a fucking jury???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineman Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, king of the county said: How bout the democrat house does it run like it in a Secret skif? Lol there were plenty of republican committee members in the SCIF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineman Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, king of the county said: They can’t be biased or prejudice have you produced any evidence that any juror was biased or prejudiced? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 46 minutes ago, king of the county said: Wtf over It's simple...the dems are desperate to avoid the investigations by Barr and Durham. They'll try anything to hurt Trump...and ignore anything that doesn't help them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maineman Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: Mistrial and then decline to prosecute again Get ready libs wanna bet? There is NO WAY this is tossed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 33 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: And? Bam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadkill Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, maineman said: have you produced any evidence that any juror was biased or prejudiced? Are you kidding? One of the jurors said under oath that she had no bias...then they found out she attacked the very people she was judging by way of social media. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Sad democrats DON'T want to get the work of the people done!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, dontlooknow said: Sad that Republican only whine when a republican gets convicted. SAD THE DEMOCRATS ARE ALL LYING CRYING HATE FILLED ASSWIPES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: What did a jury find stone guilty and you're crying. Where is crying me a river at. You better call him. Some non violent crime he’s not a threat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 Just now, dontlooknow said: So you are saying that he didn't commit the crimes because of one person. Lol I have no idea i didn’t follow one second of the trial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted February 14, 2020 Author Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, dontlooknow said: You listen to too much fox news and brietbart. Oh i watch Rachel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingRock Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 hour ago, dontlooknow said: You don't get everybody that likes you on a jury. Seriously. Not liking Trump would be a factor if it were Trump that's on trial. Trump's not on trial - Roger Stone is/was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slideman Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 There is a thing called voir dire. It involves a careful selection of the jury. The defense has the right to strike jurors it does not like. The defense agreed to seat this juror. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taipan Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 1 minute ago, dontlooknow said: Lol now you can't have justice because of one person. These cons are cry babies. "The average prison sentence for a rapist is 4.2yrs. For Involuntary Manslaughter it is 6-8yrs. 9yrs. for telling a lie to Congress? That is completely ridiculous". Sean Hannity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slideman Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 Just now, dontlooknow said: Yes but these simple republicans don't know much of anything. They know only to repeat the cant their handlers feed them. They are members of a cult Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.