Jump to content

Great Big Ol' "RollingRock Lied" Thread ... Will He Recant?


Recommended Posts

Gave you fair warning, @RollingRock. Now it's your choice to be a man or a weasel.

 

Ok, I admit I DO troll. I do curse. I insult. But I do also engage in (mostly) civil discussion.

 

Yesterday, you lied about me. I called you out, and you doubled-down, claiming that you NEVER LIE.

 

Now this thread is, first of all, proof that I was RIGHT, and you were WRONG, and secondly, a chance for you to prove that you're a decent person... and not the pure evil depicted in your "go put your head in a chipper/shredder and turn it on HIGH" persona that you portray here... by recanting your lie and admitting you were wrong.

 

So, to recap, here is yesterday's exchange:

 

18 hours ago, RollingRock said:

Out of this group of candidates, yes, I will vote for any of them.....enthusiastically.

 

The hate-filled swine in the White House needs to go away.

 

18 hours ago, benhur said:

You seem far more hate-filled than Trump does.  Look in a mirror in horror.

 

17 hours ago, RollingRock said:

Go Bad word yourself.  If you think that, you're brain dead.  

 

17 hours ago, SixShooter said:

The stuff I've seen you post proves you're hate-filled. Deny all you want, you proved it with your own words.

 

17 hours ago, leftwinger said:

All you ever do is make personal attacks on liberals.

 

....HERE is the lie:

 

17 hours ago, RollingRock said:

True.  He has ZERO interest in civil discussion.  

 

ZERO.

 

17 hours ago, SixShooter said:

No it's not true. Why do you lie?

 

17 hours ago, RollingRock said:

I don't lie. 

 

I've never seen you trying to have a civil discussion.  Maybe you do on occasion, who knows?  I know I've never witnessed it.

 

Wrong. 

 

17 hours ago, SixShooter said:

That's not what you said. You said "He has ZERO interest in civil discussion." That is a lie.

 

Here's the double-down:

 

17 hours ago, RollingRock said:

No, that's my perception.  I've never once see you not be a trollish jerk.  

 

17 hours ago, SixShooter said:

You didn't state it as such. You stated it as a fact, which you admit you cannot know. That's dishonest at best.

 

===================

 

So I offered RollingRock a chance to change his tune or I would go back and find a civil exchange between us... not just ANYONE that I was being civil with... but HIM. He obstinately refused, of course, so here is a fairly RECENT exchange (Jan 2019) between us that was civil (I'm certain there are many more, but this was the easiest to find). It's a thread RR created claiming there were a "multitude of reasons" Trump's citizenship question on the census was illegal:

 

On 1/15/2019 at 12:05 PM, Skans said:

Ignore the judge.  Put the Citizenship question on the Census anyway.

 

On 1/15/2019 at 12:23 PM, RollingRock said:

Why do you hate the rule of law?

 

On 1/15/2019 at 11:48 AM, RollingRock said:

You'd think Trump would get used to being told "NO!" by now.

 

On 1/15/2019 at 1:03 PM, SixShooter said:

By liberal activist Obamaites? No surprise, but if this doesn't violate the constitution, maybe you can post what those "multitudes of reasons" are that make it illegal? I mean, YOU don't want judges legislating from the bench do you?

 

No response from RollingRock to that one ^^^ See, HE'S the one who can't engage in civil debate.

 

On 1/15/2019 at 1:07 PM, SixShooter said:

Judges aren't supposed to make laws. What laws does the form violate?

 

On 1/15/2019 at 1:12 PM, RollingRock said:

No, the judges are upholding the law.  It's Trump and his cohorts that are trying to break the law.

 

On 1/15/2019 at 1:19 PM, SixShooter said:

Which law(s) are you referring to?

 

And here's where he dismisses me, REFUSING to debate civilly:

 

On 1/15/2019 at 1:31 PM, RollingRock said:

Read the article in my original post.  :)  It will explain everything.

 

On 1/15/2019 at 3:14 PM, SixShooter said:

I did read it, and no it did not explain which laws the census form violates. 

 

You mean you don't KNOW which laws the judge based his decision on??

 

On 1/15/2019 at 3:15 PM, SixShooter said:

I'll ask you again. Which laws are you referring to?

 

On 1/15/2019 at 7:19 PM, SixShooter said:

Well RR??

 

On 1/16/2019 at 6:45 AM, SixShooter said:

Whats the matter RR?? Cat got your tongue? :)

 

On 1/16/2019 at 9:58 AM, SixShooter said:

Well @RollingRock ??

 

As you can see, I DID engage RollingRock in civil discussion, unlike his claim yesterday. And I do that with others here all the time. Not as much as I troll, I admit, but he was wrong, and when called on it he doubled-down on his lie. I gave him fair warning and a chance to take it back before making this thread which proves once and for all to the entire forum that he LIES.

 

Worse yet, HE is the one GUILTY of that which he accuses ME! Pathetic.

 

No escaping it now, @RollingRock. If you dismiss this thread... and you will NOT be able to ignore it, I will bump it every day until you acknowledge it... it will be known throughout the forum that you got caught lying and refused to live up to your claims of personal integrity. Your choice.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, leftwinger said:

the end

 

So do you, and RollingRock, and almost every member here. So what is your point? I never denied that I troll, I denied that I never engage in civil debate. And I PROVED it.

 

Do you have anything honest or civil to say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Not that it means much but I will vouch for SixShooter being mostly prone to civil discussions. 

 

I appreciate that, but you're probably too generous. I would characterize myself as "somewhat" prone to civil discussions. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, leftwinger said:

dude, you have no integrity. you're no different from the other jerkoff trolls

 

Not surprised at your mischaracterization and your tone, but you're dead wrong. I used to give IO some guff but over the long haul he is what he claims to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RebelGator said:

uoggs.jpg

 

"That?  That is not knife.   THIS......is knife" !!

                                                                                    Crocodile Dundee                     🤠

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Taipan said:

"That?  That is not knife.   THIS......is knife" !!

                                                                                    Crocodile Dundee                     🤠

 

Good to see you check in, T.

 

Tonight, we drink. Jack? 🥃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...