Jump to content

Global Warming's 50 Years of Fraud


Recommended Posts

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/global_warmings_50_years_of_fraud.html

 

Quote

 

Global Warming's 50 Years of Fraud


By Jack Hellner


The theory for those pushing the green new deal or some other radical energy policy that will destroy tens of millions of jobs and greatly harm the poor and middle class is that humans, CO2, and fossil fuels cause warming and climate change. This warming causes the ice to melt in Alaska, then the melting ice causes sea levels to rise and the rising sea levels will cause coastal cities to under water.


They have predicted the coastal cities to disappear for the last 100 years and they have been wrong for 100 years.


Meanwhile, Alaska has been exceptionally cold for the last few months. As a nerd who knows that the people pushing the garbage theory of humans causing climate change is based on a series of lies, I look at actual data.


It is a shame most of the media, entertainers and other Democrats just repeat talking points instead of doing research.


January 2020 was the 15th coldest January on record in Fairbanks Alaska. At negative 27 degrees. it was over 13 degrees below average this year. Obviously, the ice will be thickening faster than average and is not going to be gone as predicted.


Here is a small sample of predictions and fear articles over the years.

 

Quote

 

1922-Article by AP in Washington Post and elsewhere saying icecaps were melting, oceans were dying, and coastal cities would disappear.


1970-First Earth Day. We were scared with articles that billions would die soon from catastrophic cooling.


1975-Newsweek-Doom and gloom article called “The Cooling World”


1989-Back to warming. The UN essentially repeated the warnings from 1922 article and said we only had ten years to solve the problem.


2008-ABC ran fear story saying much of Miami and New York City would be under water by 2015.


2019- The UN again repeated the same warnings from 1922 and 1989 and again we have only ten years left.

 


How did the Earth cool so much from 1945 to 1976 that we got warnings of catastrophic cooling if rising CO2, humans and fossil fuels cause warming? The answer is there is no correlation between CO2, population, fossil fuel use and temperature.


Humans can’t control the temperature of the sun, tilt of the sun, solar activity, distance the Earth is from the sun, daily rotation of the Earth, annual orbit of the Earth, high tides, low tides, the Jetstream, El Nino, or La Nina but we are told that if we give politicians and bureaucrats trillions of dollars they can control the sea level, temperature and sea levels forever. Does that make sense?


A clear indication that the theory that fossil fuels, rising CO2 and humans cause global warming or climate change is a hoax or a series of lies is that the globe had a significant cooling period from 1945 to 1976. It cooled so much that it was predicted on the first Earth Day in 1970 that we were having a disastrous cooling period where billions would die from starvation.


Besides being lied to for around 100 years that coastal cities would soon disappear, the public has been lied to that we were running out of oil for over 100 years. For a long time, we were told that we needed alternatives like wind and solar because of these lies. Now that it is known that there is plenty of fossil fuels to last a long time and that we are always finding more, we are told the lie that fossil fuels are causing climate change, warming and are destroying the planet.


The public has been continuously lied to that droughts are longer and more severe than ever when historical data and the number of deserts worldwide clearly shows that is not true.


We have also been told that floods are more severe and worse than ever when historical data and the fact that so much of the Earth is covered with water shows that to be demonstrably false.


How many times have we been told the lie that the warming is unprecedented when historical data shows that the Earth has gone through many long-term warming and cooling periods including several ice ages. A little ice age ended around 1850 so a little warming today would be normal.


Sea levels have always risen and fallen and according to estimates there has been only a small rise since the advent of fossil fuels but we get continuous predictions of impending disasters.
To scare the children, we repeatedly have been told that tens of thousands of species are dying out each year because of humans and fossil fuels.


They have repeatedly been told that polar bears are dying because of humans, fossil fuels and climate change when the population of polar bears has increased substantially the last seventy years and they were dying because of hunting, not climate change.


Meanwhile, the actual number of identified species, including many no one has heard of, that have gone extinct since 1900 is 477 or four per year. The truth obviously isn’t important when pushing an agenda.


Why is there so little concern by environmentalists about how much land solar and wind farms use and how much wildlife they kill?


We have been lied to that hurricane activity was going to be worse than ever after Katrina and we had a mild ten-year period. We’ve been told repeatedly the bald faced lie that we were going to have snowless winters.


As the predictions over the years have been 100% wrong the future predictions always get more extreme. We go from global warming to climate change to climate catastrophe and climate collapse and we repeatedly only have a few years left to solve the problem. The solution is always to transfer more power and money to the government along with relinquishing our freedom and way of life. The solution for almost all Democrat policies is more money and power to the government.


We have the environmentalists seeking to control CO2, a clear, innocuous non-pollutant gas while advocating for the massive use of lithium, a flammable pollutant. How will they dispose of all those flammable batteries?


As the predictions have been so wrong, journalists and other Democrats seek to shut those of us who tell the truth that the climate has always changed naturally. We are called liars, deniers, stupid and anti-science. It is the fear mongers who refuse to debate and look at actual historical scientific data.


One of the biggest frauds of all time was when East Anglia University manipulated temperature data to hide a medieval warming period. That would have exposed their lies about human caused global warming and they didn’t want their money spicket turned off. This fraud is much more detrimental to the world than anything we have ever seen.


Yet journalists and other Democrats didn’t give a damn about the fraud as they continue to hide the truth from the public because they also like the money train.


Al Gore and many others have used the lies to greatly enrich themselves. Many of the people pushing the lies ride around in private jets and live in mansions while lecturing the rest of us that we are destroying the planet.


I excuse Greta Thunberg and other young people for their ignorance on science because they have been indoctrinated and lied to for their entire lives. There is no excuse for journalists, entertainers, Michael Bloomberg, President Obama, the Clintons, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren et al for just repeating talking points in order to enrich the government and harm the rest of us.


Indoctrination is a dangerous thing and journalists have been major contributors to the indoctrination.


Democrats can’t count votes in Iowa in a reasonable time but they tell us they can control temperatures, sea levels and storm activity forever if we just hand them trillions of our hard earned dollars. Why the heck would anyone believe them?

 


Fraud is right ... and fraud is a crime.  

 

A price should be paid for this scam that was intended to enrich/empower leftists and which has cost the world TRILLIONS of dollars so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/global_warmings_50_years_of_fraud.html

 

Quote

 

Global Warming's 50 Years of Fraud


By Jack Hellner


The theory for those pushing the green new deal or some other radical energy policy that will destroy tens of millions of jobs and greatly harm the poor and middle class is that humans, CO2, and fossil fuels cause warming and climate change. This warming causes the ice to melt in Alaska, then the melting ice causes sea levels to rise and the rising sea levels will cause coastal cities to under water.


They have predicted the coastal cities to disappear for the last 100 years and they have been wrong for 100 years.


Meanwhile, Alaska has been exceptionally cold for the last few months. As a nerd who knows that the people pushing the garbage theory of humans causing climate change is based on a series of lies, I look at actual data.


It is a shame most of the media, entertainers and other Democrats just repeat talking points instead of doing research.


January 2020 was the 15th coldest January on record in Fairbanks Alaska. At negative 27 degrees. it was over 13 degrees below average this year. Obviously, the ice will be thickening faster than average and is not going to be gone as predicted.


Here is a small sample of predictions and fear articles over the years.

 

Quote

 

1922-Article by AP in Washington Post and elsewhere saying icecaps were melting, oceans were dying, and coastal cities would disappear.


1970-First Earth Day. We were scared with articles that billions would die soon from catastrophic cooling.


1975-Newsweek-Doom and gloom article called “The Cooling World”


1989-Back to warming. The UN essentially repeated the warnings from 1922 article and said we only had ten years to solve the problem.


2008-ABC ran fear story saying much of Miami and New York City would be under water by 2015.


2019- The UN again repeated the same warnings from 1922 and 1989 and again we have only ten years left.

 


How did the Earth cool so much from 1945 to 1976 that we got warnings of catastrophic cooling if rising CO2, humans and fossil fuels cause warming? The answer is there is no correlation between CO2, population, fossil fuel use and temperature.


Humans can’t control the temperature of the sun, tilt of the sun, solar activity, distance the Earth is from the sun, daily rotation of the Earth, annual orbit of the Earth, high tides, low tides, the Jetstream, El Nino, or La Nina but we are told that if we give politicians and bureaucrats trillions of dollars they can control the sea level, temperature and sea levels forever. Does that make sense?


A clear indication that the theory that fossil fuels, rising CO2 and humans cause global warming or climate change is a hoax or a series of lies is that the globe had a significant cooling period from 1945 to 1976. It cooled so much that it was predicted on the first Earth Day in 1970 that we were having a disastrous cooling period where billions would die from starvation.


Besides being lied to for around 100 years that coastal cities would soon disappear, the public has been lied to that we were running out of oil for over 100 years. For a long time, we were told that we needed alternatives like wind and solar because of these lies. Now that it is known that there is plenty of fossil fuels to last a long time and that we are always finding more, we are told the lie that fossil fuels are causing climate change, warming and are destroying the planet.


The public has been continuously lied to that droughts are longer and more severe than ever when historical data and the number of deserts worldwide clearly shows that is not true.


We have also been told that floods are more severe and worse than ever when historical data and the fact that so much of the Earth is covered with water shows that to be demonstrably false.


How many times have we been told the lie that the warming is unprecedented when historical data shows that the Earth has gone through many long-term warming and cooling periods including several ice ages. A little ice age ended around 1850 so a little warming today would be normal.


Sea levels have always risen and fallen and according to estimates there has been only a small rise since the advent of fossil fuels but we get continuous predictions of impending disasters.
To scare the children, we repeatedly have been told that tens of thousands of species are dying out each year because of humans and fossil fuels.


They have repeatedly been told that polar bears are dying because of humans, fossil fuels and climate change when the population of polar bears has increased substantially the last seventy years and they were dying because of hunting, not climate change.


Meanwhile, the actual number of identified species, including many no one has heard of, that have gone extinct since 1900 is 477 or four per year. The truth obviously isn’t important when pushing an agenda.


Why is there so little concern by environmentalists about how much land solar and wind farms use and how much wildlife they kill?


We have been lied to that hurricane activity was going to be worse than ever after Katrina and we had a mild ten-year period. We’ve been told repeatedly the bald faced lie that we were going to have snowless winters.


As the predictions over the years have been 100% wrong the future predictions always get more extreme. We go from global warming to climate change to climate catastrophe and climate collapse and we repeatedly only have a few years left to solve the problem. The solution is always to transfer more power and money to the government along with relinquishing our freedom and way of life. The solution for almost all Democrat policies is more money and power to the government.


We have the environmentalists seeking to control CO2, a clear, innocuous non-pollutant gas while advocating for the massive use of lithium, a flammable pollutant. How will they dispose of all those flammable batteries?


As the predictions have been so wrong, journalists and other Democrats seek to shut those of us who tell the truth that the climate has always changed naturally. We are called liars, deniers, stupid and anti-science. It is the fear mongers who refuse to debate and look at actual historical scientific data.


One of the biggest frauds of all time was when East Anglia University manipulated temperature data to hide a medieval warming period. That would have exposed their lies about human caused global warming and they didn’t want their money spicket turned off. This fraud is much more detrimental to the world than anything we have ever seen.


Yet journalists and other Democrats didn’t give a damn about the fraud as they continue to hide the truth from the public because they also like the money train.


Al Gore and many others have used the lies to greatly enrich themselves. Many of the people pushing the lies ride around in private jets and live in mansions while lecturing the rest of us that we are destroying the planet.


I excuse Greta Thunberg and other young people for their ignorance on science because they have been indoctrinated and lied to for their entire lives. There is no excuse for journalists, entertainers, Michael Bloomberg, President Obama, the Clintons, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren et al for just repeating talking points in order to enrich the government and harm the rest of us.


Indoctrination is a dangerous thing and journalists have been major contributors to the indoctrination.


Democrats can’t count votes in Iowa in a reasonable time but they tell us they can control temperatures, sea levels and storm activity forever if we just hand them trillions of our hard earned dollars. Why the heck would anyone believe them?

 


Fraud is right ... and fraud is a crime.  

 

A price should be paid for this scam that was intended to enrich/empower leftists and which has cost the world TRILLIONS of dollars so far.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the Soviet Collective collapsed, their many arctic weather stations lost funding and were closed down.

 

This removed so many data points being analized by tecnno-science geoweenies that they actually though we were catching on fire.

 

825b7c9a6484460b76ff5ef0944b7021--batman

  "Holy Vodka Teenie Batman, it's been the Russians all along."

 

 

 

kj

 

 

 

 

kj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
19 minutes ago, Mirabeau said:

When Mirabeau tells the idiots who believe the myth of anthropogenic global warming about predictions of the NEW ICE AGE that were all the rage back in the 1970s, they inevitably stammer, stutter, and walk away.

 

LOLOLOLOLOLOL……….NOPE!

 

What they actually do is laugh at you and your idiocy, Mirabooboo, and tell you that there were six times as many scientific papers published in the 1970s that predicted global warming as there were papers predicting global cooling.

 

In the real world……

 

In the 30 years leading up to the 1970s, available temperature recordings suggested that there was a cooling trend. As a result, some scientists suggested that the current interglacial period could rapidly draw to a close, which might result in the Earth plunging into a new ice age over the next few centuries. This idea could have been reinforced by the knowledge that the smog that climatologists call "aerosols" — emitted by human activities into the atmosphere — also caused cooling. In fact, as temperature recording has improved in coverage, it’s become apparent that the cooling trend was most pronounced in northern land areas and that global temperature trends were in fact relatively steady during the period prior to 1970. 

 

At the same time as some scientists were suggesting we might be facing another ice age, a greater number published contradicting studies. Their papers showed that the growing amount of greenhouse gases that humans were putting into the atmosphere would cause much greater warming — warming that would have a much greater influence on global temperature than any possible natural or human-caused cooling effects. 

 

By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the small number of predictions of an ice age appeared to be much more interesting than those of global warming, so it was those sensational "ice age" stories in the press that so many people tend to remember. 

 

The fact is that around 1970 there were six times as many scientists predicting a warming rather than a cooling planet. Today, with 30+ years more data to analyze, we've reached a clear scientific consensus: 97% of the top climate scientists agree with the view that human beings are causing global warming. 
(source - MYTH #91: An ice age was predicted in the 70s)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TruePatriot said:

 

LOLOLOLOLOLOL……….NOPE!

 

What they actually do is laugh at you and your idiocy, Mirabooboo, and tell you that there were six times as many scientific papers published in the 1970s that predicted global warming as there were papers predicting global cooling.

 

In the real world……

 

In the 30 years leading up to the 1970s, available temperature recordings suggested that there was a cooling trend. As a result, some scientists suggested that the current interglacial period could rapidly draw to a close, which might result in the Earth plunging into a new ice age over the next few centuries. This idea could have been reinforced by the knowledge that the smog that climatologists call "aerosols" — emitted by human activities into the atmosphere — also caused cooling. In fact, as temperature recording has improved in coverage, it’s become apparent that the cooling trend was most pronounced in northern land areas and that global temperature trends were in fact relatively steady during the period prior to 1970. 

 

At the same time as some scientists were suggesting we might be facing another ice age, a greater number published contradicting studies. Their papers showed that the growing amount of greenhouse gases that humans were putting into the atmosphere would cause much greater warming — warming that would have a much greater influence on global temperature than any possible natural or human-caused cooling effects. 

 

By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the small number of predictions of an ice age appeared to be much more interesting than those of global warming, so it was those sensational "ice age" stories in the press that so many people tend to remember. 

 

The fact is that around 1970 there were six times as many scientists predicting a warming rather than a cooling planet. Today, with 30+ years more data to analyze, we've reached a clear scientific consensus: 97% of the top climate scientists agree with the view that human beings are causing global warming. 
(source - MYTH #91: An ice age was predicted in the 70s)

You're such an IGNORAMUS!

 

You FALL FOR EVERY MYTH OUT THERE, DON'T YOU?

 

(Watch this, folks!)

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=ca619283f9ff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mirabeau said:

I’m such an IGNORAMUS!

 

I FALL FOR EVERY DENIER CULT MYTH OUT THERE, DON'T i?

 

(Watch me fall for another one, folks!)

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/?sh=ca619283f9ff


You are indeed a very, very gullible little retard, Mirabooboo. There is no denier cult myth, no matter how absurd, that you won’t swallow. You are quite truly an insane cultist!

 

In the real world………

Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is Warming

NASA

 

1309_temp-2020_comparison-plot-768px.jpg

Temperature data showing rapid warming in the past few decades, the latest data going up to 2020. According to NASA data, 2016 and 2020 are tied for the warmest year since 1880, continuing a long-term trend of rising global temperatures. The 10 warmest years in the 141-year record have occurred since 2005, with the seven most recent years being the warmest. Credit: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

In Brief:

A consensus on climate change and its human cause exists. Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that human activities are the primary cause of the observed climate-warming trend over the past century.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES


Statement on Climate Change from 18 Scientific Associations

(continued)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Z09 said:

Hey True Patriot

 

Did you hear about the Climate Change expert that said we'd never see snow again?


Hey Zooshit

 

Did you hear about the worldwide scientific consensus that human caused global warming and its consequent climate changes are very real, still accelerating, and happening now?

 

No? Too bad you keep your head jammed so far up your ass.

Extensive historical data shows recent extreme warming is unprecedented in past 2,000 years

 

The scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming is likely to have passed 99%, according to the lead author of the most authoritative study on the subject, and could rise further after separate research that clears up some of the remaining doubts. Three studies published in Nature and Nature Geoscience use extensive historical data to show there has never been a period in the last 2,000 years when temperature changes have been as fast and extensive as in recent decades. It had previously been thought that similarly dramatic peaks and troughs might have occurred in the past, including in periods dubbed the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Climate Anomaly. But the three studies use reconstructions based on 700 proxy records of temperature change, such as trees, ice and sediment, from all continents that indicate none of these shifts took place in more than half the globe at any one time. The authors say this highlights how unusual warming has become in recent years as a result of industrial emissions. “There is no doubt left – as has been shown extensively in many other studies addressing many different aspects of the climate system using different methods and data sets,” said Stefan Brönnimann, from the University of Bern and the Pages 2K consortium of climate scientists. Commenting on the study, other scientists said it was an important breakthrough in the “fingerprinting” task of proving how human responsibility has changed the climate in ways not seen in the past. “This paper should finally stop climate change deniers claiming that the recent observed coherent global warming is part of a natural climate cycle. This paper shows the truly stark difference between regional and localised changes in climate of the past and the truly global effect of anthropogenic greenhouse emissions,” said Mark Maslin, professor of climatology at University College London. Previous studies have shown near unanimity among climate scientists that human factors – car exhausts, factory chimneys, forest clearance and other sources of greenhouse gases – are responsible for the exceptional level of global warming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TruePatriot said:


Everybody realized that a long time age, Fuckhead615.

CHILDREN JUST AREN'T GOING TO KNOW WHAT SNOW IS

 

Tim Blair
 
less than 2 min read
January 17, 2013 - 4:03AM
 
0 comments
 
 

The Independent, 2000:

Snow is starting to disappear from our lives. Sledges, snowmen, snowballs and the excitement of waking to find that the stuff has settled outside are all a rapidly diminishing part of Britain's culture, as warmer winters – which scientists are attributing to global climate change – produce not only fewer white Christmases, but fewer white Januaries and Februaries … Global warming, the heating of the atmosphere by increased amounts of industrial gases, is now accepted as a reality by the international community … According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event". "Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said.
Stand by for icy blasts and heavy snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TruePatriot said:

97% of the top climate scientists agree with the view that human beings are causing global warming. 

 

You're still peddling that easily debunked sack of shit?? 

 

AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

That bunk was proven to be bullshit years ago. I'm genuinely embarrassed for you RN just because you're so pathetically STUPID as to trot out such a resoundingly thrashed lie

 

TrueIdiot really is a TRUE IDIOT!! :lol: 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Z09 said:

TP

One of your experts said we'd never see snow again...

 

LOL


It is kind of sad that you are too stupid to understand why that is meaningless twaddle, zooshit.

 

One British scientist talked about the future lack of snowfall in England and may have exaggerated how soon that will happen. So what, numbnuts? He said that in the year 2000, before the global warming driven disruptions to the Polar Vortex winds began bringing Arctic air masses down as far south as Florida.

 

There are tens of thousands of working, publishing climate scientists in the world. Their testimony is very nearly unanimous in affirming the absolute reality of human caused global warming and its consequent dangerous climate disruptions and changes.

 

One guy’s words, however poorly chosen they might have been, has no significance relative to that very real scientific consensus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2020 at 2:55 PM, BeAChooser said:

Fraud is right ... and fraud is a crime.  

 

A price should be paid for this scam that was intended to enrich/empower leftists and which has cost the world TRILLIONS of dollars so far.

Congratulations!!!

You just proved you have no idea what 'fraud' actually means.

Or how it applies to this case.

 

BTW - I don't really give a crap as to whether Global Warming is true or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TruePatriot said:


It is kind of sad that you are too stupid to understand why that is meaningless twaddle, zooshit.

 

One British scientist talked about the future lack of snowfall in England and may have exaggerated how soon that will happen. So what, numbnuts? He said that in the year 2000, before the global warming driven disruptions to the Polar Vortex winds began bringing Arctic air masses down as far south as Florida.

 

There are tens of thousands of working, publishing climate scientists in the world. Their testimony is very nearly unanimous in affirming the absolute reality of human caused global warming and its consequent dangerous climate disruptions and changes.

 

One guy’s words, however poorly chosen they might have been, has no significance relative to that very real scientific consensus.

"may have exaggerated"

 

Or may have lied or been 100% wrong...

 

"May have"?????????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2020 at 12:25 PM, BeAChooser said:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/global_warmings_50_years_of_fraud.html

 


Fraud is right ... and fraud is a crime.  

 

A price should be paid for this scam that was intended to enrich/empower leftists and which has cost the world TRILLIONS of dollars so far.

You could not be farther from the truth. Leftists are useful idiots. If the people who give the marching orders had to enrich those cattle, they would pass on the money. 

 

The people who run this scam are not political. They don't care about abortion, whales, rivers, hetero-normative patriarchal tyranny, men in dresses, or anything else except power. 

 

And power doesn't have politics. Power USES politics to achieve its end. It cares not WHOSE politics - whoever is hand will do. Like when bill clinton needs some pussy - "Hey, you, come here."

 

Never forget that the first people to introduce cap and trade to save the environment were republicans, under bush senior, to address acid rain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...