Jump to content
Vegas

So libs, if Trump is not removed, and wins 2020 by a landslide, then...

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, harryramar said:

trump was afforded the same opportunity any other common criminal have had during a grand jury hearing, even more so, crying won't change that fact.

I won't argue the merits with someone who has gone off the deep end, but your anger and rage is duly noted and it makes me

glad that you are pouting and thrashing about.

and anyone  with 30 guns who  still is scared needs a head shrinker.

go play with mlorons like Elton and pr. grownups are sick of your shit like we are sick of trumps shit.

I ain't skeered bitch!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all Trump is not winning by any landslide by any stretch of the imagination, if he wins it will be remarkably similar to 2016 and he will most likely still lose the popular vote by more than 5 million this time around. Election manipulation will without doubt be an integral part of securing a win probably more than 2016 and having the plot foiled with Ukraine is certainly a step in the wrong direction. I'm sure Trump has his little evil troll guiliani out there sifting through every country they can manipulate to help Trump. Hopefully being caught will be lesson enough but not likely with these characters fortunately there are enough good servants of the people who have eyes on this clown that if they try this crap again its gonna be out in the spotlight immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, fourputt said:

he will most likely still lose the popular vote by more than 5 million this time around.

But he will still be President... LMFAO

Sad liberals think winning the popular vote counts!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Duck615 said:

But he will still be President... LMFAO

Sad liberals think winning the popular vote counts!!!

It sends a message that our electoral college isn't representing the people in a democratic way. Do you honestly think it's fair that a vote from 1 state should carry 3 times the weight than another vote elsewhere? Now dont go responding in your typical name calling style seriously try to explain why this is a just and representative way to hold a election?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, fourputt said:

It sends a message that our electoral college isn't representing the people in a democratic way. Do you honestly think it's fair that a vote from 1 state should carry 3 times the weight than another vote elsewhere? Now dont go responding in your typical name calling style seriously try to explain why this is a just and representative way to hold a election?

sure it does... IF we didn't have the electoral college... NY and CA would be giving up our Presidents... Is that fair?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Duck615 said:

sure it does... IF we didn't have the electoral college... NY and CA would be giving up our Presidents... Is that fair?

 

The population in NY is either decreasing or stagnant but either way they are losing 2 seats and California may lose 2 also but 1 for sure while Texas and Florida are gaining it appears close to 5 combined. When you look at a state like Wyoming there's barely 500,000 people there with 3 electoral votes since every state has 2 senators they get the bare minimum 1 representative in the house. What ought to be done is keep the electoral college but disregard the count as totals from both houses and recalibrate it to represent the population of each state and not the representation in Congress. It also needs to be done in a way that a tie would be impossible, we dont need the Congress to decide the winner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, fourputt said:

The population in NY is either decreasing or stagnant but either way they are losing 2 seats and California may lose 2 also but 1 for sure while Texas and Florida are gaining it appears close to 5 combined. When you look at a state like Wyoming there's barely 500,000 people there with 3 electoral votes since every state has 2 senators they get the bare minimum 1 representative in the house. What ought to be done is keep the electoral college but disregard the count as totals from both houses and recalibrate it to represent the population of each state and not the representation in Congress. It also needs to be done in a way that a tie would be impossible, we dont need the Congress to decide the winner.

Why fix something that is not broken... You democrats are just pissed Hillary didn't win!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Duck615 said:

sure it does... IF we didn't have the electoral college... NY and CA would be giving up our Presidents... Is that fair?

 

Count every vote ya communist nazi cocksucker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, fishhead said:

Count every vote ya communist nazi cocksucker.

democrats are the new nazis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...