Jump to content

(Reminder) Lev Parnas testimony matches testimony by EU ambassador Gordon Sondland, who told the Impeachment inquiry that “EVERYBODY WAS IN THE LOOP"


Recommended Posts

Additional damning information against President Donald Trump has emerged since his impeachment last month.

The Trump impeachment trial begins Tuesday afternoon in the Senate, but some important questions remain unanswered or have emerged since the House voted Dec. 18 to impeach, reported The Bulwark.

 

New evidence emerged over the holidays, when the public is distracted, showing Trump’s knowledge of the Ukraine quid pro quo and awareness of the scheme’s illegality.

 

Two days after the articles of impeachment passed, 300 pages of new emails were made public showing White House officials directed the Department of Defense to block military aid to Ukraine, and made clear the order came from the president.

 

 

Those documents also showed worried White House officials then worked to cook up a justification for the pause, after the whistleblower complaint came out, because they feared Trump’s order would violate the Impoundment Control Act.

 

Documents released by an indicted associate of Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani shows the president was directly involved in his personal attorney’s efforts to conduct foreign policy on his behalf in Ukraine in violation of longstanding foreign policy against the country.

 

Giuliani, working for Trump, then worked to oust Ukrainian ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, who was maybe placed under surveillance by his associate Lev Parnas and Robert Hyde, a Republican congressional candidate.

Parnas appeared last week on MSNBC and CNN, and he told broadcasters the Ukraine scheme involved Vice President Mike Pence, Attorney General William Barr and Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

 

That matches testimony by EU ambassador Gordon Sondland, who told the impeachment inquiry that “everybody was in the loop,” and notes from Trump’s July 25 call to Ukraine president also mentioned Barr was involved.

 

Foreign efforts to interfere with the U.S. election were shown Jan. 13 to remain ongoing, after a cybersecurity company reported that Russia’s government hacked Ukrainian oil company Burisma Holdings — which is at the center of the Trump scheme.

Trump urged Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky in their July 25 call to investigate the company’s ties to Joe Biden’s son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, benson13 said:

Additional damning information against President Donald Trump has emerged since his impeachment last month.

The Trump impeachment trial begins Tuesday afternoon in the Senate, but some important questions remain unanswered or have emerged since the House voted Dec. 18 to impeach, reported The Bulwark.

 

New evidence emerged over the holidays, when the public is distracted, showing Trump’s knowledge of the Ukraine quid pro quo and awareness of the scheme’s illegality.

 

Two days after the articles of impeachment passed, 300 pages of new emails were made public showing White House officials directed the Department of Defense to block military aid to Ukraine, and made clear the order came from the president.

 

 

Those documents also showed worried White House officials then worked to cook up a justification for the pause, after the whistleblower complaint came out, because they feared Trump’s order would violate the Impoundment Control Act.

 

Documents released by an indicted associate of Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani shows the president was directly involved in his personal attorney’s efforts to conduct foreign policy on his behalf in Ukraine in violation of longstanding foreign policy against the country.

 

Giuliani, working for Trump, then worked to oust Ukrainian ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, who was maybe placed under surveillance by his associate Lev Parnas and Robert Hyde, a Republican congressional candidate.

Parnas appeared last week on MSNBC and CNN, and he told broadcasters the Ukraine scheme involved Vice President Mike Pence, Attorney General William Barr and Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

 

That matches testimony by EU ambassador Gordon Sondland, who told the impeachment inquiry that “everybody was in the loop,” and notes from Trump’s July 25 call to Ukraine president also mentioned Barr was involved.

 

Foreign efforts to interfere with the U.S. election were shown Jan. 13 to remain ongoing, after a cybersecurity company reported that Russia’s government hacked Ukrainian oil company Burisma Holdings — which is at the center of the Trump scheme.

Trump urged Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky in their July 25 call to investigate the company’s ties to Joe Biden’s son.

 

Gordon Sondland ALSO told the House Investigating panel that MOST of this stuff was HIS PERCEPTION (aka. His OPINION), and that he had NO first hand knowledge of actually being TRUE...  What he could testify to, was that Donald Trump, when he asked him WHAT he WANTED from the Ukrainians... said:
"I want NOTHING... I want them to do the right thing" !!

Regarding the conversation relating to Joe Biden... Biden had ADMITTED to being involved in a Ukrainian "Quid Pro Quo"... i.e. $1.3 Billion for FIRING the Ukrainian investigator and ENDING the Buresma investigation... Donald Trump wanted GUILTY Americans involved in the SCAM IDENTIFIED and Prosecuted...

WHICH is EXACTLY what he SHOULD have DONE... Democrat Lawyers are trying to spin it. but they will FAIL !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, benson13 said:

rednecks....tell us why your LYING POS won't let anyone testify????

 

 

ESPECIALLY if your ConMan is so innocent....

I welcome witnesses as does Trump. They will do nothing for the already established prosecution case, Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate the Bidens actions in relation with a known corrupt Ukraine oil company. Witnesses for the defense however could show Trump was right to ask for these probes. That the Bidens had an obvious conflict of interest and that Hunter pocketed millions based on the protection his father provided to Burisma and other foreign companies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, benson13 said:

I missed that....why won't Moscows Biitch and MoscowMitch allow anyone to testify??

Everyone was in the loop but the house provided ZERO witnesses actually in the loop. 😂😂

 

Sondland also admitted his entire testimony was speculation on his part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, benson13 said:

I missed that....why won't Moscows Biitch and MoscowMitch allow anyone to testify??

 

IF you wanted TESTIMONY, your HOUSE SCHITSTAINS should have gone to COURT and had that 3rd Branch TELL THEM THEY HAD TO TESTIFY!!!

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE IS A DOUBLE SIDES SWORD, SCHITSTAIN!! IF you eliminate it for your "opposition" it is ALSO ELIMINATED FOR YOU WHEN YOU HAVE POWER!!!

oops!!!

 

Oh, and beanie SCHITSTAIN, it's up to those making the charges TO PROVE THE GUILT, not the ACCUSED to prove their INNOCENCE!!!

Your COMMUNISM doesn't work in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

I welcome witnesses as does Trump. They will do nothing for the already established prosecution case, Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate the Bidens actions in relation with a known corrupt Ukraine oil company. Witnesses for the defense however could show Trump was right to ask for these probes. That the Bidens had an obvious conflict of interest and that Hunter pocketed millions based on the protection his father provided to Burisma and other foreign companies. 

Too bad crack dealers and strippers don';t keep better financial records. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, benson13 said:

 

Poor Beaner, When are you going to figure out that we really do know who you are and what you are all about? We already know what type of propaganda you are going to post before you do, Everything you post is lies and propaganda fabricated by liars and propagandist to try and get us to believe their lies and corruption for your pathetic bunch of cult leader's to gain back power.

 

LET US NEVER FORGET WHAT DEMOCRATS ARE REALLY ALL ABOUT

alinsky%252Brules%252Bbecome%252Blaw...g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NeoConvict said:

Why would a stripper keep records? That would be a boring read without pictures 😎

I dated a stripper for a while. They avoid some serious taxes....😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MidnightMax said:

 

IF you wanted TESTIMONY, your HOUSE SCHITSTAINS should have gone to COURT and had that 3rd Branch TELL THEM THEY HAD TO TESTIFY!!!

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE IS A DOUBLE SIDES SWORD, SCHITSTAIN!! IF you eliminate it for your "opposition" it is ALSO ELIMINATED FOR YOU WHEN YOU HAVE POWER!!!

oops!!!

 

Oh, and beanie SCHITSTAIN, it's up to those making the charges TO PROVE THE GUILT, not the ACCUSED to prove their INNOCENCE!!!

Your COMMUNISM doesn't work in this country.

I see so why did the founding fathers even bother with separation of powers if trump can just ignore the oversight of congress?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

I welcome witnesses as does Trump. They will do nothing for the already established prosecution case, Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate the Bidens actions in relation with a known corrupt Ukraine oil company. Witnesses for the defense however could show Trump was right to ask for these probes. That the Bidens had an obvious conflict of interest and that Hunter pocketed millions based on the protection his father provided to Burisma and other foreign companies. 

trump welcomes witnesses?

bwahahahahahhahahahaa

oh please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, harryramar said:

I see so why did the founding fathers even bother with separation of powers if trump can just ignore the oversight of congress?

 

 

Poor hairyGOATfuc'ker is just TOOOOOOO goddamn STUPID to read what was posted and then comes up with some NONSENSE like this.

 

FACT IS, goatfuc'ker, that the ADMINISTRATION has EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND HAS HAD SINCE THE COURTS RULED BACK IN WASHINGTON'S ADMINISTRATION!!!!

 

PERHAPS you should actually READ SOMETHING other than the CRAP your PROPAGANDISTS shove up your goatfuc;king ass!!!

 

 

IF Congress wants to try to overturn that PRIVILEGE, they need to go to the 3rd BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT to get it overturned!!! SO FAR, the COURTS HAVE PRETTY MUCH REFUSED!!

 

Now, suck on that one tiny boi and then SHUT THE FUC'K UP!!


CONGRESS does NOT get to dictate what the PRESIDENT AND HIS CABINET CAN DISCUSS, THE MANNER THEY DISCUSS IT, OR THEY THEY HAVE TO SHARE WHAT WAS DISCUSSED IN THEIR MEETINGS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MidnightMax said:

 

Poor hairyGOATfuc'ker is just TOOOOOOO goddamn STUPID to read what was posted and then comes up with some NONSENSE like this.

 

FACT IS, goatfuc'ker, that the ADMINISTRATION has EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND HAS HAD SINCE THE COURTS RULES BACK IN WASHINGTON'S ADMINISTRATION!!!!

 

PERHAPS you should actually READ SOMETHING other than the CRAP your PROPAGANDISTS shove up your goatfuc;king ass!!!

 

 

IF Congress wants to try to overturn that PRIVILEGE, they need to go to the 3rd BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT to get it overturned!!! SO FAR, they COURTS HAVE PRETTY MUCH REFUSED!!

 

Now, suck on that one tiny boi and then SHUT THE FUC'K UP!!


CONGRESS does NOT get to dictate what the PRESIDENT AND HIS CABINET CAN DISCUSS, THE MANNER THEY DISCUSS IT, OR THEY THEY HAVE TO SHARE WHAT WAS DISCUSSED IN THEIR MEETINGS!!!

executive priv doesn't cover crimes mikey. no wonder you only got 3 votes. even your family has no respect for you.lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DeepBreath said:

He’s already discredited, dope. Quit propagating lies. Even CNN questioned his credibility. 😂

a russo bot hole

 

 

promoting known lies 

 

Putin is giggling like an anime school girl at this silly russo bot hole hate for America

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MidnightMax said:

 

Poor hairyGOATfuc'ker is just TOOOOOOO goddamn STUPID to read what was posted and then comes up with some NONSENSE like this.

 

FACT IS, goatfuc'ker, that the ADMINISTRATION has EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND HAS HAD SINCE THE COURTS RULED BACK IN WASHINGTON'S ADMINISTRATION!!!!

 

PERHAPS you should actually READ SOMETHING other than the CRAP your PROPAGANDISTS shove up your goatfuc;king ass!!!

 

 

IF Congress wants to try to overturn that PRIVILEGE, they need to go to the 3rd BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT to get it overturned!!! SO FAR, the COURTS HAVE PRETTY MUCH REFUSED!!

 

Now, suck on that one tiny boi and then SHUT THE FUC'K UP!!


CONGRESS does NOT get to dictate what the PRESIDENT AND HIS CABINET CAN DISCUSS, THE MANNER THEY DISCUSS IT, OR THEY THEY HAVE TO SHARE WHAT WAS DISCUSSED IN THEIR MEETINGS!!!

Hey "Max"... did you and the Debutante have wings with the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, evince said:

a russo bot hole

 

 

promoting known lies 

 

Putin is giggling like an anime school girl at this silly russo bot hole hate for America

Shut up, bitch. Even CNN questions his credibility you retard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...