Duck615 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 That's all we need to shut these lying crying liberal asswipes up!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EltonJohnson Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 They need 2/3rds to convict. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 He’ll get acquitted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BatteryPowered Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, Duck615 said: That's all we need to shut these lying crying liberal asswipes up!!!! Wrong. Need two thirds to convict...100 x 2/3 = 66.7...therefore 67 votes are needed to convict in an impeachment trial. Thus, 44 votes is all that is needed for not guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 Just now, BatteryPowered said: Wrong. Need two thirds to convict...100 x 2/3 = 66.7...therefore 67 votes are needed to convict in an impeachment trial. Thus, 44 votes is all that is needed for not guilty. Ah my bad... I am wrong you are right. Thanks. But is the number 51 needed to dismiss charges after 2 weeks maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConvict Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 10 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: They need 2/3rds to convict. Correct. Anything less than 66 is not guilty. Democrats know they had no chance of removing Trump through impeachment. They wanted to screw with Bernie Sanders and Warren along with damaging Trump for 2020. Think this plan will backfire. Spectacularly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConvict Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, Duck615 said: Ah my bad... I am wrong you are right. Thanks. But is the number 51 needed to dismiss charges after 2 weeks maybe? Yep. Simple majority to dismiss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sole result Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 22 minutes ago, Duck615 said: That's all we need to shut these lying crying liberal asswipes up!!!! 51 votes to sustain not enough evidence to convict and he will always be considered guilty and got away with it just like OJ Simpson. Different theater of doubt, same plot. generations apart. even IF 100 senators voted not guilty, the media and opposing idealists will never remove the "impeached" mantra. Reality is about character manifestation, not natural position as part of the population. Image and illusion of anything else is possible but being equally created as reproduced so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, sole result said: 51 votes to sustain not enough evidence to convict and he will always be considered guilty and got away with it just like OJ Simpson. Different theater of doubt, same plot. generations apart. Worlds apart Trump and OJ... But thanks for your opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sole result Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 13 minutes ago, Duck615 said: Worlds apart Trump and OJ... But thanks for your opinion. What is a world of interpretation within an atmosphere of one species fighting against one another every generation arguing life must be more than eternally spaced apart as reproduced so far. See I don't take sides creating conflicting opinions ancestrally to sustain a historical state of confusion within each reproduction maintaining the ever changing population until extinction of one's own species. The future isn't save believing in tomorrows are better days ahead by ignoring now is physical eternity as the universe remains perpetually balancing between contracted combinations of molecular mass into inorganic universal positions and organic placements within one planetary atmosphere at the same time. Now-here and no-where else possible. can you guess where my constant use of between erosion and decomposition comes from? Ancestral positioned ancestors currently living. I don't discuss space time continmuum hypotheticals anymore without adding how life actually works in plain sight. Honest is the best policy to reach the point all lifetimes only exist as spontaneously here as simultaneously positioned in reproductive point added to an ever changing shape and form population each reproduction arrives as a fertilized cell to a boey that remains until completely decomposed. actual results compared to speculation living exceeds simultaneously here. never has, never will, adapt to that instead of adopting hypothetical standards protected by rule of law setting the stage doubt governs human behavior until extinciton so 1% governing feel superior to those equally reproduced. Vanity of humanity.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 22 minutes ago, Duck615 said: Ah my bad... I am wrong you are right. Thanks. But is the number 51 needed to dismiss charges after 2 weeks maybe? they need 51 votes to have eyewitnesses tell the truth to the ameircan public about what they saw trump do. trump and traitors like you do not want the truth to be told while at the same time you feign this syrupy fake patriotism and moral self rightiousness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 minute ago, harryramar said: they need 51 votes to have eyewitnesses tell the truth to the ameircan public about what they saw trump do. trump and traitors like you do not want the truth to be told while at the same time you feign this syrupy fake patriotism and moral self rightiousness. yet no evidence of any crimes or no proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 19 minutes ago, NeoConvict said: Yep. Simple majority to dismiss. why would they not want eyewitnesses to tell the truth to the American public. oh that's right they know he is dirty and a cheat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 Just now, harryramar said: why would they not want eyewitnesses to tell the truth to the American public. oh that's right they know he is dirty and a cheat. That was the House's job... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 Just now, harryramar said: why would they not want eyewitnesses to tell the truth to the American public. oh that's right they know he is dirty and a cheat. Witnesses already testified,,, It was a bunch of hearsay BS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taipan Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, Duck615 said: Ah my bad... I am wrong you are right. Thanks. But is the number 51 needed to dismiss charges after 2 weeks maybe? I want to see immediate dismissal after 'opening statements'. That takes 51 votes. Ted Cruz says that might not happen but the GOP Team is 'loaded for bear'...….if witnesses are called. I think Ted wants the action like a baseball player want to play baseball. Ted is 'lock & loaded'. And that cool with me. We win either way. God-Bless the GOP Team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConvict Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, harryramar said: why would they not want eyewitnesses to tell the truth to the American public. oh that's right they know he is dirty and a cheat. The truth isn't obfuscated, it's known. Additional witnesses stating Trump pressured Ukraine to criminally investigate the Bidens would do what exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of the county Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 How much will be televised? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taipan Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 8 minutes ago, harryramar said: why would they not want eyewitnesses to tell the truth to the American public. oh that's right they know he is dirty and a cheat. Ramar, Get a life jacket. The Dem Ship is sinking. 😊 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, Taipan said: Ramar, Get a life jacket. The Dem Ship is sinking. 😊 why do you personally not want to know the truth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted January 20, 2020 Author Share Posted January 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, harryramar said: why do you personally not want to know the truth? Why can't you show proof of any Trump crimes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taipan Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 minute ago, harryramar said: why do you personally not want to know the truth? The Dems have built their house on shifting sand. And hate.....hate for a duly elected President. And here is crux of the matter. The Dems are seeking power. Power to over-ride the votes of the winners of the last election. That is NOT American. That is NOT democracy. And that is NOT cool with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishhead Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Duck615 said: That's all we need to shut these lying crying liberal asswipes up!!!! ^^Patriotic to Russia^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superds77 Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 minute ago, dontlooknow said: The republicans don't want the truth to come out about trump. Simple as that. Isn't the "truth" already out there. We have been told that the evidence of Trump's guilt is "overwhelming". What gives? So the current evidence is "overwhelming", yet we need to hear more. Do I have this right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 37 minutes ago, Taipan said: The Dems have built their house on shifting sand. And hate.....hate for a duly elected President. And here is crux of the matter. The Dems are seeking power. Power to over-ride the votes of the winners of the last election. That is NOT American. That is NOT democracy. And that is NOT cool with me. when you play the " you hate...." card it alleviates any sense of having to take responsibility for that which you allow. ex: you let jr lie us into a war and you said we hate jr. holding trump accountable for his crimes is reduced to "you hate trump" and thus you get to pretend that your clown is not crooked and by extension yourselves. yes you are crooked and you are too weak to look within and ask yourselves why. it is not patriotic to allow trump to beat the rap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.