Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

Now where did I say they were stupid? Jews who support Israel, which isn't all of them but a good chunk, should stay far away from the bds supporting Democrats. Blacks have suffered in progressive run ghettos for 60 years, they might want to consider changing things around a bit because they are seeing nothing but lip service from their Democrat leaders.

The only way that blacks suffered was from jobs being sent to foreign countries.

I was in management in the ghettos.

I am proud to say that I was fired for refusing to move the factory to a foreign country.

Unfortunately, I only delayed the eventual move.

But, I tried.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In this case its odd that we even need more witnesses to testify.  Trump admitted to it.  The transcript confirms it.  Mulvaney admitted to it.  Two, first-hand witnesses were on the call.  Multitude of other second-hand witnesses testimonies concur.  And the whistleblowers initial concern.

 

Outside of politics, this would be an open & shut case. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, peter45 said:

The only way that blacks suffered was from jobs being sent to foreign countries.

I was in management in the ghettos.

I am proud to say that I was fired for refusing to move the factory to a foreign country.

Unfortunately, I only delayed the eventual move.

But, I tried.

Agree that was a substantial part of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jrock2310 said:

In this case its odd that we even need more witnesses to testify.  Trump admitted to it.  The transcript confirms it.  Mulvaney admitted to it.  Two, first-hand witnesses were on the call.  Multitude of other second-hand witnesses testimonies concur.  And the whistleblowers initial concern.

 

Outside of politics, this would be an open & shut case. 

Agree. The debate should be regarding the legality of Trump's actions. The facts are not in dispute. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, jrock2310 said:

In this case its odd that we even need more witnesses to testify.  Trump admitted to it.  The transcript confirms it.  Mulvaney admitted to it.  Two, first-hand witnesses were on the call.  Multitude of other second-hand witnesses testimonies concur.  And the whistleblowers initial concern.

 

Outside of politics, this would be an open & shut case. 

And didn't Biden do the same....?

And he had personal gain involved...

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jrock2310 said:

In this case its odd that we even need more witnesses to testify.  Trump admitted to it.  The transcript confirms it.  Mulvaney admitted to it.  Two, first-hand witnesses were on the call.  Multitude of other second-hand witnesses testimonies concur.  And the whistleblowers initial concern.

 

Outside of politics, this would be an open & shut case. 

 

Their is no crime that happened other than the non prosecution of career politicians who are skimming money from various foreign policy social engineering give aways to their personal bank acconts, Trumps crime is working for the taxpayer-voter and democrats should have been making the 2020 campaign about differences in policy without all the partisan impeachment personal attacks and the ignoring presidential orders like a permanent socialist monarchy etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NeoConvict said:

Trump got caught asking for a criminal investigation into Joe Bidens abuse of office. You always seem to leave that part off. He wasn't asking for Biden pee tapes, he wasn't asking for political dirt. He asked that a potential crime be investigated. 

trump got caught in a shakedown which explains why he ordered the eyewitnesses to not talk. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Z09 said:

And didn't Biden do the same....?

And he had personal gain involved...

On a scale of 1 to 10,

SO WHAT?

 

You will need to elect him before you can impeach him.

 

If that was the REAL motivation,

there are government agencies that do that investigating.

If Trump had done it ABOVE BOARD,

we wouldn't be talking about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, peter45 said:

On a scale of 1 to 10,

SO WHAT?

 

You will need to elect him before you can impeach him.

 

If that was the REAL motivation,

there are government agencies that do that investigating.

If Trump had done it ABOVE BOARD,

we wouldn't be talking about it.

So what?

 

Joe Biden threatens to hold aid to a country for one reason...

He wants the prosecutor fired that is investigating the company where is son is on the board of directors...

 

So what?

 

Change the Biden to a (R) and you'd flip out

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jrock2310 said:

In this case its odd that we even need more witnesses to testify.  Trump admitted to it.  The transcript confirms it.  Mulvaney admitted to it.  Two, first-hand witnesses were on the call.  Multitude of other second-hand witnesses testimonies concur.  And the whistleblowers initial concern.

 

Outside of politics, this would be an open & shut case. 

 

I got a better idea.

Let's just drop all this shi't.  And all of us, and I mean ALL, concentrate on solving this nation's problems.

Wouldn't that bring more happiness, satisfaction, and prosperity to all of us.....both Dem and GOP?                🍹.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, fourputt said:

Wrong again idiot

 

Trump has a right to investigate the Biden Crime Family.

Why?  Because that is the job of the FBI.  Who is the head of the FBI?  The Commander in Chief.

That is why he has a right to investigate the Bidens......anywhere, anytime.       Trump isn't going

anywhere.....because he has done nothing wrong.               😎

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NeoConvict said:

Agree. The debate should be regarding the legality of Trump's actions. The facts are not in dispute. 

That’s the problem w/ the system.  The law doesn’t reach the top of the mountain unless the senate agrees.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chongo said:

 

Their is no crime that happened other than the non prosecution of career politicians who are skimming money from various foreign policy social engineering give aways to their personal bank acconts, Trumps crime is working for the taxpayer-voter and democrats should have been making the 2020 campaign about differences in policy without all the partisan impeachment personal attacks and the ignoring presidential orders like a permanent socialist monarchy etc.

Ok boomer

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NeoConvict said:

I have no problem with a long drawn out trial in the Senate. Let's hear from Bolton and Mulvaney. Let's put crackhead hunter Biden and the whistleblower on the stand. All for it in fact. Do Democrats really think only witnesses that could be detrimental to Trump would be called? They need to be careful what they wish for, they just might get it.

And Nuland...who has now been subpoenaed. ...

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Taipan said:

 

I got a better idea.

Let's just drop all this shi't.  And all of us, and I mean ALL, concentrate on solving this nation's problems.

Wouldn't that bring more happiness, satisfaction, and prosperity to all of us.....both Dem and GOP?                🍹.

500+ bills laying on cocaine mitch’s desk.

 

He can take them up any time now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, peter45 said:

On a scale of 1 to 10,

SO WHAT?

 

You will need to elect him before you can impeach him.

 

If that was the REAL motivation,

there are government agencies that do that investigating.

If Trump had done it ABOVE BOARD,

we wouldn't be talking about it.

 

"We must impeach him 1st......before we can figure out

what crime he committed,....to be impeach for".             

                                                                                        Nancy Pelosi

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Z09 said:

So what?

 

Joe Biden threatens to hold aid to a country for one reason...

He wants the prosecutor fired that is investigating the company where is son is on the board of directors...

 

So what?

 

Change the Biden to a (R) and you'd flip out

You do realize that there is a section of the Constitution that says the POTUS shall be removed if he is too stupid to do the job correctly.

Pumpkin head didn't used the correct procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, harryramar said:

trump got caught in a shakedown which explains why he ordered the eyewitnesses to not talk. 

Hunter Biden has until the 23rd of December to divulge his Financials in his palimony suit surrounding his illigetimate child with a stripper.....

The sky is literally falling for the Dems....LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said:

Hunter Biden has until the 23rd of December to divulge his Financials in his palimony suit surrounding his illigetimate child with a stripper.....

The sky is literally falling for the Dems....LOL.

So Hunter Biden will be impeached?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jrock2310 said:

No.

 

Ukraine got a billion dollar aid package.

The Biden Crime Family got 3.15 million.  Personal aggrandizement.  "Pay-to-Play".

Corruption to the bone.   At the highest levels.   Abuse of power.  Extortion.  Quid-pro-quo.

 

"If you don't fire that prosecutor who is investigating my son, within the next 6hrs., 

then you are not getting the 1 billion dollars.  And sumbitch, what do you know......

he was fired within 6hrs."

                                                Joe Biden( on tape).

 

I rest my case.               🍹.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Taipan said:

 

Ukraine got a billion dollar aid package.

The Biden Crime Family got 3.15 million.  Personal aggrandizement.  "Pay-to-Play".

Corruption to the bone.   At the highest levels.   Abuse of power.  Extortion.  Quid-pro-quo.

 

"If you don't fire that prosecutor who is investigating my son, within the next 6hrs., 

then you are not getting the 1 billion dollars.  And sumbitch, what do you know......

he was fired within 6hrs."

                                                Joe Biden( on tape).

 

I rest my case.               🍹.

Does this mean that you are not going to vote for Joe?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...