Jump to content

Lisa Page Email Shows Direct Evidence of Investigative Leaking and Bias IG Horowitz Said He Could Not Find…


Recommended Posts

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/20/lisa-page-email-shows-direct-evidence-of-investigative-leaking-and-bias-ig-horowitz-said-he-could-not-find/

 

Quote

 

Lisa Page Email Shows Direct Evidence of Investigative Leaking and Bias IG Horowitz Said He Could Not Find…


by sundance


Within the small group conducting the 2016 FBI investigation of the Trump campaign, the Steele Dossier was called “Crown Material“.  A name relating to Christopher Steele’s British intelligence position. [James Comey testimony to congress]


crown-material-comey-testimony-v2.jpg


The “Crown Material” has become more interesting recently against the backdrop of U.S. Attorney John Durham seeking the documents and communication from former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey [SEE HERE] where John Brennan wanted the Crown Material (Steele Dossier) included the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.


However, there’s a coded email from Lisa Page, on January 10th, 2017, that might prove to be even more valuable for Mr. Durham as he investigates a possible conspiracy therein:


page-email-crown-material.jpg
[SOURCE: Page 365 of massive document dump FBI pdf]


Note the highlighted box text in the email from Peter Strzok to members of the small group.


“CNN update – Per Rich, CNN to publish C material today betweeen 4 and 5″


The “C material” is a reference to “Crown Material”, and when put into context of the date and email participants this tells a remarkably explosive story.


FBI lawyer Lisa Page is forwarding an origination email from Peter Strzok and informing the FBI small group: Peter Strzok, Bill Priestap, Jonathan Moffa and Jennifer Boone, that “We have lots of details from [Mike] Kortan” for a briefing at 3:45pm on January 10th.


“Kortan” is FBI Asst. Director of Media Comms Michael Kortan, who appears in multiple emails and text messages coordinating communication with the small group media allies.


However, for the context of this specific email, Peter Strzok has initiated contact with CNN to leak a story… and Strzok is informing the group that CNN will publish the “C Material”, or a story predicated on the Steele Dossier, on January 10th, 2017, between 4 and 5 pm.   That is Jake Tappers’ hour for broadcast.


What “C Material” did FBI Agent Peter Strzok leak to CNN, that FBI Spokesperson Mike Kortan confirmed for the FBI?


Here’s the January 10th, 2017, story from Tapper.  WATCH:

 


tapper-scuitto-perez-bernstein-clapper-c


page-email-crown-material.jpg


.


There is no doubt the FBI small group shared the information about the Steele Dossier with the CNN stenographers in a collaborative effort to generate the illusion of enhanced credibility for the Steele Dossier; a document they knew was demonstrably fraudulent, yet they relied upon it for the Carter Page FISA application.


That would be a clear “conspiracy”.


I find it curious that IG Horowitz could not find this email in his latest investigation.


Additionally, the Lisa Page FBI email, highlighting an internal “conspiracy”, becomes even more interesting when overlaying the third conspiracy referral previously mentioned by Devin Nunes:


The third conspiracy referral is less specific and pertains to evidence collected that shows a small group of government officials engaged in “global classified intelligence leaks” to the U.S. media and other entities and/or persons. (link)


My hunch is that email from Lisa Page is part of the evidence Nunes collected to show how the FBI manufactured “global classified intelligence leaks” to U.S. media.


April 7th, 2019:

 


.


On the conspiracy to manipulate the intelligence apparatus. That angle will be interesting to watch because it goes to the origin of activity in early 2016. The issues around how Crossfire Hurricane was officially started… and, more importantly, the earlier use of intelligence assets: Joseph Mifsud (Maltese Professor, FBI/CIA asset), Alexander Downer (Australian Diplomat), Stephan Halper (U.K. Academic and FBI/CIA asset), or Charles Tawil (Israeli CIA asset) to make contact with George Papadopoulos, Mike Flynn or Carter Page. Those contacts were covert and (un)official government missions for the weaponized U.S. intelligence apparatus.  This is where John Brennan is center-stage.


The last referral relating to specific leaks of classified intelligence – sounds like Nunes is submitting a classified list of only a few people who had access to the direct intelligence product that was leaked…. Cue the Lisa Page email.


page-email-crown-material.jpg


nunes-kortan-baker-strzok-ohr-comey-mcca

 


This is a SEDITIOUS conspiracy, folks.


Penalty … 20 years in prison.


And I think Durham has them in his sights.


Hope Lisa likes prison …


evil-smiley-275.jpg


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, neue regel said:

Just to be clear, Horowitz DIDNT come to the conclusion there was no bias. 

 

Really?

 

Senator Feinstein questioned him under oath.

 

She said "Your report states you didn’t find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation played a role.

 

He responded “That’s correct.” 

 

Then Feinstein said "And you didn’t find a 'deep state' conspiracy against candidate or President Trump.

 

And Horowitz replied “We found no bias.

 

Just to be clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Really?

 

Senator Feinstein questioned him under oath.

 

She said "Your report states you didn’t find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation played a role.

 

He responded “That’s correct.” 

 

Then Feinstein said "And you didn’t find a 'deep state' conspiracy against candidate or President Trump.

 

And Horowitz replied “We found no bias.

 

Just to be clear.


Apparently he wasn’t clear enough in his testimony. I look forward to Durham putting a finer point on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, neue regel said:

 

He came to the conclusion there was no evidence that indicated bias.

That is good enuf for me.

He kicked you nutters in the balls.

 

He cleared Lisa Page.  The whole premise of this topic is FALSE.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeAChooser said:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/12/20/lisa-page-email-shows-direct-evidence-of-investigative-leaking-and-bias-ig-horowitz-said-he-could-not-find/

 


This is a SEDITIOUS conspiracy, folks.


Penalty … 20 years in prison.


And I think Durham has them in his sights.


Hope Lisa likes prison …


evil-smiley-275.jpg


 

How much do you want to bet the Obama administration ASKED these foreign entities to spy on Trump campaign associates?  Talk about inviting foreign interference in a U.S. presidential election.  Since Trump is constantly being accused of this by Dems, it's a good bet Dems are guilty of the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, neue regel said:

Apparently he wasn’t clear enough in his testimony.

 

No, he was plenty clear in his testimony.  

 

He tried to lie but then Durham came out and challenged him.  

 

After that he tried to walk back his testimony.  

 

Horowitz tried to protect the coup members and should now end up in jail along with the rest of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, rightturnsonly said:

How much do you want to bet the Obama administration ASKED these foreign entities to spy on Trump campaign associates?  Talk about inviting foreign interference in a U.S. presidential election.  Since Trump is constantly being accused of this by Dems, it's a good bet Dems are guilty of the same thing.

Lol bar already tried to get the British to lie and they refused. They are plenty pissed off about it now. In addition pompeo interviewed the CIA analysts and could find no fault in their work. You're out to lunch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THAT was a narrative LIE brought to you by the lying leftist media to. try and minimize the damage from the IG report. 

 

It liberally vindicates Trump, Nunes and everyone else. 

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/horowitz-pushes-back-on-claim-that-he-exonerated-fbi-of-political-bias-we-did-not-reach-that-conclusion/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...