Jump to content

PBS Reporter Defends Karlan’s Attack on Barron Trump; GOP Is ‘Seizing on’ It Listen to the Article!


Recommended Posts

During a break in Wednesday’s impeachment hearing, PBS NewsHour correspondent, MSNBC political analyst, and upcoming 2020 Democratic presidential debate co-moderator Yamiche Alcindor bolstered her role a spin agent for the far-left when she explained away far-left Stanford University Professor Pamela Karlan’s supposed quip involving President Trump’s 13-year-old son Barron (which she apologized for a few hours later).

 

Alcindor’s analysis began with a variation of the word “seize”

 

What we see now are Republicans seizing on a key moment. It’s when Pamela Harlan — she a professor who is testifying and democratic witness — she said that president trump could name his son Barron but could not make him a baron. She was referring to the fact she thinks President Trump at times can act like a king because he's abusing power but she was also making a joke about the fact that the President’s 13 year old son is named baron and Barron, of course, is a noble title and she was basically making the case that he cannot be made into nobility and he won’t inherit essentially the presidency. 

 

Read article in it's entirety: https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2019/12/04/grotesque-pbs-reporter-defends-karlans-attack-barron-trump-gop

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Old Mack said:

During a break in Wednesday’s impeachment hearing, PBS NewsHour correspondent, MSNBC political analyst, and upcoming 2020 Democratic presidential debate co-moderator Yamiche Alcindor bolstered her role a spin agent for the far-left when she explained away far-left Stanford University Professor Pamela Karlan’s supposed quip involving President Trump’s 13-year-old son Barron (which she apologized for a few hours later).

 

Alcindor’s analysis began with a variation of the word “seize”

 

What we see now are Republicans seizing on a key moment. It’s when Pamela Harlan — she a professor who is testifying and democratic witness — she said that president trump could name his son Barron but could not make him a baron. She was referring to the fact she thinks President Trump at times can act like a king because he's abusing power but she was also making a joke about the fact that the President’s 13 year old son is named baron and Barron, of course, is a noble title and she was basically making the case that he cannot be made into nobility and he won’t inherit essentially the presidency. 

 

Read article in it's entirety: https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2019/12/04/grotesque-pbs-reporter-defends-karlans-attack-barron-trump-gop

 

 

 

PBS is trying to deflect from Karlan's big mistake.

 

Did the PBS employee explain why Karlan had to apologize if she thinks it was OK for Karlan to say what she did?

 

Nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...