Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Phoenix68

HOUSE IMPEACHMENT HEARING; December 4, 2019

Recommended Posts

but..but..but......the stock market....the stock market....the stock market....

 

 

 

(and Trillions of GOP RECORD DEBT with Tax Cuts to the Corporations and Top 1% to buy their Stock Back)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, king of the county said:

Any fireworks yet?

Debbie Lesko is traumatized by constitutional scholars articulating the legal basis for impeachment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reschenthaler arguing that Republican lockstep voting against impeachment is somehow exculpatory. Not exactly a robust legal argument. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turley says more information needed but didn’t question why administration won’t provide the requested information. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

Who?

Arizona 8th district representative. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Experts arguing that there is no legal basis for administration wholesale refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas.

 

There is an article right there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Olivaw said:

Experts arguing that there is no legal basis for administration wholesale refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas.

 

There is an article right there. 

Take it to court 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

Take it to court 

I think it’s in the works.  Doesn’t preclude impeachment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boy, if Kelly Armstrong was my defense attorney, I’d be looking for a new attorney. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NEXT ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT: A pattern of obstruction of justice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT: WITNESS INTIMIDATION

Trump’s own tweets are evidentiary. 
Letter instructing officials not to testify is evidentiary. 
 

Prof. Gerhardt: It is impeachable. 
Prof. Turley: Nixon tried to restrict access to evidence and lost in court. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 years ago at 8:45 pm I was made aware of a prediction made back in early 1600's what I knew would change human conditioning brains to mind social narratives since the dawn of civilization.

 

From Late november 2006 to  8:45 pm December 4, 2007 I started an idea of a bloodless Armageddon and about 2 years ago I made up a better name for it, Intellectual Armageddon.

 

Passive instinctive resistance working against passive aggressors getting others to do all the fighting for them protecting the hopes now isn't eternity and life canot be limited to self contained now as spaced apart conception to decomposed.

 

So many ways to cheat natural point of displacement but no lifetime ever escapes their position as part of the population by projecting their ideas into next generations from now on.  History is kept to keep tract of what never fails to fool each ancestor added to the ever changing populaiton from now on.

 

Only one way to correct the compounding human error practiced for over 400 reproductive cycles amounting to the population of over 7.5 billion humans occupying space here.

 

Stop pretending now isn't eternity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...