Jump to content
leftwinger

Nadler calls Trump’s bluff

Recommended Posts

When the House Intelligence Committee held depositions of key witnesses, President Trump’s lawyers cried: “Unfair! Secret hearings!” In fact, a slew of Republicans had the right to ask questions, though some chose not to attend. When the hearings moved to a public phase, the White House hollered: “Unfair! Trump’s lawyer isn’t present!” When the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), invited Trump’s lawyers to attend, the response was: “Unfair! We’re not coming!”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/02/nadler-calls-trumps-bluff/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"What is unfair is that Trump and his lawyers have given up any semblance of fidelity to facts, have smeared distinguished witnesses, attempted to intimidate the whistleblower (and put his or her safety in jeopardy), hurled baseless accusations at House Democrats investigating presidential wrongdoing and, worst of all, obstructed Congress by refusing to produce documents and blocking critical witnesses from testifying."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Constitution does not anywhere state that the president gets to decide what is fair or unfair. He can present himself as a witness or he can send a lawyer to represent him. This is not a trial, it is an impeachment which is like a grand jury, and the rules foe a trial do not apply.

 

It is idiotic for him to refuse to send a lawyer and then claim that  the process is somehow unfair because he has no legal representation.

 

Trump is a dolt. He broke the law and considers that he has the right to get away with it.

SCREW Trump!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

The Constitution does not anywhere state that the president gets to decide what is fair or unfair. He can present himself as a witness or he can send a lawyer to represent him. This is not a trial, it is an impeachment which is like a grand jury, and the rules foe a trial do not apply.

 

It is idiotic for him to refuse to send a lawyer and then claim that  the process is somehow unfair because he has no legal representation.

 

Trump is a dolt. He broke the law and considers that he has the right to get away with it.

SCREW Trump!

 

 

Chairman Nadler called Trump's bluff. He knew Trump was a whining coward. Now we have it on record.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, king of the county said:

To see what he says about meeting with the leaker 

 

What leaker? Try to say something without needing 18 posts of back and forth. Okay?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, king of the county said:

I can’t wait fir Adam schiff to testify 

Nonetheless, wait you shall.

Schiff has done a good job of revealing Trump's crimes thus far. And he is not being impeached.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, XavierOnassis said:

Nonetheless, wait you shall.

Schiff has done a good job of revealing Trump's crimes thus far. And he is not being impeached.

 

Everything but the facts for Trump supporters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, king of the county said:

To see what he says about meeting with the leaker 

There was no "leaker". There was a patriotic American who recognized that the president has committed a crime, and reported it, as his oath of office required.

 

There was one whistleblower, and what he claimed happened has been proven by several people who did hear the famous phone call and verified Trump's Bribery attempt.

 

Trump denies the truth.

Anyone who believes that Trump did not commit a crime is a fool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I missed Nadler. I was wrong. Schiff has eclipsed Nadler. No matter what Nadler does he will never beat the summation of the Intelligence Committee investigation by Schiff. Schiff was tearing up while his eyes were bugging out. Great entertainment! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, johndnorth said:

I missed Nadler. I was wrong. Schiff has eclipsed Nadler. No matter what Nadler does he will never beat the summation of the Intelligence Committee investigation

 

Which is what was supposed to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, king of the county said:

I can’t wait fir Adam schiff to testify 

His very presence with the microphone conducting hearings is his testimony.    He explains the Trump crimes almost every time he is having a hearing.    What is the point in any one asking him questions to make the same explanations?        

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Nonetheless, wait you shall.

Schiff has done a good job of revealing Trump's crimes thus far. And he is not being impeached.

Maybe you can refresh our memories.....what crimes would that be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dr. Joe B. said:

His very presence with the microphone conducting hearings is his testimony.    He explains the Trump crimes almost every time he is having a hearing.    What is the point in any one asking him questions to make the same explanations?        

He hasn't explained a damn thing to normal thinkers.....seems to have swayed a lot of brain dead liberal democrats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

There was no "leaker". There was a patriotic American who recognized that the president has committed a crime, and reported it, as his oath of office required.

 

There was one whistleblower, and what he claimed happened has been proven by several people who did hear the famous phone call and verified Trump's Bribery attempt.

 

Trump denies the truth.

Anyone who believes that Trump did not commit a crime is a fool.

Can you tell us what crime he committed without the "he heard someone say" or "everyone knows", bullshyte.

You're as pathetic as that moron slideman who pasted a whole page of nothing crap about Mueller's "findings".

You people are a sad joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RebelGator said:

Maybe you can refresh our memories.....what crimes would that be?

Attempted bribery with the intent of giving himself an advantage in his reelection by  bribing a citizen of foreign  nation, you sad, ignorant, reptilian loser.

Someone ought to smack you upside the head with a large, deceased mackerel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Attempted bribery with the intent of giving himself an advantage in his reelection by  bribing a citizen of foreign  nation, you sad, ignorant, reptilian loser.

Someone ought to smack you upside the head with a large, deceased mackerel.

That's only in your drug addled mind, school teacher.

That's simply not true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

Attempted bribery with the intent of giving himself an advantage in his reelection by  bribing a citizen of foreign  nation, you sad, ignorant, reptilian loser.

Someone ought to smack you upside the head with a large, deceased mackerel.

 

Bravo! Well said. Especially the mackerel part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, leftwinger said:

When the House Intelligence Committee held depositions of key witnesses, President Trump’s lawyers cried: “Unfair! Secret hearings!” In fact, a slew of Republicans had the right to ask questions, though some chose not to attend. When the hearings moved to a public phase, the White House hollered: “Unfair! Trump’s lawyer isn’t present!” When the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), invited Trump’s lawyers to attend, the response was: “Unfair! We’re not coming!”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/02/nadler-calls-trumps-bluff/

Trump tell the truth. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

The Constitution does not anywhere state that the president gets to decide what is fair or unfair.

 

Does that include when he signs / doesn't sign a bill into law ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, leftwinger said:

 

Bravo! Well said. Especially the mackerel part.

Reptilian Loser and Kingaroo like to "play dumb".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, king of the county said:

I can’t wait fir Adam schiff to testify 

so you see nothing wrong with the repubs wanting Schiff to testify but not the crooks who were there and aided and abetted dirtydon, like poopeeo, rudy and mickey?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...