Jump to content
Guests feel free to register and post ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS FEEL FREE TO REGISTER AND POST ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS ×

Liberalism Versus Conservatism


Recommended Posts

Do you know the secret about MSNBC news?   If you don't then  you are missing something very important.   MSNBC gives all of the best News stories  to Rachel Maddow first and then to O'Donnell next.   The reason for this is obvious.  Rachel is an incredible explainer of complex big news stories.   O'Donnell matches her ability to a great degree.  But Rachel is very special.   You always go away from her program knowing the best news stories told by the best political commentator in history.   

 

So, start listening to Rachel and Lawrence every day during the week and sometimes both do special commentary on weekend.   Hannity is a first class nothing ball who believes he has a divining rod for finding the make-believe mythical 'liberal' and 'conservative'.   Tucker is as bad at telling political stories as he was as a dancer on Dancing with The Stars.  Poo on those  two.  They have it coming.  They are destroying Fox with their nothing burger comments.  

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Joe B. said:

Do you know the secret about MSNBC news?   If you don't then  you are missing something very important.   MSNBC gives all of the best News stories  to Rachel Maddow first and then to O'Donnell next.   The reason for this is obvious.  Rachel is an incredible explainer of complex big news stories.   O'Donnell matches her ability to a great degree.  But Rachel is very special.   You always go away from her program knowing the best news stories told by the best political commentator in history.   

 

So, start listening to Rachel and Lawrence every day during the week and sometimes both do special commentary on weekend.   Hannity is a first class nothing ball who believes he has a divining rod for finding the make-believe mythical 'liberal' and 'conservative'.   Tucker is as bad at telling political stories as he was as a dancer on Dancing with The Stars.  Poo on those  two.  They have it coming.  They are destroying Fox with their nothing burger comments.  

 

I have one complaint about Rachel ---- she talks too fast  But otherwise, you are right

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr.joeb is not a professional psychologist but he knows enough about that subject to understand what motivates many of us.   There are two very basic modes of thinking that everyone seems to own without knowing they are forming opinions based on  these two modes of mentality.    Psychologist label these modes of mentality as Sublimation and Transference.  

 

Sublimation is characterized as a person's hostility is covered up by innocent jokes attacking others.   Also sublimation takes the form of covering up hostility with fake nicety.   Dr.joeb confesses that he is a guilty frequently of covering up internal hostility at a a viewer with innocent joking.   For example for a long  time Dr.joeb used the comical action of dunk tanks to innocently joke away a grievance with a viewer.   He apologizes to any one who was offended by his dunk tank joking.   But he basically is sincere in his attitude towards others when he behaves gracious to  them with friendly words.   

 

Transference behavior is much more subtle and can be damaging to a person's relationships with others unknowingly.   Transference comes about from a negative experience that colors their relationship with similar recurring confrontations with others who just do not understand why they are the object of hostility.   The best way to describe the mental mechanism is by an example.   

 

Dr.joeb has a close relationship with a female member of his family that was infected badly by Transference.   This woman was assaulted by a man in her early young years.   Later she married the love of her life and had a child.   Life went well until the male love of her life left her alone with her baby for another young lady.  This event set up a Transference of that horrible life's event to where any woman who caused her to lose a man out of close relationship to her became evil even if the unwitting women who became the recipient of her lost man sincerely wanted to have a close relationship with the women living the transference mentality.   I.e. the transference caused much contrived hatred towards the woman who was instrumental in extracting the man out of a major role in her life.   This syndrome is the basis for mother-in-law hostile behavior towards women who take their sons away.   The transference pattern can and does persist sometimes for the whole life of the person living the Transference.   Any women or man who is perceived as taking someone away from their close relationship with a loved one will be the object of their scorn and hatred based on imagined evil acts of the object of their transference without knowing the mental state that causes their transference of hatred towards the innocent person who does not understand why they are being scorned.   

 

Do you see how Transference might be a powerful factor in hatred being expressed in politics?    The mentality of Transference could be the main basis for political hostility towards others perceived as "liberals' or 'Rightees".   Dr.joeb tries actively to not acquire hostility towards viewers by Transference.   It is difficult sometimes to avoid Transference.   Dr.joeb tries to understand others based on objective facts and not the wild imagined Transference mentality.   

 

Dr. joeb with this message has taken a page out of the book of Rachel Maddow who is remarkable at avoiding negative Transference.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Psychology and Political Science are inseparable.   Knowing what motivates oneself is just as important as the motivation.   Do you know why you are motivated for your political beliefs?   This is the key to understanding ones emotional make-up in every aspect of a happy successful life.   Just start meditating on those facts of life that make you think the way you do.   Politics is just one important area that ties to ones feelings.  Why do you prefer driving a Toyota or Honda over a US built car for example.   Dr.joeb has never purchased anything other than an American made car.   His deceased father worked for a division of GM.   He w as also a Union Steward.  Dr.joeb has always favored the Democrat as his voting record corroborates.   However, now he knows why he has that state of mind...especially in view of the mess made by Bush Jr. and Trump administrations. 

 

Go forth and think of why you have beliefs about most anything but especially about politics because who leads the country politically affects everyone's life whether they like Democrats or Republicans.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr.joeb Will be 82 tomorrow Oct 21.   He will have a very happy birthday blessed with good health and love in his life.   Dr.joeb hopes to foster the same happiness to all others.  Truth marches on with or without us.   Conveying  truth is the only gift that Dr.joeb has to offer to any one.   It is much easier to give than receive.   Receiving truth means confessing and repenting often.   Willing to learn is the most important virtue any one can have.  

 

May the spirits bless all viewers of this topic giving a mindset ready to receive and accept truth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr.joeb is working hard on a paper that basically is a how to make a universe.   Sounds grandiose but it is about time someone came up with an article on how the great spirit constructed our universe.   The article when finished will give an overall view of the strategy the great spirit used to build our universe.   The title for this paper will be something like "Quarks to Infinite dimensionality".   quarks make protons. Protons make neutrons.   All atoms in the universe are made that way from quarks.  And all of that quark business happens in an infinite dimensional universe.   This article will apply the 2N color theorem published by Dr.joeb some time ago on both the micro and macro way of viewing the universe.   The 2N color theorem characterizes the limitations of possible adjacency on both the micro and macro way of viewing the universe.   It is the ideal way tol capture the big picture of our universe's construction.   

 

Since all politics relates to our universe this paper applies readily to politics and government.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Dr. Joe B. said:

Dr.joeb is working hard on a paper that basically is a how to make a universe.   Sounds grandiose but it is about time someone came up with an article on how the great spirit constructed our universe.   The article when finished will give an overall view of the strategy the great spirit used to build our universe.   The title for this paper will be something like "Quarks to Infinite dimensionality".   quarks make protons. Protons make neutrons.   All atoms in the universe are made that way from quarks.  And all of that quark business happens in an infinite dimensional universe.   This article will apply the 2N color theorem published by Dr.joeb some time ago on both the micro and macro way of viewing the universe.   The 2N color theorem characterizes the limitations of possible adjacency on both the micro and macro way of viewing the universe.   It is the ideal way tol capture the big picture of our universe's construction.   

 

Since all politics relates to our universe this paper applies readily to politics and government.    

At this time we have too many rock-head politicians who do not want to see the whole picture of our being a small contributor to the make up and safety of our universe.  Climate change is on a path to destroy our small contribution to the universe.   One Democrat and the whole GOP group of senators are ignoring the most important issue of our times to save our planet.   That is the motivation for Dr.joeb composing his new research article.   He wishes to get our politicians all giving the highest priority to keeping our planet inhabitable.   We cannot sustain our planet by ignoring it any more than we can keep using anything without maintaining it.    

 

Do you understand that any amount we set aside for planet safety is cheap compared to the consequences of global warming?    We cannot afford  to not addressing the issue of maintaining our planet habitable.   It does not matter whether we allot 3.5 trillion or 10 trillion to saving our planet.   That number is all but meaningless.   The world economy must absorb the cost of saving our planet regardless of what number of trillions is allotted.   Such an allotment only means that we are willing to allot any amount needed to fix the continuing damage being done by fire, hurricanes, flooding, and any natural disasters caused by global warming.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...