Jump to content
Skans

Adam Schiff Screws Up By Officially Releasing The Whistleblower's Name - Eric Ciaramella, And Then, Pulling It Back...

Recommended Posts

On 11/7/2019 at 11:18 AM, Skans said:

Most of the dumb leftists on this forum have no idea about what just happened

right. File with Nunes memo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, Republicans. The whistleblower’s identity no longer matters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/08/sorry-republicans-whistleblowers-identity-no-longer-matters/

The whistleblower was the equivalent of someone who made an anonymous call to the police saying that there’s a robbery going on at the First National Bank. Once the police get there and catch a bunch of guys wearing masks and holding sacks of money, it doesn’t matter who made the call or what their motives were. Maybe it was a passerby, or maybe it was the estranged wife of the leader of the gang. It doesn’t change the fact that the bank was robbed and we know who the robbers are.

Furthermore, just about everything the whistleblower alleged has been corroborated. The whistleblower accurately described the call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, the efforts to keep the call transcript concealed, the fact that military aid to Ukraine was upheld at the president’s direction, the involvement of Giuliani in pressuring the Ukrainian government and the discomfort of American diplomats, among other things.

All this has been confirmed by Trump’s words and the testimony of administration officials and career civil servants. We don’t need to know the whistleblower’s identity to assess their credibility, because we aren’t relying on their credibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

Pray for the sanity and education of them as well. They are crazy and loons  and ignorant as dodos.

I'd pray for you DickHead but I doubt it would do much good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Skans said:

I don't get you!  Why are you having such a difficult time finding Eric Ciaramella's name on the  transcript, page 236?  Since you didn't like the screen shot reference I gave you (biased Conservative site, blather), I provided you the entire transcript!    https://www.scribd.com/document/433753426/William-Taylor-testimony

Many thanks.

Im impressed you have such a small Blaze life to get to  p236.

SO p236

"does the name eric ring a bell

No"

THATS IT?

This is identifying him as the whistleblower??

Please let me know where they identifying him.

They never mention whistleblower?

All this from our cult boy who loves our teen peeker, vagina grabber and liar extraordinaire!! 

236-3d3f472845.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, slideman said:

Sorry, Republicans. The whistleblower’s identity no longer matters.

 

Schiff outed him.  Outed a CIA agent spying on the Trump Administration.  Schiff should go to prison; but so should Eric-The-Traitor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Skans said:

Schiff outed him.  Outed a CIA agent spying on the Trump Administration.  Schiff should go to prison; but so should Eric-The-Traitor.

 

you're an idiot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Skans said:

Schiff outed him.  Outed a CIA agent spying on the Trump Administration.  Schiff should go to prison; but so should Eric-The-Traitor.

this is outing??

Wow, keep reading the Blaze

Any proof he was a CIA agent? (except blaze, gateway pundit?

Hilarious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Skans said:

Schiff outed him.  Outed a CIA agent spying on the Trump Administration.  Schiff should go to prison; but so should Eric-The-Traitor.

Feds shown up at your house yet for spewing ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, leftwinger said:

 

you're an idiot

Schiff is the idiot.  He outed a CIA agent.   One that was spying on Trump. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Skans said:

Schiff is the idiot.  He outed a CIA agent.   One that was spying on Trump. 

Where is the link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Gavin1966 said:

Many thanks.

Im impressed you have such a small Blaze life to get to  p236.

SO p236

"does the name eric ring a bell

No"

THATS IT?

This is identifying him as the whistleblower??

Please let me know where they identifying him.

They never mention whistleblower?

All this from our cult boy who loves our teen peeker, vagina grabber and liar extraordinaire!! 

236-3d3f472845.jpg

Who is asking the questions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Skans said:

Schiff is the idiot.  He outed a CIA agent.   One that was spying on Trump. 

 

Stay tuned next week for the public impeachment hearing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gavin1966 said:

this is outing??

Wow, keep reading the Blaze

Any proof he was a CIA agent? (except blaze, gateway pundit?

Hilarious

No.  You go find your own proof from now on.  You repeatedly ask for links and proof.   I repeatedly provided you with both, which you never acknowledged.  Done with you - go do your own research.  If you do, you might just learn something. If you don't - it won't change the facts of what I am reporting, you simply remain ignorant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Skans said:

No.  You go find your own proof from now on.  You repeatedly ask for links and proof.   I repeatedly provided you with both, which you never acknowledged.  Done with you - go do your own research.  If you do, you might just learn something. If you don't - it won't change the facts of what I am reporting, you simply remain ignorant. 

I did acknowledge and thanked you.

I thought I posted your famous p236.

"Eric ring a bell"

No

This is divulging the WB name??

WB never mentioned in your page

Must have taken immense SS commie time to read to there

Or did we just swallow The Blaze opinion?

Here's more reading material for you

Hilarious how we pick one example and never mention our pres thousands of lies

 

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

Thanks for posting though.

Its interesting how we just regurgitate points we believe in.

Real Roger Aeyles - "our job is not to report facts, just to republish what our readers already believe.

See the doc?

Guess not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, slideman said:

Sorry, Republicans. The whistleblower’s identity no longer matters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/08/sorry-republicans-whistleblowers-identity-no-longer-matters/

The whistleblower was the equivalent of someone who made an anonymous call to the police saying that there’s a robbery going on at the First National Bank. Once the police get there and catch a bunch of guys wearing masks and holding sacks of money, it doesn’t matter who made the call or what their motives were. Maybe it was a passerby, or maybe it was the estranged wife of the leader of the gang. It doesn’t change the fact that the bank was robbed and we know who the robbers are.

Furthermore, just about everything the whistleblower alleged has been corroborated. The whistleblower accurately described the call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, the efforts to keep the call transcript concealed, the fact that military aid to Ukraine was upheld at the president’s direction, the involvement of Giuliani in pressuring the Ukrainian government and the discomfort of American diplomats, among other things.

All this has been confirmed by Trump’s words and the testimony of administration officials and career civil servants. We don’t need to know the whistleblower’s identity to assess their credibility, because we aren’t relying on their credibility.

If the "whistleblower" was a Trump supporter and a dye in the wool Republican, and had followed protocol in reporting to the right person first, then it would have had some credibility.

 

But this "spy" hates President Trump and will do anything to remove him from office.  Not a good start on credibility.

 

As it stands, he has no credibility, even if he knew some stuff.  So what if the President of the United States called a president of another country.

 

If he was trying to hide the transcript he did not do a very good job, since he released it to the public.  And now everyone in the world can know what he talked about to zelensky.

 

The military aid had already been held up and zelensky didn't even know about it for a month after the call, so if Trump was putting pressure on him, he didn't do a very good job. 

As a side note, he should have taken the approach that biden took when he threatened to withhold $1,000,000,000 of aid if the AG investigating his son was not fired, and then he gave them 6 hours to do it or else.  Now that is how you pressure another country to do what you want.  

Did the "whistleblower" report this clear quid pro quo and abuse of power?    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.  

Did any of the career diplomats who were concerned with Trump report this clear and present danger to America?   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

Why not?  Because they were dems and the president and the vice president were dems.  That's the difference.

 

Giuliani found out just what he needed to find out.  biden and son and hillarious clit had fingerprints all over ukraine and the 2016 elections, trying to defeat Trump.  The career diplomats would not have done this investigation because they are dems and hate Trump, so Trump sent his own envoy and accomplished what he wanted.  When the documents that Giuliani received from ukraine come out, it will be damaging to the dems.  So the career diplomats are enraged that Trump went over their heads and sent Giuliani.  Good job Trump.

 

So the person dressed up like a "whistleblower" gave no information that was informative, and what he did was open up a can of whoopy for his dem friends.  Because now, biden and the diplomats and Giuliani will all come before some court and let us all know just want really happened on July 25th.  Can you spell "boomerang"

 

Oh, and you are right, it is not necessary to know who this person is, but now that we do, aday shifty is in trouble.  He bungled the whole thing from the start to the end.  stupid assss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice the cons try and accuse the democrats of the same thing Trump does. It's quite entertaining 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, leftwinger said:

 

Why don't you tell us why Trump does not deserve to be impeached?

Because he did not do the things you are accusing him of doing.  It is simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, slideman said:

Sorry, Republicans. The whistleblower’s identity no longer matters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/08/sorry-republicans-whistleblowers-identity-no-longer-matters/

The whistleblower was the equivalent of someone who made an anonymous call to the police saying that there’s a robbery going on at the First National Bank. Once the police get there and catch a bunch of guys wearing masks and holding sacks of money, it doesn’t matter who made the call or what their motives were. Maybe it was a passerby, or maybe it was the estranged wife of the leader of the gang. It doesn’t change the fact that the bank was robbed and we know who the robbers are.

Furthermore, just about everything the whistleblower alleged has been corroborated. The whistleblower accurately described the call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, the efforts to keep the call transcript concealed, the fact that military aid to Ukraine was upheld at the president’s direction, the involvement of Giuliani in pressuring the Ukrainian government and the discomfort of American diplomats, among other things.

All this has been confirmed by Trump’s words and the testimony of administration officials and career civil servants. We don’t need to know the whistleblower’s identity to assess their credibility, because we aren’t relying on their credibility.

Why not 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...