Jump to content
dontlooknow

When Fox news can't defend you you know you are in trouble. Nobody with any knowledge of the laws are saying Trump didn't break the law. So sad for the republicans. Trump is the most corrupt president in the history of the United States.

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SBED said:

looks like an Ape in Heels, right?

Yes Sir. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TBHWT said:

The Obamas' set race relations back sixty years. This is the kind of Crap that is now all over the internet.

 

 

Racism in the United States - Wikipedia

A brief history of racism in the United States ...

The key reason why racism remains alive and well in America

Exposing Bias: Racism in America | Harvard Extension

Structural Racism in America | Urban Institute

Structural Racism in America....

Images of Racism in America

Racism in America Today Is Alive and Well — 

A History of Race and Racism in America, in 24 Chapters ...

Racism in America - Check it on Teoma.us - Search Info Here

Racism in America - Check it on Teoma.us - 

I always thought 50 years. I am conservative. After a further examination, I will agree SIXTY years! Lick me from where I pee DEMO-RAT BUTTERCUPS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, SBED said:

"Michelle Obama says ‘White Folks’ are what’s Wrong with America"

trump be in the history books 

he be there as a bum who got caught 

big time.

and then the bum got his seff impeached

for havin' been caught trying to shakedown

and corrupt  a foreign leader.

trump gotsta go, bro.

shed a tear and move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, SBED said:

I always thought 50 years. I am conservative. After a further examination, I will agree SIXTY years! Lick me from where I pee DEMO-RAT BUTTERCUPS

poor angry old white guy.

trump is gaw go down in history as the loser who got his asss caught in some serious felonies.

he be damaged goods and the repubs are stuck defending a caught in the act crimonal. we gots us witnesses

we gots us a paper trail

we gots us a transcript that will be sub pee nuhd

and we gots the numbers

and you ain;t gaw do nothing but pout old man.

we gots the sucka good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

No their not DickHead!!! They've divided the country like all Dims do.

you cannot name 3 specific incidents where Obama divided the country, see, trump corrupt everything he touches like king midas only it all turns to crap.

this is the clown the history books are going to ridicule as a loser.

and wait til we get his tax returns and the indictments flow,

ahhhh yep

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

Yes Sir. 

why do you poorly educated old farts even pretend that you are not racists?

I mean sure you are stupid and you fool each other, but you are such obvious racists you look patently absurd denying that you are not white trashionalist type racists.

so free your soul and admit the obvious.

it's not like the rightists here will say anything bad to you

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, harryramar said:

poor angry old white guy.

trump is gaw go down in history as the loser who got his asss caught in some serious felonies.

he be damaged goods and the repubs are stuck defending a caught in the act crimonal. we gots us witnesses

we gots us a paper trail

we gots us a transcript that will be sub pee nuhd

and we gots the numbers

and you ain;t gaw do nothing but pout old man.

we gots the sucka good.

hello nig-nog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/2/2019 at 12:50 PM, dontlooknow said:

FOX NEWS JUDGE SAYS 'PROOF' IN TRUMP IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY IS 'UNDISPUTED,' DESPITE PRESIDENT'S 'HOAX' CLAIMS

BY ALEXANDRA HUTZLER ON 11/1/19 AT 10:27 AM EDT
 
 
 
 
 
Pause
Unmute
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Time 0:03
Duration 0:18
Loaded: 100.00%
 
 
QualitySD
Fullscreen

Fox News' Judge Andrew Napolitano said that the proof of President Donald Trump's potentially impeachable offenses is largely undisputed and that congressional Republicans have no credible line of defense to protect him.

 
 
Ads by scrollerads.com
 

Napolitano reflected on the ongoing impeachment probe in an editorial published by Fox News on Thursday. The judicial analyst warned Republicans to be "careful what they ask for" going forward because of the overwhelming evidence against the president.

"Their defense of the president has addressed process, not proof," Napolitano wrote. "The proof is largely undisputed, except by the president himself. It consists of admissions, testimony and documents, which show that Trump sought to induce the government of Ukraine to become involved in the 2020 presidential election."

He added that it's a "mouthful of facts to swallow in one bite, but the legal implications are straightforward and profound."

House Democrats launched the impeachment inquiry at the end of September following reports that Trump tried to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his possible opponent in 2020, former Vice President Joe Biden. In the month since the probe began, House investigators have interviewed several witnesses behind closed doors.

On Thursday, the House of Representatives voted to formalize the impeachment inquiry against Trump. The resolution, which detailed how public hearings will be conducted and how evidence will be gathered, was passed in the 232-196 vote.

Before Thursday's vote, Trump asserted that the "Impeachment Hoax" was hurting the stock market. Then, just after the resolution was passed, Trump complained on Twitter that it was the "Greatest Witch Hunt in American History." White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham released a statement also attacking the probe, calling it an "unhinged obsession" of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic Party.

Republicans have repeatedly slammed Democrats over how they've handled the impeachment probe, arguing that the process has been unfair and conducted in secret. The GOP response to the resolution was equally as critical. Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio claimed that "trying to put a ribbon on a sham process doesn't make it any less of a sham." Representative Liz Cheney said that history would judge Democrats over this inquiry.

 

Napolitano wrote in his op-ed that the "reason Republicans have been attacking the process of impeachment is largely because there is no credible defense to the proof of impeachment. That proof has been hiding in plain sight—in the president's public words and the context to be provided by witnesses—and will soon be revealed."

 

andrew napolitano fox news op-ed impeachmentAndrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst for the Fox News Channel, testifies during a Federal Spending Oversight And Emergency Management Subcommittee hearing on June 6, 2018. Napolitano wrote in a Fox News op-ed that there is no "credible defense to the proof of impeachment" against President Donald Trump.AARON P. BERNSTEIN/GETTY

Napolitano had previously defended House Democrats and their approach to the impeachment probe during an appearance on Fox & Friends on Thursday morning.

"Congressman Schiff is, in my opinion, following the rules of the House of Representatives. You generate the information in secret. You decide which you want to make public. You can't use anything against the president that hasn't been challenged and aired in public," Napolitano said.

The judge added that the rules for these investigations were written in 2015 when the GOP controlled Congress, and now "it has come back to haunt the Republicans."

Despite the attacks on the inquiry from Trump and his GOP allies, polling shows public support for removing the president from office is growing. A Quinnipiac University poll released October 23 showed that 55 percent of registered voters approved of the inquiry, up 4 percentage points from the week before. In fact, surveys show that public support for Trump's removal is happening at a much faster rate than what occurred when President Richard Nixon was facing impeachment.

Crazy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, harryramar said:

you cannot name 3 specific incidents where Obama divided the country, see, trump corrupt everything he touches like king midas only it all turns to crap.

this is the clown the history books are going to ridicule as a loser.

and wait til we get his tax returns and the indictments flow,

ahhhh yep

(1) "Police Acted Stupidly" - I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately." Law enforcement organizations and members objected to Obama's comments and criticized his handling of the issue. In the aftermath, Obama stated that he regretted his comments and hoped that the situation could become a "teachable moment".

(2) "BLACK PANTHER PARTY" The Justice Department dropped an open-and-shut voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party. It was essentially a declaration that his administration would use the Voting Rights Act to protect only certain races.

(3)"Inherently Racist" a steady stream of false claims that America was an inherently racist society with a biased judicial and law enforcement system. Obama rekindled a racial divide that had been steadily disappearing in American society.

 

 

 

 

SHALL I CONTINUE ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SBED said:

(1) "Police Acted Stupidly" - I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately." Law enforcement organizations and members objected to Obama's comments and criticized his handling of the issue. In the aftermath, Obama stated that he regretted his comments and hoped that the situation could become a "teachable moment".

(2) "BLACK PANTHER PARTY" The Justice Department dropped an open-and-shut voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party. It was essentially a declaration that his administration would use the Voting Rights Act to protect only certain races.

(3)"Inherently Racist" a steady stream of false claims that America was an inherently racist society with a biased judicial and law enforcement system. Obama rekindled a racial divide that had been steadily disappearing in American society.

 

 

 

 

SHALL I CONTINUE ?

^^^retarded rant^^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SBED said:

(1) "Police Acted Stupidly" - I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately." Law enforcement organizations and members objected to Obama's comments and criticized his handling of the issue. In the aftermath, Obama stated that he regretted his comments and hoped that the situation could become a "teachable moment".

(2) "BLACK PANTHER PARTY" The Justice Department dropped an open-and-shut voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party. It was essentially a declaration that his administration would use the Voting Rights Act to protect only certain races.

(3)"Inherently Racist" a steady stream of false claims that America was an inherently racist society with a biased judicial and law enforcement system. Obama rekindled a racial divide that had been steadily disappearing in American society.

 

 

 

 

SHALL I CONTINUE ?

All of that has been proven false. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, dontlooknow said:

All of that has been proven false. 

Really?

 

1: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/obama-police-acted-stupidly-in-gates-arrest-320569411629

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

3: OBAMA GOT TRUMP ELECTED! 

 

GET OUT OF YOUR PARENTS CLOSET, SHAVE THE YELLOW BUTTER OFF YOUR TEETH AND GET A JOB !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SBED said:

Really?

 

1: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/obama-police-acted-stupidly-in-gates-arrest-320569411629

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

3: OBAMA GOT TRUMP ELECTED! 

 

GET OUT OF YOUR PARENTS CLOSET, SHAVE THE YELLOW BUTTER OFF YOUR TEETH AND GET A JOB !

Take your own advice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SBED said:

(1) "Police Acted Stupidly" - I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately." Law enforcement organizations and members objected to Obama's comments and criticized his handling of the issue. In the aftermath, Obama stated that he regretted his comments and hoped that the situation could become a "teachable moment".

(2) "BLACK PANTHER PARTY" The Justice Department dropped an open-and-shut voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party. It was essentially a declaration that his administration would use the Voting Rights Act to protect only certain races.

(3)"Inherently Racist" a steady stream of false claims that America was an inherently racist society with a biased judicial and law enforcement system. Obama rekindled a racial divide that had been steadily disappearing in American society.

 

 

 

 

SHALL I CONTINUE ?

if a trumpie rants and raves in a forum and no none reads his bullshit. does he make a noise?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SBED said:

Really?

 

1: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/obama-police-acted-stupidly-in-gates-arrest-320569411629

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case

3: OBAMA GOT TRUMP ELECTED! 

 

GET OUT OF YOUR PARENTS CLOSET, SHAVE THE YELLOW BUTTER OFF YOUR TEETH AND GET A JOB !

the cops did act stupidly. 

the blacks cannot hold sticks but assshoiles can carry machine guns into walmarts

the electoral college elected trump. 

sorry bro you are being played for a sucker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Zaro said:

Even Fox News has abandoned Trump

Oh no you mean someone on Fox didn't agree with Him??? That's why they call Fox News Fair and balanced Vagina Head!!!

 

LMAO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/2/2019 at 12:40 PM, dontlooknow said:

This inquiry is not about a blow job. It's about a shake down of Ukraine. 

Much, much more than that!

Obstruction of Justice

Emoluments clause.

Being an A-1 Ahole!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/4/2019 at 4:38 AM, harryramar said:

the cops did act stupidly. 

the blacks cannot hold sticks but assshoiles can carry machine guns into walmarts

the electoral college elected trump. 

I KNOW FOR A FACT! You Play Rusty Trombone

I am ready!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/2/2019 at 12:10 PM, dontlooknow said:

Anybody that tells you that the president didn't break the law is lying. 

Why can't you just point to a law he violated?

He told Sondland "no quid pro quo". 

Zelensky said "no pressure". 

Ukraine didn't know funds had been held. 

President is REQUIRED to hold funds from corrupt countries. 

 

Why can't you show us what law was broken?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/2/2019 at 12:50 PM, dontlooknow said:

FOX NEWS JUDGE SAYS 'PROOF' IN TRUMP IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY IS 'UNDISPUTED,' DESPITE PRESIDENT'S 'HOAX' CLAIMS

BY ALEXANDRA HUTZLER ON 11/1/19 AT 10:27 AM EDT
 
 
 
 
 
Pause
Unmute
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Time 0:03
Duration 0:18
Loaded: 100.00%
 
 
QualitySD
Fullscreen

Fox News' Judge Andrew Napolitano said that the proof of President Donald Trump's potentially impeachable offenses is largely undisputed and that congressional Republicans have no credible line of defense to protect him.

 
 
Ads by scrollerads.com
 

Napolitano reflected on the ongoing impeachment probe in an editorial published by Fox News on Thursday. The judicial analyst warned Republicans to be "careful what they ask for" going forward because of the overwhelming evidence against the president.

"Their defense of the president has addressed process, not proof," Napolitano wrote. "The proof is largely undisputed, except by the president himself. It consists of admissions, testimony and documents, which show that Trump sought to induce the government of Ukraine to become involved in the 2020 presidential election."

He added that it's a "mouthful of facts to swallow in one bite, but the legal implications are straightforward and profound."

House Democrats launched the impeachment inquiry at the end of September following reports that Trump tried to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his possible opponent in 2020, former Vice President Joe Biden. In the month since the probe began, House investigators have interviewed several witnesses behind closed doors.

On Thursday, the House of Representatives voted to formalize the impeachment inquiry against Trump. The resolution, which detailed how public hearings will be conducted and how evidence will be gathered, was passed in the 232-196 vote.

Before Thursday's vote, Trump asserted that the "Impeachment Hoax" was hurting the stock market. Then, just after the resolution was passed, Trump complained on Twitter that it was the "Greatest Witch Hunt in American History." White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham released a statement also attacking the probe, calling it an "unhinged obsession" of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic Party.

Republicans have repeatedly slammed Democrats over how they've handled the impeachment probe, arguing that the process has been unfair and conducted in secret. The GOP response to the resolution was equally as critical. Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio claimed that "trying to put a ribbon on a sham process doesn't make it any less of a sham." Representative Liz Cheney said that history would judge Democrats over this inquiry.

 

Napolitano wrote in his op-ed that the "reason Republicans have been attacking the process of impeachment is largely because there is no credible defense to the proof of impeachment. That proof has been hiding in plain sight—in the president's public words and the context to be provided by witnesses—and will soon be revealed."

 

andrew napolitano fox news op-ed impeachmentAndrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst for the Fox News Channel, testifies during a Federal Spending Oversight And Emergency Management Subcommittee hearing on June 6, 2018. Napolitano wrote in a Fox News op-ed that there is no "credible defense to the proof of impeachment" against President Donald Trump.AARON P. BERNSTEIN/GETTY

Napolitano had previously defended House Democrats and their approach to the impeachment probe during an appearance on Fox & Friends on Thursday morning.

"Congressman Schiff is, in my opinion, following the rules of the House of Representatives. You generate the information in secret. You decide which you want to make public. You can't use anything against the president that hasn't been challenged and aired in public," Napolitano said.

The judge added that the rules for these investigations were written in 2015 when the GOP controlled Congress, and now "it has come back to haunt the Republicans."

Despite the attacks on the inquiry from Trump and his GOP allies, polling shows public support for removing the president from office is growing. A Quinnipiac University poll released October 23 showed that 55 percent of registered voters approved of the inquiry, up 4 percentage points from the week before. In fact, surveys show that public support for Trump's removal is happening at a much faster rate than what occurred when President Richard Nixon was facing impeachment.

Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...