Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wassik

MUHAMMAD EURY UNDER ATTACK DAILY AT THE CHATEAU MOTEL AND IN YORK PENNSYLVANIA...PART 2

Recommended Posts


SEPTEMBER 13, 2-19


When one pays attention at the conspiracies against Muhammad Eury who stays at the Chateau Motel (717) 757-1714, located at: 3951 East Market Street in York/Springettsbury, Pennsylvania, you will witness the entire episode against him riddled in secrecy. We have it on good authority that there are noth witches and warlocks who have joined forces against him. And days ago Muhammad fixed the car of a party that needed help badly. The blackman betrayed the trust of Muhammad and had his wife fix a plate of food for Muhammad as payment for mechanic work done. Muhammad accepted the payment thinking that this is how black people treat black people in York. Self hatred is a very power thing amongst blacks in York, which is being orchestrated by an whole host of different parties who are both American citizens and foreigners. Guests staying at the Chateau Motel claim that Kim, the female motel owner who was left the business by relatives around 2002, is one of the most evil people they have ever met. She uses white supremacist or white power workers as attack dogs against Americans. According to the black couple in room #102, Kim and the young caucasian woman with a child that she kicked out on September 6, 2019, should have filed papers against Kim for assault. But whatever Kim has going on with police is so heavy that any illegal activity committed by her is overlooked. From what white supremacists and others are saying, no blackman is as honest and sincere as Muhammad, and they are trying to make sure that the changes about to occur in his life leads him to a life of crime. But it won't. Most blackmen have underwent this CIA sort of mind control tactic and they failed. Muhammad is much more strong minded which is why they had to employ some of the worst of blacks in York, Pennsylvania, to target him.  Police are some of the wicked parties known, and many of them are much more vicious than any criminal. Muhammad's wife is still missing, even though police may know where she is at. However, the local news still has her up as missing which is why Muhammad is still worried. 

There may be many interracial couples in York, but according to some parties within law enforcement, it isn't like those people hadn't stood against the tests of time! One very reliable source who is on the inside of secrecy informed someone to get word to Muhammad about an issue. The party was to walk past Muhammad and whisper what it was, but kept walking like nothing was ever said. He informed Muhammad that there is a major plot against him and instructed Muhammad on what to do. He also stated that police and others are monitoring our threads and is linking with ordinary residents, informing them how to proceed further. Black people are very much under a serious mind control spell which is why many of them are choosing Joe Biden, a professed sometimes racist, who has made racial comments about blackmen. Ther indoctrination goes very deep and they shall continue with their evil until they destroy earth as we all know it. Robots are now taking over McDonalds restaurants at the drive through. The Social Credit System is becoming a reality in America. And any opposition against global enslavement is being met with dissection. Some of the mkost strangest people are being used as plants, lying informants, and set up artists. Blacks are being compensated for their duties against Muhammad, and against others. Even caucasian men are being targeted who are against this wave of pure evil in York and Springettsbury, Pa. Americans just don't know that when one is against the New World Order and against injustice and corruption on the highest of levels, secret societies and police, et cetera, are spreading lies about them and can turn nearly half a town against the target. The Muhammad Eury story is a powerful one for all those who oppose the Boule Society and their many minions. Its mind control on one of the final levels. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/758989641/the-cias-secret-quest-for-mind-control-torture-lsd-and-a-poisoner-in-chief. https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/.

Money is being provided to all those with the most serious of ghetto mentalities. This is the major threat against black people! They use those who does everything around blacks as destructive forces against targets. When we think of money, we usually think of the coupon form, the official looking paper slips of various denominations. This is deceiving. Money is really an abstraction denoting material value. There are hundreds of millions of transactions every day. Do you really think paper slips get moved from bank to bank? No, all that changes is a number in your account. Yes, a tiny fraction of paper slips change hands when we use cash but this is negligible. Money is the original shapeshifter.  It starts off as "credit" which the Rothschilds bestow on your country or banks provide a loan. Then it can take any form. In an instant, it can become the shares in a company. They can be sold and the proceeds used to buy a car. The car can be sold and the proceeds used to buy a vacation in Hawaii. You see my point? Money should be thought of as a kind of electricity, the lifeblood of the economy. When it does not take the form of goods or services, "money" hibernates in the digits in millions of bank accounts. "Money" comes into the world as debt, usually the national debt which is backed by the credit of the state. The collateral for this debt is its citizens.  In the future, the Rothschilds could demand repayment of this "debt", an abstraction they created out of nothing. As their debt slaves, one day this may be a pretext for our enslavement. Imagine a power station producing this abstraction called money like a microwave tower spewing radiation.  Imagine it is run by Satanists (cabalists) who hate humanity and wish to enslave it. I'm not just speaking of physical enslavement. Money is used to enslave us spiritually as well. Most of our waking thoughts are devoted to money. Millions are wrapped up in the stock market and watch their net worth fluctuate from hour to hour. Most people spend their day trying to make money or fretting about whether they have enough money for their old age. Basically, the man behind the curtain has already enslaved us spiritually by making us obsess on money and the things it can buy. 

We associate money with liberation. But many super-rich people are not happy. Kate Spade, who committed suicide yesterday, is said to be "worth" over $200 million. If anything, money is a spiritual foretaste of our physical enslavement. My point is that money's function is not just economic. It enslaves us spiritually too. Money and sex are the North-South of our mental compass. By no coincidence, the people who make us obsess on money, are also behind sexual liberation and pornography. Both occupy our thoughts. Both take us away from God. Both dehumanize and degrade us. Satanists think "God" is a dirty word and they have banished it from public discourse. They have done this partly by misrepresenting what a God is.  After providing for our reasonable material needs, we need to banish money from our thoughts. The only man who is truly liberated is he who cares nothing about money. His soul cannot be bought. We can meet according to God's Plan if we all serve God in our own way. In fact, society has been subverted by Satanists using the banking system. Their goal is to degrade, dehumanize, and enslave us individually.  And many of those who are doing undercover work for all sorts of evil forces have no idea what price they are going to pay for betraying some of God's most precious humans. They will fall and their masters will have never gotten their hands dirty. This is the trick. The History of money, and currency, is an obfuscated History. "All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America (and Canada) arise, not from defects in their constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation."Indeed, most High School and College "Graduates" today, know neither how to make basic change nor balance a check book, let alone exhibit an ability to grapple with basic concepts of money, currency and finance. It is for convenience sake we have become entrained and are currently trafficking in abstractions and a Color-Of-Things, rather than truth and substance. We flounder in the contradiction between substance and appearance (form).

Money is not an "abstraction denoting value." Rather, Lawful money is the value. In principle, whereas currency is printed, money is minted. "Making money," for instance, refers to a minting of gold and silver bullion, into denominated coinage i.e., a manufacture of money. So whereas money constitutes an independent, repository of intrinsic value - its refined bullion content, a currency is a conveyance of a claim upon value. This is your abstraction. Further, what we call a DOLLAR is not a DOLLAR. John Quincy Adams "coins" the term... "Those things (DOLLARS) which appear to be, but are not" - this in describing a "Color-of-Law," in his reference to the Maritime claims of the Spanish Crown and her Agents. Further, in the founding American system of weights and measures, money is denoted as a fixed quantity, not a fluctuating value. Like a quart of milk, A DOLLAR of silver, comprises 371.25 grains of fine silver - DOLLARS of gold, 1/15th this measure. There is no paper money. Rather, there once were paper Bank Notes which denoted a claim, Legal Tender, or Bill, for money - as recorded on the face of earlier Bank Notes, Promising to Pay to The Bearer on Demand, real money, i.e., TEN DOLLARS, in either gold or silver coin. Thus, a lawful Bank Note which represents an intrinsic value, is "A" Legal Tender FOR a Measure of money. Federal Reserve "Notes" today, are not money, but denominated Tokens representing a conveyance of a claim upon value. A currency, although useful to production and trade, does not represent an exchange of value. Only an exchange of lawful money for goods and services, is an exchange of, rather than a claim upon value. Lawful money, is to an open and fair economy, what a PIRATE CURRENCY is to extortion and debt servitude. The key to an issuance of a people's currency, like early Colonial Scrip, is that it is issued into circulation interest-free, with its quantity being expanded or contracted in response to the needs of trade and production. The critical goal, and intent of a system of lawful, honest weights and measures, whether of a currency or money, is, to preserve the purchasing power of earned capital (wages), and savings derived therefrom. As it always has, faith collapses in the wake of a DEFLATING purchasing power in wages and savings. Interest bearing credit capital works also, to debase earned capital and savings.

Properly understood, true money, and possibly a coexistent, non-interest bearing "Scrip" currency, publicly administered in trust, is also tied in with a "Satanic" curse, that becomes the balm to the OCCULT SPELL cast by a PIRATE CURRENCY. Lawful money, unlike a Fictional Currency posing as money, cannot be "conjured." money, can however, be debased through Fractionalized Banking, an inflation of credit or finance capital, and in bullion based coinage, clipped, drilled or shaved. In principle, a people through their elected representatives must have control over an issuance of their currency, and a minting of their money. This, must be held as a closely guarded public trust, ensuring political, and economic outcomes are representative of the moral conscience and welfare of the people. Basically, in an absence of control over one's pocket, ones conscience and will is also forfeit. Lets also check out the taxes spells. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09/gary-d-barnett/fictitious-markets-false-economics-and-the-reality-of-fraud/.  We all know that the powers-that-be own the money system and that they can print up all the money that they desire for themselves at any time for any reason. Of course many people will tell you that this can't be done because simply printing up money leads to Zimbabwe-style hyperinflation; but in reality this is done all the time and wealthy nations and especially those whose currency is the world reserve currency can get away with such policies for a long time and are very adept at hiding their money creation in various financial ruses such as artificially-inflated stock markets, housing bubbles, and the derivative fiasco. This hiding of all this newly created money in the financial system is very effective in forestalling the onset of hyperinflation. The reason worthless fiat currencies were created in the first place is for the very reason that an endless supply of this 'money' can be conjured up out of thin air, based on nothing and backed by nothing. Those creating it need not actually produce any goods nor offer up anything of value with which to back up the value of the currency. 

Unlike with the case of commodities such as gold or food or finished products, trillions of dollars can be created with zero effort on their part. Zero effort in its creation and zero effort in transportation and storage. Most of the money in existence isn't even in physical form, it's merely entries in a ledger or in recent times just digits on a computer screen. Now being able to print up all the money they want is one thing but if no one actually needs any of this money to be able to survive then the powers-that-be wouldn't be able to make people accept their worthless pieces of paper in trade for goods and services (who would willingly trade the hard-earned fruits-of-their-labor for a worthless piece of paper unless they had some reason to need to). In other words, if no one had the need for 'money' with which to pay their taxes, the powers-that-be wouldn't be able to use their 'money' to acquire things, wage wars, buy fuel, pay soldiers, buy gold, bribe officials, manipulate financial markets, etc. Now at this point, some people will say that money serves as a sort of bartering chip to facilitate trade, and of course, this is correct, but you mustn't lose sight of the fact that people could use anything that they agree upon as the bartering chip. The powers-that-be use taxes as a means to force their own 'money' to be accepted as the only form of bartering chips that anyone actually needs to trade with. So, you see, taxes are there so as to create a permanent demand for this fictional currency by requiring that people (and businesses) acquire this 'money' so as to be able to pay their taxes. The powers-that-be don't need your tax money to survive; what they need is for you to be compelled to trade your lifetime of work for their essentially worthless currency. They need to give society a reason to need their money. Their existence depends on it.

In Conclusion:  Collective memory refers to how groups remember their past. While Americans remember 9/11 and subsequent events, the collective memory like many memories of tragic events can be blurred or even incorrect. Defective memory recall has been the explanation for what has been called the Mandela Effect as many people recall pop culture events in many different ways –far from the actuality of what really concurred. For example, many generations have passed since World War II, the Korean War, and Vietnam. All the memories are dying as those who were there have aged and have passed away. Families can recollect the stories that great-grandpa told about the war — Hollywood can fill in the rest but is it truly history and we need to ask ourselves how emotions affect the collective memory. Collective memory about World War II, Korea, and Vietnam now are simply facts about recollections second hand. When asked to remember World War II, Americans report numerous events, but the majority of people report the attack on Pearl Harbor, D-Day and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si5AWDCPVp0. To understand a country’s memories is to grasp something essential about their national identity and outlook. Of course, countries do not have memories; it is the people in the country who retain the memories, but often there are common themes rather than true memories. Collective remembering implies that collective forgetting also occurs and 18 years is enough time to forget details about 9/11 and so out of sheer laziness we trust the official narrative that tries to cloud some inconvenient facts that were reported first hand on the day that we are told we should never forget.

Collective memory is a burgeoning topic of research, one that might be used to understand the perspective of people in other groups, whether of a nation or of a political party or other social group. In certain cases, we can also measure collective forgetting and the events of 9/11 should be analyzed for clarity and also the narrative that is played over and over again should be exposed as an attempt to induce false memory and should be called a scam. It can be argued that false memory implantation of 9/11 created a social contagion that began the extreme polarization of the country. It can be argued that false memories and lies about the event were intentionally made in order to provide impetus for declaring two wars with the potential for more and the lingering paranoia that was used to scare people into thinking that if they did not accept new laws that destroyed their civil rights –another event similar to the attack on New York would be carried out with more people dying and more people in peril. A particularly dramatic form of social contagion is seen in studies of memory implantation. In these studies, rather than conversation shaping memory for incidents that actually happened, individuals are induced into taking on rich, vivid memories that were conjured and used for social engineering. The conjurers of these contagious memories are the media and teachers who do not value the need for accurate history that supersedes political leanings or ideology. In America today, the education system has failed in its attempt to create an interest in preserving historical consciousness. The various narrators of the events of 9/11 have intentionally overlooked details that have certainly put the official narrative in the category of induced false collective memory. The mainstream media will be a mouthpiece for a political agenda. They have a very important influence on the formation of collective memory.

Moreover, studies on collective memory have suggested that this effect of inducing false memory by a powerful narrator can occur independently of whether the narrator is viewed as an expert. One can imagine a variety of circumstances in which one person dominates a discussion, even though the group does not view the individuals as possessing any special knowledge or expertise. This means that regardless of who sits at the news desk with the lights and cameras rolling they are by no means an expert – they are only paid to be powerful narrators. The public, unfortunately, trusts them without knowing their backgrounds in journalism or in the subject they profess to know about. News documentaries and Hollywood movies are an effective and influential means of spreading memories within groups. Even if the history is twisted or glamorized for the public, a lot of things we believe about history have been given the Hollywood veneer in order to make them palatable for the public’s cognitive resonance. Through conversations, and viral stories passed around in social networks people come to a shared rendering of the past, where otherwise people would possess their own individual rendering. There are those who still have their individual renderings, especially those who experienced what has happened first hand. Bringing the attacks of the Twin Towers in our homes made the 911 events a shared experience but it was through the keyhole provided by the mainstream media. When people remember the past in a social context, when they rely on recall they get from the media and from Hollywood there is the potential, through social contagion, to influence each individual’s subsequent memories and thus increase the cohesiveness of these initially disparate memories. Things like the Mandela Effect, faulty recall, all have the potential to implant new memories and even more epiphanies about historical events.

Even though we are told that we should never forget the events of 9/11, the whole process of creating new memories is the act of forgetting other moments and memories that when not repeated are forgotten over time. Could conversations 18 years after 911 serve as vehicles for promoting forgetting as well as remembering? 84% of the American people feel as though we have not been told everything about the attacks of 9/11 and there has never been an event so sacred in American history as that dreadful day. So what is it that has been forgotten – what has not been said in 18 years that needs to be said? What needs to be revealed in order to show that there has been a concerted effort to plant false memories about the event, we are told not to forget. There is no reason to forget. Perhaps there is no reason to forgive, That it was the catalyst for the polarization of the nation long before many put all of their hate into President Trump. It is terrifying to remember that immediately after the events of 9/11 We were convinced of the necessity of big government making big decisions that were unpopular and uncomfortable and we are now in a very frightening time in our history where the shadow of what happened looms forever as a political football in the hands of endgame strategists that will do anything to keep us in a state of flux. When we are terrified or confused we forget what is happening in real-time. We hide and we flee. We ignore details and in some moments accept cherished myths that take the sting away from the reality that we have always been vulnerable. When you ask people to revisit the events of 9/11 and reconsider what really happened, you enter the Twilight Zone of public mythology where people don’t want to rethink unhappy events and where you challenge their personal egos. If you eliminate the emotional baggage and the constant bombardment of the false narrative you may be able to see the truth. Images begin to re-emerge and forgotten information comes back.

All of this we see being reported in the mainstream now, all of what awaits us could have been prevented if we were just able to see through the programming years before the event. If we are to look back in history we can see that there seems to be a paper trail of intent, a money trail of crime and denial of people that want to hold on to an ideal that died the day the towers fell. FDR once said, “If it happens, it is because we planned it that way.” This kind of mindset negates the belief that people are always in control of their government. Voting seems to be the last great argument of defense. But as we can obviously see the stakes are so awesome in this contest of life and death, that the characterization of the good guys and the bad guys have reached new levels of propaganda. Those who coerce you into believing that the government will protect you from terror are very likely to be the criminal element behind that terror. They have created it and they can cure it. They can also convince you how it all happened, with a tone of religious reverence and nationalist mythology powerful enough to convince people that giving up rights and freedoms are acts of patriotism. One man who knew how to use political mythology was Philip D. Zelikow. At Harvard, he uncannily predicted the future. He had written in 1998 that in the future the inevitable next step is terrorism. He stated in his work “Catastrophic Terrorism” that readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves because the most serious constraint on current policy [non-aggression] is lack of imagination.

“An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force.” More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great “success” or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible. Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a “before” and “after.” The effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this threat now, in the “before” period, will seem woeful, even pathetic when compared to what will happen “after.” Our so-called leaders will be judged negligent for not addressing catastrophic terrorism more urgently. Policy and history can be misused to reform cultural myth. Contemporary” history is “defined functionally by those critical people and events that go into forming the public’s presumptions about its immediate past. The idea of ‘public presumption’,” he explained, “is akin to [the] notion of ‘public myth’ but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word ‘myth.’ Such presumptions are beliefs thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and shared in common within the relevant political community.” 

In all of the chaos, there were so many stories being thrown around in the media that no one got the real truth about what was happening. Even Washington couldn’t get their suspects straight. While Osama bin Laden was the media darling and chief evil-doer-in-charge. He wasn’t even Washington’s first choice as mastermind for the attacks. All points and circumstantial evidence was being calculated by Donald Rumsfeld and he had expressed great interest in focusing our manhunt in another area. CBS News reported in 2009: “that barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq — even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks.” It was John Bolton, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and others that created the PNAC brief in order to send a message to Bill Clinton that he was too soft on Iraq. They demanded a regime change on January 16, 1998, following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections. Members of the PNAC drafted an open letter to President Clinton asking him to remove Saddam Hussein from power using U.S. diplomatic, political and military power. They thought that Saddam would pose a threat to the United States, its Middle Eastern Allies and oil resources in the region. They also claimed that he had weapons of mass destruction. It’s all the same stuff we heard about after 9/11. Does this surprise you – do you remember this? It certainly wasn’t brought up during the Condoleeza Rice interview. In fact, after Philip Zelikow praised John Bolton, the pair were asked questions about the President’s decision to meet with the Taliban and Camp David and then it dovetailed into questions about Vladimir Putin’s relationship with the President and the Russian meddling and collusion in the 2016 election. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Du6v_MsMnw.

Unless we remember who headed up the investigation of 911 – none other than Robert Mueller head of the FBI at the time. Robert Mueller, of course, we all know is the man who recently led the probe into allegations of Trump/Russia collusion. The media has placed in the public collective memory the idea that Mueller was a relentless crusader standing up to Trump and digging for truth. But when it came to investigating foreign influence into 9/11, he wasn’t much of a truth warrior at all. Of course, the state sponsor of 911 was not clear enough in our collective memory of 911 thanks to Mueller and for some reason, Saudi Arabia was overlooked in the quest for truth even though Osama bin Laden was a Saudi and 15 of the 18 hijackers were Saudi nationals. It was a case of putting political interests first and not the victims of the attacks. Both the so-called phantoms of the attacks—Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden are dead which in the end we were told had nothing to do with 911. It is also forgotten that Osama bin Laden may have died weeks after the September 11th attacks due to kidney failure. And yet the announcement of his death was made by Barack Obama on May 1st, 2011. Is this some sort of Mandela Effect? Does your memory play tricks? Timing is everything. Do not forget the attacks of 9/11, but understand that the collective memory is being used to lure us in a social trance. A trance that may bring us back to the idea that the safe route is to find a new scapegoat; however, the suspects have always been in plain sight. Some of them are still pulling the strings. And the same sort of unbelievable conspiracies is being implemented against Muhammad Eury. You had better trust this to be true because all of you humans are next once they end Muhammad. The muslims are afraid, all across America, which is why Muhammad is fighting the fight alone. Just pat close attention to what happens with Muhammad. You will soon know that everything we have informed you about was factual, and that the rebutters were incahoots with pure evil the entire time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...