Jump to content
merrill

According to a Kaiser poll 81% of Democrats favor "Medicare for all," single-payer healthcare, along with 60% of Independents and almost a third of Republicans. And for good reason: virtually every country in the developed world provides better access.

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, maineman said:

I gotta hand it to you... NOBODY does that "spaced out Steven Hawking on acid" bit better than you do.

Stephen Hawkings was a hoax used by ruling elites to use the sympathy card against people not handicapped to pay for those handicapped.  Change the idea anything is possible to now is eternity as the populaiton is being eternally separated in reproductive order to the global population alive now.

 

BEt your mind cannot do it locked in the 24/7 linear logistics of ignoring being alive simultaneously here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sole result said:

Stephen Hawkings was a hoax used by ruling elites to use the sympathy card against people not handicapped to pay for those handicapped.  Change the idea anything is possible to now is eternity as the populaiton is being eternally spearated in reproductive order to the global populaiton alive now.

 

BEt your mind cannot do it locked in the 24/7 linear logistics of ignoring being alive simultaneously here.

clap

 

clap

 

 

clap

 

 

 

you nail it... time after time, you just nail it.

 

well done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, maineman said:

clap

 

clap

 

 

clap

 

 

 

you nail it... time after time, you just nail it.

 

well done.

as well as I nailed your talking point mantra.  Always remember I am against dishonesty and corruption controlling human behavior of people living as reproduced so far. Humans don't have rights to believe real doesn't count and symbolism is all that matters.

 

Remove defamation of character from civil law suits, insubordination from arguing against people defined as leadership, and anyone discussing self evident kinetic displacement that adds into everything displaced as existing here now isn't blasphemy or treason.

 

It is simply correcting human error practiced for 6,000 years..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, maineman said:

dribble... drool.... wow.   Is that really a hill you want to die on?

 

HAHAHAHA! Moses and Hammurabi are YOU sure that's the hill YOU want to die on?

 

Quote

 

I think you should wait for something even MORE trite, irrelevant and nuanced.... if you're gonna try and look silly, I say go all in.

 

More trite, irrelevent, and nuanced? You mean like Moses and Hammurabi?

 

Quote

FYI... your chess analogies are lost on me. I have never played the game. 

 

I thought you said you were smart. Shall we take a pole to find out how many people--if any--don't comprehend their opponent losing a key piece and then immature brat that he is he knocks every piece off the chess board.?

 

Quote

I care about all people... especially those less fortunate than I am. I do care about some people more than I do others, however, as does everyone.  They're all free to vote for whomever they choose... it will not lessen the individual level of care I have for any one of them.

 

And this has to do what to do with what? 

 

Quote

 

What I AM telling you that I don't have a scintilla of jealousy for ANY aspect of you OR your supposed high falutin knowledge.

 

Your showing how jealous you are again. Read the above sentence. Note the hostility in the words. 

 

Quote

 My only reaction to you floats somewhere between ennui  and mild annoyance.

 

Why the reaction? Because your jealous.

 

If you weren't you simply wouldn't give a crap. Like my feelings with you. 

 

Do I react emotionally to you? No. Why? I couldn't care less.

 

At MIT there's a microscope that can see down to the level of atoms. If you had that microscope, you STILL couldn't see how little I care.

 

Quote

 

And I have never said I was WISE...

 

Good you know, because you certainly show how unwise you are.

 

Quote

I merely said that I knew more about certain topics than YOU did.

 

So now you show me how insecure you are. People who have knowledge in certain topics don't haave to broadcast it. Their knowledge is obvious in their presentation of that knowledge.

It's like the person who keeps telling you how honsest they are. When the brodcast their honesty it's time to hide the silverware

 

Quote

 I would never think to suggest that I was the smartest guy in the room, but I am undoubtedly smarter than you.

 

Yah, your so smart you have to broadcast it. Again, your insecurity is showing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Until they pay for it. 😂 Then people will be looking to hang democrats.

 

I won't. I'll be making a KILLING off of it. 🤣

 

That is if it ever happened which it won't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JaySolo said:

 

HAHAHAHA! Moses and Hammurabi are YOU sure that's the hill YOU want to die on?

 

 

More trite, irrelevent, and nuanced? You mean like Moses and Hammurabi?

 

 

I thought you said you were smart. Shall we take a pole [sic] to find out how many people--if any--don't comprehend their opponent losing a key piece and then immature brat that he is he knocks every piece off the chess board.?

 

 

And this has to do what to do with what? 

 

 

Your showing how jealous you are again. Read the above sentence. Note the hostility in the words. 

 

 

Why the reaction? Because your jealous.

 

If you weren't you simply wouldn't give a crap. Like my feelings with you. 

 

Do I react emotionally to you? No. Why? I couldn't care less.

 

At MIT there's a microscope that can see down to the level of atoms. If you had that microscope, you STILL couldn't see how little I care.

 

 

Good you know, because you certainly show how unwise you are.

 

 

So now you show me how insecure you are. People who have knowledge in certain topics don't haave to broadcast it. Their knowledge is obvious in their presentation of that knowledge.

It's like the person who keeps telling you how honsest they are. When the brodcast their honesty it's time to hide the silverware

 

 

Yah, your[sic] so smart you have to broadcast it. Again, your  insecurity is showing.

The fact remains... you stepped on your dick by being wrong about Hammurabi.... I was right from the jump.  I merely rubbed your nose in your mistake when you tried to make some big deal about Hammurabi being influenced by religion... you were wrong... and you keep twisting in the wind about it.

 

Again... chess references are weak.... I have no idea what you're talking about, and I doubt anybody else is even reading this diatribe at this point. and do you want to take a pole or a poll?

 

My comment about caring for people goes directly to you unsubstantiated assertion that I only care about their votes.

 

I only mention my areas of expertise as a cautionary tale for you... to warn you in advance to leave those topics alone when talking with me.  It was a courtesy I didn't need to offer, and one that you certainly did not deserve.

 

I am smart enough to understand the difference between homonyms in our language - especially when they appear in the same sentence.  

 

you're.... your....yore....

we'll.... wheel....

way, weigh, whey....

to, too, two....

heir...air...

bale...bail...

nun...none...

there, they're, their....

ball, bawl....

bear...bare...

ore...oar...

 

the list goes on and on... you fail all the time when your knowledge of the language fails you. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, maineman said:

The fact remains... you stepped on your dick by being wrong about Hammurabi....

 

As the fact remains that you stepped on your dick by not knowing the difference between "dribble" and "drool"

 

As if that isn't enough, you again step on your dick by not knowing what a queen is. You mean you couldn't tell from the context?

 

I thought you said you were smarter than me. Even I know that if I don't know what a queen is I can look it up on the internet.

 

 

Quote

 I merely rubbed your nose in your mistake when you tried to make some big deal about Hammurabi being influenced by religion... you were wrong...

 

Unlike YOU, I've never denied it. I'm secure enough to admit when I'm wrong. Are you?

 

Quote

and you keep twisting in the wind about it.

 

Talk about twisting in the wind:

 

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA , 

 

Now do you want to post the definition of a chess queen to prove you know it?

 

Quote

 

Again... chess references are weak.... I have no idea what you're talking about, and I doubt anybody else is even reading this diatribe at this point. and do you want to take a pole or a poll?

 

So if I said "checkmate," you'd have no idea of what I was talking about. Do you know what a pawn is? Again, I thought you were smarter than me. You sure do a lousy job of showing it.

 

 

Quote

 

I only mention my areas of expertise as a cautionary tale for you...

 

Yousa, yousa, yaousa from the third floor ballroom here's Maineman  blowing his own horn. Again, what does Proverbs say about the fool being wise (able to apply knowledge as wisdom is knowledge applied) in his own eyes?

 

Quote

to warn you in advance to leave those topics alone when talking with me.  It was a courtesy I didn't need to offer, and one that you certainly did not deserve.

 

Yah, a person who doesn't know the difference between "dribble" and "drool" is a real threat to me. Perhaps you should pedal your inseccurity elsewhere/

 

 

Quote

 

I am smart enough to understand the difference between homonyms in our language - especially when they appear in the same sentence.  

 

you're.... your....yore....

we'll.... wheel....

way, weigh, whey....

to, too, two....

heir...air...

bale...bail...

nun...none...

there, they're, their....

ball, bawl....

bear...bare...

ore...oar...

 

the list goes on and on... you fail all the time when your knowledge of the language fails you. 

 

 

 

Yah, I can see that:

 

 

 

The last two word of the following post:

 

 

 

And now for the hat trick:

 

 

Three strikes your out, babe.

 

You do understand that,don't you?

 

But wait there's more:

 

 

And just to cement my claim:

 

In all five of the above example you wrote "Your [sic] dismissed"

 

And these are only by the phrase search, God knows how many time you wrote just "your" instead of "you're" out of a phrase.

 

So, it seems to me you need to work on you homonyms and the whole your-you're thing escapes you too. The question is are you secure and man enough to admit it?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JaySolo said:

 

As the fact remains that you stepped on your dick by not knowing the difference between "dribble" and "drool"

 

 

dribble is an acknowledged synonym of drool.  I showed you the thesaurus entry yesterday.

 

and I often don't do my due diligence in proof reading my posts.... my MacBook often autocorrects your to you're and vice versa.  I miss it sometimes.  my bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

people playing divide by truism between literal, figurative, relative, social, ancestral truths. 4 cornered triangulation on a horizontal plane spliting a vertical axis's two ends of how and why to what, where, when, who existed or does exist now.

 

Below is two origami figures that measure 2 separate philosophies directing human nature ancestrally, which one explains my first sentence so accurately it ends 24/7 relative time line semantics means to distort how life actually exists limited to only eternally separating lifetimes as reproduced so far in this atmosphere inclusive of what became extinct or adds as a new variety of a species or species itself.

 

Know what eternity physical is before making promises tomorrow happens at all. 

 

Picture-150.jpg Picture-152.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/20/2019 at 6:31 AM, merrill said:

According to a Kaiser poll 81% of Democrats favor "Medicare for all," single-payer healthcare, along with 60% of Independents and almost a third of Republicans. And for good reason: virtually every country in the developed world provides better access to healthcare at half the cost using a single-payer system.

 

Fear mongering that single payer will cut into working families' incomes through tax hikes is disingenuous, because single payer replaces sky-rocketing insurance premiums, deductibles, and co-payments. A single payer system creates savings by cutting out for-profit middlemen and eliminating administrative waste, creating exactly the relief for working and middle-class families that AMERICA champions.

 

BECAUSE EVERYONE PAYS INTO THE SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM NO ONE IS PAYING MORE TO COVER THE COST FOR THOSE  WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE MEDICAL INSURANCE INDUSTRY. THIS IS A FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE APPROACH.

 

I am for IMPROVED Medicare Single Payer Insurance for ALL .   My tax dollars being spent on my health care is better than my tax dollars funding the USA war machine, subsidizing the oil industry, subsidizing pro sports, subsidizing local builders and developers thus the real estate industries, subsidizing tax breaks of all sorts and funding the annual raise of legislators pay etc etc etc.

 

https://www.healthcare-now.org/docs/spreport.pdf

 

I want my tax dollars being spent more efficiently and effectively for my health care. Tax dollar supported health insurance = everyone is paying because everyone pays taxes somehow.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

- Academic and Economic Infantilism -

 

- Democrat National Socialist Free Healthcare for All ~ $32.6 TRILLION Dollars.

- Actual Americans that pay Taxes ~ 100 MILLION.

- Average Individual Tax Burden per Tax-payer for Democrat National Socialist Free Healthcare for All?

 

- $326,000 -

 

- Ass-douche Self-entitled Adolescent Socialist malcontent -

Ocasio-Cortez.png

 

Ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$32.6 trillion over a ten year period is a few trillion less than the USA is spending right now while only covering mostly government employees .........

 

WHY BUILD A WALL WHEN PROVIDING HEALTH INSURANCE FOR ALL IS A TRUE INVESTMENT IN USA TAXPAYERS AND THE USA = BRINGING TAX DOLLARS HOME!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Make no mistake about it all in this country are paying taxes somehow maybe it is sales taxes, social security taxes and Medicare taxes etc etc etc. 

 

I want my tax dollars paying for health care for everyone who needs healthcare just as other countries do ......... leads to a more productive lifestyle.

 

Absolutely = I want my tax dollars being spent more efficiently and effectively for my health care. Tax dollar supported health insurance = everyone is paying because everyone pays taxes somehow.

  •  
 

Here are 10 great reasons to support IMPROVED Medicare Single Payer Insurance:

 

1. Everybody In, Nobody Out. Universal means access to health care for everyone, period.  Plus it is estimated to create 2.6 million new jobs!

 

2. Portability. If you are unemployed, or lose or change jobs, your health coverage stays with you.

 

3. Uniform Benefits. No Cadillac plans for the wealthy and Pinto plans for everyone else, with high deductibles, limited services, caps on payments for care, and no protection in the event of a catastrophe. One level of comprehensive care for everyone, regardless of the size of your wallet.

 

4. Prevention. By removing financial roadblocks, a universal health system encourages preventive care that lowers an individual's ultimate cost and pain and suffering when problems are neglected and societal cost in the over-utilization of emergency rooms or the spread of communicable diseases.

 

5. Choice. Most private insurance restricts your choice of providers and hospitals. Under the U.S. National Health Insurance Act, patients have a choice, and the provider is assured a fair payment.

 

6. No Interference with Care. Caregivers and patients regain their autonomy to decide what's best for a patient's health, not what's dictated by the billing department. No denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions or cancellation of policies for "unreported" minor health problems.

 

7. Reducing Waste. One third of every private health insurance dollar goes for paperwork and profits, compared to about 3% under Medicare, the federal government’s universal system for senior citizen healthcare.

 

8. Cost Savings. A guaranteed health care system can produce the cost savings needed to cover everyone, largely by using existing resources without the waste. Taiwan, shifting from a U.S. private health care model, adopted a similar system in 1995, boosting health coverage from 57% to 97% with little increase in overall health care spending.

 

 

9. Common Sense Budgeting. The public system sets fair reimbursements applied equally to all providers, private and public, while assuring that appropriate health care is delivered, and uses its clout to negotiate volume discounts for prescription drugs and medical equipment.

 

10. Public Oversight. The public sets the policies and administers the system, not high priced CEOs meeting in private and making decisions based on their company’s stock performance needs.

 

 

Medicare for ALL is excellent use of tax dollars and the icing on the cake is these tax dollars come back to we taxpayers in our communities to pay our medical bills. Not only that when people change jobs, get laid off, get fired or whatever they still have health care services = health care providers keep getting paid...... what's wrong with this? Nothing.

 

 

FYI:

According to HR 676 Universal Single Payer Insurance for ALL would cover every person for all necessary medical care 24/7 to include:

     

Wellness /prescription drugs / hospital / surgical / outpatient services /  primary and

preventive care / emergency services / dental / mental health / home health / physical therapy / rehabilitation (including for substance abuse) / vision care /  hearing services including hearing aids / chiropractic / medical equipment / palliative care / long term care

 

No deductibles / No Co-pays

 

The above is not free medical care just merely using our tax dollars more efficiently and effectively.

 

https://www.healthcare-now.org/docs/spreport.pdf

 

I want my tax dollars being spent more efficiently and effectively for my health care. Tax dollar supported health insurance = everyone is paying because everyone pays taxes somehow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/20/2019 at 6:31 AM, merrill said:

According to a Kaiser poll 81% of Democrats favor "Medicare for all," single-payer healthcare, along with 60% of Independents and almost a third of Republicans. And for good reason: virtually every country in the developed world provides better access to healthcare at half the cost using a single-payer system.

 

Fear mongering that single payer will cut into working families' incomes through tax hikes is disingenuous, because single payer replaces sky-rocketing insurance premiums, deductibles, and co-payments. A single payer system creates savings by cutting out for-profit middlemen and eliminating administrative waste, creating exactly the relief for working and middle-class families that AMERICA champions.

 

BECAUSE EVERYONE PAYS INTO THE SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM NO ONE IS PAYING MORE TO COVER THE COST FOR THOSE  WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE MEDICAL INSURANCE INDUSTRY. THIS IS A FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE APPROACH.

 

I am for IMPROVED Medicare Single Payer Insurance for ALL .   My tax dollars being spent on my health care is better than my tax dollars funding the USA war machine, subsidizing the oil industry, subsidizing pro sports, subsidizing local builders and developers thus the real estate industries, subsidizing tax breaks of all sorts and funding the annual raise of legislators pay etc etc etc.

 

https://www.healthcare-now.org/docs/spreport.pdf

 

I want my tax dollars being spent more efficiently and effectively for my health care. Tax dollar supported health insurance = everyone is paying because everyone pays taxes somehow.

 

 

 

A Fighter From Within - Elizabeth Warren

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-fighter-from-within/

 

Bernie Sanders Being Sane on Public Education

https://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-public-education-plan/

 

Trump As We Speak has more than 12,000 Lies on the Table

https://beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/08/29/nobody-around-trump-has-ever-seen-him-lie/

 

=== Amend the constitution to abolish the Electoral College. Hold presidential elections based on popular vote. One person one vote to determine the one leader who is supposed to answer to all the people of the country.

 

Background

The Electoral College has outlasted its usefulness. It is part of the constitution, written when communication was by pony express. Voters currently living and voting in a "red" or "blue" state are disenfranchised, because their vote doesn't matter.

 

Eliminating the electoral college means: no "swing" states getting all the attention and all the campaign stops and all the empty campaign promises.

 

The electoral members are selected by the two main political parties, Republican and Democrat, disenfranchising all other voters, independent, Libertarian, etc. End it now.

https://petitions.moveon.org/sign/abolish-the-electoral-6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/20/2019 at 6:31 AM, merrill said:

According to a Kaiser poll 81% of Democrats favor "Medicare for all," single-payer healthcare, along with 60% of Independents and almost a third of Republicans. And for good reason: virtually every country in the developed world provides better access to healthcare at half the cost using a single-payer system.

 

Fear mongering that single payer will cut into working families' incomes through tax hikes is disingenuous, because single payer replaces sky-rocketing insurance premiums, deductibles, and co-payments. A single payer system creates savings by cutting out for-profit middlemen and eliminating administrative waste, creating exactly the relief for working and middle-class families that AMERICA champions.

 

BECAUSE EVERYONE PAYS INTO THE SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM NO ONE IS PAYING MORE TO COVER THE COST FOR THOSE  WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE MEDICAL INSURANCE INDUSTRY. THIS IS A FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE APPROACH.

 

I am for IMPROVED Medicare Single Payer Insurance for ALL .   My tax dollars being spent on my health care is better than my tax dollars funding the USA war machine, subsidizing the oil industry, subsidizing pro sports, subsidizing local builders and developers thus the real estate industries, subsidizing tax breaks of all sorts and funding the annual raise of legislators pay etc etc etc.

 

https://www.healthcare-now.org/docs/spreport.pdf

 

I want my tax dollars being spent more efficiently and effectively for my health care. Tax dollar supported health insurance = everyone is paying because everyone pays taxes somehow.

 

 

 

I do not intend to support Joe Biden no matter how much pressure the media puts forward. He is not the best candidate for many reasons and he can barely speak. 

 

A Elizabeth Warren/Tulsi Gabbard or Elizabeth Warren/Kirsten Gillibrand ticket are my choices because it is time for women to take the stage.

 

Elizabeth Warren is the person who did best in the debate hands down.

 

Bernie would make a fine president however Elizabeth Warren is equally qualified.

 

It's time for women to takeover = it's time for Elizabeth Warren.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/20/2019 at 6:31 AM, merrill said:

According to a Kaiser poll 81% of Democrats favor "Medicare for all," single-payer healthcare, along with 60% of Independents and almost a third of Republicans. And for good reason: virtually every country in the developed world provides better access to healthcare at half the cost using a single-payer system.

 

Fear mongering that single payer will cut into working families' incomes through tax hikes is disingenuous, because single payer replaces sky-rocketing insurance premiums, deductibles, and co-payments. A single payer system creates savings by cutting out for-profit middlemen and eliminating administrative waste, creating exactly the relief for working and middle-class families that AMERICA champions.

 

BECAUSE EVERYONE PAYS INTO THE SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM NO ONE IS PAYING MORE TO COVER THE COST FOR THOSE  WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE MEDICAL INSURANCE INDUSTRY. THIS IS A FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE APPROACH.

 

I am for IMPROVED Medicare Single Payer Insurance for ALL .   My tax dollars being spent on my health care is better than my tax dollars funding the USA war machine, subsidizing the oil industry, subsidizing pro sports, subsidizing local builders and developers thus the real estate industries, subsidizing tax breaks of all sorts and funding the annual raise of legislators pay etc etc etc.

 

https://www.healthcare-now.org/docs/spreport.pdf

 

I want my tax dollars being spent more efficiently and effectively for my health care. Tax dollar supported health insurance = everyone is paying because everyone pays taxes somehow.

 

 

 

Medicare Health Insurance for ALL HR 676 will save mountains of tax dollars for city,state and federal governments.

 

HR 676 is the one that would be best for large and small business plus individuals. It is by far the most practical and comprehensive AND the best bang for the buck. Why should employers or unions

be forced to pay for health insurance?

 

HR 676 has been been around for years therefore has been tuned up and refined. No matter what number is attached in the end this is what consumers and business should go for.

 

Why use Medicare? It eliminates reinventing the wheel therefore saves a big bundle of money and time = efficient use of existing resources. Medicare is in place therefore it is ready to roll which is convenient. The only major change necessary is reimbursement numbers.  

 

The greedy inefficient insurance companies never pay out full invoice. Insurance companies usually pay out about 50%-60%.

 

The USA needs to STOP being be the most expensive insurance/health care of the industrialized nationsif americans want jobs back.

 

HR 676 Medicare for All insurance coverage is key to creating new wealth for america.

 

The most expensive health insurance in the world is not the answer for keeping business costs down and keeping our cost of living somewhat in check.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...