Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DennisTheMenace

Who's the lessor example of humanity...R. Kelly or Jeffrey Epstein?

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, DennisTheMenace said:

R. Kelly   Jeffrey Epstein

  

It's a real horse race...but I'd give the nod to Jeff "the jew" Epstein.   He's been friends with a couple of presidents and even had one as a "guest" at one of island parties.

 

Guess who? 

Humanity spawned their nature, in real time the parents of those they molested would have eliminated them when they abused the first adolescent.  But reality grants them diplomatic immunity until they ruling elites need a scapegoat to calm the village people under their rule of law granting diplomatic immunity to future scapegoats..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there an actual competition between disgraceful perverts?

It seems that Epstein was likely using teenyboppers as lures to blackmail billionaires for his own personal gain.

R. Kelly did not benefit financially from his perversions. He was 100% pervert al the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

Is there an actual competition between disgraceful perverts?

It seems that Epstein was likely using teenyboppers as lures to blackmail billionaires for his own personal gain.

R. Kelly did not benefit financially from his perversions. He was 100% pervert al the way.

 

So the white guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Is there an actual competition between disgraceful perverts?

It seems that Epstein was likely using teenyboppers as lures to blackmail billionaires for his own personal gain.

R. Kelly did not benefit financially from his perversions. He was 100% pervert al the way.

 

Answer the question...You are talking like a defense lawyer.

 

Who is the lessor of the perverts?   It's nut cutt'ng time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, king of the county said:

 

So the white guy

It all depends on whether perversion for financial gain is more perverse than straight perversion.

We'd be better off with no perversion at all.

After it is all over and done with, R. Kelly leaves behind some recordings that some people enjoy (perhaps despite his perversion).

Epstein leaves behind, at most, a reprehensible business plan for  using  unsuspecting underage girls for financial gain.

 

People probably will not be likely to suffer any ill effects from listening to R. Kelly's recordings.

People emulating Epstein will clearly be bad for society.

 

I doubt that any people will jump of tall buildings from fixating on the song, "I believe I can fly". Certainly no sane and sober ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DennisTheMenace said:

R. Kelly   Jeffrey Epstein

  

It's a real horse race...but I'd give the nod to Jeff "the jew" Epstein.   He's been friends with a couple of presidents and even had one as a "guest" at one of island parties.

 

Guess who? 

both are democrats....so  there really is little difference between them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, king of the county said:

The white dude 

hahahaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, DennisTheMenace said:

 

Answer the question...You are talking like a defense lawyer.

 

Who is the lessor of the perverts?   It's nut cutt'ng time. 

lessor and lesser are entirely different words. I assume you mean "lesser" (opposite of greater) and not lessor (person who demands a lease).

I would say that both of them are  equally perverted. It has not been proven that Epstein was blackmailing anyone, thought it seems quite likely that he was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bigsky said:

both are democrats....so  there really is little difference between them.

R. Kelly and Epstein being Democrats has zilch to do with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

lessor and lesser are entirely different words. I assume you mean "lesser" (opposite of greater) and not lessor (person who demands a lease).

I would say that both of them are  equally perverted. It has not been proven that Epstein was blackmailing anyone, thought it seems quite likely that he was.

 

Wrong again, the Jews own everything...they are the lessor.  😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Is there an actual competition between disgraceful perverts?

It seems that Epstein was likely using teenyboppers as lures to blackmail billionaires for his own personal gain.

R. Kelly did not benefit financially from his perversions. He was 100% pervert al the way.

You're making excuses for pedophiles because they're democrats but throw the black guy under the bus. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Q: what do you get when you cross a pirate with a child molester??

A:  Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Kelly!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, harryramar said:

Q: what do you get when you cross a pirate with a child molester??

A:  Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Kelly!

Q: what do get when you cross a wealthy jew with a child molester??

A:  Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Epstein!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, DennisTheMenace said:

Q: what do get when you cross a wealthy jew with a child molester??

A:  Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef Epstein!

A Jew pervert and a negro pervert.

Why don't we just hand them both over to the KKK? 

And then we all can go home happy.           😎

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

R. Kelly and Epstein being Democrats has zilch to do with this.

really.....I suppose the fact that they are both ni66ers has nothing to do with it either.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Taipan said:

A Jew pervert and a negro pervert.

Why don't we just hand them both over to the KKK? 

And then we all can go home happy.           😎

 

 

Good idea.  I'll run that up the chain.  👍 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DennisTheMenace said:

 

 

Good idea.  I'll run that up the chain.  👍

LOL.....LOL.....

See?   

We can agree on some things !!!     😊

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

It all depends on whether perversion for financial gain is more perverse than straight perversion.

We'd be better off with no perversion at all.

After it is all over and done with, R. Kelly leaves behind some recordings that some people enjoy (perhaps despite his perversion).

Epstein leaves behind, at most, a reprehensible business plan for  using  unsuspecting underage girls for financial gain.

 

People probably will not be likely to suffer any ill effects from listening to R. Kelly's recordings.

People emulating Epstein will clearly be bad for society.

 

I doubt that any people will jump of tall buildings from fixating on the song, "I believe I can fly". Certainly no sane and sober ones.

Sooooo the white one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...