Jump to content
Old Mack

Spelling NAZI XavierOnassis: Did you get something wrong or what ?

Recommended Posts

On 6/27/2019 at 8:33 PM, Debs said:

You are nothing but a childish PUNK Mack thats why most people  have you on ignore. I know I do. I check in once in a while to LAUGH at your STUPIDITY but seriously you are just a PUNK

Given that you retards put anyone on ignore for nothing more than having a different view than yours, this doesnt mean anything.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Wrong again !

 

On 1/14/2019 at 2:46 PM, XavierOnassis said:

...the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese Army mostly had small arms, not tanks and troop carriers. 

 

On 1/14/2019 at 3:38 PM, Old Mack said:

BTW: The NVA (North Vietnamese Army) did have tanks and other military vehicle hardware. It was rarely use until they were on the final offensive. They also used captures American heavy equipment. 

 

The  National Liberation Front / VC / Vietnamese Communist...were limited to small arms because of thier tactics.   

 

Battle of An Loc aftermath, ARVN Rangers next to a North Vietnamese T-54.

 

At this stage in the war, the PAVN often attacked with T-54 medium tanks spearheading the advance, usually preceded by a massive artillery barrage. These tactics reflected Soviet doctrine, as the PAVN had been supplied with Soviet and Chinese Communist equipment, including jets, artillery, and surface to air missiles since the beginning of the war. The battle eventually stagnated and became a periodic trade of artillery barrages. This was most probably a result of casualties sustained in the frustrated attacks on heavily entrenched enemy positions in control of a withering array of supporting firepower.

 

Image result for battle of anloc tanks"Image result for pt 76 vietnam war"Image result for destroyed t 54"

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I

7 hours ago, Old Mack said:
On 1/14/2019 at 2:46 PM, XavierOnassis said:

.the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese Army mostly had small arms, not tanks and troop carriers. 

 

On 1/14/2019 at 3:38 PM, Old Mack said:

BTW: The NVA (North Vietnamese Army) did have tanks and other military vehicle hardware. It was rarely use until they were on the final offensive. They also used captures American heavy equipment. 

What did I say? I said MOSTLY. How did most of the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong get around?  They WALKED!

 

You really had to dig back into January to call me a Nazi. It is a well-know fact that Nazis always spread propaganda about the use of tanks and troop carriers by the Viet Cong.

Herr Goebbels mentioned this ALL THE time. Just mention NVA tanks and they could not shut him up about it!

 

Make sure to vote for Trump, so that you can continue buying incandescent lightbulbs and using toilets you do not have to flush 12 times.  Do energy saving lightbulbs make YOU looks orange?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You really had to dig back into January to call me a Nazi.

 

No you did not say...the NVA / VC mosted walked. 

 

Here it is again: the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese Army mostly had small arms, not tanks and troop carriers.

 

Both the NVA/PLF had mortars...which are considered artillery.

 

I must be a cyber weirdo because I love pointing out when you are cyber wrong. (Which is quite often I just don't bother all the time)

 

BTW: I did not call you a NAZI; I called you a spelling NAZI.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Old Mack said:

 

No you did not say...the NVA / VC mosted walked. 

 

Here it is again: the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese Army mostly had small arms, not tanks and troop carriers.

 

Both the NVA/PLF had mortars...which are considered artillery.

 

I must be a cyber weirdo because I love pointing out when you are cyber wrong. (Which is quite often I just don't bother all the time)

 

BTW: I did not call you a NAZI; I called you a spelling NAZI.

 

 

Who actually gives a sh!t?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

Who actually gives a sh!t?

you do, until your methodology doesn't work anymore, then you talk this trash as your ideological intellect traditionally does by those acting larger than their proportioned point of physical displacement in this atmosphere now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

Who actually gives a sh!t?

 

Pretty much what I say about 99% of your post !

 

You mock me for my spelling BUT make cyber mistakes all the time !

 

exman...what are you some kind of drunk ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/3/2019 at 10:42 PM, XavierOnassis said:

Get a life!

 

Get a encyclopedia !

 

The three-front attack was part of the North Vietnamese Nguyen Hue Offensive (later known as the “Easter Offensive”), which had been launched on March 30. ...The attacking force included 14 infantry divisions and 26 separate regiments, with more than 120,000 troops and approximately 1,200 tanks and other armored vehicles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/27/2019 at 11:33 PM, Debs said:

You are nothing but a childish PUNK Mack thats why most people  have you on ignore. I know I do. I check in once in a while to LAUGH at your STUPIDITY but seriously you are just a PUNK

Oh lord.  I forgot Colon was here.  No mistaking that post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

Thomas Sowell is the real Uncle Tom, a hireling of the establishment.

 

Now who was that...that wants to see this ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/24/2020 at 11:41 PM, Old Mack said:

Now who was that...that wants to see this ?

 

5 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

What does singlewide peckerwood do in this forum?   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Old Mack said:

 

It is a valid question that everyone here should answer for himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

It is a valid question that everyone here should answer for himself.

 

...singlewide peckerwood huh...you're a racist that uses racial slurs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/24/2020 at 11:41 PM, Old Mack said:

Now who was that...that wants to see this ?

 

6 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

It is a valid question that everyone here should answer for himself.

 

6 hours ago, Redoctober said:

XavierOnassisSHOW ME ANYTHING I HAVE SAID THAT IS RACIST

 

7 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

What does singlewide peckerwood do in this forum?   

 

Redoctober...does the above post look racist ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Old Mack said:

 

 

 

 

Redoctober...does the above post look racist ?

Na, I make fun of my fellow cracker rednecks too. Lol 😆   

 

I bet he would scream racist id you said something about living in the projects.

 

XO is just a ledtist bitch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/26/2019 at 11:27 PM, Old Mack said:

 

Wrong again !

 

 

 

Battle of An Loc aftermath, ARVN Rangers next to a North Vietnamese T-54.

 

At this stage in the war, the PAVN often attacked with T-54 medium tanks spearheading the advance, usually preceded by a massive artillery barrage. These tactics reflected Soviet doctrine, as the PAVN had been supplied with Soviet and Chinese Communist equipment, including jets, artillery, and surface to air missiles since the beginning of the war. The battle eventually stagnated and became a periodic trade of artillery barrages. This was most probably a result of casualties sustained in the frustrated attacks on heavily entrenched enemy positions in control of a withering array of supporting firepower.

 

Image result for battle of anloc tanks"Image result for pt 76 vietnam war"Image result for destroyed t 54"

 

 

he said mostly and that is true. They certainly didn't have them early in the war.

 

Either way the US troops constantly beat the heck out of the NVC. We won the war on the ground. We lost the public opinion war at home and you can thank the left for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Redoctober said:

he said mostly and that is true. They certainly didn't have them early in the war.

 

Either way the US troops constantly beat the heck out of the NVC. We won the war on the ground. We lost the public opinion war at home and you can thank the left for that.

 

Yeah...BUT afterwards in his post exman said the North did NOT have tanks. (implaction: none)  Tanks are not for transporting personal BUT the NVA did have them. (just not in the # the Allies)

 

The United States could have won the war in weeks if not days.  Most objectives in war is to capture the Capital and than the Government will collapse.  Hanoi is 450 miles from Hue City. (The DMZ)  Had America Armed Forces done a land invasion towards Hanoi (and the border countries) with support...after a certain point pass the DMZ they would have rolled thru the NVA defences. 

 

So here is another idiotic claim from exman:

 

On 7/27/2020 at 10:15 AM, XavierOnassis said:

You do not know shit about this.  The War was unwinnable. LBJ knew it, MacNamara knew it, Nixon knew it. No bombings would bring about any victory....

 

You can read the words below of one of the greatest generals ever to live and see bombing can break a enemies back.

 

BTW: Unlike exman I do not just run my mouth...so how do I know this stuff ?  I was in the (peace time) Army and missed the draft by 6 months...thus the last guys who fought there were in my age group.  I have spoke to them and other RVN Veterans.  Also I use to read a lot of Civil War / Vietnamese war history...

where I learned a lot of stuff.

 

exman is a soft handed commie !  I just wonder if he runs his mouth about stuff he does not know about in read time like he does here. 

 

Author:  General Giap was a brilliant, highly respected leader of the North Vietnam military.  The following quote is from his memoirs currently found in the Vietnam war memorial in Hanoi:

 

“What we still don’t understand is why you Americans stopped the bombing of Hanoi. You had us on the ropes. If you had pressed us a little harder, just for another day or two, we were ready to surrender! It was the same at the battles of TET. You defeated us! We knew it, and we thought you knew it. 

 

 

 

baggage_419_knowitall-1-1.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Old Mack said:

 

Yeah...BUT afterwards in his post exman said the North did NOT have tanks. (implaction: none)  Tanks are not for transporting personal BUT the NVA did have them. (just not in the # the Allies)

 

The United States could have won the war in weeks if not days.  Most objectives in war is to capture the Capital and than the Government will collapse.  Hanoi is 450 miles from Hue City. (The DMZ)  Had America Armed Forces done a land invasion towards Hanoi (and the border countries) with support...after a certain point pass the DMZ they would have rolled thru the NVA defences. 

 

So here is another idiotic claim from exman:

 

 

You can read the words below of one of the greatest generals ever to live and see bombing can break a enemies back.

 

BTW: Unlike exman I do not just run my mouth...so how do I know this stuff ?  I was in the (peace time) Army and missed the draft by 6 months...thus the last guys who fought there were in my age group.  I have spoke to them and other RVN Veterans.  Also I use to read a lot of Civil War / Vietnamese war history...

where I learned a lot of stuff.

 

exman is a soft handed commie !  I just wonder if he runs his mouth about stuff he does not know about in read time like he does here. 

 

Author:  General Giap was a brilliant, highly respected leader of the North Vietnam military.  The following quote is from his memoirs currently found in the Vietnam war memorial in Hanoi:

 

“What we still don’t understand is why you Americans stopped the bombing of Hanoi. You had us on the ropes. If you had pressed us a little harder, just for another day or two, we were ready to surrender! It was the same at the battles of TET. You defeated us! We knew it, and we thought you knew it. 

 

 

 

baggage_419_knowitall-1-1.gif

 

 

You are correct, but in all they were still a poor country with a poor army. It wasn't until after Tet that they realized they didn't need to win on the battlefield. They just needed body bags to turn public opinion in the US

 

XO is a fake intellectual. He is the type of liberal that reads the last page in each chapter of classical books to seem as though he is smart. It's all fake. Most of what he posts is googled just before he posts it. 

 

I don't know if he is a soft handed commie. I do know he is a stupid commie. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Redoctober said:

It wasn't until after Tet that they realized they didn't need to win on the battlefield. They just needed body bags to turn public opinion in the US

 

XO is a fake intellectual. He is the type of liberal that reads the last page in each chapter of classical books to seem as though he is smart. It's all fake. Most of what he posts is googled just before he posts it. 

 

I don't know if he is a soft handed commie. I do know he is a stupid commie. 

 

Point 1:  I believe it was Uncle Ho that said...we will never lose as long as we can field a Army no matter how thin. I'm pretty sure he (or one of those VCs) also said...we will ose 10 men to your 1 BUT it will be you that grows weary of the war. (Which makes your first statement correct)

 

Point 2:  See my PIC above as far as being a intellectual.

 

Point 3:  After reading his post...I'm sure exman has never done a day of hard work in his life. 

 

 

ceaf4c5904a9f6d567437188524d3a1a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Old Mack said:

 

Point 1:  I believe it was Uncle Ho that said...we will never lose as long as we can field a Army no matter how thin. I'm pretty sure he (or one of those VCs) also said...we will ose 10 men to your 1 BUT it will be you that grows weary of the war. (Which makes your first statement correct)

 

Point 2:  See my PIC above as far as being a intellectual.

 

Point 3:  After reading his post...I'm sure exman has never done a day of hard work in his life. 

 

 

ceaf4c5904a9f6d567437188524d3a1a.jpg

XO is soft as hell. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • By XavierOnassis

    diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...