Jump to content
merrill

Amend the constitution to abolish the Electoral College. Hold presidential elections based on popular vote. One person one vote to determine the one leader who is supposed to answer to all the people of the country.

Recommended Posts

A Fighter From Within - Elizabeth Warren

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-fighter-from-within/

 

Bernie Sanders Being Sane on Public Education

https://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-public-education-plan/

 

Trump As We Speak has 10,796 Lies on the Table

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/10/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/?utm_term=.222d374dd08b

 

=== Amend the constitution to abolish the Electoral College. Hold presidential elections based on popular vote. One person one vote to determine the one leader who is supposed to answer to all the people of the country.

 

Background

The Electoral College has outlasted its usefulness. It is part of the constitution, written when communication was by pony express. Voters currently living and voting in a "red" or "blue" state are disenfranchised, because their vote doesn't matter. Eliminating the electoral college means: no "swing" states getting all the attention and all the campaign stops and all the empty campaign promises.

 

The electoral members are selected by the two main political parties, Republican and Democrat, disenfranchising all other voters, independent, Libertarian, etc. End it now.

https://petitions.moveon.org/sign/abolish-the-electoral-6

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't win Elections staying home, or voting for someone other than the Candidate

 

 

you boys need to smarten up....I'd say its probably too late, you really F"D America and yourselves MORONS 

 

 

thanks!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, merrill said:

 

=== Amend the constitution to abolish the Electoral College. Hold presidential elections based on popular vote. One person one vote to determine the one leader who is supposed to answer to all the people of the country.

 

Background

The Electoral College has outlasted its usefulness. It is part of the constitution, written when communication was by pony express. Voters currently living and voting in a "red" or "blue" state are disenfranchised, because their vote doesn't matter. Eliminating the electoral college means: no "swing" states getting all the attention and all the campaign stops and all the empty campaign promises.

 

The electoral members are selected by the two main political parties, Republican and Democrat, disenfranchising all other voters, independent, Libertarian, etc. End it now.

https://petitions.moveon.org/sign/abolish-the-electoral-6

The Electoral College is more pertinent to Presidential elections today than ever. Eliminating the Electoral College would mean that Californication, New York and the major urban centers would get "all the attention and all the campaign stops and all the empty campaign promises" While the rest of the states would be ignored.  If the Electoral College didn’t exist, heavily populated states like New York and Californication would have a disproportionate influence on the outcome of the presidential election every four years – leaving the smaller states with no reason to be a part of the union. In short the Electoral College functions as it is supposed to, that is, to prevent a tyranny of the majority over the minority.

 

The Electoral College functions as it was meant to.  Eliminating it is a bad idea!

 

 

.

TrumpLand

 

 

Clinton Archipelago

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

---------->> Amend the constitution to abolish the Electoral College. Hold presidential elections based on popular vote. <<----------

 

^^^ ^^^ ^^^

 

I agree with that, TOTALLY !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Faith said:

---------->> Amend the constitution to abolish the Electoral College. Hold presidential elections based on popular vote. <<----------

 

^^^ ^^^ ^^^

 

I agree with that, TOTALLY !

Why? The sociopath many titted empress won the popular vote by 2.86 MILLION votes over trump (48.2% to 46.1%)  due almost entirely to a 4.27 million vote margin of victory in Californication; which she carried by more than a 30-point margin (61.7% to 31.6%). Take away LA county and NYC and trump would have won even more votes.  Why should the voters of Californication get to decide who is POTUS?  The many titted empress won only 20 states to trump's victory in 30 states.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Buffalo said:

The Electoral College is more pertinent to Presidential elections today than ever. Eliminating the Electoral College would mean that Californication, New York and the major urban centers would get "all the attention and all the campaign stops and all the empty campaign promises" While the rest of the states would be ignored.  If the Electoral College didn’t exist, heavily populated states like New York and Californication would have a disproportionate influence on the outcome of the presidential election every four years – leaving the smaller states with no reason to be a part of the union. In short the Electoral College functions as it is supposed to, that is, to prevent a tyranny of the majority over the minority.

 

The Electoral College functions as it was meant to.  Eliminating it is a bad idea!

 

 

.

TrumpLand

 

 

Clinton Archipelago

 

 

Correct. Most of the country doesn't live (or want to live) like they do in the cities. It's like different worlds. This country was founded  in the hopes of liberty and rights for the individual.

 

It's hard to minimize the inherent tyranny of a national government but the electoral college helps. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad liberals always want to get rid of something when it doesn't work their way...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Buffalo said:

Why? The sociopath many titted empress won the popular vote by 2.86 MILLION votes over trump (48.2% to 46.1%)  due almost entirely to a 4.27 million vote margin of victory in Californication; which she carried by more than a 30-point margin (61.7% to 31.6%). Take away LA county and NYC and trump would have won even more votes.  Why should the voters of Californication get to decide who is POTUS?  The many titted empress won only 20 states to trump's victory in 30 states.

 

Still, for better or for worse ... we THE PEOPLE ... should be the ones calling the shots.

 

And don't forget that in a reverse situation that also could happen :

 

Like reps win more popular votes but dems still get the cake.

 

Popular vote, no matter what.

A people gets the govvie it deserves !

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Buffalo said:

The sociopath many titted empress won the popular vote by 2.86 MILLION votes over trump (48.2% to 46.1%)  

 

Those were part of the 3 million+  fraudulent votes of the dead and illegals.

 

For which she would be in jail if not for a corrupt DoJ !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Faith said:

 

Still, for better or for worse ... we THE PEOPLE ... should be the ones calling the shots.

 

And don't forget that in a reverse situation that also could happen :

 

Like reps win more popular votes but dems still get the cake.

 

Popular vote, no matter what.

A people gets the govvie it deserves !

 

 

But "we the people" don't live in California or even in a city.

 

Doing it your way would leave only one choice...splitting the country into units that think and live alike. More than 600,000 died the last time we tried that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bunch of petty Ignorant Treason Monkeys MAKING EXCUSES for why they should not have to go to all that trouble of convincing the PEOPLE and VOTERS of America they are right and win the VOTE to win the election. Why they are SO ENTITLED their votes should count for MORE than people in urban areas. Why it is FINE that the PEOPLE who vote dont AGREE with them who should be president THEY should win ANYWAY.  A bunch of whiny EXCUSES for why their MINORITY opinion should choose the president for the MAJORITY.  Whiny excuses for an voting affirmative Action program for INBRED MORONS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Michaelf said:

More than 600,000 died the last time we tried that.

 

A small price to pay for the VALUE OF  MY  VOTE !

 

No one else other than  we the people  shoud get the last say !

 

For better ... or ... for worse !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Faith said:

 

Still, for better or for worse ... we THE PEOPLE ... should be the ones calling the shots.

 

And don't forget that in a reverse situation that also could happen :

 

Like reps win more popular votes but dems still get the cake.

 

Popular vote, no matter what.

A people gets the govvie it deserves !

 

 

The country boys vs. the city boys.

That game was being played out 200yrs. ago.  It is still being played out today.

The Founding Fathers saw this dilemma and came up with the E/C.  I never could have done that.  They were smarter than I am today.

Without the E/C, the  4 largest cities would decide every election.  That ain't right.  That would lead to another Civil War.

 

Example;

There are 50 GOP cowboys on a ranch outside of town, working 16hr. days.  In town there are 1000 Dem town-folk who vote to

seize 50% of that ranch's herd every yr......so that the town-folk can eat free meat all yrs.

Is that fair?  I think not.  God-bless the E/C and our Founding Fathers.      🙂

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Buffalo said:

The Electoral College is more pertinent to Presidential elections today than ever. Eliminating the Electoral College would mean that Californication, New York and the major urban centers would get "all the attention and all the campaign stops and all the empty campaign promises" While the rest of the states would be ignored.  If the Electoral College didn’t exist, heavily populated states like New York and Californication would have a disproportionate influence on the outcome of the presidential election every four years – leaving the smaller states with no reason to be a part of the union. In short the Electoral College functions as it is supposed to, that is, to prevent a tyranny of the majority over the minority.

 

The Electoral College functions as it was meant to.  Eliminating it is a bad idea!

 

 

.

TrumpLand

 

 

Clinton Archipelago

 

Good charts, Buffalo !!

Thank you.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Michaelf said:

 

Correct. Most of the country doesn't live (or want to live) like they do in the cities. It's like different worlds. This country was founded  in the hopes of liberty and rights for the individual.

 

It's hard to minimize the inherent tyranny of a national government but the electoral college helps. 

That is because, instead of a national popular vote for POTUS, there is, in essence, 50 individual state elections for POTUS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Taipan said:

That ain't right. 

That would lead to another Civil War.

 

All I can say is ... ... SO BE IT !

I own weapons ... quite an arsenal and I was and am an excellent sharpshooter ... let it come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Faith said:

 

All I can say is ... ... SO BE IT !

I own weapons ... quite an arsenal and I was and am an excellent sharpshooter ... let it come.

So, do you agree with the purpose of the Electoral College or think it should be abolished?
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Buffalo said:

So, do you agree with the purpose of the Electoral College or think it should be abolished?
 

 

Abolish it ... like NOW !

 

I agree that we shouldn't allow them pervert californicans and depraved newyokkers dictate the future of the nation ... but we have means and meds to cure  those deviant perverts !

Laws ought to be enacted as well to counter these faggots'  influence..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any creature in the animal kingdom as STUPID as a Treason Monkey? Is there any statistic in the WORLD LESS RELEVANT than how many ACRES OF LAND a candidate carried? Cows dont vote. Tumbleweeds dont VOTE. People VOTE and in SIX of the last SEVEN Presidential elections the Democrat got MORE HUMANS voting for him.  Treason monkeys are obviously mentally retarded so they think that acres of barren LAND stat is really impressive. Those of us with functional cerebral cortexes can laugh hysterically at their STUPIDITY.  They are just doing what they were TRAINED  to do. Repeating the STUPIDITY they were BRAINWASHED with,I mean sure they are STUPID talking points. The object of ridicule by those of us with an actual intellect but Treason Monkeys really ARE that stupid. They keep vomiting up the talking points to make the argument that THEY are so entitled they shouldnt have to go to all that trouble of convincing AMERICANS they are right. They should win the elections while LOSING the VOTES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Faith said:

 

All I can say is ... ... SO BE IT !

I own weapons ... quite an arsenal and I was and am an excellent sharpshooter ... let it come.

Sooooooo……….

would you be in favor of a "non-violent" Civil War?  A "non-violent" separation of our two tribes?  We might be able to work that out. 

You Dems live on your side of the river under your laws.  We GOP will live on our side of the river under our laws. 

We could be good neighbors, without aggravating each other with forced integration.  It is called "peaceful divorce", or, "peaceful secession". 

Doesn't that logical?  Could you go for something like that?        🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Faith you disgusting bigoted PIG. You are a childish PUNK and a ridiculous IGNORANT POS so GFY. The laws should put SCUM like you in a mental institution where you belong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Debs said:

"I'm Such a Pussy...

giphy.gif

I'm Having Blue Devil's Baby!"

 

- Democrat National Socialism -

See_what_a_few_government_programs_can_d

 

at-the-core-of-liberalism-is-the-spoiled

 

Ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem with the popular vote  was proven during the 2016 election

 

Hillary won the popular vote, yeah yeah, I know some people dispute the numbers whether she won by 3 votes or 3 million or in between she won

 

The problem is she won the populous states

 

she won 20 states and Trump won 30 states

 

now if she won 25 states and Trump won 25 states and he took D.C then maybe you can make a case

 

but the reality is she won populous states, that proves why the E.C is needed.

 

plus lets be honest if it was a popular vote do you think she would have had as many votes? 

I don't even think Trump would have won as many votes

 

If it was a popular vote there would be more candidates, in our system its set up that its a race between two major parties

 

I dont think Hillary would have won even with a popular vote as their would be more candidates

A lot voters are not educated enough to know there are other candidates in the mix, they just believe its either Democrat or republican

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...