Jump to content
BIGTEX

AUTHORETTE WHO CLAIMS THERE ARE NO BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE RACES GETS SHUT DOWN BY REVIEWERS WHO USE FACTS TO DESTROY HER LIBERAL MYTHOLOGY

Recommended Posts

The average IQ in sub-Saharan Africa is 68.

 

An IQ of 68 is considered RETARDED in the USA.

 

NOW, do you know why the next-generation supercomputer will NOT be developed in Burkina Faso?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice that no liberal DARES to come to the defense of the negroes.

 

That's because they are gearing up for the election, and they know that championing the side of the negro is a losing proposition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the simple fact is obviously there are differences betwwen races cultures and genders that is not a justification for treating people in an unequal fashion it is simply reality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BIGTEX said:

She didn't attempt to write a book about race.

 

Instead, she wrote a book that is nothing but a liberal fairy tale.

 

NOTE TO ALL:  There are PROFOUND and MEASURABLE differences in the races of mankind, and those differences are due to GENETICS.

 

https://quillette.com/2019/06/05/superior-the-return-of-race-science-a-review/

Our article begins by briefly reviewing the strengths of Saini’s book. It then provides a detailed discussion of the book’s weaknesses. We divide our discussion of the book’s weaknesses into two subsections: scientific misunderstandings and logical fallacies. Overall, while Superior is timely and covers a multitude of interesting topics, it ultimately fails to deliver on its core arguments and is likely to leave the general reader confused, as well as misinformed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BIGTEX said:

She didn't attempt to write a book about race.

 

Instead, she wrote a book that is nothing but a liberal fairy tale.

 

NOTE TO ALL:  There are PROFOUND and MEASURABLE differences in the races of mankind, and those differences are due to GENETICS.

 

https://quillette.com/2019/06/05/superior-the-return-of-race-science-a-review/

Strengths

41s8YATz7L-197x300.jpg?resize=197%2C300&First, Superior is admirably succinct at a mere 256 pages, meaning that—in principle—it can be finished in a single day. Second, despite not requiring more than a day of the reader’s time, the book does manage to cover plenty of interesting material. To her credit, Saini reached out to experts in a wide range of fields, including some who work at the cutting edge of human biosocial science. During the course of Superior, the reader is treated to commentary from historians such as Evelyn Hammonds, anthropologists such as Gilles Boëtsch, psychologists such as Richard Haier, and geneticists such as David Reich. Saini even contacted several individuals whose views are obviously antithetical to her own (although she does not always interpret their remarks charitably).

In addition to including commentary from these experts, Superior reports a number of rather interesting facts. In Chapter 1, for example, we are told that many indigenous Australians favour the multi-regional theory of human origins over the more commonly accepted Out of Africa theory “because it sits closer to their own belief that they have been here from the very beginning.”  And in Chapter 7 we learn that 90 percent of Britain’s gene pool was replaced in a series of migration events beginning around 2500 BC. This means that modern white Britons are primarily descended from the so-called Bell Beaker people, rather than from the Neolithic people who built Stonehenge.

A third strength of Saini’s book is that she aptly describes how aspects of “race science” have been misused in pursuit of commercial and political agendas, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BIGTEX said:

She didn't attempt to write a book about race.

 

Instead, she wrote a book that is nothing but a liberal fairy tale.

 

NOTE TO ALL:  There are PROFOUND and MEASURABLE differences in the races of mankind, and those differences are due to GENETICS.

 

https://quillette.com/2019/06/05/superior-the-return-of-race-science-a-review/

A third strength of Saini’s book is that she aptly describes how aspects of “race science” have been misused in pursuit of commercial and political agendas, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A third strength of Saini’s book is that she aptly describes how aspects of “race science” have been misused in pursuit of commercial and political agendas, 

A third strength of Saini’s book is that she aptly describes how aspects of “race science” have been misused in pursuit of commercial and political agendas, 

A third strength of Saini’s book is that she aptly describes how aspects of “race science” have been misused in pursuit of commercial and political agendas, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For example, as late as 1907, two million visitors flocked to the Grand Colonial Exposition in Paris, where—among other attractions—they could marvel at one of the “human zoos”: mini-villages set up to give curious onlookers a glimpse into the lives of “primitive” foreigners. And of course, few readers will need reminding that the Nazis justified their genocidal policies of “racial hygiene” by appealing to the supposed superiority of an Aryan “master race.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Furthermore, Saini points out that it is not only Europeans who have sought to rewrite history, and indeed genetics, for their own political purposes. For example, despite overwhelming evidence that humans evolved in Africa around 250,000 years ago, some Hindu nationalists fiercely maintain that Hindus have no ancestry from outside India. Hence, in order to avoid sparking controversy, one team of Indian geneticists found it prudent to use the euphemism “Ancestral North Indians” when referring to an ancient population with ancestry from the western part of Eurasia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cientific Misunderstandings

We now turn to the weaknesses in Saini’s book, beginning with her scientific misunderstandings. The most important of these, which corresponds to the first of her four main theses, is her misunderstanding of race. Although Superior is about the putative return of “race science,” Saini does not actually provide a coherent definition of ‘race.’ In the Prologue, she writes:

No place or people has a claim on superiority. Race is the counter-argument. Race is at its heart the belief that we are born different, deep inside our bodies, perhaps even in character and intellect, as well as in outward appearance.

This definition inextricably binds up race with morality, making it an affront to human dignity and a threat to metaphysical equality. (We will say more about this later).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scientific Misunderstandings

We now turn to the weaknesses in Saini’s book, beginning with her scientific misunderstandings. The most important of these, which corresponds to the first of her four main theses, is her misunderstanding of race. Although Superior is about the putative return of “race science,” Saini does not actually provide a coherent definition of ‘race.’ In the Prologue, she writes:

No place or people has a claim on superiority. Race is the counter-argument. Race is at its heart the belief that we are born different, deep inside our bodies, perhaps even in character and intellect, as well as in outward appearance.

This definition inextricably binds up race with morality, making it an affront to human dignity and a threat to metaphysical equality. (We will say more about this later).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A more plausible conception of race, one that is consistent with how careful philosophers and geneticists use the term, recognises that:

  • When humans began leaving Africa around 75,000 years ago, they dispersed across a much greater range of environments than they had previously inhabited.
  • The humans that settled in different geographic regions subsequently came under different selection pressures (e.g. temperature, seasonality, altitude).
  • Natural barriers such as oceans (e.g. the Atlantic), deserts (e.g. the Sahara) and mountain ranges (e.g. the Himalayas) impeded gene flow between different populations for substantial periods of time.
  • When there is limited gene flow between populations that have come under different selection pressures, we would expect them to gradually diverge from one another over via the processes of genetic drift and natural selection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Races therefore correspond to human populations that have been living in relative isolation from one another, under different regimes of selection. This means that racial categories identify real phenotypic differences, and reflect real genetic variation. Despite the various selective quotations to the contrary in Superior, many experts who have urged that we eschew the term ‘race’ would agree with all four of the propositions listed above, even if they sedulously avoid using the term ‘race’ because of its negative political connotations. In fact, Saini herself seems to recognise this point, when she writes in Chapter 6:

The word “race” had been prudently replaced by “population,” and “racial difference” by “human variation,” but didn’t it look suspiciously like the same old creature?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only does that definition clearly apply to the major human races, depending upon whether the biologist is a ‘lumper’ or ‘splitter’, it can also be readily applied to subpopulations within the major human races. In Africa, for instance, it is easy to spot the differences between a Masai, Kikuyu, Luo or Dinka, or scores of other tribal groupings. Or in Europe between a Dutchman and a Greek. They are physically distinctive, associated with particular parts of the continent, but can and do interbreed readily. If the subspecies (race) concept is uncontroversial when applied to all other species, why should it not apply equally to Homo sapiens?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats not quite what they did they did say much of what she wrote had merit and then pointed out the flaws in her argument is that a 'shut down"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words:

 

She didn't attempt to write a book about race.

 

Instead, she wrote a book that is nothing but a liberal fairy tale.

 

NOTE TO ALL:  There are PROFOUND and MEASURABLE differences in the races of mankind, and those differences are due to GENETICS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/6/2019 at 1:59 PM, BIGTEX said:

She didn't attempt to write a book about race.

 

Instead, she wrote a book that is nothing but a liberal fairy tale.

 

NOTE TO ALL:  There are PROFOUND and MEASURABLE differences in the races of mankind, and those differences are due to GENETICS.

 

https://quillette.com/2019/06/05/superior-the-return-of-race-science-a-review/

what a line of over exaggeration again. Biology is how reproducting works, DNA is the result of it working the same within a species including all the varieties among the species able to cross breed without the reproductions unable to reproduce with either breeds of the crossed DNA. Atleast that was what I learned in school during the mid and late 60's.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This seems silly. Everyone knows White boys have smaller reproductive equipment, declining sperm rates, declining sperm motility, an inherently-weird melanin deficiency, and are always slower, weaker, and less-adept at every form of physical activity. Frankly, their women are far better suited to longevity and present a much larger opportunity for general societal utility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Fit2Serve said:

This seems silly. Everyone knows White boys have smaller reproductive equipment, declining sperm rates, declining sperm motility, an inherently-weird melanin deficiency, and are always slower, weaker, and less-adept at every form of physical activity. Frankly, their women are far better suited to longevity and present a much larger opportunity for general societal utility.

poor fit2die doesn't know who his daddy is... typical for his race...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Fit2Serve said:

This seems silly. Everyone knows White boys have smaller reproductive equipment, declining sperm rates, declining sperm motility, an inherently-weird melanin deficiency, and are always slower, weaker, and less-adept at every form of physical activity. Frankly, their women are far better suited to longevity and present a much larger opportunity for general societal utility.

duck 615 is a perfect example of a honky suffering with black penis envy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Duck615 said:

poor fit2die doesn't know who his daddy is... typical for his race...

you always knew who and where your daddy was because he spent a lotta time with you with his dick up your ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TDS said:

you always knew who and where your daddy was because he spent a lotta time with you with his dick up your ass.

your daddy fukked you up the ass? WOW I don't think I would be telling people that little fella. Seek help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She didn't attempt to write a book about race.

 

Instead, she wrote a book that is nothing but a liberal fairy tale.

 

NOTE TO ALL:  There are PROFOUND and MEASURABLE differences in the races of mankind, and those differences are due to GENETICS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Duck615 said:

poor fit2die doesn't know who his daddy is... typical for his race...

What morons we have on this Forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...