Jump to content
dontlooknow

Trump loses to everybody but one person in crowded democrat presidential candidates

Recommended Posts

Trump would lose to a lamp shade on a debate stage.    The huns love his ignorance, vitriol, & vindictiveness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's one thing if the clown were losing to the TOP democrat in the field in early polling... it is another thing entirely that he is losing to EVERY democrat in the field.  This is an unambiguous message that says "we really don't care who the democrats pick, it's gotta be better than this bozo who's got the job now!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dontlooknow said:

 

From May 9 - 14, Quinnipiac University surveyed 978 Pennsylvania voters with a margin of error of +/- 4.2 percentage points, including the design effect. The survey includes 431 registered Democrats with a margin of error of +/- 6.2 percentage points, including the design effect. 

 

45% democrats?   rolling laughter emoticon

They don't even report what numbers of Republicans and Independents were included. 

 

You sheep don't bother looking at the internals, do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go again..Trump cant win..Trump cant win...And........He won. Regardless of a couple over populated sheep pens on both ends of the Country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dontlooknow said:

same polls in 2016 said Hillary was going to wipe the floor with Trump, he was supposed to lose so bad that it was going set the Republican decades before they recovered.

 

where is the old hag now? 

 

By the way the more you leftist idiots go on about the Obstruction, Impeachment and crap, the more you piss off the American public on the fence.

 

Trump is winning 2020.

 

take that to the bank.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No the same polls were saying that Hillary would win by three percent they didn't take the electoral college into there figuring. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you need is a half ass popular figure against the unfavorable trump. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dontlooknow said:

No the same polls were saying that Hillary would win by three percent they didn't take the electoral college into there figuring. 

 

but she won the popular vote 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, chairmanOFTB said:

 

but she won the popular vote 

 

 

By 3% that was the margin in all polls the day before. We are talking about a 8% lead by biden and they havent even started yet. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, dontlooknow said:

By 3% that was the margin in all polls the day before. We are talking about a 8% lead by biden and they havent even started yet. 

What do you think Trump's odds were a year before the election? Bet you dollars to doughnuts Hillary was favored by high double digits. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Golfboy said:

 

From May 9 - 14, Quinnipiac University surveyed 978 Pennsylvania voters with a margin of error of +/- 4.2 percentage points, including the design effect. The survey includes 431 registered Democrats with a margin of error of +/- 6.2 percentage points, including the design effect. 

 

45% democrats?   rolling laughter emoticon

They don't even report what numbers of Republicans and Independents were included. 

 

You sheep don't bother looking at the internals, do you?

It was a poll about the democratic primary.... clearly, they polled 547 republicans and/or independents as well.  The internals show that the clown gets beat by every Democrat they polled about except Beto.... and, as expected, the clown's strength comes from old white uneducated voters....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DeepBreath said:

One word: Hillary😂

hang onto that all the way to the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Trump will lose to anyone you might as well put the most progressive one of the bunch up. I am sure the winning economy will have no influence on someone running with expressed plans to greatly increase taxation and open the borders. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ummm......yeah. i think we've all seen this one before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

If Trump will lose to anyone you might as well put the most progressive one of the bunch up. I am sure the winning economy will have no influence on someone running with expressed plans to greatly increase taxation and open the borders. 

don't be deliberately obtuse.

 

We might as well pt up the candidate that has the BEST chance of beating the clown, and the best chance of moving a democratic agenda forward in Washington.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, maineman said:

don't be deliberately obtuse.

 

We might as well pt up the candidate that has the BEST chance of beating the clown, and the best chance of moving a democratic agenda forward in Washington.

Nah, go for the radical change. Joe is old and white and heterosexual. He believes in a common sense approach to the climate apocalypse. We need real change. 😎

 

From the current field, regardless of polls this far out from the election, Biden is the only one with a shot against Trump. He will be bitterly contested in the primaries, perhaps it will be a pyrrhic victory. He manages to eek out a victory in the primaries but may be too damaged to compete with Trump. I take comfort in liberals overconfidence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NeoConvict said:

Nah, go for the radical change. Joe is old and white and heterosexual. He believes in a common sense approach to the climate apocalypse. We need real change. 😎

 

From the current field, regardless of polls this far out from the election, Biden is the only one with s shot against Trump. He will be bitterly contested in the primaries, perhaps it will be a pyrrhic victory. He manages to eek out a victory in the primaries but too damaged to compete with Trump. I take comfort in liberals overconfidence. 

hey... go fuck yourself.  My party will pick its candidate without your advice.  Just sit back, and shut the fuck up and let the democrats do what they've gotta do... you'll have your opportunity to cast your vote for the clown - in a state that went solidly for Hillary in 2016.  lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, maineman said:

hey... go fuck yourself.  My party will pick its candidate without your advice.  Just sit back, and shut the fuck up and let the democrats do what they've gotta do... you'll have your opportunity to cast your vote for the clown - in a state that went solidly for Hillary in 2016.  lol

😁

 

You know I am right, the primaries are going to be brutal. The "winner" will be saddled with so many commitments far left of the mainstream they may not be nationally viable. It will at least be entertaining. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Golfboy said:

 

From May 9 - 14, Quinnipiac University surveyed 978 Pennsylvania voters with a margin of error of +/- 4.2 percentage points, including the design effect. The survey includes 431 registered Democrats with a margin of error of +/- 6.2 percentage points, including the design effect. 

 

45% democrats?   rolling laughter emoticon

They don't even report what numbers of Republicans and Independents were included. 

 

You sheep don't bother looking at the internals, do you?

Let em take that poll hook line and sinker 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×