Jump to content
NeoConvict

Global warming solutions far worse than warming

Recommended Posts

Just now, Toldya said:

 

Climate change initiatives do not automatically translate to genocide.

You are absolutely insane.

They necessarily require population caps and controls. The cleaner earth prius drives are harmless apostates. The true believers are frightening. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

You appeal to the fullest extent of your colon, which is where your head lives.

Trump's environmental policies are a fvcking disaster.

 

 

 Resorting  to  insults right off the  bat...   even quicker than  usual.  That is an admittance of defeat.      You  don't know anything about the  environment except what some  lefty  climate nazi tells you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

They necessarily require population caps and controls. The cleaner earth prius drives are harmless apostates. The true believers are frightening. 

 

Who exactly is saying this?

What organization is actually advocating the murder of 6.5 billion human beings?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

The true believers are frightening. 

 

That is  because they have no  educational  background in  necessary sciences.   They are looking for  pseudo-intellectual validation of their already held beliefs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 Resorting  to  insults right off the  bat...   even quicker than  usual.  That is an admittance of defeat.      You  don't know anything about the  environment except what some  lefty  climate nazi tells you.

 

You ignored my links, so there isn't much point trying to do anything else.

Also, you're a lonely old troll who can't actually debate and you thrive on this sh!t, so I thought I would make you happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Toldya said:

 

Who exactly is saying this?

What organization is actually advocating the murder of 6.5 billion human beings?

 

 

The final final solution obviously is not something that would be politically popular. There are hundreds of environmentalist groups that believe we are grossly overpopulated, some believe action should be taken to cull our numbers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, benson13 said:

so...Uneducated Racist rednecks...reducing burning Fossil Fuels is wayyyyy too much for you to handle huh?

 

 

 

End of world in 11.9, put gov workers in apartment close to office and shut car off via GPS satellite, guv worker can use bike, cut gov worker pay and stop pollution, all legal with new socialist administrative authority laws when a commune owns you, your car, and your home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, NeoConvict said:

Nothing short of reducing the population to pre industrial levels or geoengineering could make a dent in humanity's contribution of greenhouse gases. Looking down your nose at deniers while driving your Prius will do nothing to address the issue. Killing 5 billion people or geoengineering both have unthinkable unintended consequences.

The people who make big money on the AGW hoax do not walk the walk.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NeoConvict said:

The final final solution obviously is not something that would be politically popular. There are hundreds of environmentalist groups that believe we are grossly overpopulated, some believe action should be taken to cull our numbers. 

 

So this is just one of those cases where your psychic powers are our last hope against the genocidal environmentalists?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

So this is just one of those cases where your psychic powers are our last hope against the genocidal environmentalists?

 

Doesn't take a psychic.

 

Billions are threatened by climate change caused in part by  by industrialization and increased human population.

 

Answer #1: Drive a Prius and pay the developing world billions to plant carbon sinks.

 

Answer #2: End factory farming of meat, rapidly transition to alternative energy. Cap or reduce the human population. 

 

Which answer better fits the suggested problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Toldya said:

You ignored my links, so there isn't much point trying to do anything else.

 

I didn't  ignore them.    You think  GMO is the answer?   

 

You don't even  know the  cause.    It's the  axial wobble.   GMO  can't fix that.   

 

 

It doesn't even need fixing.  It is what it is.   Only the truly   ignorant think they can  steer the  climate.

 

1 hour ago, Toldya said:

you're a lonely old troll who can't actually debate and you thrive on this sh!t, so I thought I would make you happy.

 

I am  none of that.   I  enjoy  confronting climate liars and fools. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

I didn't  ignore them.    You think  GMO is the answer?   

 

You don't even  know the  cause.    It's the  axial wobble.   GMO  can't fix that.   

 

 

It doesn't even need fixing.  It is what it is.   Only the truly   ignorant think they can  steer the  climate.

 

 

I am  none of that.   I  enjoy  confronting climate liars and fools. 

We can steer climate but the unintended consequences could be far worse than a slight warning trend. Highlander 2 was a crappy film, I don't want to see it play out in real life. Geoengineering could cool the planet. Could also make matters significantly worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NeoConvict said:

We can steer climate

 

 

Come on  bro...     no we can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NeoConvict said:

ebut the unintended consequences could be far worse

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

Come on  bro...     no we can't.

Engineered Nuclear winter. We could introduce reflective materials into the upper atmosphere that would redirect solar energy back into space. The altitude would allow them to remain aloft in sub orbit for decades. Its being proposed. Its being patented. It's being tested. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

Engineered Nuclear winter.

 

OK..   I'll give you that.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

I didn't  ignore them.    You think  GMO is the answer?   

 

You don't even  know the  cause.    It's the  axial wobble.   GMO  can't fix that.   

 

 

It doesn't even need fixing.  It is what it is.   Only the truly   ignorant think they can  steer the  climate.

 

 

I am  none of that.   I  enjoy  confronting climate liars and fools. 

 

Okay, Elton... you win.

I don't want to get into the causes of AGW argument only to end up making absolutely no progress with you yet again.

Just thinking about it makes me weary.

I am already tired of giving you the attention you crave.

 

So now is the point where you get to tell yourself that I am merely incapable of dealing with your truthful, perfectly logical brilliance and have to run away out of fear.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, NeoConvict said:

Doesn't take a psychic.

 

Billions are threatened by climate change caused in part by  by industrialization and increased human population.

 

Answer #1: Drive a Prius and pay the developing world billions to plant carbon sinks.

 

Answer #2: End factory farming of meat, rapidly transition to alternative energy. Cap or reduce the human population. 

 

Which answer better fits the suggested problem?

 

Oh my mistake... obviously there are only two incredibly ridiculous options available to us.

Genocide it is, then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

Oh my mistake... obviously there are only two incredibly ridiculous options available to us.

Genocide it is, then.

You at least agree driving a Prius and paying third world countries to plant trees is a ridiculous solution.  Progress. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

 

So now is the point where you get to tell yourself that I am merely incapable of dealing with your truthful, perfectly logical brilliance and have to run away out of fear.

 

 

 

 

It appears  we have come to  the  point where you are here for what reason?   This is debate forum.   

 

 

1 hour ago, Toldya said:

I don't want to get into the causes of AGW argument only to end up making absolutely no progress with you yet again.

 

 

understanding  the  multivariate dynamics of the   planet is  key here.   Did you  ever think   I am the  one who needs you to make  progress?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there are a million plans they are not all so deadly as you think the result of global warming will be very soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, NeoConvict said:

What pray tell is wrong with young girls?

Nothing! But your obcession with them is a bit disturbing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, guilluamezenz said:

there are a million plans they are not all so deadly as you think the result of global warming will be very soon

 

 

so,  you claim to be the smartest person here.   Tell us  why we want to cool the Earth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×