Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, WillFranklin said:

 

Who is AAF?

 

Why are you posting about the GND?

because you and the people you vote for are economically illiterate as you have just proved. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chiseler said:

because you and the people you vote for are economically illiterate as you have just proved. 

 

Who is AAF?

 

Why should we proceed with their numbers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

 

Who is AAF?

 

Why should we proceed with their numbers?

find me another number or admit you're retarded. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, maineman said:

your well traveled ass 

  Didn't he drive to the Blue Oyster Bar to give some lawyer a hummer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WillFranklin said:

 

Here we have an estimate of 3.2 Trillion for a year of universal coverage. I am not convinced it will be that much.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/10/upshot/medicare-for-all-bernie-sanders-cost-estimates.html

that's not the green new deal.

and that would still murder our economy and debt. 

try again

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chiseler said:

that's not the green new deal.

 

try again

 

I am talking Medicare for all, dumbass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WillFranklin said:

 

I am talking Medicare for all, dumbass.

yes, you are completely off topic.  retard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chiseler said:

yes, you are completely off topic.  retard

 

You are just mad because I know we can provide universal coverage. That's why you tried to change the subject to the Green New Deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WillFranklin said:

I didn't mention anything about the debt and deficit when Obama was prez cause I'm a useful idiot.

Yes...we know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

 

You are just mad because i know we can provide universal coverage. That's why you tried to change the subject to the Green new Deal.

you're mad because you are economically illiterate and you just showed me you would quadruple the deficit and drive our economy into a piss yellow mud puddle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chiseler said:

you're mad because you are economically illiterate and you just showed me you would quadruple the deficit and drive our economy into a piss yellow mud puddle. 

 

Wrong again. We would save money on health care and be better off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

 

personreal is my leader.

Thanx dude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

 

Wrong again. We would save money on health care and be better off.

rotfl we would save money by spending 3 trillion.   lol now i know you're retarded. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chiseler said:

rotfl we would save money by spending 3 trillion.   lol now i know you're retarded. 

 

We spend more than that now on health care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

 

Wrong again. We would save money on health care and be better off.

Those of us who actually pay net federal income taxes will not be better off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

 

We spend more than that now on health care.

false, 32 trillion over 10 years is how much the spending would increase, not how much it would cost. 

https://www.mercatus.org/publications/federal-fiscal-policy/costs-national-single-payer-healthcare-system

  • M4A would add approximately $32.6 trillion to federal budget commitments during the first 10 years of its implementation (2022–2031). 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chiseler said:

false, 32 trillion over 10 years is how much the spending would increase, not how much it would cost. 

 

The net amount spent on health care by the nation would decrease, idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JoeAverage said:

Those of us who actually pay net federal income taxes will not be better off!

 

Your health care bills would go away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

 

The net amount spent on health care by the nation would decrease, idiot.

false, idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

 

Your health care bills would go away.

And replaced with an increase in Federal income tax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Squatchman said:

  Didn't he drive to the Blue Oyster Bar to give some lawyer a hummer?

He DID.... ducky claimed it was a romantic interlude with him on his knees in the surf line on the beach at Ogunquit with the moonlight shining down on the Atlantic and some gay lawyer's balls bouncing on his chin.  He was quite proud of it at the time.  He even said it was the first time he had sucked a cock and he had fond memories of the taste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Chiseler said:

false, idiot.

 

No more insurance company executives to fund.

 

Big savings.

 

Tons more in savings too.

 

You really want to go there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, JoeAverage said:

And replaced with an increase in Federal income tax.

 

But would pay less overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×