Jump to content

Mueller Investigators Say They Gathered ‘Alarming’ Trump Obstruction Evidence:


Recommended Posts

The Washington Post has backed up the New York Times report from late Wednesday that some members of Robert Mueller’s team have said the special counsel report is much worse for the president than was suggested by Attorney General William Barr. In its report, the Post goes a step further, claiming some members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that they gathered “alarming and significant” evidence of obstruction by President Trump. “It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” one source is reported to have said. In his summary, Barr said that the special counsel did not establish evidence for a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and said that Mueller didn’t conclude “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice. Barr also said that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove obstruction. “There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work,” said one official. Summaries were reportedly prepared for different sections of the report, which Mueller’s team thought could be released immediately without redaction.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 616
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Comparing scandals by party

Just glancing at the chart above, it’s pretty clear which administrations are the most criminal, but let’s roll up the data anyway.

EXECUTIVE BRANCH CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES BY PARTY SINCE 1968
ADMINISTRATION

TOTAL YEARS

IN OFFICE

CRIMINAL

INDICTMENTS

CRIMINAL

CONVICTIONS

PRISON

SENTENCES

DEMOCRATIC 20 3 1 1
REPUBLICAN 28 120 89 34

Some might try to argue that this unfairly penalizes Republican administrations because GOP administrations held office for eight more years than Democratic administrations during this time period. The huge gap between the numbers shows how ridiculous that is, but even so, let’s get the averages per year of combined administrations:

AVERAGE EXECUTIVE BRANCH CRIMINAL ACTIONS BY YEAR SINCE 1968
ADMINISTRATION

AVERAGE #

INDICTMENTS

PER YEAR

AVERAGE #

CONVICTIONS

PER YEAR

AVERAGE #

IMPRISONMENTS

PER YEAR

DEMOCRATIC 0.15 0.05 0.05
REPUBLICAN 4.29 3.18 1.21

 

 

Even when we standardize it by getting annual averages, GOP administrations still have 29 times more indictments, 64 times more convictions, and 24 times more prison sentences. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really?

 

So the "investigators" who are mostly are Democrats suddenly find things that after 2 years and $25 million Mueller couldn't find or prove..

 

Usual piece about nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, benson13 said:

your LYING POS doesn't want the report shown

 

or his tax's

 

WHY??????????????..if he's so 'innocent'

He's said numerous times to show the report...

 

And he doesn't have to show his taxes....

The one that got linked out showed he paid $38 million one year

 

 

Maybe a new investigation for a few years?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, benson13 said:

your LYING POS doesn't want the report shown

 

or his tax's

 

WHY??????????????

Because progressives want them shown and by not showing them his detractors become more and more unhinged. Same reason Obama realeased a newly generated birth certificate instead of the original. Trump is making progressives appear radical to the moderate American electorate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NeoConvict said:

Because progressives want them shown and by not showing them his detractors become more and more unhinged. Same reason Obama realeased a newly generated birth certificate instead of the original. Trump is making progressives appear radical to the moderate American electorate. 

Remember the media beating the drums that Trump was going to fire Mueller...

 

All it did was create news that never happened.....

 

Now they want his tax returns knowing damn well it's not going to happen...

 

These people are juvenile

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, benson13 said:

The Washington Post has backed up the New York Times report from late Wednesday that some members of Robert Mueller’s team have said the special counsel report is much worse for the president than was suggested by Attorney General William Barr. In its report, the Post goes a step further, claiming some members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that they gathered “alarming and significant” evidence of obstruction by President Trump. “It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” one source is reported to have said. In his summary, Barr said that the special counsel did not establish evidence for a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and said that Mueller didn’t conclude “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice. Barr also said that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove obstruction. “There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work,” said one official. Summaries were reportedly prepared for different sections of the report, which Mueller’s team thought could be released immediately without redaction.

 

 

So the leaks have already started.

 

How long before the dems leak the Mueller report to the media?

 

1,5,10,30 days?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, benson13 said:

your LYING POS doesn't want the report shown

 

or his tax's

 

WHY??????????????

2 years of this BS...

He's firing Mueller!

 

It's Mueller time?

 

Trump ready to resign!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, benson13 said:

your POS won't make it through his 1st term!

Wanna bet?

 

Oh that's right!

 

We were betting and you already lost...

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, personreal said:

So the leaks have already started.

 

How long before the dems leak the Mueller report to the media?

 

1,5,10,30 days?  

I'm betting "under" 5....

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Z09 said:

I'm betting "under" 5....

OK...thanx.

 

mm hopes the leak happens in minutes...I put him down for 5 minutes.

 

It's clear mm doesn't care about the law or DOJ procedures.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Z09 said:

Remember the media beating the drums that Trump was going to fire Mueller...

 

All it did was create news that never happened.....

 

Now they want his tax returns knowing damn well it's not going to happen...

 

These people are juvenile

I think people are already suffering outrage fatigue. The longer dems beat the dead horse of the 2016 election the more moderates they lose. Faith in the media has hit new lows. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all the more reason not to rely on Barr's  whitewash.  

 

Release the report.  We paid for it... we have a right to see it in its entirety.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, benson13 said:

The Washington Post has backed up the New York Times report from late Wednesday that some members of Robert Mueller’s team have said the special counsel report is much worse for the president than was suggested by Attorney General William Barr. In its report, the Post goes a step further, claiming some members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that they gathered “alarming and significant” evidence of obstruction by President Trump. “It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” one source is reported to have said. In his summary, Barr said that the special counsel did not establish evidence for a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and said that Mueller didn’t conclude “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice. Barr also said that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove obstruction. “There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work,” said one official. Summaries were reportedly prepared for different sections of the report, which Mueller’s team thought could be released immediately without redaction.

 

 

 

I remember Comey reading the laundry list of Hillary violations only to say no prosecutor would even seek an indictment. Probably a similar situation here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...