Jump to content
kfools

How do libs feel about transgender

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

What you posted is mostly BS. Some trans women will out perform some cis women.  If you were honest you would post the science and not a bunch of opinion and anecdotal BS. 

So bitch, show the scientific testing that show trans women are stronger than cis women. 

 

Read this... you might learn something. No, Female Trans Athletes Do Not Have Unfair Advantages ...

Ok, 

 

Here is the absolute science proving it! 

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477683

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

What you posted is mostly BS. Some trans women will out perform some cis women.  If you were honest you would post the science and not a bunch of opinion and anecdotal BS. 

So bitch, show the scientific testing that show trans women are stronger than cis women. 

 

Read this... you might learn something. No, Female Trans Athletes Do Not Have Unfair Advantages ...

I can't believe it. 

 

Really. I can't. 

 

I can't believe I had to post the scientific breakdown of something that literally everybody knows. MEN are stronger than WOMEN!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Phoenix68 said:

 

 

 

That sounds like a job for.....

BACHMANN!!!

 

our

 

 

and so why should churches want gays to be ordained when gays laugh at them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, kfools said:

I can't believe it. 

 

Really. I can't. 

 

I can't believe I had to post the scientific breakdown of something that literally everybody knows. MEN are stronger than WOMEN!

Stop lying fool. You did not post anything even remotely scientific.

 

What makes men strong is testosterone. If you had any you would know.  What a man like you or Trump is emasculated by their blubber, diet and life style they become weak sissies. Then you MAGAts buy guns to make up for their shrinking limp penises  and gurly bodies. 

 

Trans women take strong testosterone blockers and take estrogen and that gives them the same physical strength as women kinda like you MAGAts. 

 

The science is clear. Low testosterone is why you MAGAts have tits and are weak and whiny little bitches like Trump.  In a sense you MAGAts are a lot like transwomen but in the case of transwomen, many of them have their nuts removed. They have no way of producing testosterone.

 

You MAGAts are pretty much like transwomen 1/2 way into the the transition process. You have tits and fat butts. Your dicks are atrophied and you are physically weaker than real men.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

Stop lying fool. You did not post anything even remotely scientific.

Didn't even read it did you. It's an actual scientific paper and you didn't even bother. 

5 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

What makes men strong is testosterone.

No. it isn't. That is just one factor. There is also bone density, size, and a number of other factors. 

5 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

If you had any you would know.  What a man like you or Trump is emasculated by their blubber, diet and life style they become weak sissies. Then you MAGAts buy guns to make up for their shrinking limp penises  and gurly bodies. 

Always funny to see somebody associate feminine qualities with gun ownership. Considering it's usually blue collar workers who own them. 

5 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

Trans women take strong testosterone blockers and take estrogen and that gives them the same physical strength as women kinda like you MAGAts.

Not all of them do that. It is not a requirement to take ANY kind of medication to be considered trans-gender. There is no requirement AT ALL that trans women have to take estrogen to compete in female sports now is there? No there isn't. 

5 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

 

The science is clear.

Yes it is. Has been for ever. Men and women have biological sexes.

5 hours ago, BlueDoggL said:

Low testosterone is why you MAGAts have tits and are weak and whiny little bitches like Trump.  In a sense you MAGAts are a lot like transwomen but in the case of transwomen, many of them have their nuts removed. They have no way of producing testosterone.

 

You MAGAts are pretty much like transwomen 1/2 way into the the transition process. You have tits and fat butts. Your dicks are atrophied and you are physically weaker than real men.

 

 

Quiet beta. Your betters are talking. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, kfools said:

Didn't even read it did you. It's an actual scientific paper and you didn't even bother. 

There was no scientific paper so stop lying. If there was any science you would have posted it again and you would have copy and pasted it.

10 minutes ago, kfools said:

No. it isn't. That is just one factor. There is also bone density, size, and a number of other factors. 

Low testosterone decreases bone density. Low Testosterone And Bone Density. Clinical trials and studies have proven that testosterone and bone density have a direct link.  

10 minutes ago, kfools said:

Always funny to see somebody associate feminine qualities with gun ownership. Considering it's usually blue collar workers who own them. 

Some of the best snipers in WW-2 were women. BTW dum dum there are a lot of female blue collar workers. 

10 minutes ago, kfools said:

Not all of them do that. It is not a requirement to take ANY kind of medication to be considered trans-gender. There is no requirement AT ALL that trans women have to take estrogen to compete in female sports now is there? No there isn't. 

The IOC would disagree. You MAGAts make up shit all the time. Athletes are tested for testosterone levels and HGH levels. 

10 minutes ago, kfools said:

Yes it is. Has been for ever. Men and women have biological sexes.

You don't know the difference between sex and gender. Learn the difference.

10 minutes ago, kfools said:

Quiet beta. Your betters are talking. 

 

Transwomen have less testosterone than biological females and therefore are not as strong. Ovaries produce some testosterone same as men's testicles.  Transwomen don't have ovaries or testicles. Some trans women only need to take testosterone blockers to femminize their bodies. 

 

Admit it. You have a thing for trannies. I'm sure a lot of your MAGAt buddies cross dress so just have one of them put on a dress and sick his dick. You know you really want to do that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

There was no scientific paper so stop lying. If there was any science you would have posted it again and you would have copy and pasted it.

Read it yourself. I am not going to post the whole thing that's annoying. 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

Low testosterone decreases bone density. Low Testosterone And Bone Density. Clinical trials and studies have proven that testosterone and bone density have a direct link. 

 

Ok, so what do you do about these trans women that have had 20 years of their bones getting dense due to testosterone? That doesn't just go away over night. Even with powerful testosterone blockers men can still produce more than women. 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

Some of the best snipers in WW-2 were women. BTW dum dum there are a lot of female blue collar workers. 

1. No. Some of the best snipers in ww2 were not women. There were some snipers who were women who fought mostly for Russia in urban warfare. 

2. So what? I never said anything about female blue collar workers....wtf are you talking about? 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

The IOC would disagree. You MAGAts make up shit all the time. Athletes are tested for testosterone levels and HGH levels. 

The IOC doesn't govern over All sports now do they? 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

You don't know the difference between sex and gender. Learn the difference.

Even assuming you are right and there is a difference I am talking about different SEXES competing. 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

Transwomen have less testosterone than biological females and therefore are not as strong.

That's an outright lie. Many transgenders take no growth or testosterone blockers at all. They put on a wig and say they are a woman. Just saying "I am transgender" Doesn't suddenly make you weaker. 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

Ovaries produce some testosterone same as men's testicles.  Transwomen don't have ovaries or testicles. Some trans women only need to take testosterone blockers to femminize their bodies. 

Again you are lying. You are talking about post OP transgenders. You don't need an operation of ANY KIND to be considered a transgender. 

2 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

Admit it. You have a thing for trannies. I'm sure a lot of your MAGAt buddies cross dress so just have one of them put on a dress and sick his dick. You know you really want to do that. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2019 at 11:18 AM, maineman said:

In the grand scheme of things... in the march toward life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for everyone, I think that tennis scholarships are the least of our concerns.

Maybe Transgender could have their own league, then everyone would be happy.  Except for maybe Pat Robertson or Rush Limbaugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, kfools said:

Read it yourself. I am not going to post the whole thing that's annoying. 

Stop lying and post some actual science. The more you lie and equivocate the more I will bust you/

59 minutes ago, kfools said:

Ok, so what do you do about these trans women that have had 20 years of their bones getting dense due to testosterone? That doesn't just go away over night. Even with powerful testosterone blockers men can still produce more than women. 

Bone density and bone size are two different things. 

See the source image

 

Her bones are smaller now. 

59 minutes ago, kfools said:

1. No. Some of the best snipers in ww2 were not women. There were some snipers who were women who fought mostly for Russia in urban warfare. 

BUSTED! 

Lyudmila Pavlichenko. Lyudmila Mikhailovna Pavlichenko (née Belova; 12 July 1916 – 10 October 1974) was a Soviet sniper in the Red Army during World War II, credited with 309 kills. She is regarded as one of the top military snipers of all time and the most successful female sniper in history.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pavlichenko
59 minutes ago, kfools said:

2. So what? I never said anything about female blue collar workers....wtf are you talking about? 

The IOC doesn't govern over All sports now do they? 

Athletes are tested for PEDs and testosteron is  PED.  YOU LOSE AGAIN!

59 minutes ago, kfools said:

Even assuming you are right and there is a difference I am talking about different SEXES competing. 

Learn the difference between sex and gender.

59 minutes ago, kfools said:

That's an outright lie. Many transgenders take no growth or testosterone blockers at all. They put on a wig and say they are a woman. Just saying "I am transgender" Doesn't suddenly make you weaker. 

Tell us how many don't take T-blockers? Google it liar. Back up your lies. 

 

Just because you play dress up and try to pass as a chick it doesn't meant that you are trans. You borrowing your sister's clothes and go to the glory hole to suck dick doesn't make you transgender. It make you an ugly transvestite.  

 

BTW, there are no medical growth blockers. 

59 minutes ago, kfools said:

Again you are lying. You are talking about post OP transgenders. You don't need an operation of ANY KIND to be considered a transgender. 

 

Warning SCIENCE: http://www.bumc.bu.edu/endo/clinics/transgender-medicine/guidelines/

For a trans woman to compete she has to prove that she is not on PEDs and she has to show that her hormone levels are the same as CIS women. 

 

When a woman transitions in her teens and early 20's her hips will widen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, jerra- said:

 

 

and so why should churches want gays to be ordained when gays laugh at them?

 

---

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Phoenix68 said:

 

 

 

That sounds like a job for.....

BACHMANN!!!

 

 

 

and so tell me now, why do gays want to go church, so they can snicker behind the pews..  in that cute way of theirs, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

Stop lying and post some actual science. The more you lie and equivocate the more I will bust you/

Bone density and bone size are two different things. 

This is so phucking easy. You really do man. You just plain make it easy. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12830370

 

Gender difference in bone size is a potential confounder when comparing bone density between males and females. A comparison of volumetric BMD (vBMD) between men and women, which is a measure of bone mass relative to three-dimensional bone volume (g/cm(3)) as opposed to areal bone density (g/cm(2)), may be a more accurate reflection of gender differences in bone density. The aims of this study were to examine gender differences in bone mass (BMC), areal BMD (aBMD), volumetric BMD (vBMD) by comparing twins of opposite sex in whom the effects of age, genes and environment are partially controlled for. DEXA derived BMC, aBMD, vBMD at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), femoral neck (FN) and forearm (1/3 radius) were compared between 82 opposite sex pairs aged 18-80. BMC was significantly higher in males at all three sites (26-45.5%). For aBMD the gender differences remained significant at all sites except the spine. The average differences in aBMD were not as great as the differences in BMC (2.2-20.5%). The differences in vBMD, however, followed a different pattern. FN and L3 vBMD were significantly higher in females (4.8 and 0.6%, respectively), while radial BMD was not significantly different between the sexes. Comparing aBMD values between males and females, when females in general have a smaller skeleton than males may not be a true indication of gender differences in bone density. A comparison of vBMD between men and women shows only small differences in bone density between the sexes.

18 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

See the source image

 

Her bones are smaller now. 

Prove it! 

18 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

BUSTED! 

Lyudmila Pavlichenko. Lyudmila Mikhailovna Pavlichenko (née Belova; 12 July 1916 – 10 October 1974) was a Soviet sniper in the Red Army during World War II, credited with 309 kills. She is regarded as one of the top military snipers of all time and the most successful female sniper in history.
 
mo "Simuna" Häyhä (Finnish pronunciation: [ˈsimo̞ ˈhæy̯ɦæ]; 17 December 1905 – 1 April 2002), nicknamed "White Death" (Russian: Белая смерть, Belaja smert; Finnish: valkoinen kuolema; Swedish: den vita döden) by the Red Army,[2] was a Finnish sniper. Using a Finnish-produced M/28-30 rifle (a variant of the Mosin–Nagant rifle) and a Suomi KP/-31, he reportedly killed 505 men (according to other sources he is credited with 542) during the 1939–40 Winter War, the highest recorded number of sniper killsin any major war.[3][4][5] Häyhä estimated in his diary that he killed more than five hundred Red Army soldiers in the Winter War.[6] Antti Rantama (Häyhä's unit military chaplain) credited Häyhä with 259 confirmed sniper kills without the use of a scope[7] and an equal number of kills by machine/submachine gun during the Winter War

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pavlichenko

Athletes are tested for PEDs and testosteron is  PED.  YOU LOSE AGAIN!

Who tests them? For all sports? 

18 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

Learn the difference between sex and gender.

Tell us how many don't take T-blockers? Google it liar. Back up your lies. 

Nobody can know for sure how many people DON'T take T blockers. That isn't how proof is provided anyways. You see how many people within the community DO take them. That answer is still unknown but what is known is that far more of those who label themselves as transgender do not take t blockers. In any case, it's besides the point. 

 

Here azzhole let's make this easy 

Here is a doctor talking about Fallon Fox....you know the transgender who broke her opponents skull cause she is a man. 

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/3/20/4128658/dr-ramona-krutzik-endocrinologist-discusses-possible-advantages-fallon-fox-has

Here's the thing. Estrogen is what actually causes bone growth. It's not the testosterone. Men convert testosterone peripherally to estrogen. That's why we think that men who have low testosterone levels become osteoporotic. It's not because of the lack of testosterone, but because that lack of test can't be converted to estrogen. When men go on hormonal blockers for other health concerns, they can get osteoporosis, but they're not getting estrogen.

So here you have a man, who was on hormonal blockers to block testosterone, but is now taking estrogen, which is then going to prevent osteoporosis, so there wouldn't be a great percentage of bone density loss, per se. Males have higher bone density and higher mass skeletons than females. It takes a long time for that to diminish.

Typically, you're looking at about 15 years after androgen suppression and SRS to really start to see significant changes in bone density. 

18 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

 

Just because you play dress up and try to pass as a chick it doesn't meant that you are trans. You borrowing your sister's clothes and go to the glory hole to suck dick doesn't make you transgender. It make you an ugly transvestite.  

 

BTW, there are no medical growth blockers. 

Muscle growth tard. Yes there are. 

18 minutes ago, BlueDoggL said:

Warning SCIENCE: http://www.bumc.bu.edu/endo/clinics/transgender-medicine/guidelines/

For a trans woman to compete she has to prove that she is not on PEDs and she has to show that her hormone levels are the same as CIS women. 

 

When a woman transitions in her teens and early 20's her hips will widen.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, kfools said:

This is so phucking easy. You really do man. You just plain make it easy. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12830370

 

Gender difference in bone size is a potential confounder when comparing bone density between males and females. A comparison of volumetric BMD (vBMD) between men and women, which is a measure of bone mass relative to three-dimensional bone volume (g/cm(3)) as opposed to areal bone density (g/cm(2)), may be a more accurate reflection of gender differences in bone density. The aims of this study were to examine gender differences in bone mass (BMC), areal BMD (aBMD), volumetric BMD (vBMD) by comparing twins of opposite sex in whom the effects of age, genes and environment are partially controlled for. DEXA derived BMC, aBMD, vBMD at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), femoral neck (FN) and forearm (1/3 radius) were compared between 82 opposite sex pairs aged 18-80. BMC was significantly higher in males at all three sites (26-45.5%). For aBMD the gender differences remained significant at all sites except the spine. The average differences in aBMD were not as great as the differences in BMC (2.2-20.5%). The differences in vBMD, however, followed a different pattern. FN and L3 vBMD were significantly higher in females (4.8 and 0.6%, respectively), while radial BMD was not significantly different between the sexes. Comparing aBMD values between males and females, when females in general have a smaller skeleton than males may not be a true indication of gender differences in bone density. A comparison of vBMD between men and women shows only small differences in bone density between the sexes.

Prove it! 

Who tests them? For all sports? 

Nobody can know for sure how many people DON'T take T blockers. That isn't how proof is provided anyways. You see how many people within the community DO take them. That answer is still unknown but what is known is that far more of those who label themselves as transgender do not take t blockers. In any case, it's besides the point. 

 

Here azzhole let's make this easy 

Here is a doctor talking about Fallon Fox....you know the transgender who broke her opponents skull cause she is a man. 

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/3/20/4128658/dr-ramona-krutzik-endocrinologist-discusses-possible-advantages-fallon-fox-has

Here's the thing. Estrogen is what actually causes bone growth. It's not the testosterone. Men convert testosterone peripherally to estrogen. That's why we think that men who have low testosterone levels become osteoporotic. It's not because of the lack of testosterone, but because that lack of test can't be converted to estrogen. When men go on hormonal blockers for other health concerns, they can get osteoporosis, but they're not getting estrogen.

So here you have a man, who was on hormonal blockers to block testosterone, but is now taking estrogen, which is then going to prevent osteoporosis, so there wouldn't be a great percentage of bone density loss, per se. Males have higher bone density and higher mass skeletons than females. It takes a long time for that to diminish.

Typically, you're looking at about 15 years after androgen suppression and SRS to really start to see significant changes in bone density. 

Muscle growth tard. Yes there are. 

 

You don't know the difference between bone size and density.  When bones get smaller they can become more dense. We know that you are dense. You have now idea how bones grow and replace cells. Men and women lose bone density as they age. When women reach menopause the lose bone density fast than men because they are also losing estrogen and testosterone.

 

Maybe your pea brain will understand this.  2 women are wrestling each other. They both weigh 120 pounds. The trans women has more weight in bones and the cis woman has more weigh in muscle. The cis woman has higher testosterone levels and more muscle. Clearly the cis woman has the strength advantage. 

 

Which one of these 5 woman do you think are stronger? Which are trans? If you were a straight guy which ones would you want to fuck the most?

 

6f6b59fb1fd354344c4f304286f16a68.jpg

 

See the source image

See the source image

 

See the source image

35d96ec62c07558c8f1be213c38d6ef0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, jerra- said:

 

 

and so why should churches want gays to be ordained when gays laugh at them?

there are may protestant denominations that are very open and accepting - the UCC being one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to science, you know that thing that Trumpanzees and assorted other ignoramuses "don't believe in," human sexuality and gender identification occur on spectrum of possibilities, and are determined by chromosomal and genetic configurations.

In other words, like skin pigmentation, it's how you are born.

The world has far more important matters to worry about than be concerned about what people believe themselves to be (male or female) regardless of their genitalia.

I'd start containing or destroying nuclear weapons, then deal with Climate Change, then make sure we have clean air and water (which the Trump EPA  is endangering), and then jobs, and then the crumbling infrastructure of the U.S.A., and then the corruption of Trump and the Republican Party, and then preserving Social Security and Medicare, and then ....

we could go on for hours, before worrying about which gender some people prefer to be considered, and really ... it's none of our business!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Persepolis said:

According to science, you know that thing that Trumpanzees and assorted other ignoramuses "don't believe in," human sexuality and gender identification occur on spectrum of possibilities, and are determined by chromosomal and genetic configurations.

In other words, like skin pigmentation, it's how you are born.

The world has far more important matters to worry about than be concerned about what people believe themselves to be (male or female) regardless of their genitalia.

I'd start containing or destroying nuclear weapons, then deal with Climate Change, then make sure we have clean air and water (which the Trump EPA  is endangering), and then jobs, and then the crumbling infrastructure of the U.S.A., and then the corruption of Trump and the Republican Party, and then preserving Social Security and Medicare, and then ....

we could go on for hours, before worrying about which gender some people prefer to be considered, and really ... it's none of our business!!!

there are 2 genders you stupid fukk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2019 at 8:31 AM, DennisTheMenace said:

 

Republican's embrace diversity now?  😉

Don't be ridiculous.    :rolleyes:

 

Of course not.   Made me laugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The  picture of that woman with the shirt that says "Trump can grab my" and then has the arrow pointing down to her danger zone is burned forever into my brain!    I wish I'd never, ever seen that picture.   lol.   Dayum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mindy09 said:

The  picture of that woman with the shirt that says "Trump can grab my" and then has the arrow pointing down to her danger zone is burned forever into my brain!    I wish I'd never, ever seen that picture.   lol.   Dayum.

How about this one...

 

evan-hempel-transgender-pregnancy-elinor

 

...or this...

 

11-73.jpg

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2019 at 2:52 PM, slideman said:

Well one big objection they have is safe gay sex being taught in sex education classes.

So...safe sex and "gay" safe sex are two different things?

 

I mean, isn't safe sex, safe sex, regardless?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rippy38 said:

How about this one...

 

evan-hempel-transgender-pregnancy-elinor

 

...or this...

 

11-73.jpg

 

 

I’m having a hard time keeping my breakfast down 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most libs don't feel anything about transgenders.   Do you feel threathened?  Live and let live as long as they aren't forcing their lifestyle on you. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, DennisTheMenace said:

Most libs don't feel anything about transgenders.

Are you the official spokesman for the libs now or what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rippy38 said:

Are you the official spokesman for the libs now or what?

 

"Most" libs are "live and let live" type folks.  A topic I'm sure you know nothing about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DennisTheMenace said:

 

"Most" libs are "live and let live" type folks.  A topic I'm sure you know nothing about. 

"Live and let live" isn't promoting the gay lifestyle, and forcing people to fund (elective) gender reassignment procedures through Govt mandates.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...