Trump’s parallels of dictators and tyrants

[BeAChooser]

I'm curious.   Why has this thread been taken off the main forum and put under a healthcare forum.    It has nothing to do with healthcare.

[jbander]

51 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

What's your posting history, jb?  The only posters I've encountered who won't provide that are hiding something.   I suspect you're just a sock of someone else on this forum who doesn't like me and who I must have embarrassed in a discussion or two by proving they were liars ... or unable to support what they say.    This is your way of *safely* attacking me.      You can prove me wrong.   It would be easy to do.   Just provide a link or two to your past posting history.    If you don't then we must wonder why not?   Especially given how *brash* you are, NEWBIE.

What a clown, you think your childish demands mean anything at all, your just another rude hater that spits out and lives on lies Your post is a embarrassment and I made it clear why that is the case. Sorry I hurt your little puppy feeling.

[Demosthenes17]

10 hours ago, jbander said:

What a clown, you think your childish demands mean anything at all, your just another rude hater that spits out and lives on lies Your post is a embarrassment and I made it clear why that is the case. Sorry I hurt your little puppy feeling.

lol he is just trying to get your post history, he did he tried to do the same thing to me 

[Demosthenes17]

11 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

 

I asked you why you did NOT support the Clinton's back in the 90s.   You said you did not.   So why?

I don't support a last name like Clinton. I support a person for who they are. I don't care about Hilary's family being political potent, I care about Hilary being good. 

[Demosthenes17]

Be a chooser you cannot disagree with the general census of the topic of trump's stratagem is similar to those used by people such as Hitler and Stalin. He is using the Mexicans and all non-white christian people as the reason for the problems of the U.S, as both tyrants above did.

[TDS]

On 2/12/2019 at 2:44 AM, Demosthenes17 said:

   Trump’s rise to power called upon the age old tradition of fear and distain for other countries, races, and religions - although he had to be more careful because of our strong and just government. Hitler came as a Phoenix from the ashes, except still blazing with fiery anger, out of the catastrophe of World War One and as Trump blaimed others for their own misfortune - in this case the Jews. Napoleon also attained power by aiming a weapon of anger at who ever he desired out of his way. So let’s not fall for this as others have before us. 

 

Excellent. I just can't get enough hitler/trump comparisons. More, more, more.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[TDS]

On 2/12/2019 at 8:31 PM, annLee said:

Trump Putin & the fat North Korea Kim fatty are all working against USA

 

Wow E Wow!  I wub yer profile picture. I wish I was 50 years younger.

[Demosthenes17]

14 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

 

I asked you why you did NOT support the Clinton's back in the 90s.   You said you did not.   So why?

Because back then it was a different Clinton and he was not as just as Hilary. Plus there were more options to vote for. 

[Demosthenes17]

23 minutes ago, TDS said:

 

Excellent. I just can't get enough hitler/trump comparisons. More, more, more.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

are you being sarcastic?

[TDS]

10 minutes ago, Demosthenes17 said:

are you being sarcastic?

 

No. 

 

[Demosthenes17]

2 minutes ago, TDS said:

 

No. 

 

cool

[TDS]

14 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

I'm curious.   Why has this thread been taken off the main forum and put under a healthcare forum.    It has nothing to do with healthcare.

WTF are you talking about. Are you fuken lost in space?

[Demosthenes17]

1 minute ago, TDS said:

WTF are you talking about. Are you fuken lost in space?

lol

[TDS]

2 hours ago, Demosthenes17 said:

cool

I see what you did there.🤭

[BeAChooser]

11 hours ago, Demosthenes17 said:

I don't support a last name like Clinton. I support a person for who they are. I don't care about Hilary's family being political potent, I care about Hilary being good. 

 

9 hours ago, Demosthenes17 said:

Because back then it was a different Clinton and he was not as just as Hilary. Plus there were more options to vote for. 

 

Don’t turn into a weasel so soon, D.

I wrote:

 

Quote

 

So you must have been really upset when the Clintons did it in the 1990s.

 

You responded:

 

Quote

I didn't support the Clintons back then.

So I asked you 

 

Quote

So my first question is why you didn't support the Clintons back in the 90s?

And you’ve avoided answering this question ever since.

First you told us why you “supported the Clintons now”, and notice you said “ClintonS” ... plural.

So I reminded you that I asked why you didn’t support them in the 1990, LIKE YOU HAD CLAIMED.

And you come back with this …

 

Quote

I don't support a last name like Clinton.  I support a person for who they are.

Which is again not an answer to the question I asked.   

And then you added this …

 

Quote

Because back then it was a different Clinton and he was not as just as Hilary.

Again you won’t answer the question that I asked. 

You clearly want to protect Hillary, but I wonder how far you're willing to go to do that?

You said you didn’t support the ClintonS back then.

PLURAL.

So I’m still asking you WHY?

What was your specific reason?

And after you do, THEN we can discuss Hillary’s role in what happened in the 90s.

For example, we can discuss how Hillary violated the law in her healthcare effort back then.  

 

Or we can discuss Hillary's role in Chinagate.

 

Or Travelgate.

 

Or Filegate.

 

Or the coverup surrounding the death of Vince Foster.

 

And the death of Ron Brown.

 

There are lots of topics we can discuss.

But first, answer the question I asked or I’ll decide you’re a weasel.

And by the way, I hope you haven’t forgotten about reading the book by Chase.

You obviously have plenty of spare time to do that.

[Demosthenes17]

6 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

 

 

Don’t turn into a weasel so soon, D.

I wrote:

 

You responded:

 

So I asked you 

 

And you’ve avoided answering this question ever since.

First you told us why you “supported the Clintons now”, and notice you said “ClintonS” ... plural.

So I reminded you that I asked why you didn’t support them in the 1990, LIKE YOU HAD CLAIMED.

And you come back with this …

 

Which is again not an answer to the question I asked.   

And then you added this …

 

Again you won’t answer the question that I asked. 

You clearly want to protect Hillary, but I wonder how far you're willing to go to do that?

You said you didn’t support the ClintonS back then.

PLURAL.

So I’m still asking you WHY?

What was your specific reason?

And after you do, THEN we can discuss Hillary’s role in what happened in the 90s.

For example, we can discuss how Hillary violated the law in her healthcare effort back then.  

 

Or we can discuss Hillary's role in Chinagate.

 

Or Travelgate.

 

Or Filegate.

 

Or the coverup surrounding the death of Vince Foster.

 

And the death of Ron Brown.

 

There are lots of topics we can discuss.

But first, answer the question I asked or I’ll decide you’re a weasel.

And by the way, I hope you haven’t forgotten about reading the book by Chase.

You obviously have plenty of spare time to do that.

I didn't support any political group back then. I was in young and didn't care about such matters. 

[jbander]

9 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

If you need bullBad word read this its the Clinton killed 900 people routine these haters have a story line , just one there is mono thinking on every issue , gets boring reading this stuff when it is so ridiculous to start with. Garbage in garbage out.

 

Don’t turn into a weasel so soon, D.

I wrote:

 

You responded:

 

So I asked you 

 

And you’ve avoided answering this question ever since.

First you told us why you “supported the Clintons now”, and notice you said “ClintonS” ... plural.

So I reminded you that I asked why you didn’t support them in the 1990, LIKE YOU HAD CLAIMED.

And you come back with this …

 

Which is again not an answer to the question I asked.   

And then you added this …

 

Again you won’t answer the question that I asked. 

You clearly want to protect Hillary, but I wonder how far you're willing to go to do that?

You said you didn’t support the ClintonS back then.

PLURAL.

So I’m still asking you WHY?

What was your specific reason?

And after you do, THEN we can discuss Hillary’s role in what happened in the 90s.

For example, we can discuss how Hillary violated the law in her healthcare effort back then.  

 

Or we can discuss Hillary's role in Chinagate.

 

Or Travelgate.

 

Or Filegate.

 

Or the coverup surrounding the death of Vince Foster.

 

And the death of Ron Brown.

 

There are lots of topics we can discuss.

But first, answer the question I asked or I’ll decide you’re a weasel.

And by the way, I hope you haven’t forgotten about reading the book by Chase.

You obviously have plenty of spare time to do that.

 

[Demosthenes17]

On 2/14/2019 at 10:34 AM, BeAChooser said:

 

What's your posting history, jb?  The only posters I've encountered who won't provide that are hiding something.   I suspect you're just a sock of someone else on this forum who doesn't like me and who I must have embarrassed in a discussion or two by proving they were liars ... or unable to support what they say.    This is your way of *safely* attacking me.      You can prove me wrong.   It would be easy to do.   Just provide a link or two to your past posting history.    If you don't then we must wonder why not?   Especially given how *brash* you are, NEWBIE.

That statement s paranoid and vain.