Jump to content
leftwinger

Michael Cohen Agrees to Testify to Congress About Work for Trump

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, drvoke said:

 

Whatever happened to lawyer/client privilege?  Trump's current lawyers will make motions to shut him up.

Good point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maineman said:

Let's see what high crimes and misdemeanors the House will accuse him of.  We're still way early in the process.

None.

It isn't their job.

And Cohen is hardly a man of integrity.

Considering how he so easily swapped ideologies to promote sympathy.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Golfboy said:

Meanwhile, Pelosi is speaker even though the new moonbat congressmen said they wouldn't vote for her... they did. 

Then they said they were going to disband ICE, and then voted to pass a bill funding the department.

And where is Nadler and why has all of his threats of impeachment suddenly gone silent, as soon as he took the reins of the Judiciary committee?

The left's little socialist hero, OAC was kept off the tax committee yesterday, by Pelosi. 

 

You have no idea what's going on, but you're still claiming Trump's going to be impeached.   

This shit is hilarious to watch.

 

The Dem party is currently infighting and a powerstruggle is brewing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

one problem.

 

There were actual crimes that occurred and were covered up in Watergate.

"high crimes and misdemeanors" was written by the founders.  they were intentionally vague for a reason. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, maineman said:

"high crimes and misdemeanors" was written by the founders.  they were intentionally vague for a reason. 

^^ and liberals consider Trump winning an election to be a "high crime". 

Go ahead and impeach him.  You idiots are incapable of learning from history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

Meanwhile, Pelosi is speaker even though the new moonbat congressmen said they wouldn't vote for her... they did. 

Then they said they were going to disband ICE, and then voted to pass a bill funding the department.

And where is Nadler and why has all of his threats of impeachment suddenly gone silent, as soon as he took the reins of the Judiciary committee?

The left's little socialist hero, OAC was kept off the tax committee yesterday, by Pelosi. 

 

You have no idea what's going on, but you're still claiming Trump's going to be impeached.   

This shit is hilarious to watch.

 

Is that rambling bit of incoherent free association supposed to be your way of saying that you think that the natural cycle of pendulum swings of political power will NOT repeat itself this time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Golfboy said:

^^ and liberals consider losing an election to be a "high crime". 

 

incorrect.  we consider campaign finance law violations to be high crimes.  we consider willfully violating the emoluments clause to be a high crime.  We consider bribery to be a high crime. we consider a whole lot of things to be high crimes.... kinda like you guys thought that lying about getting a blow job was a high crime not so long ago.  remember?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, maineman said:

Is that rambling bit of incoherent free association supposed to be your way of saying that you think that the natural cycle of pendulum swings of political power will NOT repeat itself this time?

No.  Please don't blame your failed education on my writing, and don't intentionally misstate my words because you can't rebut facts. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

 

Go ahead and impeach him.  You idiots are incapable of learning from history.

Gosh... do I have your permission?  Thanks.  I was waiting for that!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Golfboy said:

Please don't blame your failed education on my writing, and don't intentionally misstate my words because you can't rebut facts. 

 

nice dodge.  answer the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, maineman said:

incorrect.  we consider campaign finance law violations to be high crimes.  we consider willfully violating the emoluments clause to be a high crime.  We consider bribery to be a high crime. we consider a whole lot of things to be high crimes.... kinda like you guys thought that lying about getting a blow job was a high crime not so long ago.  remember?

lol.   But not when Obama was President, right?

Oh, and emoluments?   Yea, the courts said that didn't happen, and if you had read a history book about George Washington, you'd know better. 

And bribery?  Who was bribed?    Are you actually claiming a contract is bribery now?    Yea, probably so, you really are pretty Bad wording stupid. 

 

And FYI, Clinton wasn't impeached for "lying about a blowjob" dumbass. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maineman said:

nice dodge.  answer the question.

Your "question" was a misstatement of my position, dumbass. 

 

2 minutes ago, maineman said:

Gosh... do I have your permission?  Thanks.  I was waiting for that!!!

So it has been spoken, so shall it be.   You're my bitch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Golfboy said:

 

And FYI, Clinton wasn't impeached for "lying about a blowjob" dumbass. 

 

of course he was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maineman said:

of course he was.

Okay, show me the article of impeachment for that crime. 

I'll wait. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Golfboy said:

Your "question" was a misstatement of my position, dumbass. 

 

Do you think that the natural cycle of pendulum swings of political power will NOT repeat itself this time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maineman said:

Do you think that the natural cycle of pendulum swings of political power will NOT repeat itself this time?

Eventually.   So what?   What does that have to do with this thread, dumbass?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Golfboy said:
12 minutes ago, maineman said:

of course he was.

Okay, show me the article of impeachment for that crime. 

I'll wait. 

 

Waiting.

I guess mainbitch is searching media matters trying to find that fictional article of impeachment for a blow job. 

Pretty amusing since he admitted to not knowing the difference between GETTING and GIVING a blowjob.   Which is why he was so popular in the Navy.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, maineman said:

Do you think that the natural cycle of pendulum swings of political power will NOT repeat itself this time?

Damn!  Yer a genius.

 

LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, personreal said:

Damn!  Yer a genius.

 

LOL

Yea, he probably predicted the sun would rise this morning too.    Stunning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maineman said:

Do you think that the natural cycle of pendulum swings of political power will NOT repeat itself this time?

We already know that there is nothing natural about how the Dems are trying to steal back the political power they lost.

Why lie about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Whitemajikman said:

We already know that there is nothing natural about how the Dems are trying to steal back the political power they lost.

Why lie about?

 

How many rubles do you get paid to write this crap?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, leftwinger said:

 

How many rubles do you get paid to write this crap?

poor leftwingnut, still carrying the liberal mantra about russia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

Okay, show me the article of impeachment for that crime. 

I'll wait. 

 

from article 1:  

"On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before a Federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or more of the following:

(1) the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate Government employee;

(2) prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a Federal civil rights action brought against him;

(3) prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a Federal judge in that civil rights action; and

(4) his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action."

 

the false and misleading testimony mentioned above was, in fact,  lying under oath about a blowjob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

 

Waiting.

I guess mainbitch is searching media matters trying to find that fictional article of impeachment for a blow job. 

Pretty amusing since he admitted to not knowing the difference between GETTING and GIVING a blowjob.   Which is why he was so popular in the Navy.

 

actually, I was having breakfast with my wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, leftwinger said:

 

How many rubles do you get paid to write this crap?

None.

As an American it is my duty to educate the infected.

Too bad you never got immunized.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×