Jump to content
Guests feel free to register and post ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS FEEL FREE TO REGISTER AND POST ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS ×
guests can now post ×
welcome guests . feel free to test the waters. ×

Why do some people believe in Trump's lies?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

7 minutes ago, Persepolis said:

Bye dimwit. Wish I could say it's been a pleasure posting with you, but I never enjoy dealing with deranged dimwits and liars.

I'd run away too, if I kept getting my ass kicked in public like that. 

Don't worry, I'll still be here, and will still be kicking  your ass.   You'll just be willfully ignorant, as all liberals are. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Persepolis said:

Yeah, I'm scared!!!

According to you, we have nothing to fear from our long time enemy, Russia, but a firm that warns about Russian bots ... that's what we're supposed to worry about?

Is that what your master, Putin, is using you to sell these days???

 

You are a complete moron.

If you can't figure out what New Knowledge is .

And how it is used against you.

What you should be worrying about is who actually manipulated you into blaming Russia considering New Knowledge is just one of hundreds of propaganda mills which have ties to the MIC.

You keep playing the ignorance card and are forever trying to dodge the very real possibility that our own MIC may have propagated a false flag attack and that you and the rest of your ilk fell for it.

And the funny thing is.....

There is evidence that is exactly what transpired .....

 

And what is still occuring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Whitemajikman said:

You are a complete moron.

If you can't figure out what New Knowledge is .

And how it is used against you.

What you should be worrying about is who actually manipulated you into blaming Russia considering New Knowledge is just one of hundreds of propaganda mills which have ties to the MIC.

You keep playing the ignorance card and are forever trying to dodge the very real possibility that our own MIC may have propagated a false flag attack and that you and the rest of your ilk fell for it.

And the funny thing is.....

There is evidence that is exactly what transpired .....

 

And what is still occuring.

 

Boris....calm down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Whitemajikman said:

You are a complete moron.

If you can't figure out what New Knowledge is .

And how it is used against you.

What you should be worrying about is who actually manipulated you into blaming Russia considering New Knowledge is just one of hundreds of propaganda mills which have ties to the MIC.

You keep playing the ignorance card and are forever trying to dodge the very real possibility that our own MIC may have propagated a false flag attack and that you and the rest of your ilk fell for it.

And the funny thing is.....

There is evidence that is exactly what transpired .....

 

And what is still occuring.

I worry about what a corrupt and disloyal American Trump is. I worry about his idiotic tax cuts for the rich, which are skyrocketing our deficits to record highs! I worry about Trump's idiiotic trade wars, which are causing losses in our economy, and a slump in the stock market! I worry about Trump's deranged shutdown of the US government to force the expenditure on a stupid wall that will do nothing to impede immigrant traffic flows (they come in mostly on planes, and boats)! 

I worry about the 35% of Americans like you, who are so stupid they continue to believe a pathological liar like Trump, who doesn't care about anyone but himself.

Suicidal stupidity is rampant amongst Trumpanzees, but I don't want America to go down because you're all so damn ignorant!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Persepolis said:

Typical Trumpanzee reaction. Get's his "argument" exposed as idiotic, and immediately resorts to scatological stupidities to cover up for his ignorance.

One more inane vulgarity and I'm cutting you off dimwit.

golfgoy thought  Harry Reid was still in the senate so you have to make allowances for him being what he is😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Persepolis said:

I worry about what a corrupt and disloyal American Trump is. I worry about his idiotic tax cuts for the rich, which are skyrocketing our deficits to record highs! I worry about Trump's idiiotic trade wars, which are causing losses in our economy, and a slump in the stock market! I worry about Trump's deranged shutdown of the US government to force the expenditure on a stupid wall that will do nothing to impede immigrant traffic flows (they come in mostly on planes, and boats)! 

I worry about the 35% of Americans like you, who are so stupid they continue to believe a pathological liar like Trump, who doesn't care about anyone but himself.

Suicidal stupidity is rampant amongst Trumpanzees, but I don't want America to go down because you're all so damn ignorant!!!

See, you are so far gone that you can't even have a discussion about who manipulated you into becoming this one trick pony whose focus is entirely on Trump 

Let me give you some advice.

Everything in your post above is called politics at play....

Every other president  to ever set foot in the whitehouse has done similar things and our country is still standing and all of those other President's had their critics but what is occuring in Trump's case isn't just criticism .....you and a good portion of our population are now engaged in toppling a president and the media is openly fomenting this type of coup which was historically used on our enemies when nation building....it's subversion.

And you have been subverted....

Everything in your post above has absolutely no influence in your daily life regardless of the outcomes......except one thing your tax bill.

That's it...and you will pay it regardless of the outcomes.

You can't even explain why you hate Trump without using media created talking points that formed your opinions for you.

In fact the media has become such a powerful influence on you that you can no longer think for yourself .

And when I provided an article that proves that there are many shady propaganda mills with ties to the MIC that warned you about Russian meddling but actually meddled themselves against  a political campaign on US soil posing as Russians.  You for some reason are not interested and instead went straight to raising media talking points bashing Trump.

It's a defence mechanism, a symptom of being completely subverted.

You have no rational basis personally to be so wound up about events that have absolutely no bearing on your personal life but here you are ....

Completely blind and calling for revolution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leftwinger said:

 

Boris the Whiteman identifies himself as living in Canada. We don't know if he's an American. And he claims that Kremlin run RT is more reliable than all western media.

Nice.

Now tell me...

What was the purpose of your post ....

The true purpose....snowflake.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said:

See, you are so far gone that you can't even have a discussion about who manipulated you into becoming this one trick pony whose focus is entirely on Trump 

Let me give you some advice.

Everything in your post above is called politics at play....

Every other president  to ever set foot in the whitehouse has done similar things and our country is still standing and all of those other President's had their critics but what is occuring in Trump's case isn't just criticism .....you and a good portion of our population are now engaged in toppling a president and the media is openly fomenting this type of coup which was historically used on our enemies when nation building....it's subversion.

And you have been subverted....

Everything in your post above has absolutely no influence in your daily life regardless of the outcomes......except one thing your tax bill.

That's it...and you will pay it regardless of the outcomes.

You can't even explain why you hate Trump without using media created talking points that formed your opinions for you.

In fact the media has become such a powerful influence on you that you can no longer think for yourself .

And when I provided an article that proves that there are many shady propaganda mills with ties to the MIC that warned you about Russian meddling but actually meddled themselves against  a political campaign on US soil posing as Russians.  You for some reason are not interested and instead went straight to raising media talking points bashing Trump.

It's a defence mechanism, a symptom of being completely subverted.

You have no rational basis personally to be so wound up about events that have absolutely no bearing on your personal life but here you are ....

Completely blind and calling for revolution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

No Trump is not like every other president, and for you to say so after 2 years of thousands of lies, irrational tweets, betraying our Intelligence agencies, threatening investigators of his Russian ties and firing the FBI Director, as well as his tax evasions, and admitted sexual assaults, you live in an ideological bubble, where everything Trump does is "ok," but if a Democrat ever did one tenth of the crimes, you'd be screaming for his/her head!!!

Trump is a traitor, a criminal, and a deranged and malignant narcissist, and those are facts that we currently know or will soon be proven beyond a doubt!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Persepolis said:

"Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most???" 

Are you nuts??? How about thinking you could fly from the top of a tall building? What if you "need to believe that," because someone is chasing you on a roof top?

What we should believe, first and foremost are evidence based facts, which have been tried and true, as is the case with the scientific method. If we don't have all the facts, next we should believe those things which have a high probability of being true due to statistical analysis. 

We should never believe things that aren't true, no matter how much we want to, because that will lead us in the wrong direction, and could lead to at the least discomfort when we learn the truth, and in the worst cases: danger and death.

 

 Ha, the scientific method, you probably don't even read your own pharmaceutical information sheets. I began standing and fighting as a young child, I did not always win however while you were learning how to be a group, I was becoming experienced with fighting  groups. My ancestors were at Valley Forge living on tree bark in freezing temperatures as they were preparing to attack the British Army so that you could possibly have  free speech, freedom of religion, private property and be secure in your papers and effects without suffering unwanted medical experimentation etc.

 

People at Valley Forge remained positive even thou they were freezing and had no food.

 

"Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Persepolis said:

Yeah, right. Equating Obama to Trump is something only a deranged Trumpanzee brain could do. All presidents have lied, but no one has ever come close to the pathological lying of Trump, and that even includes Nixon!!!

 

You're right. Trump hasn't put out assassination orders on his own citizens without any due process or checks and balances. 

 

I'll wait for Trump to do that before I put him firmly in the Obama camp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeepBreath said:

 

You're right. Trump hasn't put out assassination orders on his own citizens without any due process or checks and balances. 

 

I'll wait for Trump to do that before I put him firmly in the Obama camp. 

Assassination orders? Was that on Fox "News?" I must have missed it!

Do you have the names of the designated victims?

Although since I would never watch something as dumb and false as Fox, there's no way I would have heard that absurd conspiracy story!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chongo said:

 

 Ha, the scientific method, you probably don't even read your own pharmaceutical information sheets. I began standing and fighting as a young child, I did not always win however while you were learning how to be a group, I was becoming experienced with fighting  groups. My ancestors were at Valley Forge living on tree bark in freezing temperatures as they were preparing to attack the British Army so that you could possibly have  free speech, freedom of religion, private property and be secure in your papers and effects without suffering unwanted medical experimentation etc.

 

People at Valley Forge remained positive even thou they were freezing and had no food.

 

"Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most"

You're confusing courage with credibility. Brave Americans fought not because they didn't believe in the future of America, but because they did and wanted their children to live in a free country.

Sure, lots of American soldiers have fought and died for this country against steep odds, like those who fought the Nazis in WWII.

And now the Trumpanzees bow down to a Nazi, racist, degeneratei like Trump.

All those US soldiers buried in Arlington, VA, must be turning over in their graves for the fact that we have such a traitor in the WH!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Persepolis said:

Assassination orders? Was that on Fox "News?" I must have missed it!

Do you have the names of the designated victims?

Although since I would never watch something as dumb and false as Fox, there's no way I would have heard that absurd conspiracy story!!!

I'm sure you did, MORON. Now read something from a REAL LIBERAL, you phony, fake ass leftist. 

 

 

 

 

 http://www.worldcantwait.net/index.php/obama/6265-confirmed-obama-authorizes-assassination-of-us-citizen

 

Confirmed: Obama Authorizes Assassination of U.S. Citizen

 

 

cia-agents%20and%20cronies(2)_250_250.jp

By Glenn Greenwald

 

 
In late January, I wrote about the Obama administration's "presidential assassination program," whereby American citizens are targeted for killings far away from any battlefield, based exclusively on unchecked accusations by the Executive Branch that they're involved in Terrorism.  
 
At the time, The Washington Post's Dana Priest had noted deep in a long article that Obama had continued Bush's policy (which Bush never actually implemented) of having the Joint Chiefs of Staff compile "hit lists" of Americans, and Priest suggested that the American-born Islamic cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was on that list.  
 
The following week, Obama's Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, acknowledged in Congressional testimony that the administration reserves the "right" to carry out such assassinations.

Now, both The New York Times and The Washington Post confirm that the Obama White House has now expressly authorized the CIA to kill al-Alwaki no matter where he is found, no matter his distance from a battlefield.  I wrote at length about the extreme dangers and lawlessness of allowing the Executive Branch the power to murder U.S. citizens far away from a battlefield (i.e., while they're sleeping, at home, with their children, etc.) and with no due process of any kind.  I won't repeat those arguments -- they're here and here -- but I do want to highlight how unbelievably Orwellian and tyrannical this is in light of these new articles today.

 
Just consider how the NYT reports on Obama's assassination order and how it is justified: “The Obama administration has taken the extraordinary step of authorizing the targeted killing of an American citizen, the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is believed to have shifted from encouraging attacks on the United States to directly participating in them, intelligence and counterterrorism officials said Tuesday. . . .
“American counterterrorism officials say Mr. Awlaki is an operative of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the affiliate of the terror network in Yemen and Saudi Arabia. They say they believe that he has become a recruiter for the terrorist network, feeding prospects into plots aimed at the United States and at Americans abroad, the officials said.
 
“It is extremely rare, if not unprecedented, for an American to be approved for targeted killing, officials said.  A former senior legal official in the administration of George W. Bush said he did not know of any American who was approved for targeted killing under the former president. . . .”
"The danger Awlaki poses to this country is no longer confined to words," said an American official, who like other current and former officials interviewed for this article spoke of the classified counterterrorism measures on the condition of anonymity. "He’s gotten involved in plots."
No due process is accorded.  No charges or trials are necessary.  No evidence is offered, nor any opportunity for him to deny these accusations (which he has done vehemently through his family).  None of that.  
 
Instead, in Barack Obama's America, the way guilt is determined for American citizens -- and a death penalty imposed -- is that the President, like the King he thinks he is, secretly decrees someone's guilt as a Terrorist.  He then dispatches his aides to run to America's newspapers -- cowardly hiding behind the shield of anonymity which they're granted -- to proclaim that the Guilty One shall be killed on sight because the Leader has decreed him to be a Terrorist.  
 
It is simply asserted that Awlaki has converted from a cleric who expresses anti-American views and advocates attacks on American military targets (advocacy which happens to be Constitutionally protected) to Actual Terrorist "involved in plots."  These newspapers then print this Executive Verdict with no questioning, no opposition, no investigation, no refutation as to its truth.  And the punishment is thus decreed:  this American citizen will now be murdered by the CIA because Barack Obama has ordered that it be done.  What kind of person could possibly justify this or think that this is a legitimate government power?
 
Just to get a sense for how extreme this behavior is, consider -- as the NYT reported -- that not even George Bush targeted American citizens for this type of extra-judicial killing (though a 2002 drone attack in Yemen did result in the death of an American citizen).  Even more strikingly, Antonin Scalia, in the 2004 case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, wrote an Opinion (joined by Justice Stevens) arguing that it was unconstitutional for the U.S. Government merely to imprison (let alone kill) American citizens as "enemy combatants"; instead, they argued, the Constitution required that Americans be charged with crimes (such as treason) and be given a trial before being punished.  
 
The full Hamdi Court held that at least some due process was required before Americans could be imprisoned as "enemy combatants."  Yet now, Barack Obama is claiming the right not merely to imprison, but to assassinate far from any battlefield, American citizens with no due process of any kind.  Even GOP Congressman Pete Hoekstra, when questioning Adm. Blair, recognized the severe dangers raised by this asserted power.
 
And what about all the progressives who screamed for years about the Bush administration's tyrannical treatment of Jose Padilla?  Bush merely imprisoned Padilla for years without a trial.  If that's a vicious, tyrannical assault on the Constitution -- and it was -- what should they be saying about the Nobel Peace Prize winner's assassination of American citizens without any due process?
 
All of this underscores the principal point made in this excellent new article by Eli Lake, who compellingly and comprehensively documents what readers here well know:  that while Obama's "speeches and some of his administration’s policy rollouts have emphasized a break from the Bush era," the reality is that the administration has retained and, in some cases, built upon the core Bush/Cheney approach to civil liberties and Terrorism.  As Al Gore asked in his superb 2006 speech protesting Bush's "War on the Constitution":
 
Can it be true that any president really has such powers under our Constitution?
 
If the answer is yes, then under the theory by which these acts are committed, are there any acts that can on their face be prohibited?
 
If the president has the inherent authority to eavesdrop on American citizens without a warrant, imprison American citizens on his own declaration, kidnap and torture, then what can't he do?
 
Notice the power that was missing from Gore's indictment of Bush radicalism:  the power to killAmerican citizens.  Add that to the litany -- as Obama has now done -- and consider how much more compelling Gore's accusatory questions become.
 
This article originally appeared on the web site of Glenn Greenwald.
 
UPDATE:  When Obama was seeking the Democratic nomination, the Constitutional Law Scholar answered a questionnaire about executive power distributed by The Boston Globe's Charlie Savage, and this was one of his answers:
 
5. Does the Constitution permit a president to detain US citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants?
[Obama]:  No. I reject the Bush Administration's claim that the President has plenary authority under the Constitution to detain U.S. citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants.
So back then, Obama said the President lacks the power merely to detain U.S. citizens without charges.  Now, as President, he claims the power to assassinate them without charges.  Could even his hardest-core loyalists try to reconcile that with a straight face?  As Spencer Ackerman documents today, not even John Yoo claimed that the President possessed the power Obama is claiming here.
 
UPDATE II:  If you're going to argue that this is all justified because Awlaki is an Evil, Violent, Murdering Terrorist Trying to Kill Americans, you should say how you know that.  Generally, guilt is determined by having a trial where the evidence is presented and the accused has an opportunity to defend himself -- not by putting blind authoritarian faith in the unchecked accusations of government leaders, even if it happens to be Barack Obama.  That's especially true given how many times accusations of Terrorism by the U.S. Government have proven to be false.
 
UPDATE III:  Congratulations, Barack Obama:  you're now to the Right of National Review on issues of executive power and due process, as Kevin Williamson objects:  "Surely there has to be some operational constraint on the executive when it comes to the killing of U.S. citizens. . . . Odious as Awlaki is, this seems to me to be setting an awful and reckless precedent. "  But Andy McCarthy -- who is about the most crazed Far Right extremist on such matters as it gets, literally -- is as pleased as can be with what Obama is doing (or, as Gawker puts it, "Obama Does Something Bloodthirsty Enough to Please the Psychos").
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeepBreath said:

I'm sure you did, MORON. Now read something from a REAL LIBERAL, you phony, fake ass leftist. 

 

 

 

 

 http://www.worldcantwait.net/index.php/obama/6265-confirmed-obama-authorizes-assassination-of-us-citizen

 

Confirmed: Obama Authorizes Assassination of U.S. Citizen

 

 

 

cia-agents%20and%20cronies(2)_250_250.jp

By Glenn Greenwald

 

 
In late January, I wrote about the Obama administration's "presidential assassination program," whereby American citizens are targeted for killings far away from any battlefield, based exclusively on unchecked accusations by the Executive Branch that they're involved in Terrorism.  
 
At the time, The Washington Post's Dana Priest had noted deep in a long article that Obama had continued Bush's policy (which Bush never actually implemented) of having the Joint Chiefs of Staff compile "hit lists" of Americans, and Priest suggested that the American-born Islamic cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was on that list.  
 
The following week, Obama's Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, acknowledged in Congressional testimony that the administration reserves the "right" to carry out such assassinations.

Now, both The New York Times and The Washington Post confirm that the Obama White House has now expressly authorized the CIA to kill al-Alwaki no matter where he is found, no matter his distance from a battlefield.  I wrote at length about the extreme dangers and lawlessness of allowing the Executive Branch the power to murder U.S. citizens far away from a battlefield (i.e., while they're sleeping, at home, with their children, etc.) and with no due process of any kind.  I won't repeat those arguments -- they're here and here -- but I do want to highlight how unbelievably Orwellian and tyrannical this is in light of these new articles today.

 
Just consider how the NYT reports on Obama's assassination order and how it is justified: “The Obama administration has taken the extraordinary step of authorizing the targeted killing of an American citizen, the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is believed to have shifted from encouraging attacks on the United States to directly participating in them, intelligence and counterterrorism officials said Tuesday. . . .
“American counterterrorism officials say Mr. Awlaki is an operative of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the affiliate of the terror network in Yemen and Saudi Arabia. They say they believe that he has become a recruiter for the terrorist network, feeding prospects into plots aimed at the United States and at Americans abroad, the officials said.
 
“It is extremely rare, if not unprecedented, for an American to be approved for targeted killing, officials said.  A former senior legal official in the administration of George W. Bush said he did not know of any American who was approved for targeted killing under the former president. . . .”
"The danger Awlaki poses to this country is no longer confined to words," said an American official, who like other current and former officials interviewed for this article spoke of the classified counterterrorism measures on the condition of anonymity. "He’s gotten involved in plots."
No due process is accorded.  No charges or trials are necessary.  No evidence is offered, nor any opportunity for him to deny these accusations (which he has done vehemently through his family).  None of that.  
 
Instead, in Barack Obama's America, the way guilt is determined for American citizens -- and a death penalty imposed -- is that the President, like the King he thinks he is, secretly decrees someone's guilt as a Terrorist.  He then dispatches his aides to run to America's newspapers -- cowardly hiding behind the shield of anonymity which they're granted -- to proclaim that the Guilty One shall be killed on sight because the Leader has decreed him to be a Terrorist.  
 
It is simply asserted that Awlaki has converted from a cleric who expresses anti-American views and advocates attacks on American military targets (advocacy which happens to be Constitutionally protected) to Actual Terrorist "involved in plots."  These newspapers then print this Executive Verdict with no questioning, no opposition, no investigation, no refutation as to its truth.  And the punishment is thus decreed:  this American citizen will now be murdered by the CIA because Barack Obama has ordered that it be done.  What kind of person could possibly justify this or think that this is a legitimate government power?
 
Just to get a sense for how extreme this behavior is, consider -- as the NYT reported -- that not even George Bush targeted American citizens for this type of extra-judicial killing (though a 2002 drone attack in Yemen did result in the death of an American citizen).  Even more strikingly, Antonin Scalia, in the 2004 case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, wrote an Opinion (joined by Justice Stevens) arguing that it was unconstitutional for the U.S. Government merely to imprison (let alone kill) American citizens as "enemy combatants"; instead, they argued, the Constitution required that Americans be charged with crimes (such as treason) and be given a trial before being punished.  
 
The full Hamdi Court held that at least some due process was required before Americans could be imprisoned as "enemy combatants."  Yet now, Barack Obama is claiming the right not merely to imprison, but to assassinate far from any battlefield, American citizens with no due process of any kind.  Even GOP Congressman Pete Hoekstra, when questioning Adm. Blair, recognized the severe dangers raised by this asserted power.
 
And what about all the progressives who screamed for years about the Bush administration's tyrannical treatment of Jose Padilla?  Bush merely imprisoned Padilla for years without a trial.  If that's a vicious, tyrannical assault on the Constitution -- and it was -- what should they be saying about the Nobel Peace Prize winner's assassination of American citizens without any due process?
 
All of this underscores the principal point made in this excellent new article by Eli Lake, who compellingly and comprehensively documents what readers here well know:  that while Obama's "speeches and some of his administration’s policy rollouts have emphasized a break from the Bush era," the reality is that the administration has retained and, in some cases, built upon the core Bush/Cheney approach to civil liberties and Terrorism.  As Al Gore asked in his superb 2006 speech protesting Bush's "War on the Constitution":
 
Can it be true that any president really has such powers under our Constitution?
 
If the answer is yes, then under the theory by which these acts are committed, are there any acts that can on their face be prohibited?
 
If the president has the inherent authority to eavesdrop on American citizens without a warrant, imprison American citizens on his own declaration, kidnap and torture, then what can't he do?
 
Notice the power that was missing from Gore's indictment of Bush radicalism:  the power to killAmerican citizens.  Add that to the litany -- as Obama has now done -- and consider how much more compelling Gore's accusatory questions become.
 
This article originally appeared on the web site of Glenn Greenwald.
 
UPDATE:  When Obama was seeking the Democratic nomination, the Constitutional Law Scholar answered a questionnaire about executive power distributed by The Boston Globe's Charlie Savage, and this was one of his answers:
 
5. Does the Constitution permit a president to detain US citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants?
[Obama]:  No. I reject the Bush Administration's claim that the President has plenary authority under the Constitution to detain U.S. citizens without charges as unlawful enemy combatants.
So back then, Obama said the President lacks the power merely to detain U.S. citizens without charges.  Now, as President, he claims the power to assassinate them without charges.  Could even his hardest-core loyalists try to reconcile that with a straight face?  As Spencer Ackerman documents today, not even John Yoo claimed that the President possessed the power Obama is claiming here.
 
UPDATE II:  If you're going to argue that this is all justified because Awlaki is an Evil, Violent, Murdering Terrorist Trying to Kill Americans, you should say how you know that.  Generally, guilt is determined by having a trial where the evidence is presented and the accused has an opportunity to defend himself -- not by putting blind authoritarian faith in the unchecked accusations of government leaders, even if it happens to be Barack Obama.  That's especially true given how many times accusations of Terrorism by the U.S. Government have proven to be false.
 
UPDATE III:  Congratulations, Barack Obama:  you're now to the Right of National Review on issues of executive power and due process, as Kevin Williamson objects:  "Surely there has to be some operational constraint on the executive when it comes to the killing of U.S. citizens. . . . Odious as Awlaki is, this seems to me to be setting an awful and reckless precedent. "  But Andy McCarthy -- who is about the most crazed Far Right extremist on such matters as it gets, literally -- is as pleased as can be with what Obama is doing (or, as Gawker puts it, "Obama Does Something Bloodthirsty Enough to Please the Psychos").

But I thought you Trumpanzees didn't like terrorists? 

So what your saying is that if some American joins ISIS and wants to kill other Americans, we should not try to track him or his fellow terrorists down, and then when he kills dozens of American soldiers with a bomb, then you would probably be the first to condemn Obama for "letting him go!" I know you're stupid, but hypocritically stupid approaches the ultimate: suicidally stupid.

And I'm sure you'll reach the ultimate soon. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Persepolis said:

But I thought you Trumpanzees didn't like terrorists? 

So what your saying is that if some American joins ISIS and wants to kill other Americans, we should not try to track him or his fellow terrorists down, and then when he kills dozens of American soldiers with a bomb, then you would probably be the first to condemn Obama for "letting him go!" I know you're stupid, but hypocritically stupid approaches the ultimate: suicidally stupid.

And I'm sure you'll reach the ultimate soon. 

 

1. I'm a liberal, a REAL liberal. You probably don't recognize REAL liberals like the one who wrote the article above because you're nothing more than an entitlement monkey.

 

2. Do you know what the due process clause is? 

Quote

Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the government outside the sanction of law.

 

I remember when civil liberties was the foundation of Liberalism before it became overran with entitlement monkeys smoking pot and living in mom's basement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's see if I've got this right: According to one of our Trumpanzee posters, Obama is to be condemned for tracking down an avowed terrorist in the Middle East, because he was an American. Obama had him made a target before he could kill American soldiers.

Now the same Trumpanzee also thinks it's ok for Russia to interfere in US elections, especially if Putin owns the weasel traitor Trump!

What is wrong with these Trumpanzees?

They are for terrorists! They are for our enemy, Russia! And they are for Trumpsky (aka: Putin's puppet)!

And then they call themselves "Americans!!!"

I call them traitors!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...