Jump to content
Guests feel free to register and post ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS FEEL FREE TO REGISTER AND POST ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS ×

ARE TECH GIANTS WORKING TOGETHER TO CENSOR CONSERVATIVES?


Recommended Posts

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a government agency responsible for regulating the internet in the United States. Its members voted to end net neutrality by a vote of 3 to 2. Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers should treat all traffic over the internet equally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hey idiots net neutrality was overturned. Jesus christ we got some idiot here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said:

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a government agency responsible for regulating the internet in the United States. Its members voted to end net neutrality by a vote of 3 to 2. Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers should treat all traffic over the internet equally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hey idiots net neutrality was overturned. Jesus christ we got some idiot here. 

 

lol.   This moron thinks "treating all traffic over the internet equally" referred to political speech.

No dumbass, it was treating your internet traffic the same as NetFlix. 

 

It's stunning how fucking stupid you can be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok 

 

 

In a nutshell, communications distributed over the internet must display full, clear, and conspicuous disclaimers on any paid advertisement containing express advocacy that is placed on another person's website, and on all solicitations of federal contributions.

 

 

 

 

so who is paying for tweeter or Facebook. Idiots. Jesus christ it took me two seconds to find this information. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said:

No but you come here and prove you are daily. 

Damn.  That was weak.   Even for you.

This moron didn't even know who the FCC was, and that they do indeed tell Facebook and Twitter what to do. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Golfboy said:

lol.   ^^ this sheep has never heard of the FCC. 

 

The answer to this isn't the FCC, Golfboy, it's the FEC.   What Twitter and Facebook are doing are in-kind contributions to the democRATS with a value in the hundreds of billions of dollars.   The FEC states such contributions are illegal for Corporations to give and there is also a limit on contributions even if they weren't corporations.    The maximum penalty for knowingly violating the law (and Twitter and Facebook have to know this is a violation) is 200% of the contribution.   So the FEC could fine Twitter and Facebook as much as half a billion dollars for doing this.   Now THAT would get their attention.

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dontlooknow said:

Ok 

 

 

In a nutshell, communications distributed over the internet must display full, clear, and conspicuous disclaimers on any paid advertisement containing express advocacy that is placed on another person's website, and on all solicitations of federal contributions.

 

 

 

 

so who is paying for tweeter or Facebook. Idiots. Jesus christ it took me two seconds to find this information. 

This is the fec law. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/twitter-has-refused-to-unlock-new-york-posts-account

 

Quote

 

Twitter refuses to unlock New York Post account unless Hunter Biden posts deleted

 

by Audrey Conklin


Twitter has refused to unlock the New York Post's account since Wednesday unless the outlet deletes six tweets about its reporting on 2020 Democratic nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, the Post reported.

 


Twitter is playing with fire.  


I see at least a HALF BILLION DOLLAR FEC fine in their future.   


And maybe breakup.


Just saying …

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/27/election-interference-google-suppresses-breitbart-news-in-search-even-with-exact-headline/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20201027

 

Quote

 

Election Interference: Google Suppresses Breitbart News in Search – Even with Exact Headline


by Allum Bokhara


Google, the world’s most powerful technology company, is actively interfering in the coming election by burying links to Breitbart News in its search results.


In July, Breitbart News published data showing that Breitbart’s Google search visibility is down 99 percent compared to the same period in 2016.


RealClearPolitics later published data corroborating this, and showing that the same silent expulsion from Google search results has happened to a variety of other conservative news websites as well.


It appears that Breitbart News links are being hidden on Google searches even when users search for the exact string of words in an original Breitbart headline. When links to Breitbart stories do appear, it is often below obscure websites that plagiarize Breitbart’s content.


Search ranking is critical for web traffic from Google. The search analytics industry has found that the top three search results on Google drive over 70 percent of clicks.


In a new video, Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow reveals in additional detail the depth of Google’s suppression of Breitbart’s reporting.


“Breitbart News is, according to Amazon-owned Alexa.com, one of the top five news publishers in the United States, yet if you search — verbatim — Breitbart headlines in Google, you won’t necessarily get any Breitbart results at all,” Marlow said.


The video goes on to demonstrate Google’s suppression of Breitbart News.


In one example, the viral Breitbart News story, “Maskless Nancy Pelosi Goes to San Francisco Hair Salon Despite Coronavirus Restrictions,” fails to return any links to the site on Google.


Instead, Google displays a list of obscure websites, some of which have plagiarized Breitbart’s article, posting the article and headline in full.


Google only displays one link that might lead users to Breitbart’s story, a link to a post about the article on thedonald.win, an independent online forum set up by exiles from r/the_Donald, the Reddit hub of Trump supporters that was blacklisted by the leftist administrators of Reddit earlier this year.


The same experiment was repeated with various other headlines, which again yield links to obscure websites plagiarizing the articles.


In one such case, an article about Candace Owens, a Breitbart link eventually shows up on Google, as the seventh result in a search for the precise wording of the headline.


However, demoting a website to the seventh result in a search for its own headline is still overwhelming suppression. According to the same search analytics cited above, the seventh result on Google drives just four percent of clicks, on average.


But in another case — an exclusive interview with President Trump — Breitbart links are nowhere to be found, meaning that users of Google can’t find an exclusive interview given by the president.


The exact headline is: “Exclusive – President Trump: ‘Last Thing I’m Thinking About’ After Coronavirus Is a Phase Two China Deal.“

 

Breitbart News invites readers to experiment with Google’s suppression of headlines. Some topics are severely censored and others appear as normal. The experiment can be repeated on competing search engines such as duckduckgo.com with dramatically different results.

 


Google search using that phrase … less than 2 pages hits (17).   Not one of which is Breitbart, who published the article.


DuckDuck search using that phrase … pages and pages and pages of hits … first hit is to Breitbart.


GUILTY as charged.


Google should be fined the maximum under FEC rules for the $$$$ amount this sort of activity is worth to democRATS.   Say half a billion dollars?   A billion.  MAKE IT HURT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/29/twitter-censors-dhs-border-wall-tweet-hateful/

 

Quote

 

Twitter censors DHS border wall tweet as 'hateful'

 

Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan


Twitter deleted a tweet and shut down the account of the country’s border chief late Wednesday after he posted a message celebrating construction of nearly 400 miles of wall.

 

“This should outrage every American citizen,” said acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan, who was with other Homeland Security officials at the border Thursday to celebrate wall construction.

 

The tweet, which was still blocked as of Thursday morning, said walls “stop gang members, murderers, sexual predators and drugs,” and said “It’s a fact, walls work.”(Snip) 

 

Twitter sent a message to Mr. Morgan saying that violated the company’s policy against threatening or harassing people based on race, ethnicity or other demographics, according to The Federalist.

 

 

The FEC needs to fine Twitter for providing an illegal in-kind contribution to the democRAT Party in order to influence an election.   The FEC regulations state the fine can be up to 200% of the value of the contribution.   Given that democRATS are going to spend nearly $2 billion dollars on the election this year, I'd suggest that the value of Twitter keeping the public from knowing the truth about topic after topic is worth at least several million dollars in contributions, if not so.  So I suggest a fine of at least half a billion dollars.  Make it hurt so that Twitter stops doing this sort of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/update-facebook-twitter-suspend-accounts-posted-benfords-law-showing-bidens-implausible-vote-totals-labeling-sexual-exploitation/

 

Quote

 

UPDATE: Facebook and Twitter Suspend Accounts That Posted on Benford’s Law Showing Biden’s Implausible Vote Totals — LABELING IT “SEXUAL EXPLOITATION”


We have heard from many readers who told us once they retweeted this tweet or tried to post it on Facebook their account was suspended!

 

The social media giants are preventing Americans from posting this mathematical evidence that proves Joe Biden’s numbers violate the Benford Law of normal distributions!


bidens-unlikely-win-benford-law.jpg


Joe Hoft previously posted on the likelihood of voter fraud based on the Benford Law analysis of Joe Biden’s numbers.


Benford Law analysis of Chicago, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh show THREE CITIES where there was likely fraud to benefit Joe Biden.


(BAC - See https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/additional-benford-analysis-chicago-pittsburg-like-milwaukee-show-likely-voter-fraud-benefiting-biden/ for more information about this analysis.)


On Sunday GNews took the same data and published their own article on the Benford Law analysis of this election.


biden-election-data-600x335.jpg


Tonight we heard from several readers who were suspended after retweeting our tweet on Benford’s law.


Facebook and Twitter flagged the tweets for sexual exploitation.


Peter Duke wrote us:


peter-duke-twitter-benford-448x600.jpg


Pat Moise was banned on Facebook for sexual exploitation.


may-be-restricted-facebook.jpg


pat-moise-twitter-sexual-benford-1-349x6

 


Twitter also suspended Gateway Pundit Assistant Editor for retweeting the Benford’s law report.

 

 

 

TWITTER AND FACEBOOK NEED TO BE DISMANTLED.

 

REVOTE OR REVOLT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...