Jump to content

sundance - The Problem Isn’t Just Corruption at the FBI and Main Justice, It’s Also The Media…

Recommended Posts

I've said this for a LONG TIME ...






The Problem Isn’t Just Corruption at the FBI and Main Justice, It’s Also The Media…


by sundance


Over the past year we have learned that a significant number of people within the DOJ and FBI have been the source of leaks to the media.  Almost all of those leaks built on lies.


Reports have confirmed that FBI Director James Comey, his chief legal counsel, James Baker as well as his chief-of-staff James Rybicki have all be leaking to media outlets.


In addition, FBI Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ/FBI Attorney Lisa Page have been identified as leaking stories to Politico, the Washington Post and New York Times.  Adding to that mix, Asst. AG Sally Yates, Asst. AG John Carlin and a host of Main Justice officials were also participating in leaks; all leaks based on self-interest.


DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie Ohr were both in close contact with Glenn Simpson and Fusion-GPS, and that entity has admitted openly to shopping -and selling- stories to the media, under the auspices of ‘anonymous sources’.  Those financially distributed Fusion-GPS stories went to a host of friendly and ideological media outlets.




In total, hundreds of leaks from the Obama White House via, Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice and the larger intelligence community staff, add up to thousands of media reports which were then re-reported by dozens more media outlets filing their reports under citations of “according to a report in (fill-in-blank)“.


Think about the scale of the reporting, and reporting on reporting, of anonymous leaks, false leaks, lies from “people with knowledge of the matter”, “government officials involved in the matter”, “people familiar with the matter”, “government sources” etc. all going in one unified and semi-coordinated direction – against the aggregate Trump administration.




We’re talking about thousands of hours of media TV pundits, thousands more columns written, and almost every scintilla of it based on originating intelligence sources -from the larger intelligence system- that are now being exposed as duplicitous and conspiratorial in the scale of their malicious intent.


This larger story-line has traveled in one direction.  The narrative has only traveled in one direction.  Each thread converging on codependent trails for collective stories all going in one direction. One big engineered narrative endlessly pushed.  Think about how far the collective media have traveled with this story over the past eighteen months.


Now, in a period of a few weeks, it has become increasingly obvious the collective journey, using all that expended effort, was going in the wrong direction.


Think about this carefully.


Do we really think, with that much exhaustive energy spent in one unified direction, that this massive monolith of media are capable of questioning their destination?


Think about it.


For context, think about how the U.S. Media writ large responded to their absolute guaranteed election outcome of November 8th 2016?


After almost two years of one-way traveling and convincing themselves of one predetermined outcome/desination, what was their response to Clinton’s loss and their getting the entire arc of the election wrong?


Did a single media outlet reset their baseline?  Did any corporate media executive demand a comprehensive reassessment of their coverage to see how they could have possibly been so comprehensively wrong?


Was there any autopsy of their own inherent institutional echo-chamber to reevaluate anything? Anything?


Were any personnel changed?  Were any executive adjustments made in the wake of their seismically wrong assumptions?  Was there a single comprehensive editorial review?








After a brief period of grief counseling amid their peer group they went right back to the exact same flawed system; used the exact same ideological perspectives; controlled by the exact same disconnected executives; and began engineering/reporting the exact same flawed and ideological broadcasts and narrative scripts from the past two years.


Not a single thing changed.




What exactly do you think the American institutional media will do with a Justice department reality, within the real DOJ and FBI story, that factually ends up in a direction 180° divergent from their current year-long travel?


The media have fully invested themselves in eighteen months of narrative distribution in only one direction.  Not a single MSM entity has questioned their travel as a result of false leaks and false sources in the totality of time they have covered the DOJ and FBI story.


Nothing within their collective need to will-an-outcome, will change the media’s proximity to facts when the truthful story behind the DOJ and FBI corruption is finally exposed.  The media are so far away from the place where this story ends, they have no inherent capability to even begin to travel in the opposite direction, toward the truth.


The only way they could align with the truth is to admit that virtually every scintilla of their reportage over the past 18 months was inherently false.   There’s not a single media outlet capable of doing that.


If the media had only gone half as far in their flawed journey, perhaps an argument could be made that their return was possible.  However, they have gone so far beyond the horizon they are no longer even capable of seeing the origination point; and even if they did turn around now, it would take so long to return they would be strangers upon arrival.


Think about a New York Times, CNN or Washington Post journalist now having to accept that every column inch they have written in the past eighteen months was built upon a foundation of lies.  Do we really think such a catastrophic level of flawed ideology could ever reconstitute into genuine reporting of fact-based information?


Unlikely.  Heck, impossible.


Think about this as we read media reporting over the next few weeks.  Keep all of this in mind. I would anticipate the media’s only reasonable option is to double down on trying to convince themselves there’s another reason, some other reason, for their disconnect.


Introspection of the level needed to admit their prior gullibility and attempt recovery would be akin to Al Gore admitting to the foundational lies of man-made global warming.


These next few weeks will be very interesting.


Very interesting.


I also note what someone wrote in the comments:  



The consolidation of the media industry is largely responsible for what we see today. In 1983 there were 50 companies that controlled a majority if US Media. By 1992 that number had dropped to just 14 and by 2004, it was just 5, like the 5 families of La Cosa Nostra. Coincidence? Perhaps but the outcome is similar – complete control. To fix this problem all the “old” media rules must be reinstated and these 5 companies broken up


Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes of course....everyone is corrupt but the guy who cheated on all his wives, cheated at business, lied about a meeting with enemy agents, lies about everything, had a fraudulent trump u, filed bk 6 times, never paid a bill in his life. 

yeah everyone is corrupt but "honest don". bwahahhahahahahahahahahaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, justrying said:

As a continuing reminder to the forum, Mark Bradman is nothing more than a Publix grocery store clerk


As a continuing reminder to the forum, justrying is too cowardly to challenge the content of sundance's articles ...


And, by the way, Mark Bradman was reported to be more than a store "clerk", making jt nothing more than a LIAR.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, justrying said:

Memo to the forum. Mark Bradman is a loser grocery store clerk from Coral gables Florida


His fan club of one is also a loser


Pay no attention to any Mark Bradman...sundance lies/threads


Carry on


By all means, jt, keep bringing it to the attention of everyone that you have neither the guts or ability to challenge the content of what you claim a lowly "grocery store clerk" writes.   All you can do is pump out a logical fallacy ... an ad hominem ... as your SOLE argument every time one of his articles appears.


That says more about you than sundance, snowflake.  :P


And by the way, sundance has large and still increasing audience.  Yet here you are on a tiny forum with an audience of what?   Twenty?   And NOONE is repeating anything you post.   So who is the real "loser" here, jt?  Three guesses.  And knowing how clueless you are, you'll probably need all three.   Or maybe four.   :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, jt ...


Do you how many visitors the Conservative Treehouse has?


There had been 20 million to the website, BACK IN 2014.


There had been 50 million by 2015.


Who knows what the number is today.


But it was listed in 2017 as the 31st most visited conservative website.  


Ahead of a whole bunch that are routinely mentioned around here.


Just saying ...




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...