Jump to content

We can create babies without men, claim scientists


Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-79711/We-create-babies-men-claim-scientists.html

 

Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.

 

It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.

The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.

Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.

Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.

The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.

The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles.

 

 

tenor.gif&f=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, EvilEyeFleegle said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-79711/We-create-babies-men-claim-scientists.html

 

Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.

 

It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.

The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.

Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.

Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.

The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.

The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles.

 

 

tenor.gif&f=1

As long as you want a girl and this isn't new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, EvilEyeFleegle said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-79711/We-create-babies-men-claim-scientists.html

 

Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.

 

It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.

The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.

Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.

Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.

The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.

The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles.

 

False alarm everyone. Technology imitates natural selection, not replaces it. Even an artificial fertilization only activates the 23 chromosomes of the 46 markers of the next ancestor added and the only thing that results is all will be female clones.

 

Human hive mentality in the spawning of science theory destroying human life as naturally eternally separated now. I hear the pride of intellectual self destruction by evileyefleegle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PaintMyHouse said:

What's natural about a nuclear weapon or IVF? Men are, optional. They were a modification to begin with.

You still only accept relative time theory as an accurate measurement of being eternally separated now with life being possible outside the moment here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...