Jump to content

Obama IG - ‘strategic coordination’ of State & Clinton on emails


Recommended Posts

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/29/obama-ig-guy-admits-strategic-coordination-state-c/

 

Quote

 

Obama IG guy flags ‘strategic coordination’ of State, Clinton on emails

 

Here’s something you don’t hear every day — but an inspector general who was actually appointed by Barack Obama told Tucker Carlson of Fox News that there was “strategic coordination” taking place among the State Department, Campaign Team Hillary Clinton, certain key legal minds and politicos on Capitol Hill, regarding the behind-scenes talk of The Emails.

 

Yes, those emails — the ones that were marked classified and top secret and that were found on Clinton’s private and unsecured email system.

 

Thud. That’s the sound of Democrats’ jaws dropping.

 

From the mouth of former Inspector General Charles McCullough III, as reported by Mediaite: “I’m well aware there was a strategic coordination between the campaign, the State Department, certain officials at the State Department, certain law firms in town and people on Capitol Hill.”

 

About?

 

About, for instance, what he told Carlson on Fox was a “deliberate effort” to mislead the public about Clinton’s emails. And who was driving that effort?

 

In McCullough’s view — the Obama administration and Team Clinton.

 

This isn’t exactly shocking to political watchers. After all, conservatives in particular watched with dismay as the FBI’s James Comey came out and on one hand, announced Clinton’s email server was dangerously improper and on the other, that he recommended no charges against her.

 

But in the face of Clinton’s complete skirt of accountability on the private email server she was allowed to operate in her New York home — a private server that compromised State Department communications, and therefore, the safety and security of the American citizenry — it’s double face-slapping to hear McCullough speak of the politicizing of the whole investigation.

 

McCullough, for instance, claimed he faced “personal backlash” while investigating the emails on the 2016 campaign trail — and that when he told then-DNI head James Clapper that he found Clinton’s email correspondences “extremely reckless,” nothing but coverup ensued.

 

He said a “deliberate effort” went forth to mislead the American people about the seriousness of the email scandal and that he personally faced “nothing but contention” for his attempt to sift through the emails and discern the true level of compromise to national security.

 

“[I was] chided [for] not considering the political consequences,” he said, Mediaite noted. “I’m an inspector general. That’s my job — to not consider the political consequences. … As an IG, you’re not a D, you’re not an R. You’re an I — you’re an IG. Those are the letters that matter to you.”

 

And when McCullough tried further to bring forth his findings into the light?

 

He said he was dismissed “as a shill of the right,” his character, “attacked” and sullied.

 

That’s got Team Democrat written all over it — Team Clinton, for sure. Attack the messenger — distract from the scandal. America’s politically savvy already knew this was taking place over the investigation of Clinton’s emails. But McCullough’s statements on Fox underscore and confirm. The coverup was massive, the behind-door whispers and strategizing, extensive. And what’s clear is that Clinton will never face accountability, in this lifetime at least, for the compromises to America’s security she shoulder-shrugged with her private email server.

 

 

The only sentence I disagree with is the last one.    You never know ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one has the left worried.  

 

They are already labeling it a “conspiracy theory”:

 

http://www.newsweek.com/clinton-conspiracy-emails-state-democrats-725600

 

And you have to love the lone comment that was left on the Newsweek webpage …

 

Quote

 

Cary Strickland · Retired USAF Major at Retired

She had 20 special access program (above Top Secret) documents on her server. Ask anybody that was cleared to see documents classified at that level what would happen to them if they removed one of them from a scif and put them on a home computer or server and got caught. They will all tell you the exact same thing the Intel IG said: They would do a long stretch of time in Leavanworth Prison.

 

 

So true ... B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, slideman said:

But look.............over there...................it's Hillary!

 

It must terrify you, slideman, knowing the damage a conviction of Hillary for such a major crime would do to the DemocRAT"ic" Party.  

 

Now if only Trump wakes up and sees that next year (still within the statute of limitations).   

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RollingRock said:

I don't get it either.  :huh:  She's not running for anything again (according to her).  Why beat a dead horse?

 

I don't know why you have such a problem understanding what I've written.   Is English not your first language, RR?   In my MANY posts and threads, I've clearly laid out the why.   The claim that she's not running is irrelevant ... as irrelevant as was the claim that Bill wasn't running post 2000.   Because proving in a court of law that she, her husband, and her minions committed very serious crimes, and then putting them in jail for those crimes, would DESTROY the DemocRAT"ic" party for years to come.   And that could only be a good thing.  ¿COMPRENDE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeAChooser said:

 

I don't know why you have such a problem understanding what I've written.   Is English not your first language, RR?   In my MANY posts and threads, I've clearly laid out the why.   The claim that she's not running is irrelevant ... as irrelevant as was the claim that Bill wasn't running post 2000.   Because proving in a court of law that she, her husband, and her minions committed very serious crimes, and then putting them in jail for those crimes, would DESTROY the DemocRAT"ic" party for years to come.   And that could only be a good thing.  ¿COMPRENDE?

 

How long have you been in love with Hillary Clinton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

I don't know why you have such a problem understanding what I've written.   Is English not your first language, RR?   In my MANY posts and threads, I've clearly laid out the why.   The claim that she's not running is irrelevant ... as irrelevant as was the claim that Bill wasn't running post 2000.   Because proving in a court of law that she, her husband, and her minions committed very serious crimes, and then putting them in jail for those crimes, would DESTROY the DemocRAT"ic" party for years to come.   And that could only be a good thing.  ¿COMPRENDE?

And why haven't you got them yet you phucking loser?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...