Jump to content

Project Veritas Takes the Wind Out of the WaPo's Collusion Narrative


Recommended Posts

The WaPo is trying to create something in their editorials that they have no idea even exists.

Even their own reporter whose job is to report on developments in the Russian investigation has seen nothing that their editorials are trying hard to convince people exists.

 

 

https://secure.anedot.com/project-veritas/cfde585f2b288c4f36528

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Project Veritas has less credibility than the National Enquirer.  Robert Mueller is still hard at work with his 17 top flight attorneys and his two grand juries.  With any luck at all, there might be a big 'ole indictment for obstruction for "Project Veritas" if they play their cards right.  They need to stay out of Mueller's way.  They're seriously out of their league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, RollingRock said:

Project Veritas has less credibility than the National Enquirer.  Robert Mueller is still hard at work with his 17 top flight attorneys and his two grand juries.  With any luck at all, there might be a big 'ole indictment for obstruction for "Project Veritas" if they play their cards right.  They need to stay out of Mueller's way.  They're seriously out of their league.

 

Just curious...how do you manage to get Project Veritas under the authority of Mueller's investigation?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BatteryPowered said:

 

Just curious...how do you manage to get Project Veritas under the authority of Mueller's investigation?

 

If they are creating lies and distractions to muddy the investigative waters, that is obstruction.  They will find themselves under the special counsel's authority with their obstructive actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RollingRock said:

If they are creating lies and distractions to muddy the investigative waters, that is obstruction.  They will find themselves under the special counsel's authority with their on obstructive actions.

 

What have they allegedly don't that (in your twisted snow covered mind) is "creating lies and distractions to muddy the investigative waters" related to the 2016 election?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BatteryPowered said:

 

What have they allegedly don't that (in your twisted snow covered mind) is "creating lies and distractions to muddy the investigative waters" related to the 2016 election?

 

That's what they're famous for.  I doubt they've located any semblance of integrity as of late.  A dog doesn't often change his spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously, Project Veritas is a fake news operation, and they failed miserably in their attempt to get the Washington Post to publish a fake news story.

They are worse than the National Inquirer, because the Nation Inquirer seeks only to sell  newspapers to simpletons, whereas these clowns seek to ruin the reputation of one of this country's most respected newspapers.

And they failed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, personreal said:

The WaPo is trying to create something in their editorials that they have no idea even exists.

Even their own reporter whose job is to report on developments in the Russian investigation has seen nothing that their editorials are trying hard to convince people exists.

 

 

https://secure.anedot.com/project-veritas/cfde585f2b288c4f36528

 

Project Veritas is a fraud and tries to corrupt people. Washington Post outed them as thugs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Obviously, Project Veritas is a fake news operation, and they failed miserably in their attempt to get the Washington Post to publish a fake news story.

They are worse than the National Inquirer, because the Nation Inquirer seeks only to sell  newspapers to simpletons, whereas these clowns seek to ruin the reputation of one of this country's most respected newspapers.

And they failed!

 

Honestly, they just need to make one small (OK, maybe not small) change.  They just need to take the approach that if they are discovered (as in this case) they say something like "Congratulations.  I am impressed with your professionalism.  In our experience, not all reporters would have taken the steps you took.  You are to be commended for you journalistic integrity." 

 

Get that on the tape and it completely changes the narrative.  Makes them appear to be simply looking to catch those who's "reputation" should be exposed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RollingRock said:

If they are creating lies and distractions to muddy the investigative waters, that is obstruction.  They will find themselves under the special counsel's authority with their obstructive actions.

Can you tell us what the Moore election has to do with Russia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, RollingRock said:

If they are creating lies and distractions to muddy the investigative waters, that is obstruction.  They will find themselves under the special counsel's authority with their obstructive actions.

 

It seems from this video it's the Washington Post that is "creating lies and distractions to muddy the waters." Maybe Mueller will target THEM for obstruction...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SixShooter said:

 

It seems from this video it's the Washington Post that is "creating lies and distractions to muddy the waters." Maybe Mueller will target THEM for obstruction...

from a liar himself who uses distraction to avoid admitting his lies.

you have no cred you have no honor.

Scout is one major sicko. I was astonished when she actually said women trapped in the sex trades deserved whatever they got...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, harryramar said:

the moron got caught by a good reporter. what a stupid woman. 

she was dumb enough to think she could fool a pro?

these clowns are really dishonest

typical of the rightist

 

Yes, perpetrating fraud. She ran away when the reporter asked questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, harryramar said:

the moron got caught by a good reporter. what a stupid woman. 

she was dumb enough to think she could fool a pro?

these clowns are really dishonest

typical of the rightist

 

I'm glad they published that lying scumbag woman's name, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, personreal said:

The WaPo is trying to create something in their editorials that they have no idea even exists.

Even their own reporter whose job is to report on developments in the Russian investigation has seen nothing that their editorials are trying hard to convince people exists.

 

 

https://secure.anedot.com/project-veritas/cfde585f2b288c4f36528

I thought his fat level was way over this photo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, untitled said:

 

Yes, good for Washington Post. Expose these cretins.

Guess that takes care of the false narrative that the Post doesn't vet their sources.  :lol:  Right wing clowns.

 

Some right wing tools pulled the same Bad word with Maddow a few months ago, sending in some fake scam about someone with some 'hair on fire' information on the Russia investigation.  MSNBC reviewed it inside and out and found it to be fake (and didn't broadcast it). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...