Jump to content
teacher

"...and the horse you rode in on."

Poll poll.  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Like my test poll?

    • Yes.
      10
    • Hell yes.
      10
    • Why can
      6
    • Say sumpin about pyramids.
      28
    • ban teacher.
      29


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

I'm saying they agree with me. Took em' long enough.

 

I have a theory on why the universe appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate. It's ridiculously simple (though not so easy to very simply explain, you have to be able to think in three dimensions) and it's very simply because of gravity, duh. I say dark matter and dark energy are bunk. I have a thread...

 

 numbers-3-8.png

 

(guess which thread is mine?) that I been getting after for about the same time I been at this thread.  I haven't added to it for a while (cept in my colossal skull with some minor tweaks) but in recent months there's be three(3) announcements of actual science instead of the dark matter and dark energy gnomes (BAC) that completely bolster my theory in ways that I could brag about for days. (And I will be.)

 

The link I just showed about accounting for the so-called missing matter...

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/astronomers-may-have-solved-the-mystery-surrounding-universes-missing-mass/vi-BBTELw8?ocid=ientp

 

A "hole" in space...

 

https://www.space.com/4271-huge-hole-universe.html

 

which I shall have to go about for some time to show that that bolsters my theory and...

 

previous universe...

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/video/wonder/there-may-have-been-a-universe-before-ours-new-evidence-shows/vi-BBMbc8r?ocid=ientp

 

which stands to reason as with my theory assumes that the universe shall contract (we are just now slowing down, have been slowing down or are already contracting) which means back to a singularity to again go big bang.

 

This theory makes my pyramid theory look like, well, they are both excellent so, never mind.

 

 

Well I am glad I followed your link because it led to this:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-didnt-need-to-do-this-dems-pounce-on-trumps-national-emergency-admission/ar-BBTG2YF?ocid=ientp

 

"I want to do it faster. I could do the wall over a longer period of time,” Trump said on Friday of his intention to issue the declaration. “I didn’t need to do this. But I’d rather do it much faster.”

 

Care to comment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

 

Politico? This has been coming all along. It seemed super obvious that's why I never commented on it. How much $h!t did Slow do by executive order and now that Trump is gonna do the same you are complaining? You should have seen this coming. Turn about is fair play.  Trump tore up Slow's executive piece-o-crap agreement with Iran. Try tearing up a wall.

 

Politico. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

Politico? This has been coming all along. It seemed super obvious that's why I never commented on it. How much $h!t did Slow do by executive order and now that Trump is gonna do the same you are complaining? You should have seen this coming. Turn about is fair play.  Trump tore up Slow's executive piece-o-crap agreement with Iran. Try tearing up a wall.

 

Politico. You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

It is just direct quotes of the orange baboon. Who cares if it is Politico? So you admit Trump is abusing Executive State of Emergency Declarations.

 

Tearing down the wall is a great idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

 So you admit Trump is abusing Executive State of Emergency Declarations.

 

No.

 

How many more Americas have to die cause of violent illegal immigrants and the crap drugs pouring over our border? How much more tax revenue should we lose cause of illegals working under the table or unscrupulous employers hiring them for spit wages instead of hiring Americans and paying them a decent wage which will also get taxed? How much more of a drain on our infrastructure, our health care system, our judicial system should we put up with cause you want open borders and illegal voting so you can solidify your socialist power grab?

 

Yea, all that and more makes for an emergency.

 

Why do you post in this thread when all that happens is you get beat up and I look good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

Tearing down the wall is a great idea.

 

I will all go to court and work its way up to SCOTUS and oh yea, that's right, howz SCOTUS looking these days? And that makes you furious. Ol' Ruth better hang in there or that'll make 6 solid righties on the SCOTUS.

 

I couldn't spot Ol' Ruth at the SOTU. Did you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

No.

 

How many more Americas have to die cause of violent illegal immigrants and the crap drugs pouring over our border? How much more tax revenue should we lose cause of illegals working under the table or unscrupulous employers hiring them for spit wages instead of hiring Americans and paying them a decent wage which will also get taxed? How much more of a drain on our infrastructure, our health care system, our judicial system should we put up with cause you want open borders and illegal voting so you can solidify your socialist power grab?

 

Yea, all that and more makes for an emergency.

 

Why do you post in this thread when all that happens is you get beat up and I look good?

 

You are trying to make illegal immigrants look like a major crime problem when you did not post anything about the comparison in crime rates. What is the ratio? How do they compare to our own vast array of citizen criminals, including the Trump Crime Family?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

You are trying to make illegal immigrants look like a major crime problem when you did not post anything about the comparison in crime rates. What is the ratio?

 

apples-and-oranges-1-1.png

 

They don't belong here to begin with. What, we gonna deport our homegrown criminals? I thought like with the gun control debate your type is always whining...

 

"If it even save one life then..."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, teacher said:

 

apples-and-oranges-1-1.png

 

They don't belong here to begin with. What, we gonna deport our homegrown criminals? I thought like with the gun control debate your type is always whining...

 

"If it even save one life then..."

 

 

So when it is getting rid of brown people you are all for it, even if you can't prove they have a high crime rate. But when it comes to gun nuts shooting up the place, no getting rid of their rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, WillFranklin said:

I thought conservatives hated PBS.

 

No, we hate that it's tax payer subsidized.
 

Quote

Of course I love NOVA. I have occasionally watched it since the very early years.

 

 

Bull$h!t, you're too stupid.

 

Quote

Better not let your conservative lawmakers diddle with PBS or NOVA is history.

 

PBS could go away tomorrow and some network would pick up NOVA. And Nature. Not sure about the rest of the swill.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, teacher said:

 


 

 

Bull$h!t, you're too stupid.

 

 

 

 

 

I am not saying I understood everything. But you don't either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

So when it is getting rid of brown people you are all for it,

 

And all the Eastern European illegal immigrants. Too. You know, the white ones? Stupid fu(ker playing the race card with me.

 

Quote

even if you can't prove they have a high crime rate.

 

Even if they had a low crime rate or no crime rate they gotta go. For all the reasons I stated. Isn't it your type of whining snowflake that is always complaining about low wages? Illegal immigrants help keep wages lower.

 

Quote

But when it comes to gun nuts shooting up the place, no getting rid of their rights.

 

I'm more for shooting them. You want me to have to defend myself with a spork.

 

You are one stupid azzhole. You make AOC look only mildly retarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

I am not saying I understood everything. But you don't either.

 

I understand all of it AND I'm ahead of them on a lot of stuff. Like dark matter and dark energy and pyramids and politics and climate change...

 

Does this look like someone who is weak on science...?

 

numbers-3-8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, teacher said:

 

I understand all of it AND I'm ahead of them on a lot of stuff. Like dark matter and dark energy and pyramids and politics and climate change...


Sure Marcy. That's why they do that for a living, many of them, and you...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

Sure Marcy. That's why they do that for a living, many of them, and you...

 

Do what I do for a living. It's not my fault I'm better at my hobby than they are at their careers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

Do what I do for a living. It's not my fault I'm better at my hobby than they are at their careers.

 

And those 95,000 illegals voting in Texas, that was bullshit. Did you hear?

 

https://start.att.net/news/read/article/the_associated_press-texas_election_chief_apologizes_over_flawed_noncit-ap/category/news

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

And those 95,000 illegals voting in Texas,

 

Fu(k you, you ain't changing the subject.

 

How is what the so-called geniuses figured out in this short video...

 

4 hours ago, teacher said:

 

any different than exactly what I theorized here...

 

"This rant is about dark matter, which, if you are up to speed in "...and the horse you rode in on" and "The universes expansion accelleration solved", threads by I, you would know I have some problems with the theory that is dark matter. The scientific community gives us estimates of how much matter there is in any given system. The scientific community then uses these estimates to calculate the gravitational pull of all of said matter, then says there ain't enough matter to account for the behavior of stars and such. So, a while back, after all of the scientific communities calculations of matter and it's gravitation effects on other matter they came out and said they were wrong about how many stars there are out there. They now say there are about three(3) times as many as they originally said there were. That's a bit of a difference when it comes to calculating how much mass there is in, for this rant, the Milky Way.

 

Before they even came out with this correction I posed a question. I've read that there is, on average, one atom/cubic cm is the viod of space. Cents I mentioned this I've seen all kinds of estimates. One atom/cubic meter, or whatever. Whatever it is, they who are called they are telling me there are buku atoms in the void of space. My question back then was did thier calulations of the ammount of matter within any given system account for the ammount of atoms in the void of space. I've never gotten an answer nor have I seen this observation begun to be addressed."

 

And they still screwed half that up. They are talking about intergalactic gases, which are atoms. They still haven't figured out the same thing is going on in interstellar space, with in our own galaxy. They are still looking for the rest of the missing matter. Photons? Duh. Just you wait, they'll figure it out before to long. Maybe after they figure it's been enough time cents reading my stuff to make it look like they ain't steling my ides.

 

https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/japan-man-made-meteor-shower/

 

Gonna tell me I didn't come up with that long before I showed up at this site...?

 

shooting-stars-1-1.png

 

Then there's pyramids, starts here...

 

https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/22244-and-the-horse-you-rode-in-on/?do=findComment&comment=1060456905

 

they're never gonna be able to steal that, that's at too many places seen by too many people.

 

I've more. Read this thread.

 

23 minutes ago, teacher said:

I understand all of it AND I'm ahead of them on a lot of stuff.

 

23 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

Sure Marcy. That's why they do that for a living, many of them, and you...

 

You were saying?

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

Fu(k you, you ain't changing the subject.

 

How is what the so-called geniuses figured out in this short video...

 

 

any different than exactly what I theorized here...

 

"This rant is about dark matter, which, if you are up to speed in "...and the horse you rode in on" and "The universes expansion accelleration solved", threads by I, you would know I have some problems with the theory that is dark matter. The scientific community gives us estimates of how much matter there is in any given system. The scientific community then uses these estimates to calculate the gravitational pull of all of said matter, then says there ain't enough matter to account for the behavior of stars and such. So, a while back, after all of the scientific communities calculations of matter and it's gravitation effects on other matter they came out and said they were wrong about how many stars there are out there. They now say there are about three(3) times as many as they originally said there were. That's a bit of a difference when it comes to calculating how much mass there is in, for this rant, the Milky Way.

 

Before they even came out with this correction I posed a question. I've read that there is, on average, one atom/cubic cm is the viod of space. Cents I mentioned this I've seen all kinds of estimates. One atom/cubic meter, or whatever. Whatever it is, they who are called they are telling me there are buku atoms in the void of space. My question back then was did thier calulations of the ammount of matter within any given system account for the ammount of atoms in the void of space. I've never gotten an answer nor have I seen this observation begun to be addressed."

 

And they still screwed half that up. They are talking about intergalactic gases, which are atoms. They still haven't figured out the same thing is going on in interstellar space, with in our own galaxy. They are still looking for the rest of the missing matter. Photons? Duh. Just you wait, they'll figure it out before to long. Maybe after they figure it's been enough time cents reading my stuff to make it look like they ain't steling my ides.

 

https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/japan-man-made-meteor-shower/

 

Gonna tell me I didn't come up with that long before I showed up at this site...?

 

shooting-stars-1-1.png

 

Then there's pyramids, starts here...

 

https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/22244-and-the-horse-you-rode-in-on/?do=findComment&comment=1060456905

 

they're never gonna be able to steal that, that's at too many places seen by too many people.

 

I've more. Read this thread.

 

 

 

You were saying?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I was saying I never worked at Arby's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

 

So some azzhole in Texas got sumpin wrong, maybe. Try California...

 

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=Uc1oXMCOArCf_Qa-lZ0o&q=la+county+has+144+voter+registration&oq=la+county+had+1&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i13.1250.5026..9635...0.0..0.144.1449.9j6......0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0j0i131j0i10j0i8i13i30.fD84gEXWBfI

 

you know, the place Shrillary won by 3 million? Which accounts for her popular vote lead. Wonder why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WillFranklin said:

I was saying I never worked at Arby's.

 

You still mad about this...?

 

will-2-1.jpg

 

or was it this one...?

 

will-12-7.jpg

 

Keep settin me up, Ms. Franklin, I can do this forever.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

So some azzhole in Texas got sumpin wrong, maybe. Try California...

 

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=Uc1oXMCOArCf_Qa-lZ0o&q=la+county+has+144+voter+registration&oq=la+county+had+1&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i13.1250.5026..9635...0.0..0.144.1449.9j6......0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0j0i131j0i10j0i8i13i30.fD84gEXWBfI

 

you know, the place Shrillary won by 3 million? Which accounts for her popular vote lead. Wonder why.

 

I think you just brought weak to your own thread. Nothing in the Google search you linked proves a great deal of illegal voting. And I did not see any names of illegal voters at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

You still mad about this...?

 

will-2-1.jpg

 

or was it this one...?

 

will-12-7.jpg

 

Keep settin me up, Ms. Franklin, I can do this forever.

 

 

 

Hey Marcy, what is your obsession with Arby's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WillFranklin said:

I think you just brought weak to your own thread. Nothing in the Google search you linked proves a great deal of illegal voting.

 

Lemme narrow it down for you...

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-05/california-has-11-counties-more-registered-voters-voting-age-citizens

 

more registered voters than the official population. Oh, but for you it has to be...

 

Quote

 And I did not see any names of illegal voters at all.

 

There are more registered voters than the official population in a state that allows illegal immigrants to get a drivers license and to register to vote in California you need a drivers license and you can't connect them dots?

 

Not only are you too stupid for NOVA but I wager you'd lose at tic-tac-toe to that chicken.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

Hey Marcy, what is your obsession with Arby's?

 

 

I'm quite sure you don't get it, tofu boy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, teacher said:

 

Lemme narrow it down for you...

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-05/california-has-11-counties-more-registered-voters-voting-age-citizens

 

more registered voters than the official population. Oh, but for you it has to be...

 

 

There are more registered voters than the official population in a state that allows illegal immigrants to get a drivers license and to register to vote in California you need a drivers license and you can't connect them dots?

 

Not only are you too stupid for NOVA but I wager you'd lose at tic-tac-toe to that chicken.

 

 

 

Okay so the difference there is the number of people registered and the number that actually vote. The claim is, and by the way shame on you for posting Judicial Watch, that the voter rolls are not maintained. So this does not mean they are illegal immigrants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, WillFranklin said:

Okay so the difference there is the number of people registered and the number that actually vote. The claim is, and by the way shame on you for posting Judicial Watch, that the voter rolls are not maintained. So this does not mean they are illegal immigrants.

 

will-13-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...