TBHWT Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Judge Pirro: I'm Tired of the Clintons & Powerful People Being Above the Law Judge Jeanine Pirro said she has some serious questions about the Clintons' and Obamas' relationship Russia. "I don't know what the problem is. But I'm telling you there is one," the judge warned on "Justice" Saturday. "If you didn't believe the deep state existed after watching Attorney General Jeff Sessions testify before Congress this week, you should now." Sessions was asked about Republican lawmakers' request for a second special counsel investigating a controversial uranium deal approved by the Obama administration while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. The deal allegedly benefited major donors to the Clinton Foundation. "What's the problem? Why isn't this in front of a grand jury? Why no special counsel? Why is it so difficult for Jeff Sessions to answer a straight question? Why does it appear he's not even clear on whether and what he's recused from?" Judge Pirro asked. Sessions said he would appoint a special counsel to investigate the uranium deal if he had more evidence to do so. "Hillary is from the school of lie, deny, and delay. She and the Obama administration have thwarted Congress at every turn," Pirro said. "Investigations are drawn out for so long that America's collective memory fades to the point where no one really cares anymore, which is just what the plan was in the first place." "To those who say, 'Another special counsel serves no purpose. This must stop,' I say baloney. I say law and order and truth and justice are the very foundations of this republic," Judge Pirro stated. "I am tired of the powerful and Clintons being above the law." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 says the old bag who was clocked doing 119 in a 65 mph zone. I am tired of these hypos fooling simpleton trumpies with their bluster and thunderous lies. http://gawker.com/257544/jeanine-pirro-under-another-investigation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 14 minutes ago, TBHWT said: Judge Pirro: I'm Tired of the Clintons & Powerful People Being Above the Law Judge Jeanine Pirro said she has some serious questions about the Clintons' and Obamas' relationship Russia. "I don't know what the problem is. But I'm telling you there is one," the judge warned on "Justice" Saturday. "If you didn't believe the deep state existed after watching Attorney General Jeff Sessions testify before Congress this week, you should now." Sessions was asked about Republican lawmakers' request for a second special counsel investigating a controversial uranium deal approved by the Obama administration while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. The deal allegedly benefited major donors to the Clinton Foundation. "What's the problem? Why isn't this in front of a grand jury? Why no special counsel? Why is it so difficult for Jeff Sessions to answer a straight question? Why does it appear he's not even clear on whether and what he's recused from?" Judge Pirro asked. Sessions said he would appoint a special counsel to investigate the uranium deal if he had more evidence to do so. "Hillary is from the school of lie, deny, and delay. She and the Obama administration have thwarted Congress at every turn," Pirro said. "Investigations are drawn out for so long that America's collective memory fades to the point where no one really cares anymore, which is just what the plan was in the first place." "To those who say, 'Another special counsel serves no purpose. This must stop,' I say baloney. I say law and order and truth and justice are the very foundations of this republic," Judge Pirro stated. "I am tired of the powerful and Clintons being above the law." No mention of Trump pretty much paints a picture of Pirro as a fukking idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hex2 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, Scout said: No mention of Trump pretty much paints a picture of Pirro as a fukking idiot. My thoughts exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 12 minutes ago, harryramar said: says the old bag who was clocked doing 119 in a 65 mph zone. I am tired of these hypos fooling simpleton trumpies with their bluster and thunderous lies. http://gawker.com/257544/jeanine-pirro-under-another-investigation Harry we already know that you can't be unbiased when the subject matter is about The Clinton's. Please recuse yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 6 minutes ago, Scout said: No mention of Trump pretty much paints a picture of Pirro as a fukking idiot. Maybe in your limited view. But The truth is the subject matter wasn't about Trump. She was giving her opinion on The Clinton's which obviously you can't handle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix68 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 24 minutes ago, TBHWT said: Judge Pirro: I'm Tired of the Clintons & Powerful People Being Above the Law https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/222218-mobsters-ex-wife-still-expects-special-treatment/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ducatirider Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 FEAR IS IN THE AIR. NUTJOBBERS LIKE PIRRO SEE BLOOD IN THE WATER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 27 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said: Harry we already know that you can't be unbiased when the subject matter is about The Clinton's. Please recuse yourself. oh pardon me all to hell. I thought the subject matter was this old bags hypocrisy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 26 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said: Maybe in your limited view. But The truth is the subject matter wasn't about Trump. She was giving her opinion on The Clinton's which obviously you can't handle. Read this headline for the article. I don't know how you interpret this headline as ONLY pertaining to the Clintons/not pertaining to the Trumps. Have you completed high school yet? Do you actually KNOW HOW to read? Judge Pirro: I'm Tired of the Clintons & Powerful People Being Above the Law Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Just now, harryramar said: oh pardon me all to hell. I thought the subject matter was this old bags hypocrisy How can one commit hypocrisy if they are giving their opinion on a specific subject which in this case was the Clinton's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 ""says the old bag who was clocked doing 119 in a 65 mph zone"" and who's Husband did a few years in Jail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Given Clinton holds no office and is 71 years old so is unlikely to seek any other employment after being President, what is the point of opening the Clinton 'can of worms' again? You already spent as much as $70 mil investigating him and gave America nothing back for it. I can't stand Clinton, but he looks quite upstanding compared to you all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingRock Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Quote Judge Pirro: I'm Tired of the Clintons & Powerful People Being Above the Law She must be pissed at President Little Hands then, huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Scout said: Read this headline for the article. I don't know how you interpret this headline as ONLY pertaining to the Clintons/not pertaining to the Trumps. Have you completed high school yet? Do you actually KNOW HOW to read? Judge Pirro: I'm Tired of the Clintons & Powerful People Being Above the Law Why do you have a problem because she didn't mention Trump when stating her opinion regarding the Clintons.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Just now, Whitemajikman said: Why do you have a problem because she didn't mention Trump when stating her opinion regarding the Clintons.... Golly gee, I think ONE of them is the current President of the USA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, Scout said: Given Clinton holds no office and is 71 years old so is unlikely to seek any other employment after being President, what is the point of opening the Clinton 'can of worms' again? You already spent as much as $70 mil investigating him and gave America nothing back for it. I can't stand Clinton, but he looks quite upstanding compared to you all. Because the only people that believe in The Clinton's innocence are partisan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 12 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said: How can one commit hypocrisy if they are giving their opinion on a specific subject which in this case was the Clinton's? well because she is above the law herself while whining about Clinton being above the law. see how simple it all is if you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said: Why do you have a problem because she didn't mention Trump when stating her opinion regarding the Clintons.... maybe because trump is far more crooked that the Clintons? oh wait, you are biased so you should recuse yourself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 minute ago, Scout said: Golly gee, I think ONE of them is the current President of the USA. She was giving a her opinion regarding the Clintons and you can't stand that fact and it's probably because she doesn't share yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitemajikman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, harryramar said: well because she is above the law herself while whining about Clinton being above the law. see how simple it all is if you think? How is she above the law? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 7 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said: Because the only people that believe in The Clinton's innocence are partisan. noooo real americans believe in the right to presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. that includes the people whose guts you hate didn't they learn you that in troll school boris? you really are either a totally lousy American or, a fascist with disdain for our rights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said: How is she above the law? uhhh thinking that the law doesn't apply to her. what kind of idiot puts lives at risk by driving at 119 mph? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scout Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Just now, Whitemajikman said: She was giving a her opinion regarding the Clintons and you can't stand that fact and it's probably because she doesn't share yours. No, I would have had no problem if she had included Trump in the criticism. But she showed she doesn't really care about this issue; she just wanted to go for Clinton because she is partisan. Since I grasp non-partisan behavior, unlike her, I can see that the behavior of both should be addressed.....not just a retired Democrat who has been investigated numerous times with no evidence of sexual criminal behavior. Would you agree to unleash a $70 mil investigation of Trump's past? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Whitemajicman "Because the only people that believe in The Clinton's innocence are partisan" Wrong....the Majority that watched the gop find NOTHING after Countless Bogus Investigations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.410f33853fed2063cbd2872dc8f5cf9e.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.