Jump to content

Why do repubs constantly LIE about the Constitution?


Recommended Posts

repubs in congress pass budget laws that give money to religions like 

religious schools and to the jews in Palestine to establish those religions.

That violates the US Constitution separation of religions and government.

But repubs run on those issues and LIE to Americans that it is somehow okeedokee.

and in LYING, repub judges and in congress also commit perjury because they took

an oath to uphold the Constitution.

 

repubs say the second amendment gives them the right to keep and bear arms.

But that is the exact opposite of the what the Constitution says.    It says to keep 

and bear arms, Americans need to be members of a well regulated militia, organized 

and disciplined and armed BY CONGRESS, ie, the state national guards which would 

keep assault rifles LOCKED UP AND OUT OF THE HANDS OF MASS  murderers.

Sooooo, why do repubs LIE and commit perjury about the Constitution?

 

repubs search Americans entering airports and government buildings even though they 

are totally innocent of any crime and even thought he government has NO warrant NOR 

any affidavit about facts of any crime.     Sooooooo, why do republicans LIE about the

Constitution and commit perjury to uphold the Constitution?

 

The constitution requires a declaration of war by congress before any war can be started.

But repubs just passed a resolution to allow bush to start his long wars in afghanistan and 

irag based on his LIES.   Those wars have wasted 6 trillion dollars of YOUR tax dollars that 

could have been used here in the USA to improve lives of Americans instead of wasting the 

lives of our soldiers, the best and bravest Americans.   A resolution to give bush the power 

to work with the UN is NOT a declaration of war.

Sooooooo, why do repubs constantly LIE about the Constitution?

 

And why are TV talking heads so dense and stupid about not asking politicians to explain 

their votes regarding these simple questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, merrill said:

Because they might not be informed as was GW Bush who claimed the Constitution was nothing more than a god damned piece of paper.

 

Soooooo, just because bush junior is a piece of shit who used the Constitution for 

toilet paper, what about all the repukes in congress and in judgships and the TV talking 

heads who also apparently do not believe in nor understand the Constitution and constantly 

LIE about what it says?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, William1444 said:

repubs in congress pass budget laws that give money to religions like 

religious schools and to the jews in Palestine to establish those religions.

That violates the US Constitution separation of religions and government.

But repubs run on those issues and LIE to Americans that it is somehow okeedokee.

and in LYING, repub judges and in congress also commit perjury because they took

an oath to uphold the Constitution.

 

 

Well...the Constitution doesn't really say anything either way about foreign aid.  It does (in Section 8) give Congress the power to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution for foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution..." and in Section 9 states "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law...".  In 1961, Congress passed The Foreign Assistance Act which allows for "economic assistance programs"...which is how the get authority under Section 8 above.  By the way...in 1961 both the House and Senate was controlled by Democrats and JFK signed the legislation.

 

37 minutes ago, William1444 said:

repubs say the second amendment gives them the right to keep and bear arms.

But that is the exact opposite of the what the Constitution says.    It says to keep 

and bear arms, Americans need to be members of a well regulated militia, organized 

and disciplined and armed BY CONGRESS, ie, the state national guards which would 

keep assault rifles LOCKED UP AND OUT OF THE HANDS OF MASS  murderers.

Sooooo, why do repubs LIE and commit perjury about the Constitution?

 

 

 

The Supreme Court disagrees with you...I'll trust them over you.

 

38 minutes ago, William1444 said:

 

repubs search Americans entering airports and government buildings even though they 

are totally innocent of any crime and even thought he government has NO warrant NOR 

any affidavit about facts of any crime.     Sooooooo, why do republicans LIE about the

Constitution and commit perjury to uphold the Constitution?

 

 

Since people have no Constitution right to travel via airplane, they CHOOSE to waive the need for a warrant.  If they don't want to be searched they just need to travel by an alternate mode of transportation.

 

39 minutes ago, William1444 said:

 

The constitution requires a declaration of war by congress before any war can be started.

But repubs just passed a resolution to allow bush to start his long wars in afghanistan and 

irag based on his LIES.   Those wars have wasted 6 trillion dollars of YOUR tax dollars that 

could have been used here in the USA to improve lives of Americans instead of wasting the 

lives of our soldiers, the best and bravest Americans.   A resolution to give bush the power 

to work with the UN is NOT a declaration of war.

Sooooooo, why do repubs constantly LIE about the Constitution?

 

 

 

 

In 1973 Congress passed the War Powers Act so they could allow military action without a formal declaration of war.  By the way, in 1973 both the House and Senate was controlled by Democrats and they overrode the veto of President Nixon to make this law.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, William1444 said:

repubs in congress pass budget laws that give money to religions like 

religious schools and to the jews in Palestine to establish those religions.

That violates the US Constitution separation of religions and government.

But repubs run on those issues and LIE to Americans that it is somehow okeedokee.

and in LYING, repub judges and in congress also commit perjury because they took

an oath to uphold the Constitution.

 

repubs say the second amendment gives them the right to keep and bear arms.

But that is the exact opposite of the what the Constitution says.    It says to keep 

and bear arms, Americans need to be members of a well regulated militia, organized 

and disciplined and armed BY CONGRESS, ie, the state national guards which would 

keep assault rifles LOCKED UP AND OUT OF THE HANDS OF MASS  murderers.

Sooooo, why do repubs LIE and commit perjury about the Constitution?

 

repubs search Americans entering airports and government buildings even though they 

are totally innocent of any crime and even thought he government has NO warrant NOR 

any affidavit about facts of any crime.     Sooooooo, why do republicans LIE about the

Constitution and commit perjury to uphold the Constitution?

 

The constitution requires a declaration of war by congress before any war can be started.

But repubs just passed a resolution to allow bush to start his long wars in afghanistan and 

irag based on his LIES.   Those wars have wasted 6 trillion dollars of YOUR tax dollars that 

could have been used here in the USA to improve lives of Americans instead of wasting the 

lives of our soldiers, the best and bravest Americans.   A resolution to give bush the power 

to work with the UN is NOT a declaration of war.

Sooooooo, why do repubs constantly LIE about the Constitution?

 

And why are TV talking heads so dense and stupid about not asking politicians to explain 

their votes regarding these simple questions?

Why are liberals such idiots?

 

First, "establishing" a religion meant our government couldn't set up an equivalent of the Church of England. 

The 2nd amendment does NOT mean you have to be part of a militia, although you are. 

The Amendment says "unreasonable" searches.   If you don't want to be searched before getting on a plane.  Drive. 

Yes, Congress must declare war.   The Constitution does not say how that must be done. 

 

I hate that liberals are so constitutionally ignorant. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BatteryPowered said:

 

Well...the Constitution doesn't really say anything either way about foreign aid.  It does (in Section 8) give Congress the power to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution for foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution..." and in Section 9 states "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law...".  In 1961, Congress passed The Foreign Assistance Act which allows for "economic assistance programs"...which is how the get authority under Section 8 above.  By the way...in 1961 both the House and Senate was controlled by Democrats and JFK signed the legislation.

Like I said, politicians LIE, LIE, LIE.    The Constitution is the highest law of the land.

It can NOT be changed by laws that to NOT rise to its level.   The only way to change the 

Constitution is to AMEND the Constitution, not pass laws subverting the Constitution.    Duhhh.

 

The Supreme Court disagrees with you...I'll trust them over you.

Well, then, you must trust political hacks who can be replaced and new ones can change and pervert 

the Constitution.

 

Since people have no Constitution right to travel via airplane, they CHOOSE to waive the need for a warrant.  If they don't want to be searched they just need to travel by an alternate mode of transportation.

One, what about people who need to go to a court house or government building?   Should they

be forced to stay home and not have access to government?

Two, what about if people are so cowardly they are afraid to travel by airplane, should they

stay home and cower in a closet rather than have their cowardliness pervert the Constitution?

 

In 1973 Congress passed the War Powers Act so they could allow military action without a formal declaration of war.  By the way, in 1973 both the House and Senate was controlled by Democrats and they overrode the veto of President Nixon to make this law.

Like I said, congress does NOT have the authority to amend the Constitution by passing a law.

congress PERVERTED THE CONSTITUTION as do judges and presidents who do not follow the Constitution.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

Why are liberals such idiots?

You are a moron, so I will type slowly.

 

First, "establishing" a religion meant our government couldn't set up an equivalent of the Church of England. 

It means NO aid of any kind to ANY religion.   Duh, you dumb fuck.

 

The 2nd amendment does NOT mean you have to be part of a militia, although you are. 

Yes it does.   Your LYING does not correctly interpret the clear and explicit words of the

Constitution.  To keep and bear arms, you must be part of a well regulated militia,

organized, disciplined and armed by congress, period.   That is what the Constitution says.

And that militia organized by congress is the national guard,    Duhhhh, you dumb fucks.

 

The Amendment says "unreasonable" searches.   If you don't want to be searched before getting on a plane.  Drive. 

No, cowards should stay home or drive if they are afraid to fly without everyone being searched.

 

Yes, Congress must declare war.   The Constitution does not say how that must be done. 

Giving bush the power to start a war is NOT the congress declaring war, you dumb fuck.

 

I hate that liberals are so constitutionally ignorant. 

You need to read the Constitution because clearly you do not understand the explicit words.

Basically, you are dumber than dog shit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just love how you lefties always blame the right

30 minutes ago, JeanMoulin said:

It was written by wealthy white men for wealthy white men.

Wow how mislead, it was written to create the greatest country in the world. Of course socialist loser' idiots like you hate America along with the constitution that's why you're always trying to change it.

 

 

Once you understand that Leftism is hate, everything falls into place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, William1444 said:

 

You need to learn how to use the quote button.

 

Establishment of religion means something specific.  Not your hair brained "any kind of religion".   You appear to have missed the part that prohibits the government from people practicing their religion.

 

The Supreme court has ruled that gun rights are an individual right, and not related to being in a militia. 

 

The Constitution says "unreasonable" searches.   If you know ahead of time you are going to be searched, and you go there, you are acknowledging that search.

 

And yes, specifically giving the President authorization to invade a country, is a declaration of war.  When the Framers wanted specific wording used, they explicitly spelled out the language to be used.    They didn't do this with declaration of war.   They left it to Congress to determine how they would do it. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, William1444 said:

repubs in congress pass budget laws that give money to religions like 

religious schools and to the jews in Palestine to establish those religions.

That violates the US Constitution separation of religions and government.

But repubs run on those issues and LIE to Americans that it is somehow okeedokee.

and in LYING, repub judges and in congress also commit perjury because they took

an oath to uphold the Constitution.

 

repubs say the second amendment gives them the right to keep and bear arms.

But that is the exact opposite of the what the Constitution says.    It says to keep 

and bear arms, Americans need to be members of a well regulated militia, organized 

and disciplined and armed BY CONGRESS, ie, the state national guards which would 

keep assault rifles LOCKED UP AND OUT OF THE HANDS OF MASS  murderers.

Sooooo, why do repubs LIE and commit perjury about the Constitution?

 

 

 

You can't quote the constitution to back up your tired old false claims

Words mean things and you obviously can't understand simple Jr. High School English

I've asked you this question many times, and you aren't smart enough to answer
The Second Amendment is a single sentence; what is the subject and predicate of the sentence?

Your answer, if you attempt one, will prove my point

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, William1444 said:

repubs in congress pass budget laws that give money to religions like 

religious schools and to the jews in Palestine to establish those religions.

That violates the US Constitution separation of religions and government.

But repubs run on those issues and LIE to Americans that it is somehow okeedokee.

and in LYING, repub judges and in congress also commit perjury because they took

an oath to uphold the Constitution.

 

repubs say the second amendment gives them the right to keep and bear arms.

But that is the exact opposite of the what the Constitution says.    It says to keep 

and bear arms, Americans need to be members of a well regulated militia, organized 

and disciplined and armed BY CONGRESS, ie, the state national guards which would 

keep assault rifles LOCKED UP AND OUT OF THE HANDS OF MASS  murderers.

Sooooo, why do repubs LIE and commit perjury about the Constitution?

 

repubs search Americans entering airports and government buildings even though they 

are totally innocent of any crime and even thought he government has NO warrant NOR 

any affidavit about facts of any crime.     Sooooooo, why do republicans LIE about the

Constitution and commit perjury to uphold the Constitution?

 

The constitution requires a declaration of war by congress before any war can be started.

But repubs just passed a resolution to allow bush to start his long wars in afghanistan and 

irag based on his LIES.   Those wars have wasted 6 trillion dollars of YOUR tax dollars that 

could have been used here in the USA to improve lives of Americans instead of wasting the 

lives of our soldiers, the best and bravest Americans.   A resolution to give bush the power 

to work with the UN is NOT a declaration of war.

Sooooooo, why do repubs constantly LIE about the Constitution?

 

And why are TV talking heads so dense and stupid about not asking politicians to explain 

their votes regarding these simple questions?

 

I remember when the Dubya Admin. sent money to Africa for a healthcare type program, and he BANNED the people being counseled about abortion.  He JUST stripped them of free speech UNLESS it was the Dubya 'approved' speech. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Chuck! said:

You can't quote the constitution to back up your tired old false claims  

Words mean things and you obviously can't understand simple Jr. High School English

Article 1, Section 8 of the body of the Constitution plus the second amendment which 

must be construed "in para materia" with it.    That is Latin.   Look it up in your law dictionary.

 

I've asked you this question many times, and you aren't smart enough to answer
The Second Amendment is a single sentence; what is the subject and predicate of the sentence?
Your answer, if you attempt one, will prove my point

Here are the exact words:  A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the 

right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

 

That slightly amends Article 1, section 8 of the body of the Constitution which states that 

the MILITIA shall be organized, disciplined, and armed by congress.  That organization is now called the state national guards.    If you and all Americans want to keep and bear arms, you must join the military or the national guard/ militia.    The Army controls the national guard if necessary and trains the militia and arms the militia.

And the Constitution says the militia purpose is to repel invasions and suppress insurrections as the state national guards did during the confederate insurrection.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

I just love how you lefties always blame the right

Wow how mislead, it was written to create the greatest country in the world. Of course socialist loser' idiots like you hate America along with the constitution that's why you're always trying to change it.

 

 

Once you understand that Leftism is hate, everything falls into place.

How misled you are. They had no idea how great America was going to be. It was an experiment that they believed may not even work. They were in constant fear that England would invade any day, which they did, so it was important for everyone to be armed. They never had much of a real standing army. In today's world, everyone having firearms makes no sense. If you righties believe you're going to hold off an army, any army, with your little pea shooters, you're even crazier then I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JeanMoulin said:

How misled you are. They had no idea how great America was going to be. It was an experiment that they believed may not even work. They were in constant fear that England would invade any day, which they did, so it was important for everyone to be armed. They never had much of a real standing army. In today's world, everyone having firearms makes no sense. If you righties believe you're going to hold off an army, any army, with your little pea shooters, you're even crazier then I thought.

Well the experiment turned out great, then democrats decided they didn't like it . So any old BS story will suffice with you idiots.

 

 Leftists are the disgruntled folk. They see things in the world that are not ideal and conclude therefore that they have the right to change those things by force. Conservative explanations of why things are not ideal -- and never can be -- fall on deaf ears
Leftists aim to deliver dismay and disruption into other people's lives.

 

Once you understand that Leftism is hate, everything falls into place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Scout said:

I remember when the Dubya Admin. sent money to Africa for a healthcare type program, and he BANNED the people being counseled about abortion.  He JUST stripped them of free speech UNLESS it was the Dubya 'approved' speech. 

lol... government is prohibited for paying for abortions, dumbass. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, William1444 said:

Here are the exact words:  A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the 

right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

 

That slightly amends Article 1, section 8 of the body of the Constitution which states that 

the MILITIA shall be organized, disciplined, and armed by congress.  That organization is now called the state national guards.    If you and all Americans want to keep and bear arms, you must join the military or the national guard/ militia.    The Army controls the national guard if necessary and trains the militia and arms the militia.

And the Constitution says the militia purpose is to repel invasions and suppress insurrections as the state national guards did during the confederate insurrection.

 

Held: 

   1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.

      (a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.

      (b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.

 

 

You're part of the militia.   You lose. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

Held: 

   1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.

      (a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.

      (b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.

You're part of the militia.   You lose. 

 

You keep posting the same bullshit.   Read my response in my other thread.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, William1444 said:

Held: 

   1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.

      (a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause.The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.

      (b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.

You're part of the militia.   You lose. 

 

You keep posting the same bullshit.   Read my response in my other thread.

 

You're the idiot creating multiple threads about the same subject, dumbass

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

You're the idiot creating multiple threads about the same subject, dumbass

 

One of my two threads is about the all of the CONSTANT LYING by republicans,

which seemed to have been boiled down to gun nut rantings,  

and my other thread was in response to veritas' questions, dumbass.

 

You do seem to be comprehensionaly challenged .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, JeanMoulin said:

How misled you are. They had no idea how great America was going to be. It was an experiment that they believed may not even work. They were in constant fear that England would invade any day, which they did, so it was important for everyone to be armed. They never had much of a real standing army. In today's world, everyone having firearms makes no sense. If you righties believe you're going to hold off an army, any army, with your little pea shooters, you're even crazier then I thought.

 

They're crazier than you thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Craig234 said:

 

They're crazier than you thought.

 

They tried it.   It was called the civil war.

The gun nuts and slave nuts and the phony christian southerners 

were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people

just to try and keep slavery.

all the republicans in the south became democrats because lincoln was 

a republican.  sooo, essentially in this country there are working American 

democrats,  and lazy ass republicans and lazy ass southern demo rats.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...