DemoMan Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 When President Donald Trump’s eldest son met with a Russian lawyer in June 2016 after being promised “information that would incriminate” Trump’s election opponent Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr. suggested that a U.S. law the lawyer was lobbying against could be reconsidered if Trump became president, according to the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya. “The meeting was a failure; none of us understood what the point of it had been,” she told Bloomberg in an interview on Monday, referring to the meeting that Trump Jr. initially claimed was about the Magnitsky Act, which Congress passed in 2012 to punish Russian officials for human rights abuses. “Looking ahead, if we come to power, we can return to this issue and think what to do about it,’’ Trump Jr. said during the meeting, according to Veselnitskaya. “I understand our side may have messed up, but it’ll take a long time to get to the bottom of it.” Veselnitskaya also claimed that he wanted “financial documents showing that money that allegedly evaded U.S. taxes had gone to Clinton’s campaign,” according to Bloomberg. But she said that she did not have them. Alan Futerfas, Trump Jr.’s lawyer, said he had no comment on Bloomberg’s story. The June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower, which The New York Times uncovered this summer, has drawn close scrutiny from the multiple investigations into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia last year. Trump Jr. took the meeting, which was also attended by Trump’s son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort, after being told that the information on Clinton was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,’’ according to emails he released in response to the Times’ reporting. “If it is what you say, I love it,” he replied in an email to music publicist Rob Goldstone, who arranged the meeting through one of his clients, Russian pop star Emin Agalarov. Trump Jr.’s explanation for the meeting repeatedly changed. He initially claimed that it concerned adoptions, referring to the Russian government banning Americans from adopting Russian children, in retaliation for the Magnitsky Act. Veselnitskaya told Bloomberg that she would be willing to meet with the Senate Judiciary Committee and with special counsel Robert Mueller’s team, which are both conducting investigations into the Trump campaign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 lol... this moron says "we can return to this issue and think what to do about it" is a quid pro quo. It's really amazing you can remember to breathe without someone reminding you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConservativeWAVE Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 THAT doesn't sound like any "Quid pro quo"... because words do not mean ANYTHING !! NOW, if the President of Russia was trying to corner the Uranium market, and was willing to bribe people to make that happen, and THEN, a sitting Sec. of State voted for the transfer of 20% of U.S. Uranium assets to Russia, and THEN, $150 million of donations are made to the Clinton Foundation from the entity that benefitted from the sale... Now THAT would be a "Qui pro quo" !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 51 minutes ago, Golfboy said: lol... this moron says "we can return to this issue and think what to do about it" is a quid pro quo. It's really amazing you can remember to breathe without someone reminding you. don tried, that is the big story. maybe that is why daddy made ratso lie about everything. oh well, Mueller will find the truth and justice will prevail. enjoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix68 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 12 minutes ago, ConservativeWAVE said: THAT doesn't sound like any "Quid pro quo"... because words do not mean ANYTHING !! ......ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY'RE COMIN' OUTTA TRUMPY'S MOUTH!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 57 minutes ago, Golfboy said: lol... this moron says "we can return to this issue and think what to do about it" is a quid pro quo. It's really amazing you can remember to breathe without someone reminding you. +1 Really dumb by Isabel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConservativeWAVE Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: Oh boy we got the trump campaign on the run. If I were the Democrats... I would be MUCH more concerned about the survival of the Democrat PAERTY... because the FAKE NEWS about Trump isn't working, and the REAL FACTS relating to Hillary and Democrat CORRUPTION are beginning to FLOW !! Donald Trump will be FINE !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConservativeWAVE Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, Phoenix68 said: ......ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY'RE COMIN' OUTTA TRUMPY'S MOUTH!!!!! No, because "Quid pro quo" is a phrase used in English to mean an exchange of goods or services, in which one transfer is contingent upon the other; "a favour for a favor". EVEN if the conversation happened... the conversation is NO proof of an INTENT to do it... and it CERTAINLY didn't happen relating to Trump... HOWRVER. it almost CERTAINLY DID with Hillary !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDontTypetoTrolls Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 15 minutes ago, Phoenix68 said: ......ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY'RE COMIN' OUTTA TRUMPY'S MOUTH!!!!! Thank you for this hilarious clip! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 24 minutes ago, harryramar said: don tried, that is the big story. You have no proof that he tried anything. Hillary did. But you think "tried" is worse. No. Really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Golfboy said: You have no proof that he tried anything. Hillary did. But you think "tried" is worse. No. Really. it shows intent, just as when he lied it showed intent to conceal a possible crime. daddy too.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 1 minute ago, harryramar said: it shows intent, just as when he lied it showed intent to conceal a possible crime. daddy too.. lol. Please quote the "intent" law that you think he violated. Go ahead, I'll wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemoMan Posted November 6, 2017 Author Share Posted November 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Golfboy said: lol... this moron says "we can return to this issue and think what to do about it" is a quid pro quo. It's really amazing you can remember to breathe without someone reminding you. Umm...Tard? Brainless, idiotic, empty headed and drooling Tard? THAT IS AN ARTICLE I CITED. Jesus Christ - how do you remember to breathe without someone reminding you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemoMan Posted November 6, 2017 Author Share Posted November 6, 2017 24 minutes ago, Z09 said: +1 Really dumb by Isabel Umm...ZO the Whore? Brainless, idiotic, empty headed and drooling ZO the Whore? THAT IS AN ARTICLE I CITED. Jesus Christ - how do you remember to breathe without someone reminding you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slideman Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States US Code Notes prev | next If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Lock the sob Up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Golfboy said: lol. Please quote the "intent" law that you think he violated. Go ahead, I'll wait. why do you think he lied about it on orders from daddy? when his ass is in front of a jury and they see the intent to attempt a crime, and then they see how much he lied about it, it may kinda make thm believe he is not telling the truth. you don't know much about the law do you? yeah, it shows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 1 minute ago, harryramar said: why do you think he lied about it on orders from daddy? when his ass is in front of a jury and they see the intent to attempt a crime, and then they see how much he lied about it, it may kinda make thm believe he is not telling the truth. you don't know much about the law do you? yeah, it shows Politics. Because they knew morons like you would lie, and claim something illegal happened. Dumbass. What I know about the law, is there has to actually BE a law violated. So, you admit they broke no law. Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, slideman said: 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States US Code Notes prev | next If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. That's Manafort, long before he had anything to do with Trump, dumbass. The question is what law Trump violated. Would you like to try again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slideman Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Oh i think that'll be Don Jr too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ducatirider Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 29 minutes ago, dontlooknow said: Trump is going down. 33% approval. 33%. That is shocking. Proof 1/3 of our population are fucking idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Just now, Golfboy said: Politics. Because they knew morons like you would lie, and claim something illegal happened. Dumbass. So, you admit they broke no law. Interesting. I see so now you are claiming the potus and his son lied to you and cube head Hannity because they knew morons like me would lie? BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA that is the dumbest fucking thing you have said to date. god lord are you seriously making that claim? " oh yes don and don jr would have told the truth but they knew I would lie about it so they chose to lie" LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemoMan Posted November 6, 2017 Author Share Posted November 6, 2017 Just now, ducatirider said: 33%. That is shocking. Proof 1/3 of our population are fucking idiots. Right? It handily identifies the stupidest people in our country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, Golfboy said: That's Manafort, long before he had anything to do with Trump, dumbass. The question is what law Trump violated. Would you like to try again? it doesn't matter if he broke a law at that meeting it is the totality of his dishonesty that will nail that creep and his old man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slideman Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, ducatirider said: Proof 1/3 of our population are fucking idiots. Always remember- half the population is below average IQ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.