benson13 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 especially on the Russian Hacking...(just like Clinton seeking help from your party with Bin-Laden Below)....Obama went to the gop in August, when the Obama administration quietly approached Capitol Hill to seek bipartisan support from congressional leaders about the growing evidence of Russian involvement, CIA Director John Brennan couldn't even get top Republicans to meet with him. We learn that when a caravan of top U.S national security officials finally sat down with members of Congress, the GOP – led by Senator Mitch McConnell – flatly refused to cooperate. We learn that when Jeh Johnson, the secretary of homeland security, contacted people in charge of elections in various states whose election data had been possibly compromised, the Republicans in those states blew him off. And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. Back to Clinton seeking help from the gop stopping Bin-Laden Clinton vs. Terror, Republicans vs. ClintonPresident Clinton led the fight against terrorism over strong opposition from Republicans in Congress and the pro-Republican Media. -- sent legislation to Congress to TIGHTEN AIRPORT SECURITY. (Remember, this is before 911) The legislation was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the airlines.-- sent legislation to Congress to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF TERRORIST FUNDING. It was defeated by Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests.-- sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF EXPLOSIVES USED BY TERRORISTS. It was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the NRA. --Robert Oakley, Reagan Counterterrorism Czar says of Clinton's efforts "Overall, I give them very high marks" and "The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama"-- Paul Bremer, Bush's Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley saying he believed the Clinton Administration had "correctly focused on bin Laden. "-- Barton Gellman of the Washington Post put it best, "By any measure available, Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him" and was the "first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Z-man had great hopes for Obama. He thought Obama would be a Savior Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 Yea.....so did KlanMan JTZilla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Last summer Obama was warned about the hacking and did nothing... I guess he was watching Maddow every night and was convinced it would be a landslide anyway.... Didn't he care about the integrity of our election? Now we know of course the Democrats-Integrity-Fair elections really don't go well together after what Donna Brazile told us.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 Obama went to the gop in August, when the Obama administration quietly approached Capitol Hill to seek bipartisan support from congressional leaders about the growing evidence of Russian involvement, CIA Director John Brennan couldn't even get top Republicans to meet with him. We learn that when a caravan of top U.S national security officials finally sat down with members of Congress, the GOP – led by Senator Mitch McConnell – flatly refused to cooperate. We learn that when Jeh Johnson, the secretary of homeland security, contacted people in charge of elections in various states whose election data had been possibly compromised, the Republicans in those states blew him off. And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. your party INTENTIONALLY IGNORED THE RUSSIAN HACKING.....why?????????????????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightMax Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 17 minutes ago, benson13 said: especially on the Russian Hacking...(just like Clinton seeking help from your party with Bin-Laden Below)....Obama went to the gop in August, when the Obama administration quietly approached Capitol Hill to seek bipartisan support from congressional leaders about the growing evidence of Russian involvement, CIA Director John Brennan couldn't even get top Republicans to meet with him. We learn that when a caravan of top U.S national security officials finally sat down with members of Congress, the GOP – led by Senator Mitch McConnell – flatly refused to cooperate. We learn that when Jeh Johnson, the secretary of homeland security, contacted people in charge of elections in various states whose election data had been possibly compromised, the Republicans in those states blew him off. And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. Poor beanie. you DO realize that "bipartisan support" is NOT needed to bring the FBI in for an INVESTIGATION and even CHARGES if warranted, right shitstain??? AND you don't need CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL to actually DO ANY OF THE THINGS oblameo SHOULD have done and did NOTHING, right?? So the REAL QUESTION still is UNANSWERED- why didn't oblameo do what he should have done as the LEADER of this country when he knew that "Russian hacking" was going on??? BECAUSE HE SURE AS HELL DIDN'T NEED CONGRESS TO PAT HIM ON THE BACK AND SAY "GO FOR IT", shitstain!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 5 minutes ago, benson13 said: Yea.....so did KlanMan JTZilla I think the Z-man is a secret socialist, like Obama Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Benson... Who wrote the article you posted? It doesn't appear to be written professionally..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Z09 said: Benson... Who wrote the article you posted? It doesn't appear to be written professionally..... Obama must have been a big disappointment for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Here's a classic line... And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. So Obama "toyed" but concluded it would be impossible to get the GOP on board..? Give is a break.... When everything fails you just blame the other party for not helping?? Obama's the president of the United States... He did nothing and his excuse was he probably couldn't get any help... It's laughable... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 who cares who wrote it...I wanna know why your party ALWAYS DOES NOTHING TO PROTECT AMERICA???????????????? Obama went to the gop in August, when the Obama administration quietly approached Capitol Hill to seek bipartisan support from congressional leaders about the growing evidence of Russian involvement, CIA Director John Brennan couldn't even get top Republicans to meet with him. We learn that when a caravan of top U.S national security officials finally sat down with members of Congress, the GOP – led by Senator Mitch McConnell – flatly refused to cooperate. We learn that when Jeh Johnson, the secretary of homeland security, contacted people in charge of elections in various states whose election data had been possibly compromised, the Republicans in those states blew him off. And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. your party INTENTIONALLY IGNORED THE RUSSIAN HACKING.....why?????????????????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 1 minute ago, benson13 said: who cares who wrote it...I wanna know why your party ALWAYS DOES NOTHING TO PROTECT AMERICA???????????????? Obama went to the gop in August, when the Obama administration quietly approached Capitol Hill to seek bipartisan support from congressional leaders about the growing evidence of Russian involvement, CIA Director John Brennan couldn't even get top Republicans to meet with him. We learn that when a caravan of top U.S national security officials finally sat down with members of Congress, the GOP – led by Senator Mitch McConnell – flatly refused to cooperate. We learn that when Jeh Johnson, the secretary of homeland security, contacted people in charge of elections in various states whose election data had been possibly compromised, the Republicans in those states blew him off. And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. your party INTENTIONALLY IGNORED THE RUSSIAN HACKING.....why?????????????????????? Show us where you picked up that article on the net please........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Z09 said: Here's a classic line... And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. So Obama "toyed" but concluded it would be impossible to get the GOP on board..? Give is a break.... When everything fails you just blame the other party for not helping?? Obama's the president of the United States... He did nothing and his excuse was he probably couldn't get any help... It's laughable... The perfect set-up. And now Trump has an asterisk after his name and Mueller after his ass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 So now we know that Obama was told our elections were being hacked but decided not to do anything because the GOP wouldn't cooperate.... But of course nobody says anything about that until AFTER the election. Yeah.....You always take credit for a mess after it happens when your in charge.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 13 minutes ago, MidnightMax said: Poor beanie. you DO realize that "bipartisan support" is NOT needed to bring the FBI in for an INVESTIGATION and even CHARGES if warranted, right shitstain??? AND you don't need CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL to actually DO ANY OF THE THINGS oblameo SHOULD have done and did NOTHING, right?? So the REAL QUESTION still is UNANSWERED- why didn't oblameo do what he should have done as the LEADER of this country when he knew that "Russian hacking" was going on??? BECAUSE HE SURE AS HELL DIDN'T NEED CONGRESS TO PAT HIM ON THE BACK AND SAY "GO FOR IT", shitstain!!!! so please explain what don is doing to protect our future elections? oh, he is doing nothing? why do you think that is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 12 minutes ago, benson13 said: Kentucky is state that takes from the gumamint far more than they pay in. I wonder why randy doesn't complain about this intrusion??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, harryramar said: so please explain what don is doing to protect our future elections? oh, he is doing nothing? why do you think that is? There's numerous investigations going on with the Russian hacking and aftermath.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Benson.. How about showing us the source of the article you posted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just now, Z09 said: There's numerous investigations going on with the Russian hacking and aftermath.... so then you agree that the Russians interfered with our election and may have been instrumental in electing trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z09 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, harryramar said: so then you agree that the Russians interfered with our election and may have been instrumental in electing trump. We simply don't know... But when the evidence was presented to Obama he did nothing..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightMax Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 14 minutes ago, benson13 said: who cares who wrote it...I wanna know why your party ALWAYS DOES NOTHING TO PROTECT AMERICA???????????????? Obama went to the gop in August, when the Obama administration quietly approached Capitol Hill to seek bipartisan support from congressional leaders about the growing evidence of Russian involvement, CIA Director John Brennan couldn't even get top Republicans to meet with him. We learn that when a caravan of top U.S national security officials finally sat down with members of Congress, the GOP – led by Senator Mitch McConnell – flatly refused to cooperate. We learn that when Jeh Johnson, the secretary of homeland security, contacted people in charge of elections in various states whose election data had been possibly compromised, the Republicans in those states blew him off. And we learn that Denis McDonough, Obama's chief of staff, toyed with the idea of a bipartisan commission to take on the Russia spy effort, the White House concluded that it would be impossible to get the GOP on board. your party INTENTIONALLY IGNORED THE RUSSIAN HACKING.....why?????????????????????? No, shitstain, that's NOT what is says!!! IT SAYS that your party REFUSED TO GO TO THE REPUBLICANS "because they didn't think they could get them on board"!!! So YOUR PARTY DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING TRY!!! Which makes it EASY for YOUR PARTY to be the moron manipulators they are with IDIOTS LIKE YOU, and "blame the other side"!!! The FACTS ARE, oblameo DIDN'T NEED REPUBLICANS ON BOARD TO ACT!!! EVER!!! SO WHY DIDN'T HE ACT???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just now, Z09 said: We simply don't know... But when the evidence was presented to Obama he did nothing..... I think the evidence is overwhelming that they interfered in our election. why is don doing nothing? is he being blackmailed by putin or sumpin??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryramar Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just now, MidnightMax said: No, shitstain, that's NOT what is says!!! IT SAYS that your party REFUSED TO GO TO THE REPUBLICANS "because they didn't think they could get them on board"!!! So YOUR PARTY DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING TRY!!! Which makes it EASY for YOUR PARTY to be the moron manipulators they are with IDIOTS LIKE YOU, and "blame the other side"!!! The FACTS ARE, oblameo DIDN'T NEED REPUBLICANS ON BOARD TO ACT!!! EVER!!! SO WHY DIDN'T HE ACT???? i'm pretty sure the article says clearly that they did try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightMax Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just now, harryramar said: I think the evidence is overwhelming that they interfered in our election. why is don doing nothing? is he being blackmailed by putin or sumpin??? So you have PROOF that PRESIDENT TRUMP is doing nothing, babytalk shtistain man-boi??? Didn't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.