untitled Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 A victory in court would grant the lawmakers immediate access to government documents related to the hotel’s operations and lease that they say would shed light on its finances, possible foreign payments to the hotel and the G.S.A.’s ruling that the hotel did not violate the terms of its lease when President Trump took office. A favorable ruling would also open a fruitful avenue for Oversight Committee Democrats to use on other issues. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/02/us/politics/democrats-trump-hotel-records-lawsuit.html?module=WatchingPortal®ion=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=13&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F11%2F02%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fdemocrats-trump-hotel-records-lawsuit.html&eventName=Watching-article-click Trump's a crook, we know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 More mental masturbation by liberals. The Old Post Office building was leased to Trump in 2013 before he had anything to do with the government. Sucks to be a liberal, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintao Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Seems like this is the Democrats only option if they are going to see the Tramp actually investigated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
untitled Posted November 3, 2017 Author Share Posted November 3, 2017 21 minutes ago, shintao said: Seems like this is the Democrats only option if they are going to see the Tramp actually investigated. This is very important to establish violation of the Emoluments clause. “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightMax Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, untitled said: This is very important to establish violation of the Emoluments clause. “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” It would actually be BENEFICIAL if you shitstains actually KNEW what an EMOLUMENT was before you started whining about "violations" of the Constitutional clause. UNLESS he is receiving PAYMENT DIRECTLY for "being the President of the United States", then there is NO EMOLUMENT involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightMax Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 hour ago, untitled said: A victory in court would grant the lawmakers immediate access to government documents related to the hotel’s operations and lease that they say would shed light on its finances, possible foreign payments to the hotel and the G.S.A.’s ruling that the hotel did not violate the terms of its lease when President Trump took office. A favorable ruling would also open a fruitful avenue for Oversight Committee Democrats to use on other issues. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/02/us/politics/democrats-trump-hotel-records-lawsuit.html?module=WatchingPortal®ion=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=13&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F11%2F02%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Fdemocrats-trump-hotel-records-lawsuit.html&eventName=Watching-article-click Trump's a crook, we know that. You PROBABLY should READ YOUR ARTICLE before you have that orgasm. The COURTS have ruled MORE RECENTLY that "standing" isn't there for this to even remotely come to light. So good luck with that little waste of time. ROFLMAO!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaughinAtLefty Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Yet another major OP fail. Quite honestly, it's very disappointing to see just how childish and plain ole' stupid people have become in this country. The OP'r is a perfect example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfboy Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 47 minutes ago, untitled said: This is very important to establish violation of the Emoluments clause. “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” It's sad how our public education has failed an entire generation. Go buy a history book. Washington rented and sold property to British elites while he was President. It's stunning how little these idiots know about their own country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.