Jump to content

Brazile: Clinton took over and offered to pay DNC debt for favorable treatment


Z09
 Share

Recommended Posts

All this from the woman that had a private server to conduct government business at home that started deleting emails when it was discovered.

 

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/elizabeth-warren-democratic-party/index.html

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/02/trump-calls-dnc-primary-rigging-illegal-slams-fake-dossier-in-fox-news-interview.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the scheme that Clinton used to get around campaign finance laws.  She directed big contributions from very wealthy donors to the DNC and then siphoned it off of the DNC only for her campaign (Bernie didn't know this money was available and wasn't provided access to it) with help from DNC insiders.   This allowed Clinton to illegally avoid reporting campaign contributions from big donors and illegally avoid campaign finance limits. 

 

Don't listen to Donna Brazile, the cheater, when she says nothing they did was illegal.  It is illegal.  Clinton herself violated a number of campaign finance disclosure and reporting laws, and violated campaign finance limits from individual donors.  Her staff, including Donna Brazile and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, aided and abetted Clinton in violating these laws.  This is actually the biggest story about the 2016 elections that has broken so far.  Even the Conservative radio pundits haven't figured out how serious this really is.  I was listening to Hew Hewitt this morning, who prides himself as a savoy DC lawyer well versed on campaign finance laws, and he just doesn't get it yet either.  Boys and girls, THIS is the story to watch.

 

ROBERT MULLER,  CHRISTOPHER WRAY,  WHERE ARE YOU.....HELLO, ROBERT MULLER........CHRISTOPHER WRAY......ARE YOU ALIVE.......FEDERAL LAWS WERE BROKEN HERE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dems are imploding and starting to eat each other. Brazile knows that she was involved in illegal money laundering and the book is the start of a possible defense. Brazile is a liar. The Clinton Crime family, oblameo, communists, and anarchists have taken over the dems and voters know it. Trump co-opted the dems and appealed to blue collar workers. Blacks voted for Trump in larger numbers. The traditional base of the dems is beginning to fracture. New leadership is needed badly. DNC is in total disarray.  Dems have no solutions except higher taxes and larger gov. Bye bye dems. Trump 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Z09 said:

All this from the woman that had a private server to conduct government business at home that started deleting emails when it was discovered.

 

And a woman who helped her husband trade the crown jewels of America's national defense to the Chinese for campaign cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Z09 said:

All this from the woman that had a private server to conduct government business at home that started deleting emails when it was discovered.

 

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/elizabeth-warren-democratic-party/index.html

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/02/trump-calls-dnc-primary-rigging-illegal-slams-fake-dossier-in-fox-news-interview.html

When it was discovered? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read a interesting article about this from a objective writer...all I can say is another day in the political hood or who do you like better; the puppet on the left or the puppet on the right ? 99% of them are NFG no matter what their stripes; some are just worse than others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NoGhost said:

Just read a interesting article about this from a objective writer...all I can say is another day in the political hood or who do you like better; the puppet on the left or the puppet on the right ? 99% of them are NFG no matter what their stripes; some are just worse than others.

flat,800x800,075,f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, shintao said:

No, which "laws?"

 

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/11/03/gregg-jarrett-hillary-clintons-scheme-in-rigging-nomination-may-have-been-criminal.html

 

Quote

 

The Federal Election Commission must immediately launch an investigation. So, too, must the Department of Justice and the FBI. It appears that Clinton may well have violated several laws which could constitute serious crimes. 

 

First, federal law sets strict limits on campaign contributions.  Financial records must now be subpoenaed to determine whether these laws were broken. Given Clinton’s past record of shady transactions such as the Whitewater land deal and her sale of cattle futures, there is a strong chance that a document trail will lead investigators to multiple violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act. 

 

Second, if Brazile’s account of Clinton’s artifice is true, it is likely that campaign finance reporting laws were broken under the same Act. Hiding campaign money through false or misleading campaign reports is illegal. In egregious cases it is a crime, not just a civil penalty.    

 

Finally, the funneling of campaign funds from one source to another smacks of money laundering. Any transaction that seeks to conceal or disguise proceeds of illegal activity constitutes money laundering. So, if it can be shown that Clinton violated campaign contribution limits or reporting requirements, then the channeling of the proceeds from one source to another would be the “laundering” of it.

 


http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/11/02/law-expert-donna-brazile-clinton-campaign-may-committed-federal-crime/

 

Quote

 

Interim DNC chairwoman and disgraced former CNN commentator Donna Brazile’s decision to hand Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign confidential questions in advance of the March primary debate may have been a violation of federal law, according to a former federal prosecutor.

 

“Stealing valuable proprietary confidential information is illegal, and debate questions are highly confidential,” Ken Sukhia, who served as United States Attorney for North Florida and who has prosecuted numerous white collar crimes, told Breitbart News.

 

“Presidential debate questions are extremely valuable and they are kept highly confidential before debates. If candidates could legally purchase the questions in advance, they would surely pay a small fortune,” Sukhia continued. “Federal law not only prohibits misappropriating valuable confidential information, it also makes it a crime for anyone to knowingly receive such misappropriated information.”

 

“A violation of the law carries a sentence of up to 10 years in Federal prison and a $5,000,000 fine,” Sukhia said.

 

 

Not that you really care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

 

No, what she did violated campaign funding laws ... which the Clintons have been doing for more than 25 years.

Like I alluded to... According to the pundits, its not illegal.   Maybe it is illegal, I don't know every law of the land.  But it would seem that its not as clear to the proper authorities as it is to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, jrock2310 said:

Like I alluded to... According to the pundits, its not illegal.   Maybe it is illegal, I don't know every law of the land.  But it would seem that its not as clear to the proper authorities as it is to you.

 

Funny how what's illegal and what's not illegal ONLY matters to you DemocRATS when a DemocRAT is accused of something.   Take Trump.   Why is Trump being investigated for collusion with Russia when collusion is not a crime?  You won't find it any statute pertaining to elections, snowflake, yet you folks have spent the past 19 months or so chanting "collusion, collusion".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Funny how what's illegal and what's not illegal ONLY matters to you DemocRATS when a DemocRAT is accused of something.   Take Trump.   Why is Trump being investigated for collusion with Russia when collusion is not a crime?  You won't find it any statute pertaining to elections, snowflake, yet you folks have spent the past 19 months or so chanting "collusion, collusion".

I don't know what youre talking about, but according to pundits, its not illegal what clinton did.  Unethical - probably.   Illegal - not according to the law apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...