Jump to content

A Well Regulated Militia...


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Blue Devil said:

 

Your Propaganda... is.

 

A symptom of raging TDS.

 

Discuss it with your mental health provider.

 

8>)

 

I love TDS.  

It has fired up the people to bring about YET ANOTHER POPULAR VOTE
LOSS FOR TRUMP.   It will explain the 60% vote for Biden.  

 

IN A LANDSLIDE this time!  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What is a gun nutter? And yes, the constitution says we may arm ourselves with whatever firearm we want .  Would you like to rewrite the constitution? To bend it to fit YOUR feelings ?  fuck your

sad Scout doesn't understand the 2nd Amendment... the bitch doesn't realize that without the 2nd you don't have the 1st.

Yes, they did.  

39 minutes ago, Duck615 said:

PROVE IT BITCH

This lack of articulation skills is why I do not chat with you, weinie.

Ignore Bin welcomes you.  It has two feet up shit in it

and I'm kicking you in there.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Scout said:

This lack of articulation skills is why I do not chat with you, weinie.

Ignore Bin welcomes you.  It has two feet up shit in it

and I'm kicking you in there.  

LMFAO YOU CAN'T PROVE IT!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Scout said:

Blue Devil has a hard time accepting 

that the Founders had their own gun control

laws to protect the public from gun nutters. 

Scout has a hard time proving her claims are true.  Because it's difficult to prove a lie is true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Scout said:

 

I love TDS.  

It has fired up the people to bring about YET ANOTHER POPULAR VOTE
LOSS FOR TRUMP.   It will explain the 60% vote for Biden.  

 

IN A LANDSLIDE this time!  

 

lol.   I think she actually believes this crap.  🤣🤣🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Scout said:

This lack of articulation skills is why I do not chat with you, weinie.

Ignore Bin welcomes you.  It has two feet up shit in it

and I'm kicking you in there.  

How about that "shall not be infringed". Talk about lack of articulation.  You constantly post opinions you heard on campass but never follow with any fact or data to back it up. You are a zombie.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, shetluck said:

How about that "shall not be infringed". Talk about lack of articulation.  You constantly post opinions you heard on campass but never follow with any fact or data to back it up. You are a zombie.

 

I post opinions I heard WHERE?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Scout said:

I'm just asking what you said in your post.  

You know exactly what he said, you're playing games over a typo. 

It's what liberals do when they get embarrassed in public.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, shetluck said:

I think Scout left to go look up the definition of infringed.

Nah, she just ran away.  It's what they do when they get their butts kicked. 

Next she'll put you on ignore, because she can't debate facts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Scout said:

Saul Cornell told you what infringed does NOT mean.  :D   

 

Of Course - you would believe an Academic Communist Malcontent like Saul Cornell.

 

This Contrary Revisionist History - is his Bread-and-Butter for Notoriety.

 

Like "Rules for Radicals" was for Academic Communist Malcontent Saul Alinsky.

 

If he's all you got...?

 

You got Nothin' ...but Propaganda.

 

 

Now THIS will set you straight, Comrade...

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Blue Devil said:

 

Of Course - you would believe an Academic Communist Malcontent like Saul Cornell.

 

This Contrary Revisionist History - is his Bread-and-Butter for Notoriety.

 

Like "Rules for Radicals" was for Academic Communist Malcontent Saul Alinsky.

 

If he's all you got...?

 

You got Nothin' ...but Propaganda.

 

 

Now THIS will set you straight, Comrade...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOwy9OWfnAM

Of course I believe a good American like Cornell over ANY gun nutter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Scout said:

Of course I believe a good American like Cornell over ANY gun nutter. 

 

A One/ea. Singular Academic Communist Malcontent on the Subject.

 

You could do better throwin' darts.

 

3a24cb2689d5d0c6741a6fb2690ed3b0-thomas-

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The phrase “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms” shows up in a draft of a proposed Virginia constitution in 1776. Subsequent drafts included the bracketed qualifier that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms [within his own lands or tenements].” Although this sentence did not find its way into the final version of the Virginia state constitution, it is documented in The Papers of Thomas Jefferson.

The sentence “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government” appears to be a modern augmentation. It does not appear to date back much further than its publication in a 1989 pro-Second Amendment newspaper column by Charlie Reese, and it is certainly not found among Jefferson’s recorded writings, letters, or speeches:

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, shetluck said:

How about that "shall not be infringed". Talk about lack of articulation.  You constantly post opinions you heard on campass but never follow with any fact or data to back it up. You are a zombie.

Go to Freethinker's? or some libs "Second Amendment" thread and read the

OP.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Scout said:

Go to Freethinker's? or some libs "Second Amendment" thread and read the

OP.  

 

They are ALL based on Academic Communist Malcontent like Saul Cornell.

 

He is your One/Ea. Propaganda canard.

 

goebbelsquote.jpg

 

...or Not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Scout said:

Go to Freethinker's? or some libs "Second Amendment" thread and read the

OP.  

Read the OP. Does not square "infringement". Lets make a deal. You can get stuck on "militia" I will get stuck on "infringement". And this will never end. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Scout said:

Saul Cornell told you what infringed does NOT mean.  :D   

Would it work for you if the same infringements you are  just fine with for the second amendment were to be applied to your abortion "rights"

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Blue Devil said:

 

They are ALL based on Academic Communist Malcontent like Saul Cornell.

 

He is your One/Ea. Propaganda canard.

 

goebbelsquote.jpg

 

...or Not.

Blue can't take the truth.

He actually does not have the ability to perform sexually without a gun in hand. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, shetluck said:

Read the OP. Does not square "infringement". Lets make a deal. You can get stuck on "militia" I will get stuck on "infringement". And this will never end. 

 

It proves the Founders did intend to have gun control.

That is the point of the article and it does it beautifully.

You guys can't come up with any defense.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, shetluck said:

Would it work for you if the same infringements you are  just fine with for the second amendment were to be applied to your abortion "rights"

 

They already are. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...