Jump to content

A Well Regulated Militia...


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Scout said:

Better tell that to your fellow gun nutters.  They

are all over the map.  You should have been

around the first time I informed them that

the Founders had gun control laws.  

 

Blue Devil shit his pants.  

Please tell me that you are not referring to cannons. As much fun as that might be I don't have room to use a cannon....... ...... yet

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What is a gun nutter? And yes, the constitution says we may arm ourselves with whatever firearm we want .  Would you like to rewrite the constitution? To bend it to fit YOUR feelings ?  fuck your

sad Scout doesn't understand the 2nd Amendment... the bitch doesn't realize that without the 2nd you don't have the 1st.

Yes, they did.  

3 minutes ago, shetluck said:

Please tell me that you are not referring to cannons. As much fun as that might be I don't have room to use a cannon....... ...... yet

 

I think she was referring to a cannon ...

 

This advance level sexual manouver requires three participants(a good bro to fire the cannon). It is in which you climb into a cannon with your legs agape and once the cannon is fired, you must land precisely onto your partner's genitals.
I can't go hang out tonight, I'm helping a friend with their sex cannon.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This analysis by Chief Justice Taft explains, in part, the confusion that has developed, especially in this century, over the interpretation of the language of the Second Amendment. The meaning of such words as "militia," "keep arms," "bear arms," "discipline," "well regulated," and "the people" was the meaning of these words as they were used in the English common law of the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries ― not as they are used today. As Chief Justice Taft further commented:

 

"The language of the Constitution cannot be interpreted safely except by reference to the common law and to British institutions as they were when the instrument was framed and adopted."

 

Thomas Jefferson, by no means an imprecise thinker, was well aware of this consideration. In commenting upon how the Constitution should properly be read, he said:

 

"On every question of construction let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning can be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one which was passed."

 

Yet despite this clear evidence, gun control and prohibition proponents attempt to squeeze out of the text of the Second Amendment the meaning that only a “collective” ― not an individual ― right is guaranteed by the amendment. They argue that the words of the amendment allegedly apply only to the group in our society that is "well regulated" and "keeps and bears arms," the National Guard. But they are wrong.

 

David I. Caplan, who has examined this issue in depth, provides this analysis:

 

"In colonial times the term ‘well regulated’ meant ‘well functioning’ ― for this was the meaning of those words at that time, as demonstrated by the following passage from the original 1789 charter of the University of North Carolina: ‘Whereas in all well regulated governments it is the indispensable duty of every Legislatures to consult the happiness of a rising generation…’ Moreover the Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘regulated’ among other things as ‘properly disciplined;’ and it defines ‘discipline’ among other things as ‘a trained condition.’"

 

Privately kept firearms and training with them apart from formal militia mustering thus was encompassed by the Second Amendment, in order to enable able-bodied citizens to be trained by being familiar in advance with the functioning of firearms. In that way, when organized the militia would be able to function well when the need arose to muster and be deployed for sudden military emergencies.

 

Therefore, even if the opening words of the Amendment, "A well regulated militia…" somehow would be interpreted as strictly limiting "the right of the people to keep…arms"; nevertheless, a properly functioning militia fundamentally presupposes that the individual citizen be allowed to keep, practice, and train himself in the use of firearms...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, shetluck said:

Please tell me that you are not referring to cannons. As much fun as that might be I don't have room to use a cannon....... ...... yet

No, but according to gun nutters, they should have the freedom to 

arm themselves with anything the military uses.

 

So, what is your point?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Scout said:

No, but according to gun nutters, they should have the freedom to 

arm themselves with anything the military uses.

 

So, what is your point?  

What is a gun nutter? And yes, the constitution says we may arm ourselves with whatever firearm we want . 
Would you like to rewrite the constitution? To bend it to fit YOUR feelings ? 
fuck your feelings 

facts don’t have feelings  

  • Haha 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Scout said:

100% lie

Why didn't Biden come right out and tell Americans that he will be banning America's rifle - the AR-15?  Was he scared to discuss that too?  Like he was scared to discuss his Supreme Court nominees?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Skans said:

Why didn't Biden come right out and tell Americans that he will be banning America's rifle - the AR-15?  Was he scared to discuss that too?  Like he was scared to discuss his Supreme Court nominees?

I didn't know he was going to do that and I doubt you do either.

But he has my full support.

People who carry AR15s are trash like you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Scout said:

I didn't know he was going to do that and I doubt you do either.

But he has my full support.

People who carry AR15s are trash like you.

 

Yes, I know Biden is going to ban AR-15's, he's said so!  Oh, I forgot, Biden lies a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Golfboy said:

From the woman that thinks Jefferson wanted to ban his own guns. 

 

I never said this.  This is 100% lie from a guy who can't win by being 

truthful.  Are you Moscow Mitch McConnell or Lindsay Graham.....

I think you are a LOT like GRAHAM, eh?  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Scout said:

 

I never said this.  This is 100% lie from a guy who can't win by being 

truthful.  Are you Moscow Mitch McConnell or Lindsay Graham.....

I think you are a LOT like GRAHAM, eh?  

 

@Golfboy - Hey, just say "thanks" - that's quite a complement!

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Scout said:

 

I never said this.  This is 100% lie from a guy who can't win by being 

truthful.  Are you Moscow Mitch McConnell or Lindsay Graham.....

I think you are a LOT like GRAHAM, eh?  

 

You've repeatedly said the founders supported gun control. 

That's simply not true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Golfboy said:

You've repeatedly said the founders supported gun control. 

That's simply not true. 

 

That isn't what you claimed I said.

You changed it on purpose because the truth doesn't work for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Scout said:

That isn't what you claimed I said.

You changed it on purpose because the truth doesn't work for you.

It is what you said.  They never banned guns, or even proposed the idea. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The founders were not rightwingers.

They were not people who sit around fantasizing about murdering people.

They were people who wanted to create a safe world, not a violent one.

They were NOT EVER rightwingers EXCEPT the ones

that owned slaves.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Golfboy said:

Nope.  And it doesn't matter how many times you repeat that lie, it's not going to magically come true. 

Yes, they did.  And it doesn't matter how often you deny it, we KNOW

for a FACT that the Founders had their own gun control laws

and that gun nutters are liars with sexual dysfunction tied to

their guns. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Scout said:

The founders were not rightwingers.

They were not people who sit around fantasizing about murdering people.

They were people who wanted to create a safe world, not a violent one.

They were NOT EVER rightwingers EXCEPT the ones

that owned slaves.  

oh look, a temper tantrum.  Crazy Smileys

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Scout said:

Yes, they did.  And it doesn't matter how often you deny it, we KNOW

for a FACT that the Founders had their own gun control laws

and that gun nutters are liars with sexual dysfunction tied to

their guns. 

Repetition of your lie isn't going to magically make it come true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Scout said:

I didn't know he was going to do that and I doubt you do either.

But he has my full support.

People who carry AR15s are trash like you.

 

No one knows what he’s going to do next . Not even him . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...