Jump to content

personreal....your BS rightwing post


Recommended Posts

"The same conditions exist between 1920 and 1940 and it has not been defined as man made global man"


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The year 1934 was a very hot year in the United States, ranking fourth behind 2012, 2006, and 1998. However, global warming takes into account temperatures over the entire planet. The U.S.'s land area accounts for only 2% of the earth's total surface area. Despite the U.S. heat in 1934, the year was not so hot over the rest of the planet, and is barely holding onto a place in the hottest 50 years in the global rankings (today it ranks 49th).


Climate change skeptics like to point to 1934 in the U.S. as proof that recent hot years are not unusual. However, this is another example of "cherry-picking" a single fact that supports a claim, while ignoring the rest of the data. Globally, the ten hottest years on record have all occurred since 1998, with 2005 and 2010 as the hottest.


The fact that there were hot years in some parts of the world in the past is not an argument against climate change. There will always be regional temperature variations as well as variations from year to year. These happened in the past, and they will continue. The problem with climate change is that on average, when looking at the entire world, the long term trend shows an unmistakable increase in global surface temperatures, in a way that is likely to dramatically alter the planet.



Here ya go....Learn something for a change VS believing all the Horseshit from Exxon/Mobil and your party


https://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hottest-year-on-record.htm


https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php





Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

"The same conditions exist between 1920 and 1940 and it has not been defined as man made global man"

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The year 1934 was a very hot year in the United States, ranking fourth behind 2012, 2006, and 1998. However, global warming takes into account temperatures over the entire planet. The U.S.'s land area accounts for only 2% of the earth's total surface area. Despite the U.S. heat in 1934, the year was not so hot over the rest of the planet, and is barely holding onto a place in the hottest 50 years in the global rankings (today it ranks 49th).

Climate change skeptics like to point to 1934 in the U.S. as proof that recent hot years are not unusual. However, this is another example of "cherry-picking" a single fact that supports a claim, while ignoring the rest of the data. Globally, the ten hottest years on record have all occurred since 1998, with 2005 and 2010 as the hottest.

The fact that there were hot years in some parts of the world in the past is not an argument against climate change. There will always be regional temperature variations as well as variations from year to year. These happened in the past, and they will continue. The problem with climate change is that on average, when looking at the entire world, the long term trend shows an unmistakable increase in global surface temperatures, in a way that is likely to dramatically alter the planet.

Here ya go....Learn something for a change VS believing all the Horseshit from Exxon/Mobil and your party

https://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hottest-year-on-record.htm

https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

 

Global data was manipulated...East Anglia University was just one of many manipulators.

 

The 97% consensus is fake.

 

If you want to buy into the AGW hoax that's your choice bent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Global data was manipulated"

 

 

LMAO....says the man from the party thats owned by Exxon/Mobil and Coal

 

 

you'd better tell the Pentagon that.... you cons and your Gullibility just keeps getting Funnier

did that global warming snow you in in atlanta benny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post links, personreal. We'll discredit and assrape your sources so hard they will bleed. Can't wait. :)

Evidence is all over the internet...you simply refuse to inform yourself.

 

You've been manipulated.

 

It's OK...we still like you. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next time you wanna post your happy horseshit the right has fed you...go here 1st for the FACTS

 

it will prevent you from looking as Ignorant as the rest of the rightwing Flock of easily manipulated Morons

 

 

https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

benny the board idiot giving advice on how to avoid looking ignorant. LMAO! He has been exposed thousands of times but he still post his left wing low info welfarecrat talking points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next time you wanna post your happy horseshit the right has fed you...go here 1st for the FACTS

 

it will prevent you from looking as Ignorant as the rest of the rightwing Flock of easily manipulated Morons

 

 

https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

I can post links to Mr. Pawn...

 

 

"NASA Exposed In ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud"

 

 

http://principia-scientific.org/nasa-exposed-in-massive-new-climate-data-fraud/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can post links to Mr. Pawn...

 

"NASA Exposed In Massive New Climate Data Fraud"

 

 

http://principia-scientific.org/nasa-exposed-in-massive-new-climate-data-fraud/

Principia Scientific International (PSI) is an organization based in the United Kingdom which promotes fringe views and material to claim that carbon dioxide is not a greenhouse gas. PSI was formed in 2010 around the time they published their first book, titled Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory. [1]

 

PSI claims it provides its members with a reliable port of call to ascertain the facts behind the news stories to better judge whether information being presented by third parties is accurate information and reflects a balanced view of all facets of the subject. [2]

 

The PSI website says the organization is for everyone who supports the traditions [sic] scientific method against the rise of sinister and secretive government funded 'post normal science'.

 

As of 2014, PSI described itself as a not-for-profit community interest subsidiary of PSI Acumen Ltd. That statement has since been removed. [2]

 

PSI Acumen was registered with Companies House in the UK in March 2013 (see PDF) as a private company, with an address in Battersea Park Road, London. In July 2013, the business address of PSI Acumen was changed (PDF) to an address in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, which is the same as the home address of John O'Sullivan, the organization's founder and chief executive officer. PSI Acument LTD was dissolved (PDF) on October 15, 2014. [3], [4], [5]

 

The two named directors were John O'Sullivan, of the UK, and a Walter James O'Brien, with a US address listed in Fargo, North Dakota. Emails published by climate skeptic blogger Pete Ridley suggest that Walter James O'Brien no longer has any connection to the PSI Acument company. [3], [6]

----

 

Next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

duh....give us the History of the partys???

 

 

and put an emphasis on the racist south, the reason they started the Civil War, ...Slavery, & the Civil Rights Act

 

 

It gets old educating you cons

Didn't you tell us Clinton would get 400 electoral votes?

 

Please don't tell us about education...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Global data was manipulated"

 

 

LMAO....says the man from the party thats owned by Exxon/Mobil and Coal

 

 

you'd better tell the Pentagon that.... you cons and your Gullibility just keeps getting Funnier

Exxon and mobile want in the carbon scam

They are "fighting" global warming now too

So there goes that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Global data was manipulated"

 

 

LMAO....says the man from the party thats owned by Exxon/Mobil and Coal

 

 

you'd better tell the Pentagon that.... you cons and your Gullibility just keeps getting Funnier

 

The funny thing is the dems grasping at straws and trying to move the argument away from the humiliating loss of the entire congress and the presidency. How did the racism charges work out for you? If there is global warming it has yet to be proved that it is caused my man. Bye dems. Drill baby drill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there's the Die-Hard republiKan

 

 

 

JTZilla

i was taxed more each year tha Nlgger was fraudulently in office,,,the world laughs at us for having a fucking filthy faggot assed Nlggar there at the whitehouse.... Im ashamed of my country!!!
JTZilla
fuck obama and the nigacrats he stands for
JTZilla

she isnt moving in because she doesnt want to smell that nlgger smell

JTZilla

seriously how do you vote for a nlgger?

unbelievable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...