Jump to content

HUSSEIN..HOW HE TREATS THE ONLY DEMOCRACY IN MIDDLE EAST


Recommended Posts

THANKS HUSSEIN......WE GOT IT YOU HATE DEMOCRACY...OK?

Many were outraged at President Obama’s decision not to veto a controversial United Nations resolution condemning Israeli settlement activity. President-elect Donald Trump, for example, vented his outrage on social media.

The big loss yesterday for Israel in the United Nations will make it much harder to negotiate peace.Too bad, but we will get it done anyway!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 24, 2016

It’s no secret that President Obama does not have a great working relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The decision to abstain from voting on the anti-Israel resolution was not the first time Obama has snubbed our strongest ally in the Middle East. Here is a list of other noteworthy snubs.

1. Ditching Netanyahu mid-meeting to have dinner (2010)

The Israeli prime minister was reportedly “humiliated” after Obama walked out of a meeting to go have dinner at the White House, leaving Netanyahu alone with his aides. Israeli newspapers described the embarrassing episode as a “hazing,” and suggesting Netanyahu had received “the treatment reserved for the President of Equatorial Guinea.”

2. Refusing to meet with Netanyahu (2012)

In an unusual move that loudly criticized by pro-Israel lawmakers, Obama declined to meet with Netanyahu at the United Nations during the Israeli prime minister’s visit to New York in September 2012. At the time, Netanyahu had been urging the United States to impose stricter sanctions against Iran, and warning of the dangers of not taking a hard line in negotiations over the regime’s nuclear program.

3. Funding efforts to unseat Netanyahu in Israel (2014)

Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers launched a wide-ranging investigation into the Obama administration’s alleged efforts to influence the Israeli election in 2015. The investigation was announced after internal government reports indicated the State Department had provided hundreds of thousands of U.S. taxpayer dollars to a political organization in Israel actively working to unseat Netanyahu as prime minister.

4. Pouting after Netanyahu won reelection (2015)

Obama waited several days before calling Netanyahu to congratulate him on winning reelection in March 2015. Instead, White House press secretary Josh Earnest announced that the administration remained “deeply concerned about the rhetoric that seeks to marginalize Arab Israeli citizens,” and implied that Netanyahu’s reelection “undermines the values and democratic ideals that have been important to our democracy and an important part of what binds the United States and Israel together.”

5. Refusing to recognize Jerusalem as part of Israel (2016)

In what was either a blatant diss or a ham-fisted gaffe, the White House apparently refused to acknowledge that Jerusalem, sight of former Israeli President Shimon Peres’s funeral, was a part of Israel. After initially sending a press release with a transcript of Obama’s remarks at the memorial service in “Jerusalem, Israel,” the White House press office quickly issued a “corrected” version of the release, in which the word Israel was crossed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far too frequently during Barack Obama’s presidency, he has stood against Israel, America’s greatest ally in the Middle East, and with the Muslim Palestinians. As he prepares to leave office, Obama and his regime chose to abstain from voting on the UN resolution which attacks the sovereignty of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East.

America had the opportunity to quash the resolution by vetoing it but chose not to.

Upon hearing the news of America’s betrayal of our ally, Israel, conservative talk radio host Mark Levin posted a scathing statement calling Obama out as an anti-Semite, which Levin has said many times, and stating Obama’s apparent desire to do as much damage as possible before he leaves office.

It appears anti-Semite Obama is working with the extremist Palestinians, and using the Israel-hating UN, to undermine our ally Israel. Obama’s a disgrace. And so is anyone in his administration who participated in this. Obama’s gone in less than a month but is obsessed with doing as much damage as he possibly can. Freedom-loving people all over the world have suffered from this failed, pathetic president, including in our own country.

 

 

 

Levin didn’t stop there, however. In another post, he reminds the word of Obama’s affiliation with the anti-Semitic, America-hating pastor, Jeremiah Wright, whose church the Obamas attended for over 20 years, and made clear that Obama’s action, or inaction, is evidence of Obama, the 44th President of the United States, standing on the side of genocidal dictators in condemning the existence of Israel.

 

 

 

 

Obama once compared Wright to being like an uncle to him. The racist pastor also officiated Barack and Michelle Obama’s wedding.

Levin referenced a story from Reuters which reports that an official, who wanted to remain unnamed, said the decision to abstain from voting rather than vetoing the vote was the decision of Barack Obama and secretary of state, John Kerry and was “secretly cooked up” with the Palestinians.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are behind a “shameful” draft anti-settlement resolution at the U.N. Security Council, a senior Israeli government official said on Friday.

It was one of the harshest personal attacks by the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Obama, coming in the final days of his presidency. The two leaders have had an acrimonious relationship.

 

 

 

“President Obama and Secretary Kerry are behind this shameful move against Israel at the UN,” said the official, who asked not to be identified.

“The U.S. administration secretly cooked up with the Palestinians an extreme anti-Israeli resolution behind Israel’s back which would be a tailwind for terror and boycotts.”

 

 

 

 

 

THANKS OBAMAHUSSEIN

YOU PATHETIC

ASSHOLE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Far too frequently during Barack Obama’s presidency, he has stood against Israel, America’s greatest ally in the Middle East, and with the Muslim Palestinians. As he prepares to leave office, Obama and his regime chose to abstain from voting on the UN resolution which attacks the sovereignty of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East.

America had the opportunity to quash the resolution by vetoing it but chose not to.

Upon hearing the news of America’s betrayal of our ally, Israel, conservative talk radio host Mark Levin posted a scathing statement calling Obama out as an anti-Semite, which Levin has said many times, and stating Obama’s apparent desire to do as much damage as possible before he leaves office.

It appears anti-Semite Obama is working with the extremist Palestinians, and using the Israel-hating UN, to undermine our ally Israel. Obama’s a disgrace. And so is anyone in his administration who participated in this. Obama’s gone in less than a month but is obsessed with doing as much damage as he possibly can. Freedom-loving people all over the world have suffered from this failed, pathetic president, including in our own country.

 

 

 

Levin didn’t stop there, however. In another post, he reminds the word of Obama’s affiliation with the anti-Semitic, America-hating pastor, Jeremiah Wright, whose church the Obamas attended for over 20 years, and made clear that Obama’s action, or inaction, is evidence of Obama, the 44th President of the United States, standing on the side of genocidal dictators in condemning the existence of Israel.

 

 

 

 

Obama once compared Wright to being like an uncle to him. The racist pastor also officiated Barack and Michelle Obama’s wedding.

Levin referenced a story from Reuters which reports that an official, who wanted to remain unnamed, said the decision to abstain from voting rather than vetoing the vote was the decision of Barack Obama and secretary of state, John Kerry and was “secretly cooked up” with the Palestinians.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are behind a “shameful” draft anti-settlement resolution at the U.N. Security Council, a senior Israeli government official said on Friday.

It was one of the harshest personal attacks by the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Obama, coming in the final days of his presidency. The two leaders have had an acrimonious relationship.

 

 

 

“President Obama and Secretary Kerry are behind this shameful move against Israel at the UN,” said the official, who asked not to be identified.

“The U.S. administration secretly cooked up with the Palestinians an extreme anti-Israeli resolution behind Israel’s back which would be a tailwind for terror and boycotts.”

 

 

 

 

 

THANKS OBAMAHUSSEIN

YOU PATHETIC

ASSHOLE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THANKS OBAMA..REMEMBER THE REFUGEE CRISIS ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER?

YUP OBAMA CAUSED THAT

HE RAN ADS IN THE DEEP SOUTH TELLING THEM TO COME

Young illegals tell Border Patrol: We’re coming because we heard about a “new” U.S. law that lets minors stay
posted at 6:41 pm on June 16, 2014 by Allahpundit

WaPo had this story a few days ago but Byron York has a smart post today about its deeper significance, as an expose of the White House’s latest lie about illegal immigration. Why are illegals from Central America, many of them kids, now streaming across the southwest border at a rate of 35,000 per month? Ask an Obama spin doctor like Josh Earnest that question and he’ll tell you there’s a simple explanation: Violence. They’re fleeing into Mexico to get away from gang wars, then continuing north to the United States.

Ask the illegals themselves, though, and you get a different answer:

Recent days have been filled with anecdotal reports, from local news outlets in Central America to major American newspapers, citing immigrants who say they came because they believe U.S. law has been changed to allow them to stay. And now comes word that Border Patrol agents in the most heavily-trafficked area of the surge, the Rio Grande Valley sector of Texas, recently questioned 230 illegal immigrants about why they came. The results showed overwhelmingly that the immigrants, including those classified as UACs, or unaccompanied children, were motivated by the belief that they would be allowed to stay in the United States — and not by conditions in their homelands. From a report written by the agents, quoting from the interviews:

“The main reason the subjects chose this particular time to migrate to the United States was to take advantage of
the ‘new’ U.S. ‘law’ that grants a ‘free pass’ or permit (referred to as “permisos”) being issued by the U.S. government to female adult OTMs traveling with minors and to UACs
. (Comments: The ‘permisos’ are the Notice to Appear documents issued to undocumented aliens, when they are released on their own recognizance pending a hearing before an immigration judge.) The information is apparently common knowledge in Central America and is spread by word of mouth, and international and local media. A high percentage of the subjects interviewed stated their family members in the U.S. urged them to travel immediately, because the United States government was only issuing immigration ‘permisos’ until the end of June 2014…The issue of ‘permisos’ was the main reason provided by 95% of the interviewed subjects.”

There is no “new law” — yet — that grants illegals the right to stay provided they make it across the border by June 30th. Where that idea came from is unclear, but it’s probably related to DHS’s two-year extension earlier this month of DACA, the executive amnesty for DREAMers that Obama ordered in 2012 as an election gimmick aimed at Latino voters. If you applied for two years of deportation relief under DACA at the time, you just got another two years’ reprieve courtesy of Barack Obama’s DHS. That doesn’t mean you get two years if you cross the border now, but go figure that some foreign media might misunderstand given the administration’s cheerleading for amnesty. Case in point:

“Almost all agree that a child who crossed the border illegally with their parents, or in search of a father or a better life, was not making an adult choice to break our laws, and should be treated differently than adult violators of the law,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson is quoted in a story about a new two-year extension of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy published by Diario El Mundo in El Salvador.

Between the media pushing bad facts and opportunistic traffickers in Central America trying to drum up business by amplifying the lie, no wonder you’ve got a surge of illegals trying to sneak in under the wire. In fact, some of them aren’t even sneaking: The LA Times says some illegals are surrendering to the Border Patrol immediately once they’ve made it inside the U.S. in the expectation that they have amnesty now that they’re here. Think O’s going to enforce the law and send those immigrant moms and kids back to Central America after they spent huge sums to try to make it here?

Here’s the best part of York’s post. Remember, any problem caused by a left-wing policy can only be solved by a more aggressive left-wing policy:

As some Democrats on the committee had already suggested, Johnson told Cornyn that, if there, in fact, are misperceptions about U.S. law among illegal immigrants,
the way to clarify the situation is to pass comprehensive immigration reform
. “If comprehensive immigration reform is passed, the uncertainty that may be existing in people’s minds about our law gets resolved,” Johnson said.

The only way to convince illegals that there’s no mass amnesty in effect is to … pass a mass amnesty. Not even Josh Earnest could float that argument with a straight face, so Biden’s headed to Central America this week to try to convince would-be illegals in Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras that, technically, they aren’t allowed to stay even if they make it across to Texas. I’m skeptical that that’ll be true in practice: If Obama’s worried enough about his base to consider an executive order relaxing deportations, he’s surely worried enough to hold off on shipping eight-year-olds back to their home countries. He’s also worried about red-state Democrats being punished in November if it seems like he’s not trying to solve this problem, though, which is why he’s rolling out the vice president instead of some lesser diplomatic apparatchik. Biden’s audience is as much American voters as it is Central American migrants. Exit quotation via the Daily Caller: “Anytime the administration sends Joe Biden to solve a problem, it’s clear evidence that the administration doesn’t see it as a problem worth solving.”

 

 

 

 

 

BECAUSE THEY CAUSED THE PROBLEM!!!!!! AS USUAL!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Israel is not actually a democracy unless the West Bank Arabs can vote in Israeli elections.

 

They can't, so it isn't.

Center for Religion, Nation and State

The Center for Religion, Nation and State seeks to address the unique challenges arising from Israel's dual identity as a Jewish nation-state and a liberal democracy. The center's principal mission is to construct a framework for the relationship between Judaism and democracy as the twin components of Israeli identity.

Among other initiatives, the center works to promote the compatibility of human rights and the Jewish tradition; attenuate the tensions between religion and state in Israel; promote Jewish pluralism; renew the intellectual foundations of Zionism for the twentieth century; defend Israel's legitimacy as a nation-state; and develop ways to integrate the ultra-Orthodox into Israeli society and the economy.

 

 

 

YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN REJECT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Israel is not actually a democracy unless the West Bank Arabs can vote in Israeli elections.

 

They can't, so it isn't.

 

Demockracy In The Middle East!

big-thumbs-up-smiley-emoticon.gif

A "conservative" Tradition!!!!

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB126/index.htm

*

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB435/

*

http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/dulles-brothers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Far too frequently during Barack Obama’s presidency, he has stood against Israel, America’s greatest ally in the Middle East, and with the Muslim Palestinians. As he prepares to leave office, Obama and his regime chose to abstain from voting on the UN resolution which attacks the sovereignty of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East.

America had the opportunity to quash the resolution by vetoing it but chose not to.

Upon hearing the news of America’s betrayal of our ally, Israel, conservative talk radio host Mark Levin posted a scathing statement calling Obama out as an anti-Semite, which Levin has said many times, and stating Obama’s apparent desire to do as much damage as possible before he leaves office.

It appears anti-Semite Obama is working with the extremist Palestinians, and using the Israel-hating UN, to undermine our ally Israel. Obama’s a disgrace. And so is anyone in his administration who participated in this. Obama’s gone in less than a month but is obsessed with doing as much damage as he possibly can. Freedom-loving people all over the world have suffered from this failed, pathetic president, including in our own country.

 

 

 

Levin didn’t stop there, however. In another post, he reminds the word of Obama’s affiliation with the anti-Semitic, America-hating pastor, Jeremiah Wright, whose church the Obamas attended for over 20 years, and made clear that Obama’s action, or inaction, is evidence of Obama, the 44th President of the United States, standing on the side of genocidal dictators in condemning the existence of Israel.

 

 

 

 

Obama once compared Wright to being like an uncle to him. The racist pastor also officiated Barack and Michelle Obama’s wedding.

Levin referenced a story from Reuters which reports that an official, who wanted to remain unnamed, said the decision to abstain from voting rather than vetoing the vote was the decision of Barack Obama and secretary of state, John Kerry and was “secretly cooked up” with the Palestinians.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are behind a “shameful” draft anti-settlement resolution at the U.N. Security Council, a senior Israeli government official said on Friday.

It was one of the harshest personal attacks by the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Obama, coming in the final days of his presidency. The two leaders have had an acrimonious relationship.

 

 

 

“President Obama and Secretary Kerry are behind this shameful move against Israel at the UN,” said the official, who asked not to be identified.

“The U.S. administration secretly cooked up with the Palestinians an extreme anti-Israeli resolution behind Israel’s back which would be a tailwind for terror and boycotts.”

 

 

 

 

 

THANKS OBAMAHUSSEIN

YOU PATHETIC

ASSHOLE

democrats-spreading-the-misery-equally-bdemocrats-spreading-the-misery-equally-b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

THANKS HUSSEIN......WE GOT IT YOU HATE DEMOCRACY...OK?

Many were outraged at President Obama’s decision not to veto a controversial United Nations resolution condemning Israeli settlement activity. President-elect Donald Trump, for example, vented his outrage on social media.

The big loss yesterday for Israel in the United Nations will make it much harder to negotiate peace.Too bad, but we will get it done anyway!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)

It’s no secret that President Obama does not have a great working relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The decision to abstain from voting on the anti-Israel resolution was not the first time Obama has snubbed our strongest ally in the Middle East. Here is a list of other noteworthy snubs.

1. Ditching Netanyahu mid-meeting to have dinner (2010)

The Israeli prime minister was reportedly “humiliated” after Obama walked out of a meeting to go have dinner at the White House, leaving Netanyahu alone with his aides. Israeli newspapers described the embarrassing episode as a “hazing,” and suggesting Netanyahu had received “the treatment reserved for the President of Equatorial Guinea.”

2. Refusing to meet with Netanyahu (2012)

In an unusual move that loudly criticized by pro-Israel lawmakers, Obama declined to meet with Netanyahu at the United Nations during the Israeli prime minister’s visit to New York in September 2012. At the time, Netanyahu had been urging the United States to impose stricter sanctions against Iran, and warning of the dangers of not taking a hard line in negotiations over the regime’s nuclear program.

3. Funding efforts to unseat Netanyahu in Israel (2014)

Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers launched a wide-ranging investigation into the Obama administration’s alleged efforts to influence the Israeli election in 2015. The investigation was announced after internal government reports indicated the State Department had provided hundreds of thousands of U.S. taxpayer dollars to a political organization in Israel actively working to unseat Netanyahu as prime minister.

4. Pouting after Netanyahu won reelection (2015)

Obama waited several days before calling Netanyahu to congratulate him on winning reelection in March 2015. Instead, White House press secretary Josh Earnest announced that the administration remained “deeply concerned about the rhetoric that seeks to marginalize Arab Israeli citizens,” and implied that Netanyahu’s reelection “undermines the values and democratic ideals that have been important to our democracy and an important part of what binds the United States and Israel together.”

5. Refusing to recognize Jerusalem as part of Israel (2016)

In what was either a blatant diss or a ham-fisted gaffe, the White House apparently refused to acknowledge that Jerusalem, sight of former Israeli President Shimon Peres’s funeral, was a part of Israel. After initially sending a press release with a transcript of Obama’s remarks at the memorial service in “Jerusalem, Israel,” the White House press office quickly issued a “corrected” version of the release, in which the word Israel was crossed out.

 

 

 

THANKS OBAMA..REMEMBER THE REFUGEE CRISIS ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER?

YUP OBAMA CAUSED THAT

HE RAN ADS IN THE DEEP SOUTH TELLING THEM TO COME

Young illegals tell Border Patrol: We’re coming because we heard about a “new” U.S. law that lets minors stay
posted at 6:41 pm on June 16, 2014 by Allahpundit

WaPo had this story a few days ago but Byron York has a smart post today about its deeper significance, as an expose of the White House’s latest lie about illegal immigration. Why are illegals from Central America, many of them kids, now streaming across the southwest border at a rate of 35,000 per month? Ask an Obama spin doctor like Josh Earnest that question and he’ll tell you there’s a simple explanation: Violence. They’re fleeing into Mexico to get away from gang wars, then continuing north to the United States.

Ask the illegals themselves, though, and you get a different answer:

Recent days have been filled with anecdotal reports, from local news outlets in Central America to major American newspapers, citing immigrants who say they came because they believe U.S. law has been changed to allow them to stay. And now comes word that Border Patrol agents in the most heavily-trafficked area of the surge, the Rio Grande Valley sector of Texas, recently questioned 230 illegal immigrants about why they came. The results showed overwhelmingly that the immigrants, including those classified as UACs, or unaccompanied children, were motivated by the belief that they would be allowed to stay in the United States — and not by conditions in their homelands. From a report written by the agents, quoting from the interviews:

“The main reason the subjects chose this particular time to migrate to the United States was to take advantage of
the ‘new’ U.S. ‘law’ that grants a ‘free pass’ or permit (referred to as “permisos”) being issued by the U.S. government to female adult OTMs traveling with minors and to UACs
. (Comments: The ‘permisos’ are the Notice to Appear documents issued to undocumented aliens, when they are released on their own recognizance pending a hearing before an immigration judge.) The information is apparently common knowledge in Central America and is spread by word of mouth, and international and local media. A high percentage of the subjects interviewed stated their family members in the U.S. urged them to travel immediately, because the United States government was only issuing immigration ‘permisos’ until the end of June 2014…The issue of ‘permisos’ was the main reason provided by 95% of the interviewed subjects.”

There is no “new law” — yet — that grants illegals the right to stay provided they make it across the border by June 30th. Where that idea came from is unclear, but it’s probably related to DHS’s two-year extension earlier this month of DACA, the executive amnesty for DREAMers that Obama ordered in 2012 as an election gimmick aimed at Latino voters. If you applied for two years of deportation relief under DACA at the time, you just got another two years’ reprieve courtesy of Barack Obama’s DHS. That doesn’t mean you get two years if you cross the border now, but go figure that some foreign media might misunderstand given the administration’s cheerleading for amnesty. Case in point:

“Almost all agree that a child who crossed the border illegally with their parents, or in search of a father or a better life, was not making an adult choice to break our laws, and should be treated differently than adult violators of the law,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson is quoted in a story about a new two-year extension of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy published by Diario El Mundo in El Salvador.

Between the media pushing bad facts and opportunistic traffickers in Central America trying to drum up business by amplifying the lie, no wonder you’ve got a surge of illegals trying to sneak in under the wire. In fact, some of them aren’t even sneaking: The LA Times says some illegals are surrendering to the Border Patrol immediately once they’ve made it inside the U.S. in the expectation that they have amnesty now that they’re here. Think O’s going to enforce the law and send those immigrant moms and kids back to Central America after they spent huge sums to try to make it here?

Here’s the best part of York’s post. Remember, any problem caused by a left-wing policy can only be solved by a more aggressive left-wing policy:

As some Democrats on the committee had already suggested, Johnson told Cornyn that, if there, in fact, are misperceptions about U.S. law among illegal immigrants,
the way to clarify the situation is to pass comprehensive immigration reform
. “If comprehensive immigration reform is passed, the uncertainty that may be existing in people’s minds about our law gets resolved,” Johnson said.

The only way to convince illegals that there’s no mass amnesty in effect is to … pass a mass amnesty. Not even Josh Earnest could float that argument with a straight face, so Biden’s headed to Central America this week to try to convince would-be illegals in Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras that, technically, they aren’t allowed to stay even if they make it across to Texas. I’m skeptical that that’ll be true in practice: If Obama’s worried enough about his base to consider an executive order relaxing deportations, he’s surely worried enough to hold off on shipping eight-year-olds back to their home countries. He’s also worried about red-state Democrats being punished in November if it seems like he’s not trying to solve this problem, though, which is why he’s rolling out the vice president instead of some lesser diplomatic apparatchik. Biden’s audience is as much American voters as it is Central American migrants. Exit quotation via the Daily Caller: “Anytime the administration sends Joe Biden to solve a problem, it’s clear evidence that the administration doesn’t see it as a problem worth solving.”

 

 

 

 

 

BECAUSE THEY CAUSED THE PROBLEM!!!!!! AS USUAL!!!!!

 

1426222876358.jpg1426222876358.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...