Jump to content

52 percent of all fed prosecutions are from immigration violations


Recommended Posts

http://www.kansas.com/news/nation-world/article123768739.html

 

Nationwide, 52 percent of all federal prosecutions in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 were for entry or re-entry without legal permission and similar immigration violations, according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

 

 

By the way,

 

 

Mexican man charged with rape had 19 deportations, removals

 

 

 

By ROXANA HEGEMAN Associated Press

WICHITA, Kan.

 

A Mexican man accused of raping a 13-year-old girl on a Greyhound bus that traveled through Kansas had been deported 10 times and voluntarily removed from the U.S. another nine times since 2003, records obtained by The Associated Press show.

 

Immigration_Kansas_Sex_Assault_79796.jpg

 

 

52% of money spent on prosecuting illegal invaders will soon be spent on the wall.

 

 

 

 

 

kj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nationwide, 52 percent of all federal prosecutions in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 were for entry or re-entry without legal permission and similar immigration violations, according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

 

 

Hello ... half of the budget is spent on 'foreign nationals not legally in the country'.

 

 

 

 

 

dyk.jpg

"It's only 15 billion so fugetaboutit."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

kj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust the employers and fine them $50,000 for each illegal employee the first violation = problem fixed.

 

Second violation $100,000 fine... per employee

 

Third violation = $300,000 per employee

 

4th violation = $500,000 per employee

 

5th violation = 1 year in prison, $1,000,000 fine plus court costs for owners and upper level management

 

employers are the problem not the workers!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust the employers and fine them $50,000 for each illegal employee the first violation = problem fixed.

Second violation $100,000 fine... per employee

Third violation = $300,000 per employee

4th violation = $500,000 per employee

5th violation = 1 year in prison, $1,000,000 fine plus court costs for owners and upper level management

employers are the problem not the workers!

What about the government incentivizing this illegal behavior?

Welfare.

Housing

Food Stamps

Education.

Drivers Licenses

Healthcare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust the employers and fine them $50,000 for each illegal employee the first violation = problem fixed.

 

Second violation $100,000 fine... per employee

 

Third violation = $300,000 per employee

 

4th violation = $500,000 per employee

 

5th violation = 1 year in prison, $1,000,000 fine plus court costs for owners and upper level management

 

employers are the problem not the workers!

 

 

You'll be busting sanctuary cities. You sure you want to do this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why am I not surprised that some on this thread do not want the companies punished for hiring illegals?

 

What Are the Penalties for Hiring an Illegal Immigrant?

Hiring illegal immigrants can lead to many severe penalties, such as:

  • Criminal and civil fines
  • Loss of business licenses

Most fines are broken down to the following:

  • First offenders can be fined $250-$2,000 per illegal employee.
  • For a second offense, the fine is $2,000-$5,000 per illegal employee.
  • Three or more offenses can cost an employer $3000-$10,000 per illegal employee. A pattern of knowingly employing illegal immigrants can mean extra fines and up to six months in jail for an employer.

This does not include “harboring” illegal immigrants, or employing ten or more illegal immigrants in one year. Harboring an illegal immigrant can lead to ten years of prison time.

 

Additionally, employers should be aware of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Employers can be sued under the act for hiring illegal immigrants, and can face large settlement deals.

 

The lawfully documented workers of the Zirkle Fruit Company recently settled a class action lawsuit brought under RICO. The suit alleged that their employer knowingly hired undocumented workers, driving down their wages.

- See more at: http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/penalties-for-employers-hiring-illegal-immigrants.html#sthash.4aGnti56.dpuf

 

It's NOT that we don't support them, it's that YOUR TIN GOD refuses to ENFORCE THEM!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why am I not surprised that some on this thread do not want the companies punished for hiring illegals?

Why am I not surprised that some on this thread do not want the sanctuary cities punished for harboring illegals?

 

They still need food/shelter/medical/opportunity, sanctuary cities provide all this, why would they stop coming here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They've been bringing them in, breed them like pigs, let them shit out 4-5 kids and POOF!!!

 

Instant, government dependent demorrhoids!!

Yet employers that hire the illegals are the root cause of them coming here in the first place and NOT the freebies liberal sanctuary cities offer. If these cities offer them jobs are they not "employers" and thus subject to the same penalties suggested for private sector employers? The liberals lost this election because of this kind of fucking hypocrisy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bust the employers and fine them $50,000 for each illegal employee the first violation = problem fixed.

 

Second violation $100,000 fine... per employee

 

Third violation = $300,000 per employee

 

4th violation = $500,000 per employee

 

5th violation = 1 year in prison, $1,000,000 fine plus court costs for owners and upper level management

 

employers are the problem not the workers!

 

 

 

Yes and ...

 

What about the government incentivizing this illegal behavior?

Welfare.

Housing

Food Stamps

Education.

Drivers Licenses

Healthcare

 

... yes.

 

I would add no banking or owning/renting housing or cars etc.

 

Make it impractical to live here.

 

That would pretty much replace the wall.

 

 

 

kj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...