Jump to content

DEFCON DON: Billions of lives are at stake and he doesn't care


drvoke
 Share

Recommended Posts

072315_Nuclear_Trump.jpg

 

 

Noam Chomsky is concerned at Trump's rhetoric. That makes me very concerned.

 

 

Nuke Experts Say Trump’s Tweet Is ‘A Very Bad Sign’

 

Noam Chomsky calls it “one of the most frightening statements I’ve seen recently.”

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-tweet-nuclear-weapons_us_585c2c6ee4b0de3a08f4a1d4

 

 

Back in August, nuclear experts told us that the idea of a nuclear-armed President Donald Trump had them on edge. With Trump now officially headed to the White House and still using Twitter to offer vague policy announcements, their fears are no longer based on hypotheticals.

In a tweet Thursday, Trump raised eyebrows by calling for an expansion of the United States’ nuclear capability.

“The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes,” the president-elect wrote.

It’s not clear whether Trump was expressing support for modernizing the nation’s aging nuclear arsenal or for stockpiling more nukes in the U.S. But either way, the message left a number of experts on nuclear arms profoundly disturbed, especially as it arrived just hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin called for a similar strengthening of Russian nuclear forces.

“We need to strengthen the military potential of strategic nuclear forces, especially with missile complexes that can reliably penetrate any existing and prospective missile defense systems,” Putin said, according to Agence France-Presse. “We must carefully monitor any changes in the balance of power and in the political-military situation in the world, especially along Russian borders, and quickly adapt plans for neutralizing threats to our country.”

Noam Chomsky, the renowned scholar and Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor emeritus, said that Trump’s tweet was “one of the most frightening statements I’ve seen recently.”

“Putin’s is bad enough,” Chomsky said, “but at least it has a defensive cast. It’s about Russia’s borders, not Mexico’s.”

Chomsky also suggested these statements could prompt a change to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsday Clock ― a symbolic representation of how close humanity is to global catastrophe ― which is due to be updated in early 2017. Since 2015, the clock has been set at three minutes to midnight.

“[The clock] just might move even closer to midnight,” Chomsky said.

Although Thursday’s tweet was Trump’s first public comment about nuclear weaponry as president-elect, experts have been sounding the alarm for months about the possibility of him engaging in this sort of escalation.

Come January, Trump will have “virtually unlimited power to rain down nuclear weapons on any adversarial regime and country at any time,” which could extinguish “hundreds of millions of lives” in just a few hours, wrote Bruce Blair, a nuclear safety expert at Princeton University, in a chilling piece earlier this year about the state of affairs with Trump’s finger on “the button.”

Blair and others have also questioned whether Trump has the temperament to handle the proverbial 3 a.m. call giving notice that a nuclear strike is imminent. With just 30 minutes to deal with missiles launched from Russia or China (and 12 minutes or less for missiles launched from submarines in the Atlantic Ocean), the president must have the brainpower and steadiness to confront such a crisis.

Trump has shown a seemingly blasé attitude toward the idea of nuclear engagement. He’s refused to rule out using tactical nuclear weapons in the war against the militant group that calls itself the Islamic State, and has sounded cavalier about the use of nuclear weaponry, going so far as to ask why the U.S. has nuclear weapons if it can’t use them. Trump has also declined to rule out using nuclear weapons in Europe.

People like John Noonan, a Republican national security expert who advised former GOP presidential candidates Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney, were left to argue that Trump’s propensity to lash out against anyone who criticizes him would not mix well with weapons of mass destruction. This is a very bad sign,” Kingston Reif, director of disarmament and threat reduction policy for the Arms Control Association, said about Trump’s position on nuclear arms.

“Even before these recent statements, the path we have been on is reckless and ill-advised and in need of a major course correction,” Reif said. “Pouring more gasoline on the fire is exactly the opposite of what is needed.”

The current U.S. arsenal of approximately 4,600 nuclear warheads “exceeds” the nation’s security requirements, said Reif. And even if Trump’s tweet referred to sustaining and modernizing this arsenal, at a cost of over $1 trillion over the next 30 years, Reif believes that’s still “unsustainable.”

The meaning of Trump’s comments wasn’t entirely clear, in part because he weighed in on the incredibly complex matter using Twitter, a medium that limits dispatches to 140 characters, said former Rep. John Tierney (D-Mass.), executive director of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation.

But Trump’s comments taken alone, and especially when coupled with Putin’s, “are heated and careless,” Tierney said. The U.S. and Russia should cooperate in the goal of reducing the role of nuclear weapons, as they have since the Cold War, he added.

“This is a time for leadership, not bravado,” Tierney said. “Russia and the U.S. already own over 93 percent of the world’s nuclear arsenal ― more than enough to deter the other and destroy humanity. This is a time for both Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to come to their senses. Billions of lives are at stake.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But but but Noam Chumpsky says Trump is dangerous. Fucking idiots

 

One of the most respected intellectuals on the planet. How's about you?

 

Read one of his books. Bring a dictionary, moron, to keep you company. It shouldn't take you more than six months to make it through one his books. You still may not be able to comprehend it, but that's your fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure buckwheat.

 

The intellectual bit gets me. Nothing against Noam but the lib reliance on intellectuals got their ass mud hole stomped since 2010.

 

Look, dropsky, you got slam dunked and the liberal agenda got kicked to the curb.

 

Best of all at this time the dems don't have a single individual that could win nationally.

 

SCHHHNIIICCCKKKKER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure buckwheat.

 

The intellectual bit gets me. Nothing against Noam but the lib reliance on intellectuals got their ass mud hole stomped since 2010.

 

Look, dropsky, you got slam dunked and the liberal agenda got kicked to the curb.

 

Best of all at this time the dems don't have a single individual that could win nationally.

 

SCHHHNIIICCCKKKKER

 

 

Is this supposed to pass for the 'superior' common sense of the common man? Kicking eggheads to the curb? People who actually know what the fuck they are talking about? Democracy's inherent flaw: most people are ignorant fools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One of the most respected intellectuals on the planet. How's about you?

 

Read one of his books. Bring a dictionary, moron, to keep you company. It shouldn't take you more than six months to make it through one his books. You still may not be able to comprehend it, but that's your fault.

 

Whatevs. Who did you say was gonna win the election? You libs are the biggest morons on the planet. Go read Cumsky. No one cares

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Whatevs. Who did you say was gonna win the election? You libs are the biggest morons on the planet. Go read Cumsky. No one cares

 

I thought Clinton would win easily. As much contempt as I have for humanity, I always make the mistake of giving them too much credit. Most of humanity is excrement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I thought Clinton would win easily. As much contempt as I have for humanity, I always make the mistake of giving them too much credit. Most of humanity is excrement.

 

 

Your line of thinking is exactly why clinton lost. YOu put your faith in what is basically a Mafia Princess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Is this supposed to pass for the 'superior' common sense of the common man? Kicking eggheads to the curb? People who actually know what the fuck they are talking about? Democracy's inherent flaw: most people are ignorant fools.

people dont like being told what to do , and being expected to vote for a criminal,,,, yall got crushed even though you cheated your ass off !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I thought Clinton would win easily. As much contempt as I have for humanity, I always make the mistake of giving them too much credit. Most of humanity is excrement.

Don't worry about being nuked, Chris is surviving oil sludge fish, radiation will be a treat for him. Putin has ordered his Russsian officials and people home for the upcoming scorched earth show. Unlike America, Putin has put in place massive 14 million people bunkers to survive the upcoming event. I think we got a roll of duck tape and some plastic for the nuclear winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry about being nuked, Chris is surviving oil sludge fish, radiation will be a treat for him. Putin has ordered his Russsian officials and people home for the upcoming scorched earth show. Unlike America, Putin has put in place massive 14 million people bunkers to survive the upcoming event. I think we got a roll of duck tape and some plastic for the nuclear winter.

 

 

Who is Chris?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure buckwheat.

 

The intellectual bit gets me. Nothing against Noam but the lib reliance on intellectuals got their ass mud hole stomped since 2010.

 

Look, dropsky, you got slam dunked and the liberal agenda got kicked to the curb.

 

Best of all at this time the dems don't have a single individual that could win nationally.

 

SCHHHNIIICCCKKKKER

This isn't about winning an election. Trump has as much intellect as you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Evidently he and I have a tremendous amount of intellect compared to you and your loser brethren.

 

Son, young and stupid is no excuse.

Evident through what? That he suckered a bunch of crackers? That's no evidence of intellect. And that you got suckered is none either
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evident through what? That he suckered a bunch of crackers? That's no evidence of intellect. And that you got suckered is none either

 

 

Not really, dumbalina. Do we have to explain everything to you like a frikken K2? Really?

 

You hitched your wagon to 8 years of failure, and then with incredible stupidity you hitched your wagon to the most stupendously unelectable candidate possible.

 

But alas, you are too stupid to acknowledge your bumbling mistakes.

 

That is why we luv ya...we are gonna call the shots for at least 8 years and maybe more.

 

You do understand that we will have our way with SCOTUS for at least 20 years.

 

You do understand that all of Soetoro's XO's are gonna be shit canned.

 

You do understand that you are a powerless whining, pablum spoon fed grain of sand in our sea of change.

 

Merry Christmas For lease Navidad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Not really, dumbalina. Do we have to explain everything to you like a frikken K2? Really?

 

You hitched your wagon to 8 years of failure, and then with incredible stupidity you hitched your wagon to the most stupendously unelectable candidate possible.

 

But alas, you are too stupid to acknowledge your bumbling mistakes.

 

That is why we luv ya...we are gonna call the shots for at least 8 years and maybe more.

 

You do understand that we will have our way with SCOTUS for at least 20 years.

 

You do understand that all of Soetoro's XO's are gonna be shit canned.

 

You do understand that you are a powerless whining, pablum spoon fed grain of sand in our sea of change.

 

Merry Christmas For lease Navidad

You hitched your wagon to a con artist and you are too stupid to figure it out
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon me while I guffaw at you.

 

Do you have any idea how a successful person looks at such a loinfo loser as yourself.

 

Son, genital references show your weakness and stupidity.

 

Would you care to debate real world USA economic issues and why your side so miserably failed.

 

Look, I know you can't do that. There are 2 reasons why you can't.

 

1. You are indoctrinated

 

2. You're dumber than a box of rocks.

 

I frikken double dog dare you to debate me on real economic issues and dumb fuck huffypuffy talking points ain't gonna fly, dumbalina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...