Jump to content

Google and Facebook to Stop Linking Fake News Sites


doodsaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites http://nyti.ms/2ezMPpS

 

Oh no, how will rightwingers seek out new fake news?

lol, after having all your news sources lie to you about Hillary, you claim rightwingers read fake news? lol-049.gif

You're not too bright, are you?

 

 

Did you see the NY Times admit they are going to "rededicate" themselves to "reporting honestly"?

Do you understand that means they are admitting they lied to you?

 

CxAfOrrUQAEHOjw.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites http://nyti.ms/2ezMPpS

 

Oh no, how will rightwingers seek out new fake news?

Don't trust either to do what they say as they work with the corrupted methodology to sustain power of suggestion directing social outcomes for each added ancestor to the atmosphere restricted to only having a lifetime now when alive here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a choose your news world.. the integrity of the media is in doubt.

No it isn't. We on the right have knows they were liars for years. This year, is was simply put on display by Wikileaks.

Had they not exposed the coordination between the media and the Democrat party, this shit would still be going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, after having all your news sources lie to you about Hillary, you claim rightwingers read fake news? lol-049.gif

You're not too bright, are you?

 

 

Did you see the NY Times admit they are going to "rededicate" themselves to "reporting honestly"?

Do you understand that means they are admitting they lied to you?

 

CxAfOrrUQAEHOjw.jpg

LOL!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. Rightwingers don't appear to understand the difference between "underestimating a candidate" and "fake news"/"lying."

 

The polls were right about Trump and low IQ voters...

And your sources predicted a Clinton landslide....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. Rightwingers don't appear to understand the difference between "underestimating a candidate" and "fake news"/"lying."

 

The polls were right about Trump and low IQ voters...

We understand fake news and lying just fine. We've been watching your news sources lie to you for a year.

How'd that work out for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We understand fake news and lying just fine. We've been watching your news sources lie to you for a year.

How'd that work out for you?

So when your mom told you that you would be a great, famous man one day, you're saying she lied?

 

Ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And your sources predicted a Clinton landslide....

 

 

So they were wrong, is that lying in your McFly world ???

 

You do understand what predicted means ....right ???

 

 

 

lol, after having all your news sources lie to you about Hillary, you claim rightwingers read fake news? lol-049.gif

You're not too bright, are you?

 

 

Did you see the NY Times admit they are going to "rededicate" themselves to "reporting honestly"?

Do you understand that means they are admitting they lied to you?

 

CxAfOrrUQAEHOjw.jpg

 

 

 

So in your McFly world, out of context, interpretation the NYT admitted they lied ???

 

"We believe we reported on both candidates fairly"

 

 

BTW just how did the credible news sources lie about Hillary ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they were wrong, is that lying in your McFly world ???

You do understand what predicted means ....right ???

 

So in your McFly world, out of context, interpretation the NYT admitted they lied ???

"We believe we reported on both candidates fairly"

 

BTW just how did the credible news sources lie about Hillary ???

lol... why did they need to rededicate themselves to the truth, if they were already telling the truth?

I love watching liberals fail at simple logic problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they were wrong, is that lying in your McFly world ???

 

You do understand what predicted means ....right ???

 

 

 

 

 

 

So in your McFly world, out of context, interpretation the NYT admitted they lied ???

 

"We believe we reported on both candidates fairly"

 

 

BTW just how did the credible news sources lie about Hillary ???

 

 

Cadman..

 

It's rather enjoyable watching you spin away in the dust pile of defeat......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Facebook to begin formal policy of censoring criticism of Islam
Mark-Zuckerberg-10.jpg?resize=372%2C279

Far-left Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg vowed to support free speech on January 9th and then banned criticism of Islam two weeks later.

For years Facebook has censored criticism of Islam. However, now they are making it a formal policy.

Facebook has an army of censors who work in 3rd world countries for $1.50 an hours. Nearly half of Facebook’s censors work at an office building in Morocco, which is a Muslim country. Even if it wasn’t Facebook’s formal policy, the end result was that criticism of Islam was routinely deleted.

However, Facebook just announced that it is introducing a formal policy of deleting pages which are critical of Islam.

Immediately after the Turkish Prime Minister marched for “Free Speech” in Paris, the Turkish government blocked hundreds of websites from the nation’s internet feed. The primary reason, for blocking websites, was for publishing Charlie Hebdo cartoons. The Turkish government gave Facebook an ultimatum. Ban criticism of Islam, or be banned in Turkey.

Facebook replied that they will institute a world-wide ban on criticism of Islam on Facebook. The announcement comes two weeks after Zuckerberg himself publicly pledged support for freedom of speech after the Chairle Hebdo killings.

Turkey currently blocks Twitter and Youtube for allowing criticism of Islam.


***********************************************************************************************************************Facebook has censored conservatives since the website was founded. Recently Facebook deleted American White History Month, a page with over 300,000 followers. (A new version of the page can be found here.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol... why did they need to rededicate themselves to the truth, if they were already telling the truth?

I love watching liberals fail at simple logic problems.

 

 

Simple.....In light of Trump's victory, they were assuring their subscribers that they would CONTINUE to accurately report the news....

even though they most likely thought he was vastly unqualified, along with the rational, critical thinking population,

which I might add, is in the majority, despite undocumented claims that illegals voted for Hillary to boost he popular vote victory over the undesired Trump

 

and I quote.....

You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.

 

 

 

What does the above quote from your posted NYT letter mean to you ???

 

The reading comprehension, (and jumping to conclusions) of the Trump supporters (aka conholers) is very challenged as displayed here by Goofy,

who is the poster boy for their uneducated popular minority electorate.......poor basterds.......poor America, till trump is only a memory....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...