Jump to content

As for the Electoral College and Presidential Debates Inc.


merrill
 Share

Recommended Posts

As for the electoral college the high vote getter should never take all = split the votes accordingly.

As for the Presidential Debate Commission Inc throw it out. How is it two political parties can own a private corporation at taxpayers expense? This is the fox in the chicken coop. All candidates should be included in the debates NOT just candidates funded with unethical,obscenely large amounts of corrupt special interest dollars.
Put these two items on a ballot and watch how quickly they change or disappear!!!
Put the debates back in the hands of The League of Women Voters!!!! Where did the political parties find the legal authority to steal the debates from the League of Women Voters?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you're agreeing with the electoral college. Hilliary, being the high vote getter, shouldn't take it all.

 

 

Absolutely .... across the board no matter party affiliation. High vote getter takes all = some votes did not count = voters get screwed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why are you pushing for an end-run around the Constitution with NPV (National Popular Vote)?

 

 

Because the legislature will never clean up this mess and voters should be the ultimate authority on the voting process.

 

I like democracy.

As for the electoral college the high vote getter should never take all = split the votes accordingly.

As for the Presidential Debate Commission Inc throw it out. How is it two political parties can own a private corporation at taxpayers expense? This is the fox in the chicken coop. All candidates should be included in the debates NOT just candidates funded with unethical,obscenely large amounts of corrupt special interest dollars.
Put these two items on a ballot and watch how quickly they change or disappear!!!
Put the debates back in the hands of The League of Women Voters!!!! Where did the political parties find the legal authority to steal the debates from the League of Women Voters?

 

 

 

The legislature will never clean up this mess and voters should be the ultimate authority on the voting process.

I like democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Because the legislature will never clean up this mess and voters should be the ultimate authority on the voting process.

 

I like democracy.

 

 

The legislature will never clean up this mess and voters should be the ultimate authority on the voting process.

I like democracy.

You're all over map. You want the electoral college but only if you can make it subject to the national popular vote. You cannot explain why, when there are plenty of reasons why we have the electoral college.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how the libs flooded the zone with illegals..... They get counted on the census and Electoral votes are awarded. So that Blue States get more ev like California....

 

Then get slaughtered by some uppity cracker with no political experience and the full hatred of the press....

 

 

And cry foul?

 

 

Pathetic ignorant child

Your beloved press was in on this.....

 

Days before the "upset" they started floating the idea of the ev winner not getting a majority of votes...

 

 

You got played

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the electoral college the high vote getter should never take all = split the votes accordingly.

 

Explain why we have the electoral college? Be sure it makes sense....

 

Be sure the explanation applies to now and unlimited spending on campaigns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

As for the electoral college the high vote getter should never take all = split the votes accordingly.

 

Explain why we have the electoral college? Be sure it makes sense....

 

Be sure the explanation applies to now and unlimited spending on campaigns.

 

 

Our founding fathers were smarter than you....

They wanted to make sure smaller state's had rights and they 're citizens counted.

 

Its worked for two hundred years

And I wonder why Obama didnt change it ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our founding fathers were smarter than you....

They wanted to make sure smaller state's had rights and they 're citizens counted.

 

Its worked for two hundred years

And I wonder why Obama didnt change it ???

 

Two hundred years ago is not today.

 

How can all of the citizens vote count when the high vote getter takes all the votes .....

 

It's not worked in the last 40 years and the only reason it is still around is because the two recognized parties love their hold on the nations

politics no matter that tons of voters don't see status quo politics working for the people.

 

Big money rules is not democracy!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two hundred years ago is not today.

 

How can all of the citizens vote count when the high vote getter takes all the votes .....

 

It's not worked in the last 40 years and the only reason it is still around is because the two recognized parties love their hold on the nations

politics no matter that tons of voters don't see status quo politics working for the people.

 

Big money rules is not democracy!!!

It has worked fine...

 

You need to understand the concept that no candidate can go to California or NY or Texas and no where else.....

 

You need to appreciate the idea behind it.

 

Let's pretend there's a baseball league with 10 teams and you can have as many players as you want on the team...

 

Nine teams vote one way but one team votes the other.....The (1) team has 100 players on their team

The other teams have ten each...

 

The nine teams have been out voted because of the one team....

 

The founding fathers saw through this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Big money rules is not democracy!!!

 

 

Fortunately, we don't live in a democracy, we live in a republic

I know you are against states rights, but that just shows how out of touch the Lying Liberal Leftists are

 

Seems funny that you are pointing out Hillary's ties to big money as the reason she lost though

 

Guess what buttercup?

We ain't going to change the Constitution just because you are crying

 

iu8sfqxu61xx.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Fortunately, we don't live in a democracy, we live in a republic

I know you are against states rights, but that just shows how out of touch the Lying Liberal Leftists are

 

Seems funny that you are pointing out Hillary's ties to big money as the reason she lost though

 

Guess what buttercup?

We ain't going to change the Constitution just because you are crying

 

iu8sfqxu61xx.jpg

 

What states rights am I against?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Two hundred years ago is not today"

 

 

you'll never convinvce the cons of that

 

Two hundred years ago is not today

 

"You'll never convince the cons.."

 

Why didn't the liberals change it when they had control of both houses Benson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

How can all of the citizens vote count when the high vote getter takes all the votes .....

 

 

 

All over the map. Hilliary WAS the high vote getter and she didn't take all the electoral votes. As a result, she lost the election for President.

 

You are basically trying to take advantage of the naivety of the young. It's disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...